ClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT03075904Updated Feb 5, 2020Results posted

A Safety and Dose-Finding Study of SYNT001 in Subjects With Pemphigus (Vulgaris or Foliaceus)

A Phase 1/2 interventional study of ALXN1830 in Pemphigus, Pemphigus Vulgaris and Pemphigus Foliaceus, sponsored by Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. Terminated at 3 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-02-05.

Sponsored by Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (part of AstraZeneca) · Phase 1/2, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Study objectives achieved
Phase
Phase 1/2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
8
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This was a multicenter, open-label safety study to determine the dose regimen of SYNT001 (ALXN1830) administered intravenously in participants with pemphigus (vulgaris or foliaceus).

Read the detailed description

This study planned to evaluate 2 cohorts: up to 8 participants to receive 5 weekly intravenous (IV) doses of ALXN1830 at 10 milligram/kilogram (mg/kg) (Cohort 1) and up to 12 participants to receive 3 x 30 mg/kg weekly doses of ALXN1830 IV (loading) followed by 5 x 10 mg/kg doses of ALXN1830 IV every other week or 10 weekly doses of ALXN1830 IV (maintenance) (Cohort 2).

This study was terminated after the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and efficacy were characterized in participants with pemphigus at a single dose level (10 mg/kg) in Cohort 1, before any participants were enrolled in Cohort 2.

The study consisted of 3 periods: Screening, Treatment, and Follow-Up.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pemphigus
  • Pemphigus Vulgaris
  • Pemphigus Foliaceus

Browse trials for

03

In context

Pemphigus

76 studies on the registry are indexed under Pemphigus; 18 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 8 is below the median of 30 across 53 interventional studies indexed under Pemphigus.

Browse Pemphigus studies →

Lead sponsor

Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is the lead sponsor of 255 studies on the registry; 23 are open to participants now.

Of its 101 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 75 (74%) have results posted.

First submitted before Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. became part of AstraZeneca.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Participants must have meet the following criteria to be included:

  • Were willing and able to read, understand and sign an form
  • Documented diagnosis of pemphigus vulgaris or foliaceus
  • Were required to use medically acceptable

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Participants meeting any of the following criteria were excluded:

  • Were unable or unwilling to comply with the protocol
  • Active non-hematologic or history of non-hematologic malignancy in the 3 years prior to screening (exclusive of non-melanoma skin cancer and cervical cancer in situ)
  • Positive for (HIV) or antibody
  • Positive for surface antigen
  • IV immunoglobulin treatment within 30 days of screening
  • Any exposure to an drug or device within the 30 days prior to screening
  • Plasmapheresis or immunoadsorption within 30 days of screening
  • Participant had any current medical condition that, in the opinion of the Investigator, may have compromised their safety or compliance, preclude successful conduct of the study, or interfere with interpretation of the results
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(7)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Hepatitis C tests

Hepatitis C is a virus that infects the liver. An HCV antibody test can stay positive after an infection has cleared (and is occasionally positive without one); an HCV RNA test shows whether the virus is there now.

After treatment, hepatitis C counts as cured when HCV RNA is still undetectable 12 weeks or more after the treatment ended. Studies often accept people cured this way.

Hepatitis B tests

Hepatitis B is a virus that infects the liver. These are separate tests: HBsAg positive usually means a current infection (a recent vaccination can briefly cause it too); total anti-HBc (HBcAb) positive means an infection now or in the past; HBV DNA measures how much virus is in the blood.

Some studies accept a past infection if HBV DNA is undetectable, sometimes with antiviral medicine during the study. Check what this study allows.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Sequential assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
8 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Cohort 1: ALXN1830

    Participants received 5 doses of ALXN1830 10 mg/kg administered weekly.

    Drug: ALXN1830

  • Experimental
    Cohort 2: ALXN1830

    Participants were to receive 3 doses of ALXN1830 30 mg/kg administered weekly (loading) followed by 5 doses of ALXN1830 10 mg/kg administered every other week or 10 weekly doses of ALXN1830 IV (maintenance).

    Drug: ALXN1830

Interventions

  • Administered via IV infusion.

    Also known as: SYNT001

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Count Of Participants Reporting Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

    A TEAE was defined as any adverse event (AE) that starts on or after the first dose of study drug or occurs prior to the first dose and worsens in severity on or after the first dose of study drug, during the Treatment Period and Follow-up Period. A TEAE was considered "serious" (Grade 3) if, in the view of either the investigator or sponsor, it resulted in any of the following outcomes: death, life-threatening adverse drug event, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant incapacity or substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions, congenital anomaly/birth defect, or an event that may have jeopardized the participant and may have required medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the previously listed outcomes. A summary of serious and all other non-serious adverse events, regardless of causality, is located in the Reported Adverse Events module.

    Time frame: Day 1 (after first dose) through Day 112

Secondary outcomes

  1. Maximum Percent Reduction Of Mean Total Immunoglobulin G (IgG) Levels From Baseline

    Pharmacodynamic samples were collected for analysis throughout the study. The maximum percent reduction of mean serum total IgG levels from Baseline observed during the study is presented.

    Time frame: Baseline through Day 112

  2. Maximum Percent Reduction In Mean Pemphigus Disease Area Index (PDAI) Total Activity Score From Baseline

    Pemphigus severity and disease activity was measured using the PDAI in regions where a validated questionnaire was available. The PDAI was administered during Treatment Period and Follow-up Period. PDAI total activity was comprised of scores for the skin, mucous membrane, and scalp subscales. The investigator determined a PDAI score as 0 to 250 points for total activity score (0 to 120 for skin, 0 to 10 for scalp, and 0 to 120 for mucosa). A higher score indicated higher impact on skin disease. The maximum percent reduction in PDAI total activity score from Baseline observed during the study is presented.

    Time frame: Baseline through Day 112

  3. Maximum Percent Reduction Of Mean Circulating Immune Complexes (CIC) Levels From Baseline

    Pharmacodynamic samples were collected for analysis throughout the study. The maximum percent reduction of mean CIC levels from Baseline observed during the study is presented.

    Time frame: Baseline through Day 112

  4. Maximum Percent Reduction Of Mean Anti-Desmoglein (Dsg) 1 And 3 Antibodies From Baseline

    Pharmacodynamic samples were collected for analysis throughout the study. The maximum percent reduction of mean anti-Dsg 1 and 3 antibodies from Baseline observed during the study is presented.

    Time frame: Baseline through Day 112

07

Results

Posted Feb 5, 2020

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneCohort 1: ALXN1830
Started8
Received at least 1 dose of study drug8
Completed4
Not completed4
Withdrew: Physician decision3
Withdrew: Need for medication not permitted1

Outcome measures

PrimaryCount Of Participants Reporting Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

A TEAE was defined as any adverse event (AE) that starts on or after the first dose of study drug or occurs prior to the first dose and worsens in severity on or after the first dose of study drug, during the Treatment Period and Follow-up Period. A TEAE was considered "serious" (Grade 3) if, in the view of either the investigator or sponsor, it resulted in any of the following outcomes: death, life-threatening adverse drug event, inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant incapacity or substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions, congenital anomaly/birth defect, or an event that may have jeopardized the participant and may have required medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the previously listed outcomes. A summary of serious and all other non-serious adverse events, regardless of causality, is located in the Reported Adverse Events module.

Time frame:
Day 1 (after first dose) through Day 112
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Count Of Participants Reporting Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
ParticipantsCohort 1: ALXN1830
TEAEs7
Serious TEAEs1
Discontinuations due to TEAEs0
Deaths0
SecondaryMaximum Percent Reduction Of Mean Total Immunoglobulin G (IgG) Levels From Baseline

Pharmacodynamic samples were collected for analysis throughout the study. The maximum percent reduction of mean serum total IgG levels from Baseline observed during the study is presented.

Time frame:
Baseline through Day 112
Reported as:
Number · percentage of reduction
Maximum Percent Reduction Of Mean Total Immunoglobulin G (IgG) Levels From Baseline
percentage of reductionCohort 1: ALXN1830
Maximum Percent Reduction Of Mean Total Immunoglobulin G (IgG) Levels From Baseline57.3
SecondaryMaximum Percent Reduction In Mean Pemphigus Disease Area Index (PDAI) Total Activity Score From Baseline

Pemphigus severity and disease activity was measured using the PDAI in regions where a validated questionnaire was available. The PDAI was administered during Treatment Period and Follow-up Period. PDAI total activity was comprised of scores for the skin, mucous membrane, and scalp subscales. The investigator determined a PDAI score as 0 to 250 points for total activity score (0 to 120 for skin, 0 to 10 for scalp, and 0 to 120 for mucosa). A higher score indicated higher impact on skin disease. The maximum percent reduction in PDAI total activity score from Baseline observed during the study is presented.

Time frame:
Baseline through Day 112
Reported as:
Number · percentage of reduction
Maximum Percent Reduction In Mean Pemphigus Disease Area Index (PDAI) Total Activity Score From Baseline
percentage of reductionCohort 1: ALXN1830
Maximum Percent Reduction In Mean Pemphigus Disease Area Index (PDAI) Total Activity Score From Baseline45.7
SecondaryMaximum Percent Reduction Of Mean Circulating Immune Complexes (CIC) Levels From Baseline

Pharmacodynamic samples were collected for analysis throughout the study. The maximum percent reduction of mean CIC levels from Baseline observed during the study is presented.

Time frame:
Baseline through Day 112
Reported as:
Number · percentage of reduction
Maximum Percent Reduction Of Mean Circulating Immune Complexes (CIC) Levels From Baseline
percentage of reductionCohort 1: ALXN1830
Maximum Percent Reduction Of Mean Circulating Immune Complexes (CIC) Levels From Baseline51.4
SecondaryMaximum Percent Reduction Of Mean Anti-Desmoglein (Dsg) 1 And 3 Antibodies From Baseline

Pharmacodynamic samples were collected for analysis throughout the study. The maximum percent reduction of mean anti-Dsg 1 and 3 antibodies from Baseline observed during the study is presented.

Time frame:
Baseline through Day 112
Reported as:
Number · percentage of reduction
Maximum Percent Reduction Of Mean Anti-Desmoglein (Dsg) 1 And 3 Antibodies From Baseline
percentage of reductionCohort 1: ALXN1830
anti-Dsg 18.9
anti-Dsg 320.4

Adverse events

Collected over Baseline through Day 112. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Cohort 1: ALXN18300/8 (0%)1/8 (12.5%)7/8 (87.5%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventCohort 1: ALXN1830
Disease progressionGeneral disorders1/8
Acute kidney injuryRenal and urinary disorders1/8
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 19
Most frequent other events
EventCohort 1: ALXN1830
HeadacheNervous system disorders6/8
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders2/8
FatigueGeneral disorders2/8
Dry eyeEye disorders1/8
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders1/8
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders1/8
MalaiseGeneral disorders1/8
PyrexiaGeneral disorders1/8
Hepatic cystHepatobiliary disorders1/8
Herpes simplexInfections and infestations1/8

Baseline characteristics

All participants who were enrolled in the study.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Cohort 1: ALXN1830
Mean51.4 ± 16.43
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Cohort 1: ALXN1830
Female5
Male3
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Cohort 1: ALXN1830
Hispanic or Latino0
Not Hispanic or Latino8
Unknown or Not Reported0
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Cohort 1: ALXN1830
American Indian or Alaska Native0
Asian0
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0
Black or African American3
White5
More than one race0
Unknown or Not Reported0
Type of Pemphigus
Type of Pemphigus(Participants)Cohort 1: ALXN1830
Vulgaris7
Foliaceus1
Age at Diagnosis of Pemphigus
Age at Diagnosis of Pemphigus(years)Cohort 1: ALXN1830
Mean41.3 ± 18.90
08

Study locations

3 sites
  • Alexion Study Site
    Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27516, United States
  • Alexion Study Site
    Durham, North Carolina 27710, United States
  • Alexion Study Site
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Werth VP, Culton DA, Concha JSS, Graydon JS, Blumberg LJ, Okawa J, Pyzik M, Blumberg RS, Hall RP 3rd. Safety, Tolerability, and Activity of ALXN1830 Targeting the Neonatal Fc Receptor in Chronic Pemphigus. J Invest Dermatol. 2021 Dec;141(12):2858-2865.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2021.04.031. Epub 2021 Jun 12. PubMed 34126109 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Jul 2017 to primary completion in Jan 2019, 17 months.

Results were first posted in Feb 2020, 1 year after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 6, 2017
First posted
Mar 9, 2017
StartActual
Jul 18, 2017
Primary completionActual
Jan 16, 2019
CompletionActual
Jan 16, 2019
Results first posted
Feb 5, 2020
Last update
Feb 5, 2020
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 5, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03075904
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 9, 2017
Start date
Jul 18, 2017
Primary completion
Jan 16, 2019
Completion
Jan 16, 2019
Results posted
Feb 5, 2020
Last update
Feb 5, 2020

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Jan 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Orilanolimab

Start the discussion