CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT03150784EPIC2Updated May 30, 2018

Rhythmic Motor Learning in Children With Developmental Coordination Disorders

An interventional study of EPIC Club in Developmental Coordination Disorder, sponsored by Oxford Brookes University. Status unknown at 5 sites in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 12 Years to 15 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-05-30.

Sponsored by Oxford Brookes University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Basic science

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified May 2018), so the status shown — last known as Active, not recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
87
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
12 Years to 15 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The importance of play and physical activity include many benefits on positively improving health and well-being, enhancing children's and young people's thinking and performance in school, improving their sleep and enabling confidence and skill building. However, some children find it hard to learn and perform motor skills, and are at risk of decreased participation in sports and physical activity and subsequently decreased physical fitness and overall health and well-being.

Previous studies from the research group have explored the impact and recovery following acute exercise at different intensities in children and adolescents with and without movement difficulties. Following this, a pathway promoting physical activity and engagement has been successfully established within schools for those with and without movement difficulties. Taking the previous studies further, we want to specifically focus on the children's performance and learning of a sporting skill, such as stepping, and the associated brain activity changes, using available high resolution imaging techniques. This will help us understand how these children perform and learn motor and sporting skills. Evidence obtained from imaging alongside measures of movement has helped the development of optimal therapeutic approaches for other conditions such as stroke and Parkinson's and will help us to develop approaches to help children best learn motor skills and hence gain confidence in performing sporting activities.

Read the detailed description

Children with poor motor skill acquisition and execution despite having opportunity for learning, are now described as having developmental coordination disorder (DCD). There is a prevalence of 5-6% of young people who have normal intelligence who meet this category who have problems affecting their activities of daily living (ADL's). Young people with lower motor skills are one of a number of conditions affecting children identified by the Chief Medical Officer as requiring an improved evidence base for management. Poor motor skill acquisition and execution, whereby skills remain substantially lower than expected despite opportunities for learning; interferes with participation in academic, sporting and leisure activities. Motor performance is slower and of poor quality; and children may have difficulties learning all kinds of motor skills including sporting activities. Importantly people with poor motor skill acquisition and execution can fail to establish the fundamental movement skills and literacy required to integrate in physical pursuits, such as sport, and become exposed to long-term conditions associated with inactivity. Motor sporting skills can be learnt if trained, but difficulties in performing and learning skills persist into adulthood.

Brain imaging during rhythmic motor tasks which are essential in day-to-day (non-)sporting activities, have established that children with poor motor skill acquisition and execution show differences to healthy controls in grey and white matter functional connectivity and in cortical activation patterns during performance of simple movement tasks . Provisional evidence suggests that individuals with poor motor skill acquisition and execution utilise activation processes when learning motor tasks that are more controlled and require extra processing demands, but a systematic review of neural correlates of those with poor motor skill acquisition and execution concludes that data is scarce and more studies are needed. Performance of motor tasks requires a balance between automatic and controlled processes that is dependent upon the demands of the task and the capabilities of the individual. Young people need to be able to consider their environment when performing a sport rather than just thinking about the skill, so that they can work out where the best place to kick a ball on a football pitch is, not just kick the ball. Typically developing (TDC) children acquire motor skills either implicitly or explicitly by observing and imitating other children and adults or by trial and error. Acquisition of motor tasks requires plasticity in the nervous system with improvements in motor performance underpinned by a move from cortically controlled mechanism, towards more automatic performance, freeing up cortical resources. The ability to automate certain parts of motor skills allows the execution of tasks in more complex environments. Provisional evidence suggests that people with poor motor skill acquisition and execution may learn motor skills in a more controlled manner and have a reduced ability to move automatically. To date no studies have explored the brain changes underpinning fundamental motor skills attainment over a training period in people with poor motor skill acquisition and execution.

The main aim contribute evidence towards describing motor performance in relation to brain structure and functioning in children with lower motor skills and DCD,. This study proposes to test both the feasibility and determine the extent of the impact of learning a novel coordination task on motor performance and brain structure and functioning in children with DCD to inform a full-scale trial of skill acquisition.

02

Conditions studied

  • Developmental Coordination Disorder

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Motor Learning
  • Coordination
  • Children
  • Motor Skills Disorders
  • Movement
03

In context

Motor Skills Disorders

94 studies on the registry are indexed under Motor Skills Disorders; 24 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 87 is above the median of 40 across 67 interventional studies indexed under Motor Skills Disorders.

Browse Motor Skills Disorders studies →

Lead sponsor

Oxford Brookes University is the lead sponsor of 32 studies on the registry; 5 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
12 Years to 15 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • 12-15 years old children (year 9 students only) with normal intelligence in the lowest quartile of fitness (30 with poor motor skill acquisition and performance affecting daily functioning, 30 who score in the lower 25% of fitness measures without poor motor skill acquisition and execution).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Behavioural/intellectual issues that prevent safe participation or may put the participant, investigators and others at risk.
  • Any contraindications to perform maximal exercise or physical training, as determined by the Physical Activity Health Questionnaire PARQ sent out to parents before screening.
  • Children suffering from muscular/neurological degenerative conditions or with uncontrolled epilepsy/seizures (must be stable epilepsy/on medication for greater than 12 weeks).
  • Surgical procedures in the previous 6 months.
  • If there are any concerns regarding a child being able to participate safely, we will ask parents/guardians to contact the GP/paediatrician/physiotherapist.
  • MRI Scanner: children with metal objects due to surgery or dental care cannot partake in the scanning part of the research.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
87 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Motor coordination difficulties

    Type: Experimental main EPIC club: 60min session / 2 times weekly / 7 weeks

    Other: EPIC Club

  • Other
    Non motor coordination difficulties

    Type: Experimental comparator EPIC club: 60min session / 2 times weekly / 7 weeks

    Other: EPIC Club

Interventions

  • OtherEPIC Club

    Weekly exercise gym sessions. Participants will start with a warm-up of 20-25 mins cardiovascular training either doing cycling, treadmill running or cross-training. The remainder of the session consists of strength/resistance and weight-training involving leg press, leg extensor, pull downs, kettle bells, dumbbells. In addition to the above, a novel rhythmical stepping task will be performed over 10 mins.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Novel Stepping Task (assessing change over time)

    Rhythmic stepping task measuring coordination

    Time frame: Baseline - change from baseline 6-7 weeks - change from baseline 12 weeks

  2. Functional Near-Infra red Spectroscopy (FNIRs) (assessing change over time)

    Monitoring haemodynamic change of the cortex

    Time frame: Baseline - change from baseline 6-7 weeks - change from baseline 12 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Physical Activity Audit (PAQ-A) (assessing change over time)

    Questionnaire

    Time frame: Baseline - change from baseline 6-7 weeks - change from baseline 12 weeks

  2. Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (FMRI) (assessing change over time)

    Monitoring change in brain activity

    Time frame: Baseline - change from baseline 6-7 weeks

  3. Movement Assessment Battery for Children 2

    Measuring Motor Coordination

    Time frame: Baseline

  4. Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU)

    Accelerometry Gait Analysis

    Time frame: Baseline - change from baseline 6-7 weeks - change from baseline 12 weeks

  5. Child Health Utility Questionnaire 9D (assessing change over time)

    Questionnaire

    Time frame: Baseline - change from baseline 6-7 weeks - change from baseline 12 weeks

  6. Harter's Self-Perception Profile for children (assessing change over time)

    Questionnaire

    Time frame: Baseline - change from baseline 6-7 weeks - change from baseline 12 weeks

  7. Axivity AX3 Accelerometer

    7 Day physical activity measurement

    Time frame: Baseline - change from baseline 6-7 weeks - change from baseline 12 weeks

07

Study locations

5 sites
  • Cherwell School
    Oxford, Oxon OX2 7EE, United Kingdom
  • Clinical Exercise Rehabilitation Unit
    Oxford, Oxon OX3 0BP, United Kingdom
  • Oxford Brookes University
    Oxford, Oxon OX3 0BP, United Kingdom
  • Cheney School
    Oxford, Oxon OX3 7QH, United Kingdom
  • Wheatley Park School
    Oxford, Oxon OX33 1QH, United Kingdom
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — As per ethical outline, data will not be stored in a shared repository. All data will be stored in an anonymised format on site. Data access requests should be made to the principle investigator in writing which will be discussed in the data monitoring committee meetings.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 30, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03150784
Lead sponsor
Oxford Brookes University
Collaborators
University of Oxford, National University of Ireland, Maynooth
Responsible party
Helen Dawes (Professor, Movement Science Group, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford Brookes University) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 12, 2017
Start date
Oct 2016
Primary completion
Aug 2018 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 2018 (estimated)
Last update
May 30, 2018

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in May 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion