CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT03073694Updated Jun 9, 2023

Comparing Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) Using Mitomycin-C Versus Melphalan for Colorectal Peritoneal Carcinomatosis

A Phase 2 interventional study of Mitomycin c and Melphalan in Cancer, Appendiceal and ColoRectal Cancer, sponsored by University of Kansas Medical Center. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-06-09.

Sponsored by University of Kansas Medical Center · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jul 2024, 2 years 3 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Jul 2017; still recruiting 9 years 2 months later.
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 75 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this trial is to compare the morbidity and mortality of CRS-HIPEC using mitomycin-C versus melphalan for colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis. Morbidity and mortality will measured using the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) score, Common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE version 4.03), and the Clavien-Dindo Classification.

Read the detailed description

BACKGROUND: Peritoneal dissemination of cancer (peritoneal carcinomatosis) from gastrointestinal malignancies, meaning tumor deposits along the inside abdominal or pelvic wall and surfaces of the intestines and organs, has historically been considered a terminal disease. Although peritoneal surface tumors can respond to systemic therapy as a sole form of treatment, patient survival remains poor and cure is considered impossible.

A plasma-peritoneal barrier makes systemic therapy relatively ineffective against peritoneal surface disease. In the 1990's, cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal therapy (CRS-HIPEC) began to be popularized as a more effective treatment.

Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy has several advantages. High-dose chemotherapy can be used due to the plasma-peritoneal barrier resulting in little absorption into the blood stream. Hyperthermia itself has cytotoxic effects and can increase the depth of tumor penetration by the chemotherapeutic agent up to 3 mm and moreover can potentiate its antineoplastic effects. Although CRS-HIPEC has been considered standard treatment for ruptured appendiceal neoplasms and primary peritoneal mesothelioma, in the past decade its indications have broadened to other peritoneal surface malignant processes.

Historically, morbidity and mortality associated with CRS-HIPEC was considerably higher than other complex operations, and thus its use was often discouraged. However, in recent times, especially in high-volume centers, morbidity and mortality has drastically improved. Due to recent improvements in mortality after major surgical interventions, including HIPEC, the focus has shifted toward other endpoints besides efficacy, such as morbidity, quality of life and cost.

While HIPEC is universally felt to be a vital component after cytoreductive surgery, there is a lack of consensus on the optimal regimen, especially the chemotherapeutic agent that should be used. In the United States, the most commonly used agent during HIPEC is mitomycin-C, however, it remains unknown if mitomycin-C is the optimal drug to use with regards to toxicity and survival.

Randomized prospective studies are needed comparing the toxicity and effectiveness of HIPEC with mitomycin-C to other agents.

OBJECTIVE: To compare morbidity and mortality after CRS-HIPEC utilizing mitomycin-C versus melphalan.

METHODS: In this study, patients will be randomized to one of two treatment arms: Arm 1.) Mitomycin-C initial dose of 15 mg/m2, 45 minutes into the perfusion a maintenance dose of 5 mg/m2 will be administered; or Arm 2): Melphalan 60 mg/m2 45 minutes into the perfusion. Morbidity will be measured during immediate and short-term surgical recovery (up to 90 days post-hospital discharge). Mortality will be measured beginning with the date of surgery and ending with the date of participant death.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cancer, Appendiceal
  • ColoRectal Cancer

Keywords

  • Peritoneal Surface Disease
  • mitomycin-c
  • melphalan
  • Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC)
  • Peritoneal Carcinomatosis
03

In context

Carcinoma

6,741 studies on the registry are indexed under Carcinoma; 1,161 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is above the median of 45 across 5,170 interventional studies indexed under Carcinoma.

Browse Carcinoma studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Kansas Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 483 studies on the registry; 113 are open to participants now.

Of its 38 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 24 (63%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 75 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent.
  • Peritoneal Surface Disease (PSD) due to Colorectal Cancer or High-Grade Appendiceal Cancer
  • No clear evidence of systemic metastases
  • No prior CRS-HIPEC treatment
  • Patient has a planned CC0 (Complete Macroscopic Cytoreduction (visual)) cytoreduction - NOTE: randomization occurs during surgery and not before; if, during surgery, the PI/SubI discerns that all disease cannot be removed surgically, the participant will be considered a "screen failure", HIPEC will not be performed, and the participant will be removed from the study. If participant is removed from the study, PI / surgeon will decide if standard of care surgery will proceed.
  • Age 18 - 75
  • ECOG (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) Score 0 - 2
  • Recorded ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologist Classification) classification - as determined by the anesthesiologist (particular value not required - only recording of the classification is required).
  • Medically fit to undergo complex major abdominal surgery, as determined by examination by PI / Sub-Is.
  • Medically fit to receive systemic chemotherapy, as determined by examination by PI / Sub-Is.
  • Adequate organ and marrow function as defined below:

    • leukocytes ≥ 3,000/mcL (microliter)
    • absolute neutrophil count ≥ 1,500/mcL
    • platelets ≥ 100,000/mcL
    • total bilirubin within normal institutional limits
    • AST (Aspartate aminotransferase) (SGOT [Serum Glutamic Oxaloacetic Transaminase]) ≤ 2.5 X institutional upper limit of normal
    • ALT (Alanine Aminotransferase) (SPGT [Serum Glutamic Pyruvic Transaminase]) ≤ 2.5 X institutional upper limit of normal
    • creatinine within normal institutional limits
  • Women of child-bearing potential and men with partners of child-bearing potential must agree to use adequate contraception (hormonal or barrier method of birth control; abstinence) prior to study entry, for the duration of study participation, and for 90 days following completion of therapy. Should a woman become pregnant or suspect she is pregnant while participating in this study, she should inform her treating physician immediately.

    • A woman of child-bearing potential is any female (regardless of sexual orientation, having undergone a tubal ligation, or remaining celibate by choice) who meets the following criteria:

      • Has not undergone a hysterectomy or bilateral oophorectomy; or
      • Has not been naturally postmenopausal for at least 12 consecutive months (i.e., has had menses at any time in the preceding 12 consecutive months)
    • Men of child-bearing potential must not donate sperm while on this study and for 90 days after the study treatment (surgery with HIPEC).

Exclusion Criteria Participants meeting any of the exclusion criteria at baseline will be excluded from study participation.

  • Current or anticipated use of other investigational agents while participating in this study.
  • Patient has received systemic chemotherapy or radiotherapy within 4 weeks prior to study enrollment.
  • Patient has not recovered sufficiently (PI will judge patient recovery status) from adverse events due to agents administered more than 4 weeks prior to enrollment on this study.
  • Patient has history of or currently has non-peritoneal surface metastatic disease in addition to peritoneal surface malignancy.
  • History of allergic reactions attributed to compounds of similar chemical or biologic composition to mitomycin-C or melphalan.
  • Uncontrolled intercurrent illness including, but not limited to, ongoing or active infection, symptomatic congestive heart failure, unstable angina pectoris, life-threatening cardiac arrhythmia, severe pulmonary disease, uncontrolled diabetes, severe kidney disease or psychiatric illness/social situations that would limit compliance with study requirements.
  • Pregnant or nursing. There is a potential for congenital abnormalities and for this regimen to harm nursing infants.
  • Patient actively being treated for other malignancy (current active treatment of early stage squamous or basal cell carcinomas of the skin is allowed, excluding treatment with other investigational agents and systemic chemotherapy or radiotherapy).
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Mitomycin C Group

    Mitomycin-C initial dose of 15 mg/m2 (milligrams per meter squared) 45 minutes into the perfusion, a maintenance dose of 5 mg/m2 will be administered.

    Drug: Mitomycin c

  • Experimental
    Melphalan Group

    Melphalan 60 mg/m2 (milligrams per meter squared) 45 minutes into the perfusion.

    Drug: Melphalan

Interventions

  • DrugMitomycin c

    Mitomycin-c will be given to participants in Treatment Arm 1 as a one-time, intraoperative, intravenous administration for a duration of 90 minutes. 45 minutes into the perfusion, a maintenance dose will be administered.

    Also known as: Mutamycin, MTC

  • DrugMelphalan

    Melphalan will be given to participants in Treatment Arm 2 as a one-time, intraoperative, intravenous administration for a duration of 90 minutes.

    Also known as: Alkeran

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) score.

    CCI will be evaluated using the following data: morbidity, mortality.

    Time frame: Every 3 months until Year 2

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • The University of Kansas Medical Center
    Westwood, Kansas 66205, United States
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 9, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03073694
Lead sponsor
University of Kansas Medical Center
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 8, 2017
Start date
Jul 14, 2017
Primary completion
Jul 2024 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 2025 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 9, 2023

Study contacts

Mazin Al-kasspooles, MD
Contact
mal-kasspooles@kumc.edu
913-588-6568
Ashley Shores
Contact
ashores@kumc.edu
913-588-1897
Mazin Al-kasspooles, MD
principal investigator · The University of Kansas - Cancer Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion