CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03224026Updated Jan 6, 2023

Validation of a Proteomic Signature and Assessment of Viremia in Children With Fever Without Source

An observational study in Infectious Disease, Fever and Viremia, sponsored by MeMed Diagnostics Ltd.. Completed at 1 site in Switzerland. Open to participants aged 1 Day to 3 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-01-06.

Sponsored by MeMed Diagnostics Ltd. · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
206
Ages
1 Day to 3 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The study is an observational blinded Validation study in pediatric patients below 3 years old with a diagnosis of Fever Without Source (FWS). In this study the investigators aim to validate the performance of a proteomic signature aiding the physicians to discriminate between viral and bacterial infections in febrile children. The study will also assess the prevalence of Human Enteroviruses (HEV), Human Parechoviruses (HPeV), Adenovirus (AdV) and Human Herpesvirus type 6 (HHV-6) viremia, as well as Kingella Kingae bacteremia in the study cohort.

02

Conditions studied

  • Infectious Disease
  • Fever
  • Viremia
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
1 Day to 3 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Pediatric patients below three years old which were presented with a diagnosis of fever without source to the emergency room in the Children's Hospital, Geneva University Hospitals

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Clinical diagnosis of FWS (fever of less than 7 days with no cause determined by the history or the physical exam)
  • Age \< 3 years old
  • Informed consent (IC) given by parent or legal guardian

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unavailable blood
  • Comorbidities predisposing to infections such as cancer, primary or secondary immunodeficiency, and iatrogenic immunosuppression

Inclusion Criteria for healthy controls:

  • Age \< 3 years old
  • Informed consent (IC) given by parent or legal guardian
  • No suspicion of infectious or inflammatory disease at presentation and during the two weeks before.
04

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
206 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples without dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Fever Without Source

    Clinical diagnosis of FWS (fever of less than 7 days with no cause determined by the history and the physical exam).

  • Healthy control

    Children visiting the hospital due to a non-infectious, non inflammatory etiology

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Diagnostic accuracy compared to expert panel for bacterial versus viral.

    Sensitivity, specificity, NPV and PPV were measured for ImmunoXpert and Labscore. The proteomic signature is a combination of different markers including: tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) (pg/mL), interferon γ-induced protein-10 (IP-10) (pg/mL) and C-reactive protein (CRP) (mg/L). The proteomic signature is expressed as a score (no units. ranges 0-100). The Labscore is a combination of procalcitonin (ng/mL), C-reactive protein (CRP) (mg/L) and urinary dipstix (positive if presence of leucocyturia or nitrites). The Lab-score is expressed as a score (no units. ranges 0-9)

    Time frame: 0-7 days after initiation of symptoms

Secondary outcomes

  1. Diagnostic accuracy compared to microbiology gold standard for ruling out invasive bacterial infection.

    Case by case comparison between microbiology gold standard and ImmunoXpert and Labscore. The proteomic signature is a combination of different markers including: tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) (pg/mL), interferon γ-induced protein-10 (IP-10) (pg/mL) and C-reactive protein (CRP) (mg/L). The proteomic signature is expressed as a score (no units, ranges 0-100). The Labscore is a combination of procalcitonin (ng/mL), C-reactive protein (CRP) (mg/L) and urinary dipstix (positive if presence of leucocyturia or nitrites). The Lab-score is expressed as a score (no units, ranges 0-9).

    Time frame: 0-7 days after initiation of symptoms

  2. Comparison of biomarker levels in patients with different etiologies as classified by the expert panel or healthy.

    An expert panel classified a patient as experiencing a bacterial versus viral infection. In addition healthy patients were requited. The following biomarkers were examined across the healthy versus bacterial versus viral patients: 1. The proteomic signature is a combination of different markers including: tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) (pg/mL), interferon γ-induced protein-10 (IP-10) (pg/mL) and C-reactive protein (CRP) (mg/L). The proteomic signature is expressed as a score (no units, ranges 0-100). 2. The Labscore is a combination of procalcitonin (ng/mL), C-reactive protein (CRP) (mg/L) and urinary dipstix (positive if presence of leucocyturia or nitrites). The Lab-score is expressed as a score (no units, ranges 0-9). 3. Tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) (pg/mL). 4. interferon γ-induced protein-10 (IP-10) (pg/mL). 5. C-reactive protein (CRP) (mg/L).

    Time frame: 0-7 days after initiation of symptoms in cases with infection.

  3. Prevalence of viruses in children with fever without source.

    Prevalence of Human Enteroviruses, Human Parechoviruses, Adenovirus and Human Herpesvirus type 6 viremia and viremia from other microorganism identified by Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) (no units) or other techniques, as well as K. kingae bacteremia in children under three years old presenting with fever without source.

    Time frame: 0-7 days after the initiation of symptoms

06

Study locations

1 site
  • Geneva University Hospitals
    Geneva, Switzerland
07

References and documents

Publications

  • Oved K, Cohen A, Boico O, Navon R, Friedman T, Etshtein L, Kriger O, Bamberger E, Fonar Y, Yacobov R, Wolchinsky R, Denkberg G, Dotan Y, Hochberg A, Reiter Y, Grupper M, Srugo I, Feigin P, Gorfine M, Chistyakov I, Dagan R, Klein A, Potasman I, Eden E. A novel host-proteome signature for distinguishing between acute bacterial and viral infections. PLoS One. 2015 Mar 18;10(3):e0120012. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0120012. eCollection 2015. PubMed 25785720 ↗
  • Colvin JM, Muenzer JT, Jaffe DM, Smason A, Deych E, Shannon WD, Arens MQ, Buller RS, Lee WM, Weinstock EJ, Weinstock GM, Storch GA. Detection of viruses in young children with fever without an apparent source. Pediatrics. 2012 Dec;130(6):e1455-62. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-1391. Epub 2012 Nov 5. PubMed 23129086 ↗
  • Ambrosioni J, Bridevaux PO, Wagner G, Mamin A, Kaiser L. Epidemiology of viral respiratory infections in a tertiary care centre in the era of molecular diagnosis, Geneva, Switzerland, 2011-2012. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2014 Sep;20(9):O578-84. doi: 10.1111/1469-0691.12525. Epub 2014 Jan 24. PubMed 24382326 ↗
  • L'Huillier AG, Mardegan C, Cordey S, Luterbacher F, Papis S, Hugon F, Kaiser L, Gervaix A, Posfay-Barbe K, Galetto-Lacour A. Enterovirus, parechovirus, adenovirus and herpes virus type 6 viraemia in fever without source. Arch Dis Child. 2020 Feb;105(2):180-186. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2019-317382. Epub 2019 Aug 28. PubMed 31462437 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03224026
Lead sponsor
MeMed Diagnostics Ltd.
Collaborators
University Hospital, Geneva
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 21, 2017
Start date
Nov 2015
Primary completion
Jun 2018
Completion
Aug 2018
Last update
Jan 6, 2023

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion