CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT03126903Updated Dec 10, 2019

A Clinical Study to Evaluate the KeraKlear Keratoprosthesis in Patients With Corneal Opacity

An interventional study of KeraKlear Non-Penetrating Keratoprosthesis in Corneal Blindness, sponsored by KeraMed, Inc.. Terminated at 4 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 22 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-12-10.

Sponsored by KeraMed, Inc. · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
KeraMed is being discontinued because it is no longer feasible due to the slow pace of recruitment and insufficient financial resources.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
11
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
22 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

To evaluate the safety and probable benefit of the KeraKlear Non-Penetrating Keratoprosthesis when implanted in an eye with corneal opacity that is at high risk of complications with PK.

Read the detailed description

To evaluate the safety and probable benefit of the KeraKlear Non-Penetrating Keratoprosthesis when implanted in an eye with corneal opacity that is at high risk of complications with PK. A prospective, multicenter, clinical trial, designed to demonstrate the safety and performance of the KeraKlear Non-Penetrating Keratoprosthesis.

02

Conditions studied

  • Corneal Blindness
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
22 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Corneal blindness where cornea transplantation is necessary but with a high risk of graft failure due to

    1. severe limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD) associated with aniridia or
    2. one full-thickness graft failure and at high risk of a failed second graft; specifically, those who have either young recipient age (age less than 40 years), a history of anterior segment surgery (in addition to prior PKP), and/or pre-operative glaucoma or
    3. multiple (two or more) failed cornea transplantation surgeries and spontaneous visual improvement without surgical intervention is not expected or probable.
  • Best Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (Snellen) which is equal or worse than 20/200 in the study eye (but at least light perception with projection)
  • Estimated visual potential of the study eye is greater than or equal to at least two lines visual improvement of BCDVA of current vision in the study eye.
  • Patient and/or caregiver willing and able to insert and remove bandage contact lens.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Visual Acuity of No Light Perception (NLP) in the study eye
  • The patient is monocular or the non-study eye has Best Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (Snellen) of worse than 20/160 due to an ocular condition other than severe aniridic limbal stem cell deficiency or failed cornea transplantation surgery(ies).
  • Suitable for standard PK with donor tissue in the study eye.
  • History of severe dry eye syndrome or a Schirmer test with results of less than 3mm after 5 minutes of testing with the use of topical anesthetic in either eye.
  • Active or history of an auto-immune disease (e.g. Rheumatoid Arthritis, Ocular Cicatricial Pemphigoid, Lupus, Steven's Johnson Syndrome, atopic keratoconjunctivitis, etc.).
  • On medications that may affect wound healing, such as antimetabolites or other chemotherapeutic agents.
  • History of posterior segment eye disease in either eye (including macular degeneration, optic neuropathy, posterior uveitis) which is expected to limit the visual improvement to less than two lines of vision.
  • History of retinal surgery in the fellow eye (including retinal detachment repair, intravitreal injection etc.).
  • History of retinal surgery in the study eye (including retinal detachment repair, intravitreal injection, etc.) unless the vision is at least light perception with projection in four field quadrants and the macula is attached (if there is no view of the retina, an ultrasound must show the macula is attached).
  • History of uncontrolled glaucoma in either eye (IOP has been measured above 25 mmHg at any time in the last 6 months).
  • Current use of beta blocker eye drops (e.g. timolol, levobunolol, etc.).
  • Vertical cup-to-disc (C:D) ratio greater than or equal to 0.8 in either eye (if able to visible through corneal opacity). If not visible, patient is not to be excluded.
  • Limited visual potential (patient does not have the ability to improve a minimum of two lines of vision of BCDVA by history).
  • History of amblyopia in the study eye limiting visual potential.
  • If the patient has had a corneal transplant, corneal transplantation surgery was performed less than 2 years ago.
  • Anticipated need for surgery on the study eye during the course of the study (including cataract surgery).
  • Aphakia in the study eye.
  • Active ocular infection in either eye.
  • Hypotony in the study eye (IOP \< 6mmHg).
  • History of herpetic ocular infection in the study eye.
  • Corneal thickness less than 400 microns in any region of the pachymetry map, i.e.

lamellar resection depth would be \<100 microns from corneal endothelium accounting for the optic height of the selected implant design (i.e. 300 microns for KeraKlear or 500 microns for KeraKlear XT model).*.

  • Inability to protect the operated eye from trauma.
  • Females who are pregnant, lactating, or unwilling to use adequate birth control for t the duration of the study.
  • Patient is currently taking Sumatriptan (Imitrex) and unable to discontinue during the study.
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
11 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Single-Arm

    KeraKlear Non-Penetrating Keratoprosthesis

    Device: KeraKlear Non-Penetrating Keratoprosthesis

Interventions

  • DeviceKeraKlear Non-Penetrating Keratoprosthesis

    The KeraKlear is a flexible non-penetrating artificial cornea designed to be implanted through small corneal incisions in subjects with corneal opacity.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Improvement in BCDVA compared to baseline

    Best Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (BCDVA) will be measured in the study eye. An ETDRS visual acuity chart will be used to measure BCDVA at baseline, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3, Month 4, Month 6, Month 9, and Month 12.

    Time frame: Baseline, Month 1, Month 2, Month 3, Month 4, Month 6, Month 9 and Month 12

06

Study locations

4 sites
  • University of California Irvine
    Irvine, California 92697, United States
  • Cincinnati Eye Institute
    Edgewood, Kentucky 41017, United States
  • Massachussetts Eye and Ear Infirmary
    Boston, Massachusetts 02114, United States
  • Duke University School of Medicine - Dept. of Ophthalmology
    Durham, North Carolina 27710, United States
07

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03126903
Lead sponsor
KeraMed, Inc.
Collaborators
National Eye Institute (NEI), ClinReg Consulting Services, Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 25, 2017
Start date
Mar 22, 2018
Primary completion
Nov 30, 2019
Completion
Nov 30, 2019
Last update
Dec 10, 2019

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Dec 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion