An interventional study of Quality Improvement Support in Cardiovascular Diseases, sponsored by Virginia Commonwealth University. Completed. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-11-09.
Sponsored by Virginia Commonwealth University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research
Most care for chronic conditions is provided by primary care clinicians. Although Virginia ranks 4th among the 50 states in average income, it ranks 27th in mortality due to heart attacks and strokes. The scope and focus of this project will materially improve the rates of screening and treatment of risk factors for heart attacks and strokes, and will give primary care clinicians the tools and training to improve the care of other chronic illnesses and the delivery of preventive services.
Restoring Primary Care in Virginia: Patient Centered Outcomes Research (PCOR) Learning as a Pathway to Value is an extension of the Virginia Center for Health Innovation's (VCHI) work to address primary care transformation in its Virginia Health Innovation Plan. VCHI, in partnership with four of Virginia's schools of medicine, the Virginia Center for Health Quality (VHQC), and evaluation specialists at George Mason University, will form the Virginia Primary Care Transformation Collaborative (VPCTC). They will use an evidence-based, comprehensive strategy to help up to 300 small-to-medium sized primary care practices: 1) accelerate incorporation of PCOR clinical and organizational findings into practice with an initial focus on cardiovascular health and the Aspirin, Blood Pressure, Cholesterol, and Smoking (ABCS); 2) increase their capacity to integrate new PCOR findings on an on-going basis; and 3) learn strategies that can help them sustain and revitalize their organizations while restoring the joy to primary care practice. Practice supports will include on-site coaching, expert consultation, collaborative learning events, an online support center, and data feedback and benchmarking. As a result of this project, "Restoring Primary Care in Virginia," participating practices will develop stronger Quality Improvement (QI) capacity and learn strategies that can help them sustain and revitalize their organizations while restoring the joy to primary care practice. The value proposition to recruit and retain participating practices includes: Improved financial performance; improved clinician, staff, and patient satisfaction; objectively improved quality of care; improved ability to negotiate for and receive pay for performance bonuses, including Electronic Medical Record (EMR) meaningful use stage 2; completion of Part IV certification by the American Board of Family Medicine (ABFM) and American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM) for QI work completed in this initiative; and engagement in a self-sustaining learning collaborative of similar practices after the end of the project. The evaluation plan is designed to answer these questions: (1) Did the VPCTC intervention improve the performance of small physician practices in Virginia as measured by the individual ABCS? (2) Which elements of the intervention were most important to the physicians for performance improvement? (3) Did "maintenance" or follow-up intervention activities add value or was the initial intense intervention enough to produce the measured impact? (4) Which internal contextual or structural features of practices at baseline are most likely to be associated with improved performance (e.g., expansive use of EMRs, degree of adaptive reserve or change processing capacity, number of physicians in the practice, etc.)? (5) Did the VPCTC improve the capacity of small physician practices to implement future PCOR findings and improve quality on an ongoing basis? (6) Which elements of the intervention were most important to the physicians for QI capacity building? Multivariate statistical modeling of clinical performance and survey data will be performed to answer questions 1, 3, and 4.
Qualitative interviews, surveys and statistical analysis of survey results will answer questions 2, 5, and 6.
5,025 studies on the registry are indexed under Cardiovascular Diseases; 930 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 231 is above the median of 100 across 2,801 interventional studies indexed under Cardiovascular Diseases.
Browse Cardiovascular Diseases studies →Virginia Commonwealth University is the lead sponsor of 648 studies on the registry; 82 are open to participants now.
Of its 90 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 64 (71%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
A blended support strategy will include practice facilitation, expert consultation, collaborative learning events, an online support center, and data feedback and benchmarking.
Other: Quality Improvement Support
Practices will receive a blended strategy of quality improvement facilitation to help participating practices incorporate PCOR clinical and organizational findings while building their overall practice capabilities. Primary care practices will be provided tools and training to improve the rates of screening and treatment of risk factors for heart attacks and strokes, as well as other chronic illnesses and the delivery of preventive services.
Aspirin prescriptions
Practice level rates of aspirin or other anti-thrombotics being prescribed. The outcome measure will be assessed from data extracted from practice EMR.
Time frame: 3 month
Blood pressure
Blood pressure control for hypertensives. The outcome measure will be assessed from data extracted from practice EMR.
Time frame: 3 months
Statin prescriptions
Practice level rates of Statins being prescribed for categories of higher risk cholesterol levels. The outcome measure will be assessed from data extracted from practice EMR.
Time frame: 3 months
Smoking
Smoking assessment. The outcome measure will be assessed from data extracted from practice EMR.
Time frame: 3 months
Smoking
Smoking cessation counseling. The outcome measure will be assessed from data extracted from practice EMR.
Time frame: 3 months
Capacities to incorporate new patient centered outcome research
Capacities of practices to incorporate new patient centered outcome research into their care of patients. This outcome measure will be assessed using surveys.
Time frame: 1 year after intervention
Capacities to incorporate new patient centered outcome research
Capacities of practices to incorporate new patient centered outcome research into their care of patients. This outcome measure will be assessed using interviews.
Time frame: 1 year after intervention
Joy in practice
This outcome measure will be assessed by way of surveys.
Time frame: 1 year after intervention
No study locations are listed for this record.
Plan to share: No
This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Virginia Commonwealth University →