CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT03221166Updated Sep 4, 2020

Thalidomide Versus Infliximab in New Onset Crohn's Disease With Poor Prognostic Factors

A Phase 3 interventional study of Thalidomide and Infliximab in Crohn Disease, sponsored by IRCCS Burlo Garofolo. Terminated at 6 sites in Italy. Open to participants aged 6 Years to 17 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-09-04.

Sponsored by IRCCS Burlo Garofolo · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Difficulty in recruiting subjects who meet the inclusion/exclusion criteria
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
9
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
6 Years to 17 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Crohn's disease (CD) is a life-long inflammatory bowel disease disease with an unknown pathogenesis. The ultimate goal of therapy is to modify the natural history of CD thus reducing complications. Thalidomide is a small molecule with immunomodulatory and anti-angiogenetic properties. It is currently approved for the treatment of erythema nodosum leprosum, an immunological complication of leprosy and multiple myeloma. It has also been used in several other inflammatory diseases of the skin and of the mucosal membranes, such as Behcet disease, oropharyngeal ulcers in AIDS, cutaneous lupus, and graft versus host disease. Many case series and one pediatric randomized controlled trial proved the efficacy of thalidomide in the treatment of children with CD refractory to standard treatments. In these patients, clinical remission was achieved in about 50% of the cases and was maintained for a mean time superior of 3 years. Mucosal healing after 52 weeks of treatment was observed in 40% of the patients in clinical remission. Moreover, thalidomide was found to have a steroid-sparing effect and to decrease the need for surgical interventions. The clinical and endoscopic efficacy of thalidomide was also observed in children with failure to respond or intolerance to anti-TNF biological drugs.

The aim of this multicentric prospective randomized controlled is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of thalidomide vs infliximab in changing the natural history of CD in patients with poor prognostic outcome. Moreover, the study will evaluate the immunological and genetical mechanisms of CD, the mechanisms of action thalidomide in CD and will the pharmacokinetics, metabolomics and pharmacogenomics of thalidomide, and their impact on thalidomide safety and effectiveness.

02

Conditions studied

  • Crohn Disease

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Children
  • Crohn disease
  • Thalidomide
  • Mucosal healing
03

In context

Crohn Disease

1,880 studies on the registry are indexed under Crohn Disease; 462 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 9 is below the median of 66 across 1,188 interventional studies indexed under Crohn Disease.

Browse Crohn Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

IRCCS Burlo Garofolo is the lead sponsor of 87 studies on the registry; 32 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
6 Years to 17 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age at diagnosis \<18 years and >=6 years
  • New diagnosis of CD based on Porto criteria
  • CD with inflammatory phenotype (non-penetrating, non-fistulizing) and with no need for surgery except for perinal fistulas
  • Presence of at least one of the following risk factors for poor prognosis:

    • fistulizing perianal disease
    • pan-enteric disease
    • disease extension > 60 cm
    • severe growth delay (height z-score \< -2 DS)
    • severe osteoporosis (z score \< -2 DS)
    • hypoalbuminemia (\< 3g/dL) or high C-reactive protein (2 times higher the normal range)
  • Acceptance of the Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) program for reducing the teratogenic risk.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • ongoing pregnancy
  • presence of peripheral neuropathy
  • HIV
  • patients with transplanted organs
  • ongoing major infections or other severe diseases
  • participation to other experimental studies.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
9 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Thalidomide

    Thalidomide is a immunomodulatory and antiangiogenetic drug with anti tumor necrosis factor (TNF) alpha properties

    Drug: Thalidomide

  • Active comparator
    Infliximab

    Infliximab is a chimeric monoclonal antibody against TNF alpha

    Drug: Infliximab

Interventions

  • DrugThalidomide

    Thalidomide is a immunomodulatory and antiangiogenetic drug with anti TNF alpha properties

  • DrugInfliximab

    Infliximab is a chimeric monoclonal antibody against TNF alpha

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Efficacy in inducing mucosal healing

    Proportion of patients that achieve mucosal healing, defined by a Simplified Endoscopic Activity Index for CD (SES-CD) ≤ 2.

    Time frame: 52 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Efficacy in inducing clinical response

    Clinical response will be evaluated with the weighted Pediatric Crohn's Disease Activity Index (wPCDAI), defined by a reduction of wPCDAI \> 50% from the basal values.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  2. Efficacy in inducing clinical response

    Clinical response will be evaluated with the weighted Pediatric Crohn's Disease Activity Index (wPCDAI), defined by a reduction of wPCDAI \> 50% from the basal values.

    Time frame: 52 weeks

  3. Efficacy in inducing clinical remission

    Clinical remission will be evaluated with the weighted Pediatric Crohn's Disease Activity Index (wPCDAI), defined by a wPCDAI \<12.5.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  4. Efficacy in inducing clinical remission

    Clinical remission will be evaluated with the weighted Pediatric Crohn's Disease Activity Index (wPCDAI), defined by a wPCDAI \<12.5.

    Time frame: 52 weeks

  5. Efficacy in reducing the need to change therapy

    Evaluation of the proportion of patients that need a therapeutic change

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  6. Efficacy in reducing the need to change therapy

    Evaluation of the proportion of patients that need a therapeutic change

    Time frame: 52 weeks

  7. Efficacy in reducing hospitalizations

    Evaluation of the proportion of patients that need hospitalization.

    Time frame: 52 weeks

  8. Efficacy in reducing the need for surgery

    Evaluation of the proportion of patients that need surgery

    Time frame: 52 weeks

  9. Efficacy in reducing erythrocyte sedimentation rate

    Evaluation of the trend of erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR)

    Time frame: Each time point between enrolment and 52 weeks (0, 4, 8, 14, 26, 38, 52 weeks)

  10. Efficacy in reducing C-reactive protein

    Evaluation of the trend of C-reactive protein (CRP)

    Time frame: Each time point between enrolment and 52 weeks (0, 4, 8, 14, 26, 38, 52 weeks)

  11. Efficacy in reducing faecal calprotectin

    Evaluation of the trend of faecal calprotectin

    Time frame: Each time point between enrolment and 52 weeks (0, 4, 8, 14, 26, 38, 52 weeks)

  12. Efficacy in modifying body mass index

    Evaluation of the trend of body mass index, defined as weight (kg)/height (m)\^2

    Time frame: Each time point between enrolment and 52 weeks (0, 4, 8, 14, 26, 38, 52 weeks)

  13. Efficacy in modifying height-for-age z score

    Evaluation of the trend of height-for-age z score

    Time frame: Each time point between enrolment and 52 weeks (0, 4, 8, 14, 26, 38, 52 weeks)

  14. Efficacy in modifying weight-for-age z score

    Evaluation of the trend of weight-for-age z score

    Time frame: Each time point between enrolment and 52 weeks (0, 4, 8, 14, 26, 38, 52 weeks)

  15. Evaluation of the Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events

    Number and type

    Time frame: Between enrolment and 52 weeks

  16. Direct and indirect costs

    Comparison of direct and indirect costs (i.e. drugs, medical supplies and equipment, laboratory and diagnostic tests, hospitalizations, visits, transportation to and from healthcare facilities, missing work and school days...) between the two groups

    Time frame: 52 weeks

07

Study locations

6 sites
  • Dipartimento di Pediatria dell'Università di Napoli "Federico II"
    Napoli, Campania 80131, Italy
  • IRCCS Burlo Garofolo
    Trieste, Friuli Venezia Giulia 34137, Italy
  • Pediatria III Gastroenterologia ed Endoscopia Digestiva, Istituto Giannina Gaslini
    Genoa, Liguria 16147, Italy
  • Fondazione MBBM , Azienda Ospedaliera San Gerardo - Università Milano Bicocca
    Monza, Lombardia 20052, Italy
  • Unità di Gastroenterologia Pediatrica e Fibrosi Cistica, Dipartimento di Scienze Pediatriche Mediche e Chirurgiche, Policlinico Universitario
    Messina, Sicilia 98124, Italy
  • Gastroenterologia e Nutrizione Pediatrica, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Meyer
    Firenze, Toscana 50139, Italy
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 4, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03221166
Lead sponsor
IRCCS Burlo Garofolo
Collaborators
Centro di Riferimento Oncologico - Aviano, Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale degli Spedali Civili di Brescia
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 18, 2017
Start date
Feb 27, 2018
Primary completion
Jul 31, 2020
Completion
Jul 31, 2020
Last update
Sep 4, 2020

Study contacts

Alessandro Ventura, MD PhD
study chair · IRCCS Burlo Garofolo

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Sep 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion