CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT03115190UrgentUpdated Jan 7, 2021

Improving the Referral of Patients With Chest Pain

An interventional study of General Practitioner diagnosis with Heart score in Acute Coronary Syndrome, Myocardial Infarction and Chest Pain, sponsored by VieCuri Medical Centre. Terminated at 1 site in Netherlands. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-01-07.

Sponsored by VieCuri Medical Centre · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Why this study was terminated
The Philips Minicare has been taken off the market due to financial company issues that have nothing to do with the safety of the Minicare or the URGENT trial.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Rationale: This study aims to aid the general practitioner (GP) in the diagnostic dilemma of chest pain patients. Patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) should be referred to the hospital promptly, though referring all patients with chest pain is not feasible, as up to 80% of the patients with chest pain in the primary care do not have ACS.

Objective: The primary objective is to refer patients who contact the out-of-hours GP cooperation (GPC) with suspicion of ACS more accurately with a hypothesized reduction of 10% in unnecessary referrals.

Study design: This study is a prospective, observational, prevalence-based cohort study within the standard care of ACS patients.

Study population: All patients with chest pain, or other complaints suspect of ACS, will be included in which the GP at the GPC is in need of further diagnostics to come to a decision of referral. The follow-up will be a registry of all patients with suspected ACS referred to the emergency department (ED). Patients with typical complaints of ACS, and thus a high suspicion, will be excluded and referred promptly.

Intervention: Triage nurses working at the GPC will receive specific ACS training. Patients who arrive at the GPC with non-typical chest pain, will be screened for enrolment within the study. The GP evaluates patients using the Heart score, this includes electrocardiogram recording and point of care (POC) troponin testing. With the Heart score the GP can make an informed decision to refer the patient to the ED.

To evaluate the intervention a registry of all patients referred to the ED with suspected ACS will be compared to a baseline registry performed from the 1st of September 2015 until the 1st of March 2016. Patients not referred to the ED, will have a (standard) high-sensitivity troponin and a POC troponin as follow-up at least four hours (up to 24 hours) after first measurement.

The burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: Patients enrolled within this study will receive a finger stick blood test and electrocardiogram recording at the GPC and a finger stick blood test and a venous blood test at least four hours after first troponin measurement. We may follow-up by telephone if we can not obtain the required information from medical records. We expect no adverse events and there are no expected risks associated with this protocol. We expect patients with ACS to be referred more accurately and more promptly to the ED and thus lowering risks.

02

Conditions studied

  • Acute Coronary Syndrome
  • Myocardial Infarction
  • Chest Pain
03

In context

Myocardial Infarction

2,744 studies on the registry are indexed under Myocardial Infarction; 418 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 40 is below the median of 148 across 1,595 interventional studies indexed under Myocardial Infarction.

Browse Myocardial Infarction studies →

Lead sponsor

VieCuri Medical Centre is the lead sponsor of 15 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

All patients with chest pain or other complaints suspect of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) can be included in which the general practitioner is in need of further diagnostics to come to a decision of referral.

All patients referred to the emergency department (ED) with suspected ACS will be included to evaluate the appropriateness of referral.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients younger than 18 years
  • Patients in which a typical history and/or physical examination requires immediate referral; high suspicion of ACS
  • Patients in which an acute non-coronary diagnosis is suspected, e.g. pulmonary embolism, thoracic aortic dissection etc.

The baseline of patients seen at the ED will not exclude any patients referred with suspected ACS.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
40 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    General practitioner diagnosis with Heart score

    Patients with chest pain who are reviewed by the general practitioner (GP) at the GP cooperation will be evaluated with the Heart score to support the GP with the diagnosis.

    Diagnostic Test: General Practitioner diagnosis with Heart score

  • No intervention
    Triage Nurse education

    The general practitioner cooperation employs nurses for (telephone) triage. They are aided by a computer based triage system, the Netherlands triage system (NTS), a 6-level urgency triage system. With this study we aim to educate the nurses in the signs and symptoms of chest pain patients. The training program will aim to educate the triage nurses in acute coronary syndrome, including pathophysiology, symptoms and risk factors. The NTS will be incorporated within the training. The triage nurses will receive a training session by Cardiologists with information about acute coronary syndrome, the symptoms and the risks.

  • No intervention
    Baseline registry as comparison

    All patients referred to the emergency department (ED) with suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS) will be evaluated. They will receive a questionnaire to evaluate the accuracy of referral and the delays of ACS patients. This will be compared to the registry at baseline. Some patients will either have not contacted the general practitioner cooperation (GPC) at all, or will have been referred to the ED directly through the GPC nurse triage. The 30 day, 6 months and one year follow-up of all patients will be via medical records, or in case of no or not enough information, by telephone.

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testGeneral Practitioner diagnosis with Heart score

    All patients seen by the general practitioner (GP) at the GP cooperation and agreeing to participation will be evaluated with the Heart score. This is a score including history, electrocardiogram, age, risk factors and troponin to assess whether a patient is at high risk for acute coronary syndrome. The troponins asked for in the Heart score are at arrival of the patient, not regarding the time of onset of chest pain. We shall use point of care (POC) troponin, thereby modifying the Heart score. The GP must realize that the POC troponin is not reliable on its own with one test. If the Heart score is low, it is acceptable and safe to not refer the patient, it is however not safe to refer the patient solely on negative troponin result.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Suspected diagnosis

    The primary outcome measure is a more accurate referral of patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS) to the cardiac emergency department and thus the concordance of suspected ACS and the actual diagnosis. The endpoint will be compared to the baseline registry that has been executed from 1st of September 2015 until 1st of March 2016.

    Time frame: 30 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Major adverse cardiovascular events

    Combination endpoint of: mortality and any ischemic event (ST-elevated myocardial infarction, non-ST-elevated myocardial infarction, (Unstable)Angina Pectoris, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting, Resuscitation)

    Time frame: 30 days, 6 months and 1 year

07

Study locations

1 site
  • VieCuri Medical Center
    Venlo, 5912BL, Netherlands
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Verdon F, Herzig L, Burnand B, Bischoff T, Pecoud A, Junod M, Muhlemann N, Favrat B; GMIRG. Chest pain in daily practice: occurrence, causes and management. Swiss Med Wkly. 2008 Jun 14;138(23-24):340-7. doi: 10.4414/smw.2008.12123. PubMed 18561039 ↗
  • Task Force on the management of ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC); Steg PG, James SK, Atar D, Badano LP, Blomstrom-Lundqvist C, Borger MA, Di Mario C, Dickstein K, Ducrocq G, Fernandez-Aviles F, Gershlick AH, Giannuzzi P, Halvorsen S, Huber K, Juni P, Kastrati A, Knuuti J, Lenzen MJ, Mahaffey KW, Valgimigli M, van 't Hof A, Widimsky P, Zahger D. ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J. 2012 Oct;33(20):2569-619. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs215. Epub 2012 Aug 24. No abstract available. PubMed 22922416 ↗
  • Bosner S, Becker A, Haasenritter J, Abu Hani M, Keller H, Sonnichsen AC, Karatolios K, Schaefer JR, Seitz G, Baum E, Donner-Banzhoff N. Chest pain in primary care: epidemiology and pre-work-up probabilities. Eur J Gen Pract. 2009;15(3):141-6. doi: 10.3109/13814780903329528. PubMed 19883149 ↗
  • Ruddox V, Mathisen M, Otterstad JE. Prevalence and prognosis of non-specific chest pain among patients hospitalized for suspected acute coronary syndrome - a systematic literature search. BMC Med. 2012 Jun 12;10:58. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-10-58. PubMed 22691301 ↗
  • Webster R, Norman P, Goodacre S, Thompson A. The prevalence and correlates of psychological outcomes in patients with acute non-cardiac chest pain: a systematic review. Emerg Med J. 2012 Apr;29(4):267-73. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2011-200526. Epub 2011 Oct 27. PubMed 22034535 ↗
  • Weinstock MB, Weingart S, Orth F, VanFossen D, Kaide C, Anderson J, Newman DH. Risk for Clinically Relevant Adverse Cardiac Events in Patients With Chest Pain at Hospital Admission. JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Jul;175(7):1207-12. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.1674. PubMed 25985100 ↗
  • Knockaert DC, Buntinx F, Stoens N, Bruyninckx R, Delooz H. Chest pain in the emergency department: the broad spectrum of causes. Eur J Emerg Med. 2002 Mar;9(1):25-30. doi: 10.1097/00063110-200203000-00007. PubMed 11989492 ↗
  • Huibers L, Giesen P, Smits M, Mokkink H, Grol R, Wensing M. Nurse telephone triage in Dutch out-of-hours primary care: the relation between history taking and urgency estimation. Eur J Emerg Med. 2012 Oct;19(5):309-15. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0b013e32834d3e67. PubMed 22008589 ↗
  • Nilsson S, Ortoft K, Molstad S. The accuracy of general practitioners' clinical assessment of chest pain patients. Eur J Gen Pract. 2008;14(2):50-5. doi: 10.1080/13814780802342622. PubMed 18720273 ↗
  • Wilcox HM, Vickery AW, Emery JD. Cardiac troponin testing for diagnosis of acute coronary syndromes in primary care. Med J Aust. 2015 Oct 19;203(8):336. doi: 10.5694/mja14.01154. PubMed 26465699 ↗
  • Backus BE, Six AJ, Kelder JC, Mast TP, van den Akker F, Mast EG, Monnink SH, van Tooren RM, Doevendans PA. Chest pain in the emergency room: a multicenter validation of the HEART Score. Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2010 Sep;9(3):164-9. doi: 10.1097/HPC.0b013e3181ec36d8. PubMed 20802272 ↗
  • Leite L, Baptista R, Leitao J, Cochicho J, Breda F, Elvas L, Fonseca I, Carvalho A, Costa JN. Chest pain in the emergency department: risk stratification with Manchester triage system and HEART score. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2015 Jun 11;15:48. doi: 10.1186/s12872-015-0049-6. PubMed 26062607 ↗
  • Ishak M, Ali D, Fokkert MJ, Slingerland RJ, Tolsma RT, Badings E, van der Sluis A, van Eenennaam F, Mosterd A, Ten Berg JM, van 't Hof AW. Fast assessment and management of chest pain patients without ST-elevation in the pre-hospital gateway (FamouS Triage): ruling out a myocardial infarction at home with the modified HEART score. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2018 Mar;7(2):102-110. doi: 10.1177/2048872616687116. Epub 2017 Jan 13. PubMed 28084079 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — IPD will not be made available to other researchers to secure privacy in study patients.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 7, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03115190
Lead sponsor
VieCuri Medical Centre
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 14, 2017
Start date
Apr 18, 2017
Primary completion
Nov 1, 2017
Completion
Nov 1, 2018
Last update
Jan 7, 2021

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Jan 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion