CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03150173O-BMTUpdated Dec 11, 2025Results posted

Onsite Buprenorphine Treatment at Syringe Exchange Programs

A Phase 2 interventional study of Onsite treatment and Enhanced referral in Opiate Addiction, sponsored by Montefiore Medical Center. Completed at 3 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-12-11.

Sponsored by Montefiore Medical Center · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
97
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This trial will recruit syringe exchange participants with opioid use disorder in New York City and test whether starting buprenorphine treatment at the syringe exchange program is more effective than referral to a community health center for buprenorphine treatment.

Read the detailed description

In a 24 week randomized controlled trial based in a large urban area with high rates of opioid use disorder (OUD) and HIV, 250 out-of-treatment opioid users who utilize syringe exchanges will be recruited and randomize to receive an onsite treatment intervention (O-BMT) or enhanced referral to buprenorphine treatment. Over 2 weeks, participants in the O-BMT arm will see a buprenorphine provider twice, receive weekly blister packs of medication, and then their care will be transferred to a community health center for maintenance buprenorphine treatment. In the control arm, participants will receive enhanced referral to the community health center for maintenance buprenorphine treatment. Data collection will include urine drug tests, questionnaires, and medical and pharmacy record review. Key outcomes will include engagement in buprenorphine treatment, treatment outcomes, and programmatic costs. Buprenorphine diversion will be assessed by using electronic monitors that estimate medication adherence, testing urine samples for buprenorphine, and through sequential surveys regarding buying or selling illicit buprenorphine.

02

Conditions studied

  • Opiate Addiction

Keywords

  • opioid use disorder, syringe exchange, HIV risk reduction
03

In context

Opioid-Related Disorders

1,411 studies on the registry are indexed under Opioid-Related Disorders; 290 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 97 is above the median of 63 across 1,123 interventional studies indexed under Opioid-Related Disorders.

Browse Opioid-Related Disorders studies →

Lead sponsor

Montefiore Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 402 studies on the registry; 70 are open to participants now.

Of its 81 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 73 (90%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. age ≥ 18 years
  2. opioid use disorder
  3. interest in buprenorphine treatment
  4. motivation for opioid use disorder treatment
  5. willingness to accept community health center referral
  6. syringe exchange participant

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. receiving opioid agonist treatment in the past 30 days (confirmed by New York Prescription Drug Monitoring Program);
  2. inability to provide informed consent
  3. unstable mental illness (e.g., suicidality, psychosis, etc.)
  4. severe alcohol use disorder or benzodiazepine use disorder by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) criteria
  5. hypersensitivity to buprenorphine or naloxone.
  6. pregnancy (confirmed via urine testing)
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
97 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    O-BMT (onsite treatment)

    Over 2 weeks at the syringe-exchange program, participants in the O-BMT arm will see a buprenorphine provider twice, receive weekly blister packs of medication, and then their care will be transferred to a community health center for maintenance buprenorphine treatment

    Behavioral: Onsite treatment · Drug: Buprenorphine

  • Active comparator
    Enhanced Referral

    In the control arm, participants will receive enhanced referral to a community health center for maintenance buprenorphine treatment

    Behavioral: Enhanced referral · Drug: Buprenorphine

Interventions

  • BehavioralOnsite treatment

    Participants will see a buprenorphine treatment provider who will assess for clinical criteria for opioid use disorder and write a prescription for buprenorphine treatment, which will be filled in a community pharmacy.

  • BehavioralEnhanced referral

    Participants will receive an expedited appointment at a community health center for evaluation for buprenorphine treatment

  • DrugBuprenorphine

    all participants will receive buprenorphine

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Buprenorphine Engagement

    Buprenorphine engagement was defined as the number of participants having an active buprenorphine prescription at 30 days after randomization. Responses were tallied using a dichotomous (i.e., Yes/No) measure. Data are summarized by study arm.

    Time frame: 30 days after randomization

Secondary outcomes

  1. Treatment Retention

    Treatment retention was assessed by the number/percentage of participants who had a medical visit AND active buprenorphine prescription each month after buprenorphine initiation for 6 months. Results are summarized by study arm.

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. HIV Risk Behaviors

    Change in HIV risk behaviors will be assessed using the HIV risk behavior survey. This survey, consisting of a dichotomous (yes/no) measure of injection risk, will be used based on self-report of at least one risk behavior (sharing syringes, not using bleach to clean syringes, sharing cookers, or front/back loading of syringes) reported during the interval. The number of participants demonstrating at least one risk behavior is during the 6 month interval is summarized by study arm.

    Time frame: 6 months

  3. Buprenorphine Diversion

    Buprenorphine diversion will be defined as having at least one problem behavior: non-adherence to prescribed medication on electronic monitoring, self-reported diversion, or a urine sample consistent with diversion during the 6 month interval. This outcome measure is used to determine how many participants sell or give away prescribed medication. The number of participants with at least one problem behavior is summarized by study arm.

    Time frame: 6 months

  4. Incremental Cost-effectiveness Ratio (ICER)

    The ICER will be calculated by dividing the incremental mean cost of the O-BMT arm relative to the control arm by the incremental mean effectiveness of the O-BMT arm relative to the control arm. The primary economic effectiveness outcome will be the quality-adjusted life-year (QALY), a measure that incorporates both duration and health-related quality-of-life and is recommended as the primary economic effectiveness measure. ICER is a composite measure that incorporates QALYs (also reported as a separate outcome measure) and mean costs (also reported as a separate outcome measure).

    Time frame: 6 months

  5. Quality-adjusted Life-years (QALYs) Gained

    The main economic effectiveness outcome will be the quality-adjusted life-year (QALY), a measure that incorporates both duration and health-related quality-of-life and is recommended as the primary economic effectiveness measure. Mean years gained are summarized by study arm.

    Time frame: 6 months

  6. Mean Difference in Total Costs

    Mean cost (in US dollars) of the O-BMT arm were compared to the control arm. The resource utilization and resulting cost of implementing and administering the O-BMT intervention were estimated using microcosting analysis and participant self-report. Mean costs (in US dollars) are summarized by study arm.

    Time frame: 6 months

  7. Time to First Buprenorphine Prescription

    Time to first buprenorphine prescription is defined as the amount of time, in days, from when a participant enrolled in the study to receipt of first buprenorphine prescription. Results are summarized by study arm using basic descriptive statistics.

    Time frame: 1 month

  8. Number/Percentage of Participants Who Received Any Buprenorphine Prescription

    The Number/percentage of participants who received any buprenorphine prescription is defined as the number/percentage of participants that filled at least one prescription for buprenorphine while enrolled in the study. Results are summarized by study arm.

    Time frame: 6 months

  9. Total Time Prescribed Buprenorphine

    Total time prescribed buprenorphine is defined as the amount of time in days that participants were prescribed buprenorphine during the study period. Results are summarized by study arm using basic descriptive statistics.

    Time frame: 6 months

07

Results

Posted Jan 14, 2025

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneO-BMT (Onsite Treatment)Enhanced Referral
Started4849
Completed3544
Not completed135
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up135

Outcome measures

PrimaryBuprenorphine Engagement

Buprenorphine engagement was defined as the number of participants having an active buprenorphine prescription at 30 days after randomization. Responses were tallied using a dichotomous (i.e., Yes/No) measure. Data are summarized by study arm.

Time frame:
30 days after randomization
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Buprenorphine Engagement
ParticipantsO-BMT (Onsite Treatment)Enhanced Referral
Buprenorphine Engagement1919
Statistical analysis
  • O-BMT (Onsite Treatment) vs Enhanced Referral · Chi-squared · p = 0.94
SecondaryTreatment Retention

Treatment retention was assessed by the number/percentage of participants who had a medical visit AND active buprenorphine prescription each month after buprenorphine initiation for 6 months. Results are summarized by study arm.

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Treatment Retention
ParticipantsO-BMT (Onsite Treatment)Enhanced Referral
Treatment Retention26
Statistical analysis
  • O-BMT (Onsite Treatment) vs Enhanced Referral · Chi-squared · p = 0.148
SecondaryHIV Risk Behaviors

Change in HIV risk behaviors will be assessed using the HIV risk behavior survey. This survey, consisting of a dichotomous (yes/no) measure of injection risk, will be used based on self-report of at least one risk behavior (sharing syringes, not using bleach to clean syringes, sharing cookers, or front/back loading of syringes) reported during the interval. The number of participants demonstrating at least one risk behavior is during the 6 month interval is summarized by study arm.

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
HIV Risk Behaviors
ParticipantsO-BMT (Onsite Treatment)Enhanced Referral
HIV Risk Behaviors54
Statistical analysis
  • O-BMT (Onsite Treatment) vs Enhanced Referral · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.6132 · Odds ratio (or): 1.445 · 95% CI 0.347 to 6.018Adjustment for baseline self-report of injection-related HIV risk behaviors in the past 30 days
SecondaryBuprenorphine Diversion

Buprenorphine diversion will be defined as having at least one problem behavior: non-adherence to prescribed medication on electronic monitoring, self-reported diversion, or a urine sample consistent with diversion during the 6 month interval. This outcome measure is used to determine how many participants sell or give away prescribed medication. The number of participants with at least one problem behavior is summarized by study arm.

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Buprenorphine Diversion
ParticipantsO-BMT (Onsite Treatment)Enhanced Referral
Buprenorphine Diversion82
Statistical analysis
  • O-BMT (Onsite Treatment) vs Enhanced Referral · Fisher Exact · p = .051
SecondaryIncremental Cost-effectiveness Ratio (ICER)

The ICER will be calculated by dividing the incremental mean cost of the O-BMT arm relative to the control arm by the incremental mean effectiveness of the O-BMT arm relative to the control arm. The primary economic effectiveness outcome will be the quality-adjusted life-year (QALY), a measure that incorporates both duration and health-related quality-of-life and is recommended as the primary economic effectiveness measure. ICER is a composite measure that incorporates QALYs (also reported as a separate outcome measure) and mean costs (also reported as a separate outcome measure).

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Number · Ratio (US dollars/QALY)
Incremental Cost-effectiveness Ratio (ICER)
Ratio (US dollars/QALY)O-BMT vs. Enhanced Referral
Incremental Cost-effectiveness Ratio (ICER)-805067
Statistical analysis
  • O-BMT vs. Enhanced Referral · Probability of cost effectiveness: 0.94
SecondaryQuality-adjusted Life-years (QALYs) Gained

The main economic effectiveness outcome will be the quality-adjusted life-year (QALY), a measure that incorporates both duration and health-related quality-of-life and is recommended as the primary economic effectiveness measure. Mean years gained are summarized by study arm.

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Mean · years gained
Quality-adjusted Life-years (QALYs) Gained
years gainedO-BMT (Onsite Treatment)Enhanced Referral
Quality-adjusted Life-years (QALYs) Gained0.20 (0.18 to 0.21)0.17 (0.15 to 0.19)
Statistical analysis
  • O-BMT (Onsite Treatment) vs Enhanced Referral · non-parametric bootstrapping · p = 0.10 (This is an actual calculated value not a threshold value)Non-parametric bootstrapping of adjusted mean values with 1000 iterations
SecondaryMean Difference in Total Costs

Mean cost (in US dollars) of the O-BMT arm were compared to the control arm. The resource utilization and resulting cost of implementing and administering the O-BMT intervention were estimated using microcosting analysis and participant self-report. Mean costs (in US dollars) are summarized by study arm.

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Least squares mean · US Dollars
Mean Difference in Total Costs
US DollarsO-BMT (Onsite Treatment)Enhanced Referral
Mean Difference in Total Costs2702.43 (1280.77 to 6825.75)26853.97 (7001.37 to 146995.55)
Statistical analysis
  • O-BMT (Onsite Treatment) vs Enhanced Referral · non-parametric bootstrapping · p = < 0.01 (This is an actual calculated value not a threshold value.)Non-parametric bootstrapping of adjusted mean values with 1000 iterations
SecondaryTime to First Buprenorphine Prescription

Time to first buprenorphine prescription is defined as the amount of time, in days, from when a participant enrolled in the study to receipt of first buprenorphine prescription. Results are summarized by study arm using basic descriptive statistics.

Time frame:
1 month
Reported as:
Mean · days
Time to First Buprenorphine Prescription
daysO-BMT (Onsite Treatment)Enhanced Referral
Time to First Buprenorphine Prescription3.0 ± 4.614.0 ± 20.9
Statistical analysis
  • O-BMT (Onsite Treatment) vs Enhanced Referral · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.011
SecondaryNumber/Percentage of Participants Who Received Any Buprenorphine Prescription

The Number/percentage of participants who received any buprenorphine prescription is defined as the number/percentage of participants that filled at least one prescription for buprenorphine while enrolled in the study. Results are summarized by study arm.

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number/Percentage of Participants Who Received Any Buprenorphine Prescription
ParticipantsO-BMT (Onsite Treatment)Enhanced Referral
Number/Percentage of Participants Who Received Any Buprenorphine Prescription3629
Statistical analysis
  • O-BMT (Onsite Treatment) vs Enhanced Referral · Chi-squared · p = 0.098
SecondaryTotal Time Prescribed Buprenorphine

Total time prescribed buprenorphine is defined as the amount of time in days that participants were prescribed buprenorphine during the study period. Results are summarized by study arm using basic descriptive statistics.

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Mean · days
Total Time Prescribed Buprenorphine
daysO-BMT (Onsite Treatment)Enhanced Referral
Total Time Prescribed Buprenorphine46.7 ± 32.956.6 ± 34.8
Statistical analysis
  • O-BMT (Onsite Treatment) vs Enhanced Referral · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.256
Post-hocBuprenorphine Adherence (Self-reported)

Buprenorphine Adherence (self-reported), defined as meeting the primary outcome of buprenorphine engagement and self-reporting buprenorphine use at 30 days, was assessed as a composite measure for sensitivity analysis. The number of participants who both maintained an active buprenorphine prescription at 30 days after randomization, based on a dichotomous (i.e., Yes/No) measure, AND self-reported having taken buprenorphine on 1 or more days during the 30-day period were tabulated. Data are summarized by study arm.

Time frame:
30 days after randomization
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Buprenorphine Adherence (Self-reported)
ParticipantsO-BMT (Onsite Treatment)Enhanced Referral
Buprenorphine Adherence (Self-reported)1313
Post-hocBuprenorphine Adherence (Confirmed)

Buprenorphine Adherence (confirmed) was defined as meeting the primary outcome and having a urine drug screen positive for buprenorphine at 30 days. This outcome was assessed as a composite measure for sensitivity analysis. The number of participants who both maintained an active buprenorphine prescription at 30 days after randomization, based on a dichotomous (i.e., Yes/No) measure, AND tested positive for Buprenorphine in their urine sample following the 30-day period were tabulated. Data are summarized by study arm.

Time frame:
30 days after randomization
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Buprenorphine Adherence (Confirmed)
ParticipantsO-BMT (Onsite Treatment)Enhanced Referral
Buprenorphine Adherence (Confirmed)58

Adverse events

Collected over 24 weeks. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
O-BMT (Onsite Treatment)0/48 (0%)1/48 (2.1%)2/48 (4.2%)
Enhanced Referral0/49 (0%)2/49 (4.1%)1/49 (2%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventO-BMT (Onsite Treatment)Enhanced Referral
Skin Infection (Abscess)Infections and infestations1/480/49
Opioid OverdoseInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/481/49
Skin Infection (Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus)Infections and infestations0/481/49
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventO-BMT (Onsite Treatment)Enhanced Referral
Asthma AttackRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/481/49
Endometriosis painInfections and infestations1/480/49
Transportation AccidentInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/481/49

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)O-BMT (Onsite Treatment)Enhanced ReferralTotal
Mean40.6 ± 9.943.3 ± 11.342.0 ± 10.6
Sex/Gender, Customized
Sex/Gender, Customized(Participants)O-BMT (Onsite Treatment)Enhanced ReferralTotal
Male383876
Female91019
Transgender011
Refuse to answer101
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)O-BMT (Onsite Treatment)Enhanced ReferralTotal
Hispanic Black12416
Hispanic White549
Hispanic Other131427
Non-Hispanic Black61016
Non-Hispanic White111324
Non-Hispanic Other145
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)O-BMT (Onsite Treatment)Enhanced ReferralTotal
United States484997
Mental Health Condition
Mental Health Condition(Participants)O-BMT (Onsite Treatment)Enhanced ReferralTotal
Count of participants222244
Intravenous Drug Use
Intravenous Drug Use(Participants)O-BMT (Onsite Treatment)Enhanced ReferralTotal
Count of participants283361
Buprenorphine Use
Buprenorphine Use(Participants)O-BMT (Onsite Treatment)Enhanced ReferralTotal
Count of participants191635
Opioid Use Disorder (OUD) Criteria
Opioid Use Disorder (OUD) Criteria(criteria)O-BMT (Onsite Treatment)Enhanced ReferralTotal
Mean10.5 ± 2.110.8 ± 2.210.7 ± 2.2

7 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

3 sites
  • Washington Heights CORNER Project
    New York, New York 10033, United States
  • New York Harm Reduction Educators
    New York, New York 10035, United States
  • BOOM!Health Harm Reduction Center
    The Bronx, New York 10451, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Perez-Correa A, Abbas B, Riback L, Ghiroli M, Norton B, Murphy S, Jakubowski A, Hayes BT, Cunningham CO, Fox AD. Onsite buprenorphine inductions at harm reduction agencies to increase treatment engagement and reduce HIV risk: Design and rationale. Contemp Clin Trials. 2022 Mar;114:106674. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2021.106674. Epub 2022 Jan 3. PubMed 34990854 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Jul 6, 2020
  • Informed consent form · Apr 10, 2024

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 11, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03150173
Lead sponsor
Montefiore Medical Center
Collaborators
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 12, 2017
Start date
Jan 2, 2019
Primary completion
Oct 11, 2023
Completion
Mar 31, 2024
Results posted
Jan 14, 2025
Last update
Dec 11, 2025

Study contacts

Aaron Fox, MD, MS
principal investigator · Associate Professor of Medicine

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion