An observational study in Endometriosis, Central Sensitisation and Dyspareunia, sponsored by BC Women's Hospital & Health Centre. Completed at 1 site in Canada. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 49 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-08.
Sponsored by BC Women's Hospital & Health Centre · Observational
Background: Endometriosis affects 10% of reproductive aged females, and can have a negative impact on sexual quality of life. Endometriosis can cause pelvic pain with deep penetration during intercourse, as well as other sexual and non-sexual pains. This study will allow us to determine if an increase in sexual pain is related to central sensitization.
Purpose: The purpose of this study is to determine if there is an association between the severity of sexual pain and central sensitization in women with endometriosis.
Measurement tools: Data will be collected from the Clinic's Data Registry, an online questionnaire, a quantitative sensory test (QST) to measure pain-pressure threshold (PPT) as a marker of central sensitization, and daily entry to an online survey.
Primary Hypothesis: Central sensitization (measured by lower pain-pressure threshold) will be associated with an increased severity of deep dyspareunia, as well as a tenderness of the bladder/pelvic floor and depression, in women with endometriosis.
Background:
Endometriosis results from the presence of endometrial cells growing abnormally outside the uterus and affects approximately 10% of reproductive-aged females. Endometriosis can be associated with various types of pain such as: dysmenorrhea (painful cramps with menses), deep dyspareunia (pelvic pain with deep penetration during intercourse), dyschezia (painful bowel movements) and chronic pelvic pain. Few studies have explored the association between endometriosis and deep dyspareunia resulting in a limited understanding of how to treat deep dyspareunia. Deep dyspareunia is defined as pelvic pain with deep penetration and occurs in 50% of women with endometriosis at some time in their sexual lives. Deep dyspareunia has been shown to lower or cease intercourse, thus lowering self-esteem and resulting in negative effects on sexual functioning and interpersonal relationships.
A potential contributor to deep dyspareunia in women with endometriosis that is largely under-researched is the concept of central sensitization. Central sensitization is an amplification of nociceptive signaling that may result from prolonged pain causing sensitization of the dorsal horn neurons, which results in hyperalgesia (increased response to pain) and allodynia (response to pain when there normally would not be). A recent study, comparing cross-sectional data from suspected or surgically diagnosed endometriosis patients, suggested that bladder and pelvic floor tenderness may be markers of central sensitization. However, the linkage between the indirect markers of central sensitization and the presence of central sensitization requires confirmation. This link can be assessed through validated quantitative sensory testing (QST). Likewise, the association between central sensitization and deep dyspareunia may also be confirmed through QST. QST is an objective measurement tool to determine the presence and/or degree of sensory disturbances, by detecting the alterations in nociceptive pathways. For example, a low pain-pressure threshold (i.e., increased pain sensation) at healthy unaffected areas, as measured by QST, indicates central sensitization.
Purpose: To determine if deep dyspareunia is associated with central sensitization in women with endometriosis.
Research Question: Is deep dyspareunia associated with central sensitization assessed by decreased pain-pressure threshold?
Objectives:
Primary Objective:
Secondary Objectives:
Examine the association between central sensitization and psychological measures (assessed by validated questionnaires).
Research Hypotheses:
Primary Hypothesis: Central sensitization (measured by pain-pressure threshold) is associated with an increased severity of deep dyspareunia, as well as a tenderness of the bladder/pelvic floor and depression, in women with endometriosis.
Secondary Hypothesis: Women with endometriosis will have greater central sensitization (indicated by a lower pain-pressure threshold) than women without endometriosis.
Setting: The Pelvic Pain and Endometriosis program at the BC Women's Health Centre uses an interdisciplinary approach to managing pain, including: physiotherapy for bladder and pelvic floor, surgical intervention, pain education and medical management. This program addresses multiple factors influencing pain through multiple approaches, as opposed to the traditional approach of surgical removal of the endometriosis to resolve the pain alone.
Design: This study is a longitudinal, prospective cohort study, involving cases and controls.
Primary Outcome: Severity of deep dyspareunia (0-10 numeric rating scale)
Secondary Outcomes: Severity of superficial dyspareunia, severity of non-sexual pains, and psychological questionnaire scores
Main Independent Variables: Central sensitization measured by pain-pressure threshold (PPT) determined through QST
Study Population: The case population includes women who have consented to the Data Registry (H16-00264) and who are newly or re-referred to the BC Women's Centre for Pelvic Pain and Endometriosis, and who have regardless of the severity of deep dyspareunia, either: 1) previous surgical diagnosis of endometriosis or 2) current ovarian endometrioma cyst or 3) current endometriosis nodule.
Sample Size: 30 cases and 15 controls.
Recruitment and Data Collection prior to Test date:
Cases:
Control:
Procedures for Data Collection (on Test day)
Questionnaire:
Case and Control:
Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST):
Case and Control:
Feedback Questionnaire:
Case and Controls:
Procedures for Data Collection (after Test day)
Online Survey:
Cases only:
Participants without email addresses will have the opportunity to complete the surveys on a printed out copy (given to them on the appointment day) and mail/bring in-person to the Centre at the end of the 6 weeks.
920 studies on the registry are indexed under Endometriosis; 266 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 56 is below the median of 135 across 349 observational studies indexed under Endometriosis.
Browse Endometriosis studies →BC Women's Hospital & Health Centre is the lead sponsor of 11 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Tertiary care centre (BC Women's Health Centre for Pelvic Pain and Endometriosis) for case participants.
Community sample for control participants.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Case:
Control:
Exclusion Criteria:
- Case and Control:
* Consented to participate in the Data Registry (H16-00264) prior to their physician appointment at the BC Women's Health Centre. * New or re-referred to the BC Women's Health Centre for Pelvic Pain and Endometriosis. * Endometriosis (previously surgically diagnosed, or current endometrioma, or current nodule) * Willing and committed to indicating pain scores and menstrual data on a REDCap survey every day for 6 weeks after the test date. * At least 18 years old
Other: No Intervention
* Reproductive aged female with no suspected or diagnosed endometriosis. * Have not experienced any sexual pain scores over 4/10 on a 11-point numeric rating scale, as determined on an online questionnaire prior to test day. * At least 18 years old
Other: No Intervention
There is no treatment intervention. We are assigning measurement tools such as the Electronic Thimble Algometer for QST and questionnaires to both groups.
Deep Dyspareunia Score
Self reported response to the question: "In the last 24 hours, how painful was deep penetration during sexual intercourse?" on an 11-point numeric rating scale (Not applicable (no intercourse), 0= no pain, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10= worst pain imaginable). The average of the deep dyspareunia scores in the prospective 6 week period was calculated.
Time frame: Case only: daily for 6 weeks after QST testing date
Superficial Dyspareunia Score
Self reported response to the question: "In the last 24 hours, how painful was initial penetration (entry) during sexual intercourse?" on an 11-point numeric rating scale (Not applicable (no intercourse), 0= no pain, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10= worst pain imaginable). The average of the superficial dyspareunia scores in the prospective 6 week period was calculated.
Time frame: Case only: daily for 6 weeks after QST testing date
Chronic Pelvic Pain Score
Self reported response to the question: "What was your average level of pelvic pain in the last 24 hours?" on an 11-point numeric rating scale (0= no pain, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10= worst pain imaginable). The average of the chronic pelvic pain scores in the prospective 6 week period was calculated.
Time frame: Case only: daily for 6 weeks after QST testing date
Case participants: People with endometriosis from a tertiary endometriosis care center were approached after their baseline visit with their gynecologist and recruited for the study. Control participants: People with no suspected/diagnosed endometriosis and no pelvic pain scores above 4/10 were recruited from poster advertisements, in-person information sessions, and institutional research newsletters at the BC Women's Hospital.
| Milestone | Case | Control |
|---|---|---|
| Started | 37 | 19 |
| Completed | 36 | 19 |
| Not completed | 1 | 0 |
| Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject | 1 | 0 |
Self reported response to the question: "In the last 24 hours, how painful was deep penetration during sexual intercourse?" on an 11-point numeric rating scale (Not applicable (no intercourse), 0= no pain, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10= worst pain imaginable). The average of the deep dyspareunia scores in the prospective 6 week period was calculated.
| scores on a scale | Case |
|---|---|
| Low (<5) | 3.08 ± 2.32 |
Self reported response to the question: "In the last 24 hours, how painful was initial penetration (entry) during sexual intercourse?" on an 11-point numeric rating scale (Not applicable (no intercourse), 0= no pain, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10= worst pain imaginable). The average of the superficial dyspareunia scores in the prospective 6 week period was calculated.
| scores on a scale | Case |
|---|---|
| Superficial Dyspareunia Score | 2.34 ± 2.34 |
Self reported response to the question: "What was your average level of pelvic pain in the last 24 hours?" on an 11-point numeric rating scale (0= no pain, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10= worst pain imaginable). The average of the chronic pelvic pain scores in the prospective 6 week period was calculated.
| scores on a scale | Case |
|---|---|
| Chronic Pelvic Pain Score | 2.68 ± 1.76 |
Collected over During test day (QST) appointment. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| Case | 0/36 (0%) | 0/36 (0%) | 0/36 (0%) |
| Control | 0/19 (0%) | 0/19 (0%) | 0/19 (0%) |
| Age, Continuous(years) | Case | Control | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 33 ± 7 | 31 ± 8 | 32 ± 7 |
| Sex: Female, Male(Participants) | Case | Control | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 36 | 19 | 55 |
| Male | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants) | Case | Control | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| White | 23 | 13 | 36 |
| Other | 13 | 6 | 19 |
| Pain-pressure threshold(Newtons) | Case | Control | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Deltoid | 15.3 ± 6.9 | 14.6 ± 5.7 | 15.1 ± 6.5 |
| First dorsal interosseous | 14.5 ± 7.7 | 11.9 ± 7.1 | 13.6 ± 7.5 |
| Bladder and/or pelvic floor tenderness(Participants) | Case | Control | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bladder and/or pelvic floor tenderness | 11 | 0 | 11 |
| No bladder or pelvic floor tenderness | 25 | 0 | 25 |
PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.
Plan to share: No
Ran from Jul 2017 to primary completion in Apr 2019, 20 months.
Results were first posted in Apr 2026, 7 years after primary completion.
Of 155 non-industry observational studies under Endometriosis, half reached primary completion within 30 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 14 and three quarters within 48. This study's 20 months is below that.
Counting every sponsor, half of 182 studies reached it within 30 months; a quarter within 14 and three quarters within 47.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
BC Women's Hospital & Health Centre