CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT03178292Updated Jun 6, 2017

Conventional Antibiotic Prophylaxis Versus Add-On 5 Days Levofloxacin Before Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy

An interventional study of Levofloxacin and Placebo in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy, Infection and Sepsis, sponsored by Mansoura University. Status unknown at 1 site in Egypt. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-06-06.

Sponsored by Mansoura University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified May 2017), so the status shown — last known as Not yet recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
300
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

To evaluate whether 5 days of levofloxacin before percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in reducing upper urinary tract infection and urosepsis after PCNL.

Read the detailed description

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is a minimally invasive procedure for removal of large volume upper urinary tract stones. Although PCNL is effective and yielding high stone-free rates, complications rates range from 18.30% to 83% with sepsis has been reported in 0.3% to 7.6% of cases result in the most common cause of perioperative mortality in PCNL patients.

Urosepsis after PNL is an important and potentially catastrophic complication. The overall incidence of fever (25%), bacteremia (23%), endotoxemia (34%) and septicemic shock occurs in 0.3%-2.5% of patients. Urosepsis and shock result from the intravasation of bacteria or endotoxins into bloodstream, which in turn increases with prolonged surgery, degree of hydronephrosis, bacterial load in the renal pelvis, and presence of infected stones.

Charton et al., concluded that without antibiotic prophylaxis 35% of patient suffered urinary tract infection a post-PCNL, although preoperative urine showing no growth. In a prospective but nonrandomized assessment of PCNL patients receiving oral ciprofloxacin, intravenous ciprofloxacin, or no antimicrobial treatment found postoperative urinary tract infection to occur in 17%, 0%, and 40% of patients, respectively. Mariappan et al., stated that midstream urine (MSU) culture does not represent upper tract infection in patients with obstructing stones. Also, stone and pelvic urine cultures are better predictors of upper tract infection and urosepsis in such cases.

Antibiotic prophylaxis has been recommended (Level of evidence: IIb, III) for patients subjected to PCNL to avert these infectious complications, as profiled in an American Urological Association (AUA) Best Practice Policy Statement. They also recommend antibiotic prophylaxis before shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy with high level (Level of evidence: Ia and Ib, respectively) due to presence of meta-analysis and large randomised controlled trial.

The optimal timing, dosing, and duration of a prophylactic antibiotic regimen for PCNL procedures has also been a point of discussion. The AUA best practice policy statement currently recommends that a one-time dose on the day of the procedure is sufficient. The EAU guidelines are less definitive in concluding that a short course is adequate but that the "length of time is to be determined." Mariappan and colleagues in a prospective non-randomised trial found that 52 patients who had dilated collecting systems, stone burden greater than 2 cm, and no confounding factors predisposing to UTIs who received a 1-week course of ciprofloxacin before PCNL had a 3-fold lower risk of postoperative UTI and SIRS than 46 patients who received standard perioperative antibiotics on the day of surgery.

Bag and colleagues prospectively randomized 101 patients with greater than 2.5-cm kidney stones and/or hydronephrosis with sterile preoperative urine cultures to a 7-day course of nitrofurantoin versus no antibiotics before PCNL and found a statistically significant lower rate of postoperative SIRS (19% vs 49%), endotoxemia (18% vs 42%), positive result on kidney urine culture (0% vs 10%), and positive result on stone culture (8% vs 30%) in the arm receiving nitrofurantoin.

Although these two small series support a week of preoperative antibiotics before PCNL, larger, prospective, randomized studies are needed to better elucidate the risks and benefits of empiric antibiotics

02

Conditions studied

  • Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
  • Infection
  • Sepsis
  • Antibiotics
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Mansoura University is the lead sponsor of 1,077 studies on the registry; 183 are open to participants now.

Of its 9 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Stones ≥ 2.5 cm and/or hydronephrosis
  • Sterile mid urine stream

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with a stent, nephrostomy tube or indwelling catheter
  • Uncontrolled Diabetes mellitus
  • Renal failure
  • Fever before surgery
  • Concomitant bladder stone or tumour
  • Patients with active UTI
  • Contralateral renal/ureteric stone
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
300 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Levofloxacin

    Levofloxacin 500 mg daily for 5 days

    Drug: Levofloxacin

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Placebo tab daily for 5 days

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • DrugLevofloxacin

    Levofloxacin 500Mg daily for 5 days

    Also known as: Levofloxacin 500Mg

  • DrugPlacebo

    Placebo Oral Tablet daily for 5 days

    Also known as: placebo Oral Tablet

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Upper urinary tract infection and systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) after PCNL by Criteria for SIRS established by the American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine Consensus Conference

    SIRS if patient has Two or more of the 4 SIRS criteria

    Time frame: 1 year

Secondary outcomes

  1. difference between culture and sensitivity of Preoperative urine (MSU) and intraoperative renal pelvic urine and extracted stone.

    Preoperative urine (MSU),intraoperative renal pelvic urine and extracted stone culture and sensitivity.

    Time frame: 1 year

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Urology and Nephrology Center
    Mansoura, Aldakahlia 35516, Egypt
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Yes meta-analyses by contact the Prof. Ahmed Shoma, MD, Phd (Study Chair)

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 6, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03178292
Lead sponsor
Mansoura University
Responsible party
Abdelwahab Hashem (Urology Msc, Oncology fellow at Urology and Nephrology Center, Principal Investigator, Mansoura University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 6, 2017
Start date
Jun 15, 2017 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jun 15, 2017 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 15, 2017 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 6, 2017

Study contacts

Abdelwahab R. Hashem, Msc
Contact
abdelwahab_hashem@yahoo.com
01069678979 ext. 002
Ahmed Shoma, MD
study chair · Urology and Nephrology center
Nasr Eltabey, MD
study director · Urology and Nephrology center
Mahmoud Laimon, Msc
principal investigator · Urology and Nephrology center
Muhamad Abdullateef, Msc
principal investigator · Urology and Nephrology center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in May 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion