CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03226366Updated Jun 18, 2020Results posted

Effect of Emergency Department Care Reorganization on Door-to-antibiotic Times for Sepsis (LDS SWARM)

An observational study in Septic Shock and Sepsis, sponsored by Intermountain Health Care, Inc.. Completed at 4 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-06-18.

Sponsored by Intermountain Health Care, Inc. · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
3,230
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Sepsis is a common syndrome resulting from a dysregulated response to infection. The timing of antibiotic initiation is an important determinant of outcomes for patients presenting to the emergency department with sepsis. The potential effect of care reorganization on very early care for sepsis is unknown. This study will investigate whether multidisciplinary coordination of the initial patient evaluation in the emergency department influences door-to-antibiotic time for septic patients.

Read the detailed description

This is a retrospective cohort study of emergency department sepsis care before versus after implementation of a "swarming" model for simultaneous patient evaluation by multidisciplinary care providers. The analysis will use data from similar hospitals that did not change sepsis care organization during the study period to control for changes in sepsis care not resulting from the "swarming" intervention.

02

Conditions studied

  • Septic Shock
  • Sepsis

Keywords

  • door-to-antibiotic time
  • emergency department care
  • antimicrobial
  • care reorganization
  • severe sepsis
  • swarming
03

In context

Sepsis

1,899 studies on the registry are indexed under Sepsis; 462 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 3,230 is above the median of 160 across 931 observational studies indexed under Sepsis.

Browse Sepsis studies →

Lead sponsor

Intermountain Health Care, Inc. is the lead sponsor of 118 studies on the registry; 15 are open to participants now.

Of its 9 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 3 (33%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Adult patients presenting to the ED with sepsis or septic shock

Eligibility criteria

Primary inclusion criteria:

  • Adult patients age ≥18 years
  • Presented to the ED of study hospital from May 16, 2015 to April 15, 2016 (pre-implementation cohort) or May 16 to November 15, 2016 (post-implementation cohort)
  • Sepsis present in ED (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment [SOFA] score ≥2 points above baseline while in ED plus antibiotic initiation while in the ED)
  • Triage acuity score 2-5

Inclusion criteria for supplemental sensitivity analyses:

  • Presented to the ED of study hospital between May 16, 2015 and April 15, 2016 (pre-implementation cohort) or May 16, 2016 and February 15, 2017 (post-implementation cohort).
  • Sepsis on presentation to ED, defined as initial Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score ≥2 points above baseline plus antibiotics initiation within 24 hours of ED arrival.

Overall exclusion criteria:

  • Age \<18 years
  • No antibiotics within 24 hours of ED arrival
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
3,230 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Pre-implementation (intervention site)

    Adult patients age ≥18 years who received usual care after presenting to the ED of the intervention hospital with sepsis or septic shock between May 16, 2015 and April 15, 2016

  • Post-implementation (intervention site)

    Adult patients age ≥18 years eligible to receive immediate evaluation by multidisciplinary team ("swarming") after presenting to the ED of the intervention hospital with sepsis or septic shock between May 16, 2016 and February 15, 2017

    Other: Immediate evaluation by multidisciplinary team

  • Pre-implementation (control site)

    Adult patients age ≥18 years who received usual care after presenting to the ED of a non-intervention study hospital with sepsis or septic shock between May 16, 2015 and April 15, 2016

  • Post-implementation (control site)

    Adult patients age ≥18 years who received usual care after presenting to the ED of a non-intervention study hospital with sepsis or septic shock between May 16, 2016 and February 15, 2017

Interventions

  • OtherImmediate evaluation by multidisciplinary team

    Simultaneous initial evaluation by the ED physician, nurse, and patient care associate

    Also known as: Swarming

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Time From ED Arrival to Administration of First Dose of Antibiotics

    Time frame: 24 hours

Secondary outcomes

  1. Hospital Mortality

    Time frame: Up to 1 year

  2. ED Length of Stay

    Time (minutes) from ED arrival to ED departure

    Time frame: Up to 1 week

  3. Door-to-physician Evaluation Time

    Time (minutes) from subject's arrival in the ED until initial evaluation by a physician.

    Time frame: Up to 24 hours

07

Results

Posted Jun 18, 2020

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePre-implementation (Intervention Site)Post-implementation (Intervention Site)Pre-implementation (Control Site)Post-implementation (Control Site)
Started9114951183641
Completed9114951183641
Not completed0000

Outcome measures

PrimaryTime From ED Arrival to Administration of First Dose of Antibiotics
Time frame:
24 hours
Reported as:
Mean · minutes
Time From ED Arrival to Administration of First Dose of Antibiotics
minutesPre-implementation (Intervention Site)Post-implementation (Intervention Site)Pre-implementation (Control Site)Post-implementation (Control Site)
Time From ED Arrival to Administration of First Dose of Antibiotics173 ± 98165 ± 95169 ± 90163 ± 85
Statistical analysis
  • Pre-implementation (Intervention Site) vs Post-implementation (Intervention Site) vs Pre-implementation (Control Site) vs Post-implementation (Control Site) · Regression, Linear · p = 0.29 · Mean difference (final values): -7.9 · 95% CI -20.4 to 6.1Change in emergency department door-to-antibiotic time (minutes) based on adjusted differences-in-differences analysis
SecondaryHospital Mortality
Time frame:
Up to 1 year
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Hospital Mortality
ParticipantsPre-implementation (Intervention Site)Post-implementation (Intervention Site)Pre-implementation (Control Site)Post-implementation (Control Site)
Hospital Mortality1972311
Statistical analysis
  • Pre-implementation (Intervention Site) vs Post-implementation (Intervention Site) vs Pre-implementation (Control Site) vs Post-implementation (Control Site) · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.72 · Odds ratio (or): 0.81 · 95% CI 0.25 to 2.61Odds ratio for hospital mortality after versus before intervention implementation based on adjusted differences-in-differences analysis
SecondaryED Length of Stay

Time (minutes) from ED arrival to ED departure

Time frame:
Up to 1 week
Reported as:
Mean · minutes
ED Length of Stay
minutesPre-implementation (Intervention Site)Post-implementation (Intervention Site)Pre-implementation (Control Site)Post-implementation (Control Site)
ED Length of Stay280 ± 1143265 ± 110269 ± 108261 ± 98
Statistical analysis
  • Pre-implementation (Intervention Site) vs Post-implementation (Intervention Site) vs Pre-implementation (Control Site) vs Post-implementation (Control Site) · Regression, Linear · p = 0.26 · Mean difference (final values): -9.5 · 95% CI -25.9 to 7.0Change in emergency department length of stay (minutes) after versus before intervention implementation based on adjusted differences-in-differences analysis
SecondaryDoor-to-physician Evaluation Time

Time (minutes) from subject's arrival in the ED until initial evaluation by a physician.

Time frame:
Up to 24 hours
Reported as:
Mean · minutes
Door-to-physician Evaluation Time
minutesPre-implementation (Intervention Site)Post-implementation (Intervention Site)Pre-implementation (Control Site)Post-implementation (Control Site)
Door-to-physician Evaluation Time25 ± 1823 ± 1522 ± 2420 ± 16
Statistical analysis
  • Pre-implementation (Intervention Site) vs Post-implementation (Intervention Site) vs Pre-implementation (Control Site) vs Post-implementation (Control Site) · Regression, Linear · p = 0.55 · Mean difference (final values): -0.8 · 95% CI -3.3 to 1.8Estimated change in emergency department door-to-physician evaluation time (minutes) after versus before intervention implementation based on adjusted differences-in-differences analysis

Adverse events

Collected over 1 year. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Pre-implementation (Intervention Site)19/911 (2.1%)0/911 (0%)0/911 (0%)
Post-implementation (Intervention Site)7/495 (1.4%)0/495 (0%)0/495 (0%)
Pre-implementation (Control Site)23/1,183 (1.9%)0/1,183 (0%)0/1,183 (0%)
Post-implementation (Control Site)11/641 (1.7%)0/641 (0%)0/641 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Pre-implementation (Intervention Site)Post-implementation (Intervention Site)Pre-implementation (Control Site)Post-implementation (Control Site)Total
Mean55.0 ± 19.755.6 ± 19.659.9 ± 19.758.7 ± 20.457.6 ± 19.9
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Pre-implementation (Intervention Site)Post-implementation (Intervention Site)Pre-implementation (Control Site)Post-implementation (Control Site)Total
Female4742516873771789
Male4372444962641441
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Pre-implementation (Intervention Site)Post-implementation (Intervention Site)Pre-implementation (Control Site)Post-implementation (Control Site)Total
Hispanic or Latino117746945305
Not Hispanic or Latino79442111145962925
Unknown or Not Reported00000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Pre-implementation (Intervention Site)Post-implementation (Intervention Site)Pre-implementation (Control Site)Post-implementation (Control Site)Total
American Indian or Alaska Native1595231
Asian14818545
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander3012121367
Black or African American25156450
White82745111426173037
More than one race00000
Unknown or Not Reported00000
08

Study locations

4 sites
  • Intermountain Medical Center
    Murray, Utah 84157, United States
  • Riverton Hospital
    Riverton, Utah 84065, United States
  • LDS Hospital
    Salt Lake City, Utah 84143, United States
  • Alta View Hospital
    Sandy, Utah 84094, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Peltan ID, Bledsoe JR, Brems D, McLean S, Murnin E, Brown SM. Institution of an emergency department "swarming" care model and sepsis door-to-antibiotic time: A quasi-experimental retrospective analysis. PLoS One. 2020 May 5;15(5):e0232794. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232794. eCollection 2020. PubMed 32369531 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Feb 11, 2020

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — In order to protect patient privacy and comply with relevant regulations, identified data will be unavailable. Requests for deidentified data from qualified researchers with appropriate ethics board approvals and relevant data use agreements will be processed by the Intermountain Office of Research, officeofresearch@imail.org.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Csr, Analytic code

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 18, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03226366
Lead sponsor
Intermountain Health Care, Inc.
Responsible party
Ithan Peltan (Attending Physician, Intermountain Medical Center, Intermountain Health Care, Inc.) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 21, 2017
Start date
May 16, 2015
Primary completion
Jan 31, 2017
Completion
Apr 11, 2020
Results posted
Jun 18, 2020
Last update
Jun 18, 2020

Study contacts

Ithan Peltan, MD, MSc
principal investigator · Intermountain Health Care, Inc.

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion