CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT03073850ATEMS-AFUpdated Sep 9, 2020

Antithrombotic Treatment in Patients With Effectively Maintained Sinus Rhythm After Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

A Phase 4 interventional study of Antiplatelet and Low dose oral anticoagulant in Atrial Fibrillation, sponsored by Korea University Guro Hospital. Terminated at 4 sites in Korea, Republic of. Open to participants aged 19 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-09-09.

Sponsored by Korea University Guro Hospital · Phase 4, Interventional, and Prevention

Why this study was terminated
Majority of enrolled patients have withdrawn.
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
48
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
19 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of the study is to investigate the best strategy for long-term stroke prevention in patients who have sinus rhythm after a successful catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) and who are at risk of thromboembolic events (CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥2). The investigators are going to compare antiplatelet therapy to oral anticoagulation (OAC) with different doses of edoxaban (30mg and 60mg).

Read the detailed description

The investigators hypothesize that the strategy of OAC will be superior to antiplatelet therapy, but low dose edoxaban (30mg) will be non-inferior to standard dose edoxaban (60mg) for reducing the risk of stroke or systemic embolism in patients who underwent successful AF ablation. Although AF ablation is an effective therapy for reducing and/or eliminating the burden of AF, there may continue to be a risk of late recurrence or asymptomatic recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmias. Until now, the guideline has recommended the continuation of OAC in patients who are at risk of stroke or systemic embolism based on the CHA2DS2-VASc score, even though they have maintained sinus rhythm. The annual rate of stroke, however, is still lower compared to that predicted by the scoring system, because AF ablation reduced the AF burden by 86% and the remaining episodes were significantly shorter in duration (median 6 minutes) than those pre-ablation reported by the previous study. Based on recent studies which demonstrated that both standard-dose and low-dose non-vitamin K OACs (NOAC) performed equally well with regard to the stroke prevention in patients with AF, low dose NOACs may also be sufficient for stroke prevention of briefly lasting AF episodes after successful AF ablation.

02

Conditions studied

  • Atrial Fibrillation

Browse trials for

03

In context

Atrial Fibrillation

3,870 studies on the registry are indexed under Atrial Fibrillation; 924 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 48 is below the median of 144 across 2,380 interventional studies indexed under Atrial Fibrillation.

Browse Atrial Fibrillation studies →

Lead sponsor

Korea University Guro Hospital is the lead sponsor of 83 studies on the registry; 15 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
19 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients without evidence of any clinically apparent arrhythmia recurrence during at least six months after last catheter ablation of AF.
  • Willing and able to provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who do not meet all of the above listed inclusion criteria.
  • Patients with significant valvular heart disease or mechanical valve.
  • Patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
  • Patients with chronic renal impairment with creatinine clearance rate of \< 30 mg/dl.
  • Patients with contraindication to long-term OAC.
  • Patients who had a stroke within one year prior to enrolment.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
48 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Antiplatelet therapy

    acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) 100mg or clopidogrel 75mg if intolerant to ASA

    Drug: Antiplatelet

  • Experimental
    Low-dose OAC therapy

    Edoxaban of 30mg (Reduced dose of 15mg if body weight \< 60kg, CCr\< 50 ml/min, concomittant use of P-gp)

    Drug: Low dose oral anticoagulant

  • Active comparator
    Standard-dose OAC therapy

    Edoxaban of 60mg (Reduced dose of 30mg if body weight \< 60kg, CCr\< 50 ml/min, concomittant use of P-gp)

    Drug: Standard dose oral anticoagulant

Interventions

  • DrugAntiplatelet

    ASA or clopidogrel

    Also known as: aspirin 100mg or clopidogrel 75mg

  • DrugLow dose oral anticoagulant

    Edoxaban of 30mg

    Also known as: Edoxaban of 30mg

  • DrugStandard dose oral anticoagulant

    Edoxaban of 60mg

    Also known as: Edoxaban of 60mg

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Freedom rate of stroke or systemic embolism during 2 years after successful AF ablation procedure

    Check stroke or systemic embolism through neurologic examination or imaging studies

    Time frame: 2 year

07

Study locations

4 sites
  • Korea University Anam Hospital
    Seoul, Korea, Republic of
  • Korea University Guro Hospital
    Seoul, Korea, Republic of
  • Seoul National University Hospital
    Seoul, Korea, Republic of
  • Yonsei University Severance Hospital
    Seoul, Korea, Republic of
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 9, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03073850
Lead sponsor
Korea University Guro Hospital
Responsible party
Hong Euy Lim, MD (Professor, Korea University Guro Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 8, 2017
Start date
Feb 23, 2017
Primary completion
Dec 15, 2019
Completion
Dec 15, 2019
Last update
Sep 9, 2020

Study contacts

Hong Euy Lim, Dr.
principal investigator · Korea University Guro Hospital

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Sep 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion