ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03159286NetworkUpdated Nov 21, 2019

Experimental Test of Facebook Social Drinking Norms on Adolescent Alcohol Use

An interventional study of Abstainer and Abstainer + User in Feedback, Psychological, Underage Alcohol Use and Risk-Taking, sponsored by University of Washington. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 15 Years to 20 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-11-21.

Sponsored by University of Washington · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
306
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
15 Years to 20 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The proposed research will be the first study to focus on experimentally manipulating both injunctive and descriptive norms on social networking sites in order to elucidate the relationship between alcohol and abstainer displays on social networking sites and subsequent alcohol cognitions, use, and related negative consequences. Based on literature focusing on developmentally appropriate health models for adolescents, the Prototype Willingness Model (PWM) assumes that health-risk behaviors occur either when individuals have developed intentions to engage in a risk behavior (and these intentions vary as a function of attitudes and perceived injunctive norms) or through willingness to engage in risks (which varies as a function of perceived vulnerability to negative consequences, perceived descriptive norms , and prototypes). To fully understand the relationships between alcohol abstaining displays on social networking sites, we will examine 1) the role of descriptive and injunctive abstainer and user norms, when experimentally manipulated with SNS profiles, on willingness and intentions, subsequent alcohol use and related negative consequences among adolescents (age 1 5-20) 2) whether intentions and willingness mediate the relation between our experimental manipulation and subsequent alcohol use and negative consequences and whether 3) individual differences in social influence moderate the effect of the experimental manipulation on intentions, willingness, alcohol use, and negative consequences. We will test these aims by recruiting a community sample of adolescents (N = 300), living in the greater Seattle metropolitan area. Participants will complete a web-based baseline assessment and participate in an in-person experimental manipulation in which they are either assigned to see same-sex social networking site profiles of alcohol abstainers, abstainers +users, or a control condition where neither user or abstainer information will be provided. Immediately after the manipulation, participants will answer a series of questions about the profiles they just viewed and their alcohol-related cognitions. Participants will also complete a one-month in person follow up assessment to test for impacts on intentions, willingness, alcohol use, and related negative consequences. Additionally, individual differences in social influence will be examined as possible moderators o f the relationship between SNS-portrayed norms and our primary outcomes. This study is both significant and innovative in that it uses a theoretical perspective to experimentally test the impact of alcohol content, in particular abstainer norms, on Facebook on adolescent alcohol use and related cognitions. The results have the potential to inform preventative interventions while addressing NIH priorities.

02

Conditions studied

  • Feedback, Psychological
  • Underage Alcohol Use
  • Risk-Taking
03

In context

Underage Drinking

44 studies on the registry are indexed under Underage Drinking; 13 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 306 is below the median of 360 across 43 interventional studies indexed under Underage Drinking.

Browse Underage Drinking studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Washington is the lead sponsor of 1,433 studies on the registry; 225 are open to participants now.

Of its 158 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 136 (86%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
15 Years to 20 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Must be between 15 and 20 years old
  • Must reside within Seattle area
  • Must use alcohol at least once in the last 6 months
  • Must have valid email address
  • Must have active profile on social networking site (Facebook, Instagram and/or Snapchat)
  • Regular access to the web or personal mobile phone
  • Willing to come to office for the experimental manipulation and post-manipulation assessment.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The only exclusion criteria is not to not meet the above inclusion criteria
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
306 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Abstainer

    Participants view social networking site profiles with alcohol content that references abstaining from alcohol use.

    Behavioral: Abstainer

  • Experimental
    Abstainer + User

    Participants view social networking site profiles with alcohol content that references both abstaining from alcohol use and using alcohol.

    Behavioral: Abstainer + User

  • Experimental
    Control

    Participants view social networking site profiles with no alcohol content.

    Behavioral: Control

Interventions

  • BehavioralAbstainer

    Participants view social networking site profiles with alcohol content referencing abstaining from alcohol use.

  • BehavioralAbstainer + User

    Participants view social networking site profiles with alcohol content referencing abstaining from alcohol use and using alcohol.

  • BehavioralControl

    Participants view social networking site profiles with no alcohol content.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Willingness and Intentions to Use Alcohol

    Assesses willingness to use alcohol and intentions to use alcohol at Baseline, Post-Manipulation, and 1-Month Follow-Up assessments.

    Time frame: Baseline, Post-Manipulation and 1-Month Follow-Up time points

  2. Change in Self-Reported Alcohol Use

    Assesses self-reported alcohol use (using the Daily Drinking Questionnaire and Quantity Frequency measures) at Baseline and 1-Month Follow-Up assessments.

    Time frame: Baseline and 1-Month Follow-Up time points

  3. Change in Alcohol-Related Negative Consequences

    Assesses alcohol-related negative consequences (using the Young Adult Alcohol Consequences Questionnaire) at Baseline and 1-Month Follow Up.

    Time frame: Baseline and 1-Month Follow-Up time points

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Center for the Study of Health and Risk Behaviors
    Seattle, Washington 98105, United States
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — A select number of researchers will have access to unidentified participant data at the close of the study.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Mar 2017 to primary completion in Oct 2017, 6 months.

Of 34 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Underage Drinking, half reached primary completion within 24 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 13 and three quarters within 38. This study's 6 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 36 studies reached it within 24 months; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 38.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 16, 2017
First posted
May 18, 2017
StartActual
Mar 22, 2017
Primary completionActual
Oct 1, 2017
CompletionActual
Apr 30, 2018
Last update
Nov 21, 2019
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 21, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03159286
Collaborators
University of North Texas Health Science Center
Responsible party
Dana Litt (Affiliate Associate Professor, University of North Texas Health Science Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 18, 2017
Start date
Mar 22, 2017
Primary completion
Oct 1, 2017
Completion
Apr 30, 2018
Last update
Nov 21, 2019

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion