ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT06551493Updated Aug 8, 2025

Postnatal Perineal Wound Assessment

An observational study in Perineum; Wound, sponsored by Oxford Brookes University. Recruiting at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 100 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-08-08.

Sponsored by Oxford Brookes University · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Aug 2025, 1 year 3 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Nov 2024; still recruiting 1 year 11 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
20
Ages
18 Years to 100 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Around 85% of women who give birth vaginally experience a perineal wound, which could be a tear or an incision between the vaginal opening and the anus. Despite that, there is often insufficient exploration of how postnatal perineal wound assessment is conducted in healthcare research.

Clinical guidelines from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) touch on the typical signs of wound infection but do not offer detailed guidance on the execution of perineal assessment. Existing research evidence is mostly focused on long-term complications, management of perineal trauma immediately after birth or severe perineal trauma. The limited research on perineal wound care highlights how poor communication and information provision harm women at a physical and psychological level, negatively affecting daily tasks such as caring for their newborns.

Although there have been few studies examining women's or midwives' perspectives on perineal wound assessment in the context of uncomplicated wounds, their perspectives have never been jointly investigated to produce a comprehensive overview. Moreover, no research has had a clinical focus, investigating how the assessment is conducted in practice and what informs this practice, except from women's reports of perceived sub-standard care received.

Therefore, this proposed research is clinically grounded and aims to explore women's and midwives' perspectives on postnatal perineal wound assessment. This is needed to identify evidence-based practices, or lack thereof, in order to determine ways in which the experience can be improved for women and to have a more positive impact on their wellbeing.

Eight to ten pairs of midwives-women will be first observed whilst the routine assessment is conducted to understand what happens during this episode of care, and then they will be separately interviewed within a few days to gather further understanding. Recruitment will be in a single centre, which is a tertiary unit in the UK.

02

Conditions studied

  • Perineum; Wound

Browse trials for

03

In context

Wounds and Injuries

2,217 studies on the registry are indexed under Wounds and Injuries; 441 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 20 is below the median of 169 across 690 observational studies indexed under Wounds and Injuries.

Browse Wounds and Injuries studies →

Lead sponsor

Oxford Brookes University is the lead sponsor of 35 studies on the registry; 6 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 100 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Midwives and postnatal women

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Midwives:

  • NMC Registered midwives
  • Working in the NHS
  • Working in the community or postnatal ward
  • Who assess perineal wounds

Women:

  • Postnatal women who had a vaginal birth within the last ten days and had an uncomplicated perineal tear (first, second-degree or episiotomy).
  • Had a healthy newborn (for example, the newborn is not currently admitted to newborn intensive care or the woman did not have a stillbirth)
  • Located in the community or in hospital being cared for by midwives, within ten days postpartum when postnatal perineal wound assessment occurs.
  • Over the age of 18, who can consent to participation
  • English-speaking

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Midwives:

  • Non-registered midwives and those working outside the NHS
  • Who do not perform postnatal perineal wound assessment due to clinical settings or task restrictions.

Women:

  • Who had a cesarean section
  • Who had a stillbirth or fetal/neonatal complications
  • Who had a vaginal birth but sustained severe perineal tears (third or fourth-degree tears)
  • Who have not received NHS care or are outside standard postnatal locations
  • Who are over 10 days postpartum at the time of perineal wound assessment
  • Who are below the age of 18
  • Non-English-speaking women
05

Study design

Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
20 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Postnatal women

    Other: Observation of postnatal wound assessment · Other: Interview

  • Registered midwives

    Other: Observation of postnatal wound assessment · Other: Interview

Interventions

  • OtherObservation of postnatal wound assessment

    Observation of postnatal wound assessment

  • OtherInterview

    Interview to elicit individual perspectives of wound assessment

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Survey. How midwives conduct postnatal perineal wound assessment step-by-step.

    Time frame: 10 days postnatal

  2. Survey women's experiences of postnatal perineal wound assessment, i.e. emotional or physical discomfort.

    Time frame: 10 days postnatal

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 8, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06551493
Lead sponsor
Oxford Brookes University
Responsible party
Giada Giusmin (Senior Lecturer in Midwifery, Oxford Brookes University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 13, 2024
Start date
Nov 20, 2024
Primary completion
Aug 2025 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 8, 2025

Study contacts

Giada Giusmin
Contact
ggiusmin@brookes.ac.uk
01865603166

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion