An interventional study of Scannographic evaluation of the tumor response performed with mRECIST criteria after 3 months of treatment with sorafenib in Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Perfusion Scanner, sponsored by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Amiens. Completed at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-07-20.
Sponsored by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Amiens · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a hypervascular tumor. The reference treatment of advanced forms of stage C according to the Barcelona classification (BCLC C) is sorafenib, a multi-target tyrosine kinase inhibitor with predominant anti-angiogenic action. In order not to underestimate the efficacy of sorafenib, scannographic evaluation of the tumor response should be performed with mRECIST criteria that are significantly better correlated with survival. These criteria take into account the tumor size and also the modification of the tumor contrast enhancement after anti-angiogenic treatment. It seems appropriate to evaluate tumor control rather than tumor response since sorafenib is more stable than tumor response.
This evaluation will be made according to the mRECIST criteria after 3 months of treatment since the progression-free survival is of the order of 3 to 4 months. The determination of early predictive criteria for the response to sorafenib would optimize the management of advanced HCCs. Indeed, sorafenib only improves overall survival by 3 months in selected patients, and with undesirable effects and a significant cost. Predictive biological criteria have already been studied, such as alpha foeto-protein (AFP), whose early decrease with sorafenib is associated with better overall survival. The same applies to the early reduction at 4-6 weeks of tumor arterial contrast according to mRECIST criteria. The perfusion scanner appears to be an accessible and reproducible choice imaging technique for assessing tumor vasculature. In metastatic kidney cancers, it was demonstrated that some criteria for tumor perfusion prior to treatment with sorafenib were predictive of better control of the disease and even a better tumor response according to the RECIST 1.1 criteria. The determination of pre-therapeutic tumor perfusion criteria in order to predict tumor control or even overall survival has never been studied in advanced CHCs. On the other hand, an early variation in the criteria for tumor perfusion under treatment would tend to be correlated with the tumor response and even with overall progression-free survival.
Therefore, the study of tumor vascularization by the perfusion scanner could make it possible to demonstrate early predictive criteria for tumor control under sorafenib in order to optimize the management of patients with advanced HCC.
6,741 studies on the registry are indexed under Carcinoma; 1,161 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 2 is below the median of 45 across 5,170 interventional studies indexed under Carcinoma.
Browse Carcinoma studies →Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Amiens is the lead sponsor of 576 studies on the registry; 178 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Hepatocellular carcinoma:
Indication of treatment by sorafenib after validation in a multidisciplinary consultation meeting:
Exclusion Criteria:
Other: Scannographic evaluation of the tumor response performed with mRECIST criteria after 3 months of treatment with sorafenib
To evaluate the association between tumor perfusion criteria (blood flow, blood volume, mean transit time, capillary permeability) at the initial perfusion scan and tumor control according to the mRECIST criteria after 3 months of treatment with sorafenib.
Scannographic evaluation of tumor response with mRECIST criteria
Time frame: 1 year
This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Amiens