CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03230006Updated Apr 9, 2025Results posted

Transdiagnostic CBT for Comorbid Alcohol Use and Anxiety Disorders

An interventional study of Unified Protocol for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders and Take Control in Alcohol Use Disorder and Anxiety Disorders, sponsored by Boston University Charles River Campus. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 21 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-04-09.

Sponsored by Boston University Charles River Campus · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
75
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
21 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Almost 18 million US adults have alcohol use disorders (AUD), with one third of these individuals also diagnosed with anxiety disorders (AXD). The coexistence of AUD and AXD imposes a high burden via healthcare costs and lost productivity. To date, existing treatment approaches for addressing AUD/AXD comorbidity have been only modestly effective and there is a lack of adequate research to guide treatment decisions.

The Unified Protocol (UP) is a transdiagnostic, cognitive-behavioral therapy that has shown efficacy in treating emotional disorders. The efficacy of the UP to facilitate abstinence from alcohol consumption in individuals with comorbid AUD/AXD has also been examined, with results from this study indicating a reduction from baseline in drinks consumed per day. However, further evaluation of the UP for managing AUD/AXD is warranted.

In this clinical trial, the investigators will further assess the UP's effectiveness in reducing alcohol consumption in patients with comorbid AUD/AXD. Participants will be randomized to one of two conditions: 1) treatment with the UP or 2) treatment with therapist-guided Take Control (TC; a computerized alcohol reduction program). In addition, in a subset of twenty-five participants, functional magnetic resonance scanning (fMRI) will be used to examine the effects of the UP on changes in brain activity in areas important to regulation of emotional and reward processes implicated in excessive alcohol consumption.

The researchers' primary hypotheses are that the UP group will, compared to the TC group: 1) be superior in acute symptom reduction from pre- to post-treatment, and 2) evidence greater reductions in percent days heavy drinking, percent days of drinking per week, and alcohol craving.

02

Conditions studied

  • Alcohol Use Disorder
  • Anxiety Disorders
03

In context

Alcoholism

1,606 studies on the registry are indexed under Alcoholism; 329 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 75 is below the median of 87 across 1,371 interventional studies indexed under Alcoholism.

Browse Alcoholism studies →

Lead sponsor

Boston University Charles River Campus is the lead sponsor of 154 studies on the registry; 30 are open to participants now.

Of its 14 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 8 (57%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
21 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

  1. DSM-5 diagnosis of an alcohol use disorder (AUD)
  2. DSM-5 diagnosis of Social Anxiety Disorder (SAD), Panic Disorder/Agoraphobia (PD/A), Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD), and/or Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD) as determined by a clinician-administered diagnostic assessment using the Anxiety Disorder Interview Schedule (ADIS) for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5); and are rated as crossing the threshold for a formal DSM-5 diagnosis by assignment of an ADIS clinical severity rating (CSR) of 4 (definitely disturbing/disabling on the 0-8 CSR scale) or higher on at least the principal diagnosis.
  3. Adults 21 years old or older
  4. Expressed desire to stop drinking alcohol completely or to reduce alcohol consumption
  5. Reported drinking an average of at least 15 standard drinks per week for males, or 8 for females occurring over a 28-consecutive day period during the 90 day-long time window that preceded the screening session
  6. Must be willing to discontinue any form of psychotherapy, except Alcoholics Anonymous (AA), that he or she may be receiving for either anxiety or depression prior to screening.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. DSM-5 diagnosis of current major depressive disorder (with the exception of substance-induced depressive disorder) that requires immediate treatment with pharmacologic agents, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, current bulimia/anorexia, dementia, or other substance dependence, with the exception of nicotine, marijuana, and caffeine dependence.
  2. Presence of suicidal ideation or history of suicide attempts
  3. Non-English speakers
  4. Previously received an adequate trial of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT; 8 sessions within the past 5 years)
  5. Contraindications to MRI scans
  6. History of head injury with >5-minute loss of consciousness
  7. Pregnancy Note: Women of childbearing potential (not postmenopausal for at least one year) will be required to provide a negative urine pregnancy test prior to each scan.
  8. Implantation of anything containing magnetically sensitive material including metal plates, aneurysm clips, and cardiac pacemakers, stents; history of sheet metal work, claustrophobia
  9. Cognitive impairment (MOCA\<21).
  10. Serious medical illness or instability for which hospitalization may be likely within the next year.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
75 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Unified Protocol

    The Unified Protocol for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders (UP) consists of 5 core skills modules based on cognitive behavioral treatment elements of proven effectiveness. As noted above, these core skills modules were designed to target (and have been shown to address) negative emotionality and aversive reactivity to emotional experiences when they occur. These modules are preceded by an introductory session that reviews the patient's presenting symptoms and provides a therapeutic rationale, as well as a module on motivational enhancement. A final module consists of relapse prevention. As the treatment proceeds, the domains of thoughts, feelings, and behaviors are each explored in detail, focusing specifically on elucidating dysfunctional emotion regulation strategies that the patient has developed over time within each of these domains, and teaching patients more adaptive emotion regulation skills.

    Behavioral: Unified Protocol for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders

  • Placebo comparator
    Take Control

    TC is a psychotherapy platform derived from the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism's (NIAAA) self-help approach, Rethinking Drinking. In this study, TC, originally designed as a computerized treatment has been modified to be administered by the therapist to control for effects that may be related to patient-therapist interaction (as opposed to elements of the treatment itself).

    Behavioral: Take Control

Interventions

  • BehavioralUnified Protocol for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders

    The UP will be conducted in a standardized fashion over 16 sessions, in a minimum of 16- and a maximum of 21-weeks, following the published therapist guide with minor refinements for application in the proposed comorbid population.

    Also known as: UP

  • BehavioralTake Control

    TC will be conducted over 12 sessions, in a minimum of 12- and a maximum of 16-weeks. Therapists will review material from TC and offer general advice on implementation of the alcohol reduction skills in daily life.

    Also known as: TC

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Mean Number of Drinks Consumed Per Week

    The Timeline Followback (TLFB) was used to estimate participants' daily drinking during the 90-day period preceding the baseline assessment and was subsequently administered at the beginning of each psychotherapy session and during the follow-up sessions.

    Time frame: Change from baseline following 12-sessions (Take Control Arm), up to 16 weeks, or 16-sessions (Unified Protocol Arm), up to 21 weeks, of treatment.

07

Results

Posted Feb 25, 2025

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneUnified ProtocolTake Control
Started5124
Completed3821
Not completed133

Outcome measures

PrimaryMean Number of Drinks Consumed Per Week

The Timeline Followback (TLFB) was used to estimate participants' daily drinking during the 90-day period preceding the baseline assessment and was subsequently administered at the beginning of each psychotherapy session and during the follow-up sessions.

Time frame:
Change from baseline following 12-sessions (Take Control Arm), up to 16 weeks, or 16-sessions (Unified Protocol Arm), up to 21 weeks, of treatment.
Reported as:
Mean · Standard Drinking Units per Week
Mean Number of Drinks Consumed Per Week
Standard Drinking Units per WeekUnified ProtocolTake Control
Weekly Average Drinks at Baseline40.82 ± 49.0729.62 ± 20.09
Weekly Average Drinks at Post-Treatment12.12 ± 10.8923.86 ± 21.54
Statistical analysis
  • Unified Protocol vs Take Control · ANOVA · p = 0.002 · Partial eta squared: .152A two-way mixed ANOVA was conducted to investigate treatment group differences in change in mean number of drinks consumed from baseline to post-treatment, as indicated by the Time by Treatment Condition interaction effect.
  • Unified Protocol vs Take Control · ANOVA · p = <.001 (The threshold for significance is p \<.05.) · Partial eta squared: .342This is the partial eta squared for the main effect of time.
  • Unified Protocol vs Take Control · ANOVA · p = .309 · Partial eta squared: .018This is the partial eta squared for the main effect of treatment condition.
  • Unified Protocol · ANOVA · p = <.001 (The threshold for significance is p \<.05.) · F: 38.92
  • Take Control · ANOVA · p = .030 · F: 5.43
  • Unified Protocol vs Take Control · ANOVA · p = .016 · F: 1.15This is the simple main effect of treatment condition on mean number of drinks consumed per week at baseline. For the UP, n=51; for the TC, n=24.
  • Unified Protocol vs Take Control · ANOVA · p = .007 · F: 7.78This is the simple main effect of treatment condition on mean number of drinks consumed per week at post-treatment. For the UP, n=38; for the TC, n=21.

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse event data were collected throughout treatment (12 or 16 sessions), up to 21 weeks, through to the 6-month follow-up.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Unified Protocol0/51 (0%)0/51 (0%)0/51 (0%)
Take Control0/24 (0%)0/24 (0%)0/24 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)Unified ProtocolTake ControlTotal
Mean43.71 (24 to 71)41.83 (21 to 66)43.11 (21 to 71)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Unified ProtocolTake ControlTotal
Female291544
Male22931
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Unified ProtocolTake ControlTotal
Hispanic or Latino314
Not Hispanic or Latino482371
Unknown or Not Reported000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Unified ProtocolTake ControlTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian202
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American415
White392261
More than one race314
Unknown or Not Reported303
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Unified ProtocolTake ControlTotal
United States512475
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Boston University, Charles River Campus
    Boston, Massachusetts 02215, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Sauer-Zavala S, Boswell JF, Gallagher MW, Bentley KH, Ametaj A, Barlow DH. The role of negative affectivity and negative reactivity to emotions in predicting outcomes in the unified protocol for the transdiagnostic treatment of emotional disorders. Behav Res Ther. 2012 Sep;50(9):551-7. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2012.05.005. Epub 2012 Jun 9. PubMed 22738907 ↗
  • Boswell JF, Farchione TJ, Sauer-Zavala S, Murray HW, Fortune MR, Barlow DH. Anxiety sensitivity and interoceptive exposure: a transdiagnostic construct and change strategy. Behav Ther. 2013 Sep;44(3):417-31. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2013.03.006. Epub 2013 Apr 2. PubMed 23768669 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol, analysis plan and consent form · Apr 8, 2025

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 9, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03230006
Lead sponsor
Boston University Charles River Campus
Responsible party
Todd Farchione (Research Associate Professor, Boston University Charles River Campus) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 26, 2017
Start date
Mar 1, 2018
Primary completion
Aug 31, 2023
Completion
Jan 31, 2024
Results posted
Feb 25, 2025
Last update
Apr 9, 2025

Study contacts

Todd Farchione, PhD
principal investigator · Boston Univeristy

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion