ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03208803Ruxo-EPOUpdated Jul 20, 2022

Combination of JAK2 Inhibitor and Erythropoiesis-stimulating Agent in Myelofibrosis

An observational study in Myelofibrosis; Anemia, sponsored by Centre Hospitalier Annecy Genevois. Completed. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-07-20.

Sponsored by Centre Hospitalier Annecy Genevois · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Other
Enrollment
65
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

In patients with myelofibrosis, ruxolitinib is a current therapeutic option, which has demonstrated rapid and durable reduction in splenomegaly and improved disease-related symptoms. Anemia is another frequent issue in myelofibrosis. Consistent with its JAK2 signalling inhibition, ruxolitinib therapy has been shown to be detrimental on the hemoglobin level, increasing the depth of anemia or transfusion need.

Despite potential antagonistic mechanisms of action on Janus Kinase 2, some responses on anemia have been reported with the addition of Erythropoiesis-stimulating Agent to ruxolitinib in a small subset of patients in the COMFORT II study.

Ruxo-EPO is an observational study aimed to better assess the combination of Erythropoiesis-stimulating Agent and a Janus Kinase 2 inhibitor for therapeutic efficacy on anemia, Myelofibrosis evolution and for tolerance, in a larger cohort of patients treated for myelofibrosis in general practice.

Read the detailed description

Myeloproliferative Neoplasms are chronic diseases; they encompass Polycythemia Vera, Essential Thrombocythemia, and Primary Myelofibrosis with shared mutations that constitutively activate the physiologic signal-transduction pathways responsible for hematopoiesis. Myelofibroses may arise either as primary or antecedent to Polycythemia Vera and Essential Thrombocythemia. Myelofibrosis is the least common and the most aggressive of these diseases leading to death in 5 to 7 years due to bone marrow failure, massive splenomegaly related to extra medullary hematopoiesis, constitutional symptoms and cachexia.

Until recently, treatment of Myelofibrosis consisted of supportive care only, especially transfusions.

Since 2005 driver mutations have been identified in more than 90% of patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms, providing substantial insight into their pathogenesis and leading to the development of JAK inhibitor drugs. Ruxolitinib, the first one available, has shown activity whatever the presence of Janus Kinase 2 mutation, in reducing splenomegaly, improving cytopenias, alleviating constitutional symptoms and finally improving survival (COMFORT I and II studies). In France, access to ruxolitinib has been possible since April 2011, before wider availability in November 2012.

Anemia is a frequent issue in Myelofibrosis, which may be managed by the use of Erythropoiesis-stimulating Agent, leading to a 40-50% response rate in small studies.

Consistent with its Janus Kinase 2 signalling inhibition, ruxolitinib therapy has been shown to be detrimental on the hemoglobin level, increasing the depth of anemia or transfusion need, especially during the first 12-24 weeks of treatment in the COMFORT studies.

Despite potential antagonistic mechanisms of action on Janus Kinase 2, some responses on anemia have been reported with the addition of Erythropoiesis-stimulating Agent to ruxolitinib in a small subset of patients in the COMFORT II study.

Ruxo-EPO is an observational study aimed to better assess the combination of Erythropoiesis-stimulating Agent and a Janus Kinase 2 inhibitor for therapeutic efficacy on anemia, Myelofibrosis evolution and for tolerance, in a larger cohort of patients treated for myelofibrosis in general practice.

02

Conditions studied

  • Myelofibrosis; Anemia

Keywords

  • Myelofibrosis
  • Erythropoiesis-stimulating Agents
  • Janus Kinase 2 inhibitors
  • Ruxolitinib
03

In context

Primary Myelofibrosis

431 studies on the registry are indexed under Primary Myelofibrosis; 118 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 65 is below the median of 134 across 56 observational studies indexed under Primary Myelofibrosis.

Browse Primary Myelofibrosis studies →

Lead sponsor

Centre Hospitalier Annecy Genevois is the lead sponsor of 32 studies on the registry; 8 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients with myelofibroses treated with a combination of Janus Kinase 2 Inhibitor and Erythropoiesis-stimulating Agent in one of the France Intergroup Myeloproliferative neoplasms centers

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • patients with primary myelofibrosis or post-polycythemia myelofibrosis or post-essential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis
  • previously started with a combination of Janus Kinase 2 Inhibitor and Erythropoiesis-stimulating Agent, whatever the date during the course of their disease

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

- patients who denied participating to this observational study

05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Other
Enrollment
65 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Effect on anemia of the combination Janus Kinase 2 Inhibitor and Erythropoiesis-stimulating Agent

    Response rate assessed with 2006 International Working Group-Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Research and Treatment (IWG-MRT) and European Leukemia Network (ELN) criteria

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Patterns of the combination Janus Kinase 2 Inhibitor and Erythropoiesis-stimulating Agent

    Modalities of the combination (drugs of interest begun at the same or at different dates, order of the drug combination if started at different dates, duration of combination, doses of each drug)

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. Patients and Myelofibrosis characteristics

    Demographic characteristics of included patients, Characteristics of diseases (date of diagnosis, primary or secondary myelofibrosis, prognostic scores, level of hemoglobin, transfusion dependency, splenomegaly, mutations, delay between myelofibrosis diagnosis and Jak2 inhibitor treatment)

    Time frame: at inclusion

  3. Response rate of the combination treatment on constitutional symptoms of myelofibrosis

    Time frame: 3 years

  4. Response rate of the combination treatment on splenomegaly

    Splenomegaly size assessment

    Time frame: 3 years

  5. Efficacy of the combination treatment on bone marrow fibrosis

    Assessment of bone marrow fibrosis change if bone marrow biopsy has been done

    Time frame: 3 years

  6. Efficacy of the combination treatment on Janus Kinase 2 allelic burden change

    Assessment of Janus Kinase 2 allelic burden change if molecular evaluation has been done in blood

    Time frame: 3 years

  7. Adverse Events on combination treatment

    Time frame: 3 years

  8. Overall survival on combination treatment

    Time frame: 3 years

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Cervantes F. How I treat myelofibrosis. Blood. 2014 Oct 23;124(17):2635-42. doi: 10.1182/blood-2014-07-575373. Epub 2014 Sep 16. PubMed 25232060 ↗
  • James C, Ugo V, Le Couedic JP, Staerk J, Delhommeau F, Lacout C, Garcon L, Raslova H, Berger R, Bennaceur-Griscelli A, Villeval JL, Constantinescu SN, Casadevall N, Vainchenker W. A unique clonal JAK2 mutation leading to constitutive signalling causes polycythaemia vera. Nature. 2005 Apr 28;434(7037):1144-8. doi: 10.1038/nature03546. PubMed 15793561 ↗
  • Verstovsek S, Mesa RA, Gotlib J, Levy RS, Gupta V, DiPersio JF, Catalano JV, Deininger MW, Miller CB, Silver RT, Talpaz M, Winton EF, Harvey JH Jr, Arcasoy MO, Hexner EO, Lyons RM, Raza A, Vaddi K, Sun W, Peng W, Sandor V, Kantarjian H; COMFORT-I investigators. Efficacy, safety, and survival with ruxolitinib in patients with myelofibrosis: results of a median 3-year follow-up of COMFORT-I. Haematologica. 2015 Apr;100(4):479-88. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2014.115840. Epub 2015 Jan 23. PubMed 25616577 ↗
  • Cervantes F, Vannucchi AM, Kiladjian JJ, Al-Ali HK, Sirulnik A, Stalbovskaya V, McQuitty M, Hunter DS, Levy RS, Passamonti F, Barbui T, Barosi G, Harrison CN, Knoops L, Gisslinger H; COMFORT-II investigators. Three-year efficacy, safety, and survival findings from COMFORT-II, a phase 3 study comparing ruxolitinib with best available therapy for myelofibrosis. Blood. 2013 Dec 12;122(25):4047-53. doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-02-485888. Epub 2013 Oct 30. PubMed 24174625 ↗
  • Ellis MH, Lavi N, Mishchenko E, Dally N, Lavie D, Courevitch A, Gutwein O, Bulvik S, Braester A, Chubar E, Tavor S, Duek A, Kirgner I, Koren-Michowitz M. Ruxolitinib treatment for myelofibrosis: Efficacy and tolerability in routine practice. Leuk Res. 2015 Aug 12:S0145-2126(15)30356-8. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2015.08.003. Online ahead of print. PubMed 26364797 ↗
  • McMullin MF, Harrison CN, Niederwieser D, Demuynck H, Jakel N, Gopalakrishna P, McQuitty M, Stalbovskaya V, Recher C, Theunissen K, Gisslinger H, Kiladjian JJ, Al-Ali HK. The use of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents with ruxolitinib in patients with myelofibrosis in COMFORT-II: an open-label, phase 3 study assessing efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib versus best available therapy in the treatment of myelofibrosis. Exp Hematol Oncol. 2015 Sep 15;4:26. doi: 10.1186/s40164-015-0021-2. eCollection 2015. PubMed 26380150 ↗
  • Tefferi A, Cervantes F, Mesa R, Passamonti F, Verstovsek S, Vannucchi AM, Gotlib J, Dupriez B, Pardanani A, Harrison C, Hoffman R, Gisslinger H, Kroger N, Thiele J, Barbui T, Barosi G. Revised response criteria for myelofibrosis: International Working Group-Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Research and Treatment (IWG-MRT) and European LeukemiaNet (ELN) consensus report. Blood. 2013 Aug 22;122(8):1395-8. doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-03-488098. Epub 2013 Jul 9. PubMed 23838352 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from May 2016 to primary completion in Dec 2016, 7 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 28, 2017
First posted
Jul 6, 2017
StartActual
May 2016
Primary completionActual
Dec 31, 2016
CompletionActual
Dec 31, 2016
Last update
Jul 20, 2022
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 20, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03208803
Lead sponsor
Centre Hospitalier Annecy Genevois
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 6, 2017
Start date
May 2016
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2016
Completion
Dec 31, 2016
Last update
Jul 20, 2022

Study contacts

Sandra Malak, MD
principal investigator · Hôpital René Huguenin - Institut Curie - St Cloud - France
Lydia Roy, MD
study director · Hôpital Henri Mondor - Créteil - France
Pascale Cony-Makhoul, MD
study director · CH Annecy Genevois - Pringy - France
Mathieu Wemeau, MD
study director · CH Arras

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion