CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03123731Updated Sep 19, 2024Results posted

iSTEP - an mHealth Physical Activity and Diet Intervention for Persons With HIV

An interventional study of Control Arm and iSTEP in HIV/AIDS, sponsored by University of California, San Diego. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-09-19.

Sponsored by University of California, San Diego · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

HIV is associated with a pattern of neurocognitive deficits, metabolic dysfunction, and an elevated risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD), phenomena that remain untreated despite the use of medications to control the disease. This proposal will examine the effect of a personalized, automated, interactive mobile phone text message intervention (iSTEP) designed to increase moderate physical activity (PA), decrease sedentary behavior (SB), and promote a healthy Mediterranean-style diet (MedDiet) in persons living with HIV (PLWH). The investigators propose that participants who receive the iSTEP intervention will increase the amount of physical activity, improve their diet, show a reduction in risk factors for CVD, and exhibit improved neurocognitive performance.

02

Conditions studied

  • HIV/AIDS

Keywords

  • physical activity
  • diet
  • mHealth
  • Fitbit
  • neurocognition
  • text messaging
03

In context

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome

2,040 studies on the registry are indexed under Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome; 272 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 100 is close to the median of 105 across 1,543 interventional studies indexed under Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome.

Browse Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

University of California, San Diego is the lead sponsor of 958 studies on the registry; 191 are open to participants now.

Of its 110 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 70 (64%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • ability to provide informed consent
  • HIV infection documented at the University of California, San Diego (UCSD) HIV Neurobehavioral Research Program (HNRP) or assessed by an HIV test at screening
  • proficient in English
  • physically capable of participating in moderate PA as screened by the Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire
  • consent from primary care physician to participate in the study
  • able to consume walnuts - no nut allergies

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • any physical conditions that would prevent moderate physical activity or where moderate physical activity would represent a health risk for the individual, including a history of myocardial infarction or stroke
  • unwillingness or inability to participate in daily text messaging
  • tree nut allergy that would prevent walnut consumption or other food restrictions that would prevent participation in the Mediterranean-style diet intervention (e.g., unable to eat fish or use olive oil for cooking).
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
100 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Control Arm

    Participants will wear a Fitbit but will not receive any additional elements of the iSTEP intervention.

    Behavioral: Control Arm

  • Experimental
    iSTEP PA intervention

    Participants will wear a Fitbit and receive interactive daily text messages that are designed to motivate moderate physical activity (PA) and reduce sedentary behavior, including setting weekly goals to increase average daily step counts.

    Behavioral: iSTEP

  • Experimental
    iSTEP PA and diet intervention

    Participants will wear a Fitbit and receive interactive daily text messages that are designed to motivate moderate physical activity (PA), reduce sedentary behavior, and promote adherence to a Mediterranean-style diet. Participants will also be administered diet counseling from a registered dietitian and receive weekly feedback on both physical activity and diet behaviors.

    Behavioral: iSTEP

Interventions

  • BehavioralControl Arm

    Wearing Physical Activity Monitor

  • BehavioraliSTEP

    Physical Activity Intervention

  • BehavioraliSTEP

    Physical Activity and Diet Intervention

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Physical Activity - Total Steps Recorded During 24 Weeks

    Total number of steps recorded by the Fitbit over 24 weeks. Zero is the minimum and there is no maximum. Higher scores (steps) indicates a better outcome.

    Time frame: 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Physical Activity - Change in Average Daily Steps Per Day Between Week 1 and Week 24

    This is the change in average daily steps comparing the beginning (Week 1) and end (Week 24) of the intervention. A higher number is a positive outcome, indicated an increase in steps during the study. A negative number is a worse outcome, indicating a decline in steps during the intervention. Zero is the minimum and there is no maximum.

    Time frame: 24 weeks

  2. Average Steps Per Day During the 24-week Intervention

    This measure reports the average daily steps per day during the entire intervention (over 24 weeks). A higher number of steps indicates greater physical activity and is a positive outcome. A lower number of daily steps indicates lower physical activity. Zero is the minimum and there is no maximum.

    Time frame: 24 weeks

  3. C-reactive Protein

    The change in C-reactive protein between baseline and the follow-up visit after the 24-week intervention. Higher numbers indicate that inflammation increased over time, a worse outcome. Lower numbers indicate less inflammation, a better outcome.

    Time frame: 24 weeks

  4. Change in Total Cholesterol.

    This measures the change in total plasma cholesterol between the baseline visit and the 24-week follow-up visit. A decrease in cholesterol is healthy, while an increase is unhealthy.

    Time frame: 24 weeks

  5. Level of GPLD1 (Phosphatidylinositol-glycan-specific Phospholipase D) Enzyme at the Baseline Visit

    This measures the plasma level of GPLD1 at the baseline study visit before the 24-week intervention. Higher levels are hypothesized to be positive and associated with better health and lower inflammation.The minimum level is zero and there is no maximum limit.

    Time frame: 1 day baseline visit

  6. Change in GPLD1 (Phosphatidylinositol-glycan-specific Phospholipase D) Enzyme Between the Baseline and 24-week Visit

    This measures the change in GPLD1 between the baseline and 24-week visit after the study intervention. An increase in GPLD1 is hypothesized to associate with health benefits, while a decrease is a negative outcome.

    Time frame: 24 weeks

  7. Association Between Physical Activity (PA) and GPLD1 (Phosphatidylinositol-glycan-specific Phospholipase d) at Baseline

    This measures the correlation (Pearson r) between GPLD1 (measured on one 1 day) and participant PA (assessed by average daily steps for 1 week) at the baseline before the 24-week intervention. A positive number indicates that higher GPLD1 was associated with greater PA. A negative number indicates that higher GPLD1 associates with lower PA. The minimum value is -1. The maximum value is +1.

    Time frame: 1 week

  8. Association Between the Change in Physical Activity (PA) and Change in GPLD1 (Phosphatidylinositol-glycan-specific Phospholipase d) Between the Baseline Visit and 24-week Visit After the Intervention

    This measures the correlation (Pearson r) between the change in GPLD1 across the baseline and 24-week visits and the change in PA (average daily steps) between the first week (Week 1) and last week (Week 24) of the study. A positive number indicates that an increase in GPLD1 associated with an increase in PA over time, a negative number indicates the opposite. The minimum value is -1. The maximum value is +1.

    Time frame: 24 weeks

  9. Association Between Cognitive Performance (Executive Function) and GPLD1 (Phosphatidylinositol-glycan-specific Phospholipase d) at the 24-week Visit After the Intervention

    This measures the correlation (Pearson r) between GPLD1 and executive function (measured by T score) at the 24-week visit after the intervention. A positive number indicates that higher GPLD1 associates with better executive function. A negative number indicates that higher GPLD1 associates with worse cognition (lower T score). The minimum value is -1. The maximum value is +1.

    Time frame: 1 day at the end of the 24-week intervention

  10. Association Between the Change in Inflammation (C-reactive Protein, or CRP) and Change in GPLD1 (Phosphatidylinositol-glycan-specific Phospholipase d) Between the Baseline and 24-week Visits.

    This measures the correlation (Pearson r) between the change in CRP and the change in GPLD1 across the baseline and 24-week visits. A positive number indicates that an increase in GPLD1 associated with an increase in CRP (higher inflammation). A negative number indicates that an increase in GPLD1 associated with a decrease in CRP (lower inflammation). The minimum value is -1. The maximum value is +1.

    Time frame: 24 weeks

07

Results

Posted Sep 19, 2024

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneControl ArmiSTEP PA InterventioniSTEP PA and Diet Intervention
Started323533
Completed232126
Not completed9147

Outcome measures

PrimaryPhysical Activity - Total Steps Recorded During 24 Weeks

Total number of steps recorded by the Fitbit over 24 weeks. Zero is the minimum and there is no maximum. Higher scores (steps) indicates a better outcome.

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Mean · steps
Physical Activity - Total Steps Recorded During 24 Weeks
stepsControl ArmiSTEP PA InterventioniSTEP PA and Diet Intervention
Physical Activity - Total Steps Recorded During 24 Weeks1345700 ± 992881686395 ± 1876791684843 ± 137606
SecondaryPhysical Activity - Change in Average Daily Steps Per Day Between Week 1 and Week 24

This is the change in average daily steps comparing the beginning (Week 1) and end (Week 24) of the intervention. A higher number is a positive outcome, indicated an increase in steps during the study. A negative number is a worse outcome, indicating a decline in steps during the intervention. Zero is the minimum and there is no maximum.

Time frame:
24 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · steps/day
Physical Activity - Change in Average Daily Steps Per Day Between Week 1 and Week 24
steps/dayControl ArmiSTEP PA InterventioniSTEP PA and Diet Intervention
Physical Activity - Change in Average Daily Steps Per Day Between Week 1 and Week 24-1504 ± 6201667 ± 1086-685 ± 921
SecondaryAverage Steps Per Day During the 24-week Intervention

This measure reports the average daily steps per day during the entire intervention (over 24 weeks). A higher number of steps indicates greater physical activity and is a positive outcome. A lower number of daily steps indicates lower physical activity. Zero is the minimum and there is no maximum.

Time frame:
24 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · steps/day
Average Steps Per Day During the 24-week Intervention
steps/dayControl ArmiSTEP PA InterventioniSTEP PA and Diet Intervention
Average Steps Per Day During the 24-week Intervention8081 ± 58810850 ± 117910015 ± 787
SecondaryC-reactive Protein

The change in C-reactive protein between baseline and the follow-up visit after the 24-week intervention. Higher numbers indicate that inflammation increased over time, a worse outcome. Lower numbers indicate less inflammation, a better outcome.

Time frame:
24 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · pg/ml
C-reactive Protein
pg/mlControl ArmiSTEP PA InterventioniSTEP PA and Diet Intervention
C-reactive Protein-289405 ± 682583-63545 ± 603429-239997 ± 729441
SecondaryChange in Total Cholesterol.

This measures the change in total plasma cholesterol between the baseline visit and the 24-week follow-up visit. A decrease in cholesterol is healthy, while an increase is unhealthy.

Time frame:
24 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · mg/dL
Change in Total Cholesterol.
mg/dLControl ArmiSTEP PA InterventioniSTEP PA and Diet Intervention
Change in Total Cholesterol.2.14 ± 4.5617.83 ± 11.7710.04 ± 4.72
SecondaryLevel of GPLD1 (Phosphatidylinositol-glycan-specific Phospholipase D) Enzyme at the Baseline Visit

This measures the plasma level of GPLD1 at the baseline study visit before the 24-week intervention. Higher levels are hypothesized to be positive and associated with better health and lower inflammation.The minimum level is zero and there is no maximum limit.

Time frame:
1 day baseline visit
Reported as:
Mean · pg/ml
Level of GPLD1 (Phosphatidylinositol-glycan-specific Phospholipase D) Enzyme at the Baseline Visit
pg/mlControl ArmiSTEP PA InterventioniSTEP PA and Diet Intervention
Level of GPLD1 (Phosphatidylinositol-glycan-specific Phospholipase D) Enzyme at the Baseline Visit190278 ± 12179196997 ± 17343168417 ± 13811
SecondaryChange in GPLD1 (Phosphatidylinositol-glycan-specific Phospholipase D) Enzyme Between the Baseline and 24-week Visit

This measures the change in GPLD1 between the baseline and 24-week visit after the study intervention. An increase in GPLD1 is hypothesized to associate with health benefits, while a decrease is a negative outcome.

Time frame:
24 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · pg/ml
Change in GPLD1 (Phosphatidylinositol-glycan-specific Phospholipase D) Enzyme Between the Baseline and 24-week Visit
pg/mlControl ArmiSTEP PA InterventioniSTEP PA and Diet Intervention
Change in GPLD1 (Phosphatidylinositol-glycan-specific Phospholipase D) Enzyme Between the Baseline and 24-week Visit14497 ± 12720-36496 ± 2124829674 ± 15927
SecondaryAssociation Between Physical Activity (PA) and GPLD1 (Phosphatidylinositol-glycan-specific Phospholipase d) at Baseline

This measures the correlation (Pearson r) between GPLD1 (measured on one 1 day) and participant PA (assessed by average daily steps for 1 week) at the baseline before the 24-week intervention. A positive number indicates that higher GPLD1 was associated with greater PA. A negative number indicates that higher GPLD1 associates with lower PA. The minimum value is -1. The maximum value is +1.

Time frame:
1 week
Reported as:
Number · Pearson's r
Association Between Physical Activity (PA) and GPLD1 (Phosphatidylinositol-glycan-specific Phospholipase d) at Baseline
Pearson's rControl ArmiSTEP PA InterventioniSTEP PA and Diet Intervention
Association Between Physical Activity (PA) and GPLD1 (Phosphatidylinositol-glycan-specific Phospholipase d) at Baseline-0.175-4.06-0.05
SecondaryAssociation Between the Change in Physical Activity (PA) and Change in GPLD1 (Phosphatidylinositol-glycan-specific Phospholipase d) Between the Baseline Visit and 24-week Visit After the Intervention

This measures the correlation (Pearson r) between the change in GPLD1 across the baseline and 24-week visits and the change in PA (average daily steps) between the first week (Week 1) and last week (Week 24) of the study. A positive number indicates that an increase in GPLD1 associated with an increase in PA over time, a negative number indicates the opposite. The minimum value is -1. The maximum value is +1.

Time frame:
24 weeks
Reported as:
Number · Pearson's r
Association Between the Change in Physical Activity (PA) and Change in GPLD1 (Phosphatidylinositol-glycan-specific Phospholipase d) Between the Baseline Visit and 24-week Visit After the Intervention
Pearson's rControl ArmiSTEP PA InterventioniSTEP PA and Diet Intervention
Association Between the Change in Physical Activity (PA) and Change in GPLD1 (Phosphatidylinositol-glycan-specific Phospholipase d) Between the Baseline Visit and 24-week Visit After the Intervention-0.3540.1470.363
SecondaryAssociation Between Cognitive Performance (Executive Function) and GPLD1 (Phosphatidylinositol-glycan-specific Phospholipase d) at the 24-week Visit After the Intervention

This measures the correlation (Pearson r) between GPLD1 and executive function (measured by T score) at the 24-week visit after the intervention. A positive number indicates that higher GPLD1 associates with better executive function. A negative number indicates that higher GPLD1 associates with worse cognition (lower T score). The minimum value is -1. The maximum value is +1.

Time frame:
1 day at the end of the 24-week intervention
Reported as:
Number · Pearson's r
Association Between Cognitive Performance (Executive Function) and GPLD1 (Phosphatidylinositol-glycan-specific Phospholipase d) at the 24-week Visit After the Intervention
Pearson's rControl ArmiSTEP PA InterventioniSTEP PA and Diet Intervention
Association Between Cognitive Performance (Executive Function) and GPLD1 (Phosphatidylinositol-glycan-specific Phospholipase d) at the 24-week Visit After the Intervention0.3320.2260.213
SecondaryAssociation Between the Change in Inflammation (C-reactive Protein, or CRP) and Change in GPLD1 (Phosphatidylinositol-glycan-specific Phospholipase d) Between the Baseline and 24-week Visits.

This measures the correlation (Pearson r) between the change in CRP and the change in GPLD1 across the baseline and 24-week visits. A positive number indicates that an increase in GPLD1 associated with an increase in CRP (higher inflammation). A negative number indicates that an increase in GPLD1 associated with a decrease in CRP (lower inflammation). The minimum value is -1. The maximum value is +1.

Time frame:
24 weeks
Reported as:
Number · Pearson's r
Association Between the Change in Inflammation (C-reactive Protein, or CRP) and Change in GPLD1 (Phosphatidylinositol-glycan-specific Phospholipase d) Between the Baseline and 24-week Visits.
Pearson's rControl ArmiSTEP PA InterventioniSTEP PA and Diet Intervention
Association Between the Change in Inflammation (C-reactive Protein, or CRP) and Change in GPLD1 (Phosphatidylinositol-glycan-specific Phospholipase d) Between the Baseline and 24-week Visits.-0.401-0.4220.174

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse events were monitored during the 24-week (6-month) study intervention for each participant.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Control Arm1/32 (3.1%)1/32 (3.1%)9/32 (28.1%)
iSTEP PA Intervention0/35 (0%)0/35 (0%)10/35 (28.6%)
iSTEP PA and Diet Intervention0/33 (0%)0/33 (0%)12/33 (36.4%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventControl ArmiSTEP PA InterventioniSTEP PA and Diet Intervention
Myocardial infarctionVascular disorders1/320/350/33
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventControl ArmiSTEP PA InterventioniSTEP PA and Diet Intervention
minor muscle sorenessMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders9/3210/3512/33

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Control ArmiSTEP PA InterventioniSTEP PA and Diet InterventionTotal
Mean54 ± 1051 ± 1552 ± 1352 ± 13
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Control ArmiSTEP PA InterventioniSTEP PA and Diet InterventionTotal
Female45514
Male28302886
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Control ArmiSTEP PA InterventioniSTEP PA and Diet InterventionTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native0112
Asian0101
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander1012
Black or African American55414
White21212668
More than one race1405
Unknown or Not Reported4318
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)Control ArmiSTEP PA InterventioniSTEP PA and Diet InterventionTotal
United States323533100
08

Study locations

1 site
  • HIV Neurobehavioral Research Program
    San Diego, California 92103, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Henry BL, Quintana E, Moore DJ, Garcia J, Montoya JL. Focus groups inform a mobile health intervention to promote adherence to a Mediterranean diet and engagement in physical activity among people living with HIV. BMC Public Health. 2019 Jan 22;19(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-6386-5. PubMed 30669986 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Dec 1, 2016

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 19, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03123731
Lead sponsor
University of California, San Diego
Collaborators
National Institute on Aging (NIA)
Responsible party
Brook Henry (Associate Project Scientist, University of California, San Diego) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 21, 2017
Start date
Dec 1, 2018
Primary completion
Aug 15, 2023
Completion
Aug 15, 2023
Results posted
Sep 19, 2024
Last update
Sep 19, 2024

Study contacts

Brook L Henry, Ph.D.
principal investigator · University of California, San Diego

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion