ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03179202Updated Aug 5, 2022Results posted

Electrical Stimulation for the Treatment of Back Pain Using Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS)

An interventional study of SPRINT Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) System in Back Pain and Low Back Pain, sponsored by SPR Therapeutics, Inc.. Completed at 8 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 21 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-08-05.

Sponsored by SPR Therapeutics, Inc. (part of Medtronic) · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
166
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
21 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of electrical stimulation (low levels of electricity) on low back pain. This study involves the SPRINT Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) system. The System delivers mild electrical stimulation to the nerves in the low back. The System includes up to four small wires (called "Leads") that are placed through the skin into the muscles in the low back. The wires attach to device(s) worn on the body that deliver stimulation (called Stimulators).

02

Conditions studied

  • Back Pain
  • Low Back Pain

Keywords

  • Electrical Stimulation
  • Neurostimulation
  • Neuromodulation
  • Back Pain
  • Low Back Pain
03

In context

Back Pain

2,389 studies on the registry are indexed under Back Pain; 282 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 166 is above the median of 60 across 1,952 interventional studies indexed under Back Pain.

Browse Back Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

SPR Therapeutics, Inc. is the lead sponsor of 10 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Of its 5 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 4 (80%) have results posted.

First submitted before SPR Therapeutics, Inc. became part of Medtronic.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
21 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria:

  • At least 21 years of age
  • Chronic low back pain

Key Exclusion Criteria:

  • Infection on or around the low back
  • Conditions with increased risk of infection (e.g., valvular heart disease, compromised immune system, history of recurrent skin infections)
  • Implanted electronic device
  • Body Mass Index (BMI) > 40
  • Pregnant
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
166 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Peripheral Nerve Stimulation

    All study subjects will have up to 4 Leads placed in their low back, will use the SPRINT Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) System, and will receive electrical stimulation.

    Device: SPRINT Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) System

Interventions

  • DeviceSPRINT Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) System

    The SPRINT PNS System is a device which delivers mild electrical stimulation to the muscles in the low back. The System includes up to four small wires (called "Leads") that are placed through the skin into the muscles in the low back. The wires attach to device(s) worn on the body that deliver stimulation (called Stimulators). The PNS System was approved by the FDA for up to 60 days of use for the management of acute and chronic pain, including back pain.

    Also known as: SPRINT System, Smartpatch System, SPRINT, Smartpatch

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Subjects That Experienced ≥30% Reduction in Average Low Back Pain Intensity

    All subjects were asked to complete daily diaries to record their average pain intensity on each day of a 7-day period. The pain intensity question was excerpted from the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form Question 5 (BPI-5). The BPI-5 uses an 11-point numerical rating scale where 0 represents "No Pain" and 10 represents "Pain as bad as you can imagine." For each subject, the mean score for the baseline and end of treatment (EOT) diary periods were calculated and percent reduction was determined. Subjects that achieved ≥30% reduction in pain, were considered successful.

    Time frame: Baseline and End of Treatment (EOT= 8-weeks post-start of treatment)

  2. Number of Subjects That Experienced at Least One Study-Related Adverse Event

    At each study visit following the baseline assessment at Visit 1, subjects were questioned if any changes in their medical status or condition has occurred since their previous visit. If the subject experienced a change that was an adverse event, an Adverse Event Form was completed by the site. The number of subjects that experienced at least one study-related adverse event is reported here.

    Time frame: Up to 15 months for each subject from baseline to the last study visit

Secondary outcomes

  1. Worst Pain Intensity

    All subjects were asked to complete daily diaries to record their worst pain intensity on each day of a 7-day period. The pain intensity question was excerpted from the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form Question 3 (BPI-3). The BPI-3 uses an 11-point numerical rating scale where 0 represents "No Pain" and 10 represents "Pain as bad as you can imagine." For each subject, the mean score for the baseline and end of treatment (EOT) diary periods were calculated. The mean score across all subjects for each time point is reported.

    Time frame: Baseline and End of Treatment (EOT= 8-weeks post-start of treatment)

  2. Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)

    The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is a widely used assessment designed to measure the degree of disability in people with low back pain. This validated questionnaire includes topics concerning the intensity of pain, the subject's ability to perform normal daily activities such as personal care, walking, sitting, or standing, and how pain affects the subject's sex life, social life, and travel. The scale ranges from 0-100 and higher scores indicate greater disability due to low back pain. The mean score across all subjects at baseline and end of treatment (EOT) is reported here.

    Time frame: Baseline and End of Treatment (EOT= 8-weeks post-start of treatment)

  3. Mean Change in Health-Related Quality of Life

    The RAND 36-Item Short Form Health Survey is a widely accepted form used to quantify quality of life. The survey consists of 8 categories with a total of 36 questions regarding the subject's general health and activities. The survey assesses physical and emotional problems associated with pain during the past 4 weeks. Each category is scored on a 0-100 scale, where a higher score indicates a more favorable health state. The score for each category was calculated at baseline and End of Treatment (EOT) for each subject. The change in each category score from Baseline to EOT was then calculated for each subject (with a positive change indicating an increase in health-related quality of life). The mean and standard deviation of the subjects' changes in each category are presented below.

    Time frame: Baseline and End of Treatment (EOT= 8-weeks post-start of treatment)

  4. Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II)

    The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) is a validated, 21-question survey used to measure depression severity. Questions are rated on a scale from 0 to 3, and the scores from each question are totaled to provide an overall score ranging between 0 to 63. Scores from 0-13 indicate minimal depression, 14-19 mild depression, 20-28 moderate depression, and 29-63 indicates severe depression. The average total scores across subjects were calculated at baseline and end of treatment (EOT).

    Time frame: Baseline and End of Treatment (EOT= 8-weeks post-start of treatment)

  5. Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Survey

    The Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) asks subjects to rate their improvement with treatment on a 7-point scale where 1 represents "very much worse" and 7 represents "very much improved" as compared to before stimulation treatment. The subjects combine all the components of their experience into one overall score. The number of participants with each rating after 8 weeks of treatment is reported here.

    Time frame: 8-weeks post-Start of Treatment (SOT)

  6. Pain Interference

    Question 9 of the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-9) is a 7-part question that assesses the level of interference that subjects experience in their daily lives due to pain. The 7 categories are general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, and enjoyment of life. Subjects were asked to rate how much their low back pain interferes with each aspect on an 11-point numerical scale where 0 represents "Does Not Interfere" and 10 represents "Completely Interferes." The average of these 7 scores was calculated for each subject. The mean was taken across subjects for each time point.

    Time frame: Baseline and End of Treatment (EOT= 8-weeks post-start of treatment)

07

Results

Posted Aug 5, 2022

Participant flow

Recruitment began in June 2017 and was concluded in December 2019. Subjects were screened from the available pool of candidates who presented with chronic low back pain.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneConsented Subjects
Started166
Enrolled/received leads99
Protocol population91
Completed75
Not completed91
Withdrew: Screen failure67
Withdrew: Subject lost to follow up12
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject7
Withdrew: Adverse event3
Withdrew: Unrelated death reported in all-cause mortality1
Withdrew: Other reason: incarceration after enrollment1

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Subjects That Experienced ≥30% Reduction in Average Low Back Pain Intensity

All subjects were asked to complete daily diaries to record their average pain intensity on each day of a 7-day period. The pain intensity question was excerpted from the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form Question 5 (BPI-5). The BPI-5 uses an 11-point numerical rating scale where 0 represents "No Pain" and 10 represents "Pain as bad as you can imagine." For each subject, the mean score for the baseline and end of treatment (EOT) diary periods were calculated and percent reduction was determined. Subjects that achieved ≥30% reduction in pain, were considered successful.

Time frame:
Baseline and End of Treatment (EOT= 8-weeks post-start of treatment)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Subjects That Experienced ≥30% Reduction in Average Low Back Pain Intensity
ParticipantsProtocol Population
Number of Subjects That Experienced ≥30% Reduction in Average Low Back Pain Intensity58
PrimaryNumber of Subjects That Experienced at Least One Study-Related Adverse Event

At each study visit following the baseline assessment at Visit 1, subjects were questioned if any changes in their medical status or condition has occurred since their previous visit. If the subject experienced a change that was an adverse event, an Adverse Event Form was completed by the site. The number of subjects that experienced at least one study-related adverse event is reported here.

Time frame:
Up to 15 months for each subject from baseline to the last study visit
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Subjects That Experienced at Least One Study-Related Adverse Event
ParticipantsEnrolled/Received Leads
Number of Subjects That Experienced at Least One Study-Related Adverse Event49
SecondaryWorst Pain Intensity

All subjects were asked to complete daily diaries to record their worst pain intensity on each day of a 7-day period. The pain intensity question was excerpted from the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form Question 3 (BPI-3). The BPI-3 uses an 11-point numerical rating scale where 0 represents "No Pain" and 10 represents "Pain as bad as you can imagine." For each subject, the mean score for the baseline and end of treatment (EOT) diary periods were calculated. The mean score across all subjects for each time point is reported.

Time frame:
Baseline and End of Treatment (EOT= 8-weeks post-start of treatment)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Worst Pain Intensity
score on a scaleProtocol Population
Baseline7.7 ± 1.2
EOT4.5 ± 2.1
SecondaryOswestry Disability Index (ODI)

The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is a widely used assessment designed to measure the degree of disability in people with low back pain. This validated questionnaire includes topics concerning the intensity of pain, the subject's ability to perform normal daily activities such as personal care, walking, sitting, or standing, and how pain affects the subject's sex life, social life, and travel. The scale ranges from 0-100 and higher scores indicate greater disability due to low back pain. The mean score across all subjects at baseline and end of treatment (EOT) is reported here.

Time frame:
Baseline and End of Treatment (EOT= 8-weeks post-start of treatment)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)
score on a scaleProtocol Population
Baseline39.1 ± 12.1
EOT23.6 ± 12.6
SecondaryMean Change in Health-Related Quality of Life

The RAND 36-Item Short Form Health Survey is a widely accepted form used to quantify quality of life. The survey consists of 8 categories with a total of 36 questions regarding the subject's general health and activities. The survey assesses physical and emotional problems associated with pain during the past 4 weeks. Each category is scored on a 0-100 scale, where a higher score indicates a more favorable health state. The score for each category was calculated at baseline and End of Treatment (EOT) for each subject. The change in each category score from Baseline to EOT was then calculated for each subject (with a positive change indicating an increase in health-related quality of life). The mean and standard deviation of the subjects' changes in each category are presented below.

Time frame:
Baseline and End of Treatment (EOT= 8-weeks post-start of treatment)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Mean Change in Health-Related Quality of Life
score on a scaleProtocol Population
Physical Functioning13.2 ± 19.6
Role Limitations due to Physical Health26.6 ± 39.9
Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems12.2 ± 42.5
Energy/Fatigue12.8 ± 17.0
Emotional well-being7.2 ± 15.2
Social Functioning18.0 ± 22.5
Pain21.6 ± 20.8
General Health5.0 ± 15.1
SecondaryBeck Depression Inventory (BDI-II)

The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) is a validated, 21-question survey used to measure depression severity. Questions are rated on a scale from 0 to 3, and the scores from each question are totaled to provide an overall score ranging between 0 to 63. Scores from 0-13 indicate minimal depression, 14-19 mild depression, 20-28 moderate depression, and 29-63 indicates severe depression. The average total scores across subjects were calculated at baseline and end of treatment (EOT).

Time frame:
Baseline and End of Treatment (EOT= 8-weeks post-start of treatment)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II)
score on a scaleProtocol Population
Baseline8.9 ± 5.6
EOT5.2 ± 5.1
SecondaryPatient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Survey

The Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) asks subjects to rate their improvement with treatment on a 7-point scale where 1 represents "very much worse" and 7 represents "very much improved" as compared to before stimulation treatment. The subjects combine all the components of their experience into one overall score. The number of participants with each rating after 8 weeks of treatment is reported here.

Time frame:
8-weeks post-Start of Treatment (SOT)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Survey
ParticipantsProtocol Population
Very Much Improved12
Much Improved39
Minimally Improved23
No Change8
Minimally Worse0
Much Worse1
Very Much Worse0
SecondaryPain Interference

Question 9 of the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-9) is a 7-part question that assesses the level of interference that subjects experience in their daily lives due to pain. The 7 categories are general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, and enjoyment of life. Subjects were asked to rate how much their low back pain interferes with each aspect on an 11-point numerical scale where 0 represents "Does Not Interfere" and 10 represents "Completely Interferes." The average of these 7 scores was calculated for each subject. The mean was taken across subjects for each time point.

Time frame:
Baseline and End of Treatment (EOT= 8-weeks post-start of treatment)
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Pain Interference
score on a scaleProtocol Population
Baseline5.7 ± 2.0
EOT2.8 ± 2.0

Adverse events

Collected over Each participant enrolled was assessed for adverse events from the time of informed consent through the 12-month follow up visit. The total assessment period was approximately 14 months for each participant.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Enrolled/Received Leads1/99 (1%)4/99 (4%)49/99 (49.5%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventEnrolled/Received Leads
Shoulder procedureSurgical and medical procedures1/99
Heart attackCardiac disorders1/99
Breast CancerNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)1/99
Heart proceduresSurgical and medical procedures1/99
MelanomaNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)1/99
Liver/Lymph node metastasesNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)1/99
SCS trial and permanent implantSurgical and medical procedures1/99
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 32
Most frequent other events
EventEnrolled/Received Leads
Irritation or bruising at bandage site or connector cradlesSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders19/99
Irritation at pad and/or Lead exit sitesSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders16/99
Itching at bandage siteSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders13/99
Itching at pad and/or Lead exit sitesSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders11/99
Uncomfortable stimulationMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders8/99
Pain (distal or unrelated to device location)Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders6/99
Pain/discomfort at lead siteMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders5/99
Worsening low back painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders4/99
Discharge or bleeding from electrode/insertion siteSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders3/99
Pain from Lead PlacementMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders3/99

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Enrolled/Received Leads
<=18 years0
Between 18 and 65 years64
>=65 years35
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Enrolled/Received Leads
Mean57.4 ± 13.8
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Enrolled/Received Leads
Female50
Male49
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Enrolled/Received Leads
Hispanic or Latino2
Not Hispanic or Latino97
Unknown or Not Reported0
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Enrolled/Received Leads
American Indian or Alaska Native0
Asian1
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander1
Black or African American12
White84
More than one race1
Unknown or Not Reported0
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Enrolled/Received Leads
United States99
Duration of Low Back Pain
Duration of Low Back Pain(years)Enrolled/Received Leads
Mean17.2 ± 14.7
Employment Status
Employment Status(Participants)Enrolled/Received Leads
Currently Working44
On Leave of Absence1
Retired (not due to health)30
Homemaker4
Unemployed7
Student2
Disabled and/or Retired Because of Low Back Pain8
Other3
08

Study locations

8 sites
  • Hope Research Institute
    Peoria, Arizona 85381, United States
  • Integrated Pain Management Medical Group
    Walnut Creek, California 94598, United States
  • International Spine, Pain and Performance Center
    Washington D.C., District of Columbia 20006, United States
  • Premier Pain Centers
    Shrewsbury, New Jersey 07702, United States
  • Duke University Medical Center
    Durham, North Carolina 27710, United States
  • Center for Clinical Research
    Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27103, United States
  • Virginia iSpine Physicians
    Richmond, Virginia 23235, United States
  • The Spine and Nerve Center of St. Francis Hospital
    Charleston, West Virginia 25301, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Gilmore CA, Deer TR, Desai MJ, Li S, DePalma MJ, Cohen SP, Swan BD, McGee MJ, Boggs JW. Four-Year Follow-Up from a Prospective, Multicenter Study of Percutaneous 60-Day Peripheral Nerve Stimulation for Chronic Low Back Pain. Pain Ther. 2025 Jun;14(3):1103-1115. doi: 10.1007/s40122-025-00737-3. Epub 2025 Apr 22. PubMed 40261580 ↗
  • Deer TR, Gilmore CA, Desai MJ, Li SC, DePalma MJ, Hopkins TJ, Burgher AH, Spinner DA, Cohen SP, McGee MJ, Boggs JW. Percutaneous Peripheral Nerve Stimulation of the Medial Branch Nerves for the Treatment of Chronic Axial Back Pain in Patients After Radiofrequency Ablation. Pain Med. 2021 Mar 18;22(3):548-560. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnaa432. PubMed 33616178 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Apr 29, 2019

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Jun 2017 to primary completion in May 2021, 46 months.

Results were first posted in Aug 2022, 1 year 2 months after primary completion.

Of 64 industry-sponsored interventional studies with no phase under Back Pain, half reached primary completion within 17 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 11 and three quarters within 25. This study's 46 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 997 studies reached it within 11 months; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 24.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jun 1, 2017
First posted
Jun 7, 2017
StartActual
Jun 23, 2017
Primary completionActual
May 11, 2021
CompletionActual
May 11, 2021
Results first posted
Aug 5, 2022
Last update
Aug 5, 2022
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 5, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03179202
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 7, 2017
Start date
Jun 23, 2017
Primary completion
May 11, 2021
Completion
May 11, 2021
Results posted
Aug 5, 2022
Last update
Aug 5, 2022

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion