CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT03180385NAVAUpdated Mar 10, 2020Results posted

NAVA Versus BiPAP Non-Invasive Respiratory Support in Infants Following Congenital Heart Surgery

An interventional study of Neurally-Adusted Ventilatory Assist (NAVA) and Biphasic Positive Airway Pressure Support (BiPAP) in Respiratory Failure, sponsored by Children's Hospitals and Clinics of Minnesota. Terminated at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged Up to 12 Months. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-03-10.

Sponsored by Children's Hospitals and Clinics of Minnesota · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Very small percentage of enrolled patients needing non-invasive support and small chance of us reaching target enrollment within funding period.

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 3 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Mar 2017, registered Jun 2017).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
15
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
Up to 12 Months
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Pediatric patients often require prolonged mechanical ventilation after cardiac surgery which comes with many undesirable effects. As a result, neurally-adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA) and biphasic positive airway pressure support (BiPAP) have been developed as non-invasive alternatives to providing respiratory support post-operatively. The investigators hypothesize that providing synchronized biphasic support with NAVA will be associated with shorter duration of non-invasive respiratory support, less sedation requirements, and reduced length of hospital stay. This is a prospective, randomized study. Subjects are randomized to receive either NAVA or BiPAP following their cardiothoracic surgery.

Read the detailed description

Mechanical ventilation is often very necessary in the care of critically ill pediatric patients. However, it comes with many different complications that include chronic lung disease, tissue damage, and ventilator-associated pneumonia. Over time, we have increased our understanding of how a child's physiology interacts with a ventilator and this has led to two different non-invasive forms of respiratory support: bilevel positive air pressure (BiPAP) and neurally adjusted ventilator assist (NAVA). While both modalities come with a lot of benefits such as improved gas exchange, decreased respiratory and heart rate and decreased inspiratory work of breathing, NAVA has the ability to provide synchronous ventilatory support due to the electrical activity of the diaphragm.

The purpose of this study is to compare clinical outcomes following use of NAVA versus BiPAP in patients undergoing cardiac surgery, Specifically, comparisons of non-invasive respiratory support, duration of sedation, and length of hospital stay. The investigators hypothesize that the use of NAVA will lead to a shorter duration of non-invasive respiratory support, less sedation requirements, and reduced length of hospital stay compared to the use of BiPAP.

This is a single-site, prospective randomized study. Subjects are randomized into two arms: those who receive NAVA and those who receive BiPAP post-operatively.

Subjects will be followed for up to 14 days post-operatively or until they are discharged, whichever comes first. Pain medication administered, FLACC (Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability), and SBS (State Behavioral Scale) scores are recorded daily for up to 14 days.

02

Conditions studied

  • Respiratory Failure

Keywords

  • NAVA
  • BiPAP
  • Pediatrics
  • Cardiac Surgery
03

In context

Respiratory Insufficiency

1,650 studies on the registry are indexed under Respiratory Insufficiency; 296 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 15 is below the median of 55 across 1,043 interventional studies indexed under Respiratory Insufficiency.

Browse Respiratory Insufficiency studies →

Lead sponsor

Children's Hospitals and Clinics of Minnesota is the lead sponsor of 49 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Up to 12 Months
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Postoperative cardiac surgery patients admitted to the Cardiovascular Care Center (CVCC) at Children's Hospitals and Clinics of Minnesota
  • Recommended for non-invasive (NIV) respiratory support following extubation, per provider discretion
  • 0 to 12 months of age

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Documented airway malformation (congenital or acquired)

    1. Laryngomalacia
    2. Bronchomalacia
    3. Laryngeal web
    4. Tracheal or bronchial rings (complete or incomplete)
  • Documented ENT abnormality
  • Documented central apnea
  • Patients who are overly sedated, per provider discretion
  • Tracheostomy in place at time of cardiac surgery
  • Documented phrenic nerve paralysis (Note: Vocal cord paresis and paralysis will not be an exclusion)
  • Other chromosomal abnormality (non-Down syndrome)
  • Chronic lung disease
  • Pre-operative non-invasive respiratory support
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
15 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Neurally-Adjusted Ventilatory Assist (NAVA)

    Synchronized biphasic non-invasive respiratory support

    Device: Neurally-Adusted Ventilatory Assist (NAVA)

  • Active comparator
    Biphasic Positive Airway Pressure Support (BiPAP)

    Conventional non-invasive respiratory support

    Device: Biphasic Positive Airway Pressure Support (BiPAP)

Interventions

  • DeviceNeurally-Adusted Ventilatory Assist (NAVA)

    Delivery of positive pressure is based on the electrical activity of the diaphragm (Edi) via a nasogastric (NG) catheter that is placed on the phrenic nerve, which runs along the esophagus. This results in synchronous ventilation for the patient.

  • DeviceBiphasic Positive Airway Pressure Support (BiPAP)

    Conventional form of non-invasive respiratory support that does not deliver positive airway pressure in a synchronous fashion.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Average Post-operative Midazolam Dose

    Time frame: Up to 14 days post-operatively

  2. Post-operative Pain Scores-FLACC

    FLACC (Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability) scale

    Time frame: Up to 14 days post-operatively

  3. Post-operative Sedation Scores-SBS

    SBS (State Behavioral Scale)

    Time frame: Up to 14 days post-operatively

  4. Length of Intubation

    Time frame: Up to 14 days post-operatively

  5. Length of Non-Invasive Respiratory Support

    Time frame: Up to 14 days post-operatively

  6. Average Post-operative Morphine Dose

    Time frame: Up to 14 days post-operatively

  7. Average Post-operative Lorazepam Dose

    Time frame: Up to 14 days post-operatively

  8. Average Post-operative Dexmedetomidine Dose

    Time frame: Up to 14 days post-operatively

  9. Average Post-operative Total Fentanyl Dose

    Time frame: Up to 14 days post-operatively

  10. Average Post-operative PCA Fentanyl Dose

    Time frame: Up to 14 days post-operatively

07

Results

Posted Oct 15, 2019

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneNeurally-Adjusted Ventilatory Assist (NAVA)Biphasic Positive Airway Pressure Support (BiPAP)
Started02
Completed02
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryAverage Post-operative Midazolam Dose
Time frame:
Up to 14 days post-operatively
Reported as:
Mean · mg/kg
Average Post-operative Midazolam Dose
mg/kgNeurally-Adjusted Ventilatory Assist (NAVA)Biphasic Positive Airway Pressure Support (BiPAP)
Average Post-operative Midazolam Dose—0.035 ± 0.007
PrimaryPost-operative Pain Scores-FLACC

FLACC (Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability) scale

Time frame:
Up to 14 days post-operatively

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

PrimaryPost-operative Sedation Scores-SBS

SBS (State Behavioral Scale)

Time frame:
Up to 14 days post-operatively

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

PrimaryLength of Intubation
Time frame:
Up to 14 days post-operatively
Reported as:
Mean · hours
Length of Intubation
hoursNeurally-Adjusted Ventilatory Assist (NAVA)Biphasic Positive Airway Pressure Support (BiPAP)
Length of Intubation—37.24 ± 3.87
PrimaryLength of Non-Invasive Respiratory Support
Time frame:
Up to 14 days post-operatively
Reported as:
Number · hours
Length of Non-Invasive Respiratory Support
hoursNeurally-Adjusted Ventilatory Assist (NAVA)Biphasic Positive Airway Pressure Support (BiPAP)
Length of Non-Invasive Respiratory Support—7.17
PrimaryAverage Post-operative Morphine Dose
Time frame:
Up to 14 days post-operatively
Reported as:
Mean · mg/kg
Average Post-operative Morphine Dose
mg/kgNeurally-Adjusted Ventilatory Assist (NAVA)Biphasic Positive Airway Pressure Support (BiPAP)
Average Post-operative Morphine Dose—NA ± NA
PrimaryAverage Post-operative Lorazepam Dose
Time frame:
Up to 14 days post-operatively
Reported as:
Mean · mg/kg
Average Post-operative Lorazepam Dose
mg/kgNeurally-Adjusted Ventilatory Assist (NAVA)Biphasic Positive Airway Pressure Support (BiPAP)
Average Post-operative Lorazepam Dose—0.11 ± 0.15
PrimaryAverage Post-operative Dexmedetomidine Dose
Time frame:
Up to 14 days post-operatively
Reported as:
Mean · mcg/kg
Average Post-operative Dexmedetomidine Dose
mcg/kgNeurally-Adjusted Ventilatory Assist (NAVA)Biphasic Positive Airway Pressure Support (BiPAP)
Average Post-operative Dexmedetomidine Dose—6.71 ± 9.49
PrimaryAverage Post-operative Total Fentanyl Dose
Time frame:
Up to 14 days post-operatively
Reported as:
Mean · mcg/kg
Average Post-operative Total Fentanyl Dose
mcg/kgNeurally-Adjusted Ventilatory Assist (NAVA)Biphasic Positive Airway Pressure Support (BiPAP)
Average Post-operative Total Fentanyl Dose—8.09 ± 7.06
PrimaryAverage Post-operative PCA Fentanyl Dose
Time frame:
Up to 14 days post-operatively
Reported as:
Mean · boluses
Average Post-operative PCA Fentanyl Dose
bolusesNeurally-Adjusted Ventilatory Assist (NAVA)Biphasic Positive Airway Pressure Support (BiPAP)
Average Post-operative PCA Fentanyl Dose—NA ± NA

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse event data was collected over the span of the patient's hospital stay, specifically up to 14 days post-cardiac surgery.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Neurally-Adjusted Ventilatory Assist (NAVA)———
Biphasic Positive Airway Pressure Support (BiPAP)0/2 (0%)1/2 (50%)0/2 (0%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventNeurally-Adjusted Ventilatory Assist (NAVA)Biphasic Positive Airway Pressure Support (BiPAP)
Re-intubationRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders—1/2

Baseline characteristics

No patients who were enrolled in the study and needed non-invasive respiratory support post-cardiac surgery were randomized to NAVA, only BiPAP.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Neurally-Adjusted Ventilatory Assist (NAVA)Biphasic Positive Airway Pressure Support (BiPAP)Total
Mean—0.46 ± 0.040.46 ± 0.04
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Neurally-Adjusted Ventilatory Assist (NAVA)Biphasic Positive Airway Pressure Support (BiPAP)Total
Female—11
Male—11
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)Neurally-Adjusted Ventilatory Assist (NAVA)Biphasic Positive Airway Pressure Support (BiPAP)Total
Count of participants——0
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Neurally-Adjusted Ventilatory Assist (NAVA)Biphasic Positive Airway Pressure Support (BiPAP)Total
United States—22
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Children's Hospitals and Clinics of Minnesota
    Minneapolis, Minnesota 55404, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Jan 10, 2018

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 10, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03180385
Lead sponsor
Children's Hospitals and Clinics of Minnesota
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 8, 2017
Start date
Mar 1, 2017
Primary completion
Apr 10, 2018
Completion
Apr 10, 2018
Results posted
Oct 15, 2019
Last update
Mar 10, 2020

Study contacts

Gretchen A McGuire, RN, MSN, CPNP-AC
principal investigator · Children's Hospitals and Clinics of Minnesota
Robert Horvath-Csongradi, MD
principal investigator · Children's Hospitals and Clinics of Minnesota

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Sep 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion