A Phase 1/2 interventional study of Durvalumab and Cetuximab in Head and Neck Neoplasms, sponsored by Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi. Status unknown. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-11-22.
Sponsored by Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi · Phase 1/2, Interventional, and Treatment
In over 60% of cases, squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) is discovered at a loco-regionally advanced stage that requires a combined multimodal strategy in order to pursue a curative intent. Bonner et al demonstrated that the combination of radiation (RT) with Cetuximab (CTX), a chimeric mouse IgG1 monoclonal anti-EGFR antibody, results in better median locoregional control and overall survival compared with RT alone without an increased rate of > G3 acute toxicity or detrimental effect on compliance and quality of life. However, subsequent negative trials (RTOG 0522) led to the hypothesis that in unselected patient populations the benefit of CTX may be diluted due to the molecular heterogeneity of SSCHN. Moreover, the absence of biomarkers predictive of response to anti-EGFR treatment may in part be explained by the observation that other factors play a role in favoring its anticancer effect, namely immunologic mechanisms. It has been demonstrated that SCCHN is an immunosuppressive disease characterized by prominent immuno-escape mechanisms, such as induction of a tumor-permissive cytokine profile and qualitative/quantitative lymphocyte deficiencies, occurrence of anergy in major immune effector cells and poor antigen presentation. Given these observations, it has been postulated that SCCHN may benefit from immunotherapeutic strategies, primarily aimed at PD-L1/PD1 checkpoint blockade. Segal et al (Asco 2015) reported preliminary results on the use of Durvalumab in pretreated patients with recurrent/metastatic SCCHN. Durvalumab is a humanized monoclonal IgG1 antibody that blocks PD-L1 binding to PD-1 and CD80 with high affinity and selectivity, thereby promoting activity of tumor-specific effector T cells and global anti-tumor immune response. Out of 64 treated patients, 51 patients were available for the preliminary efficacy analysis: promisingly, the overall response rate was 12% (25% in PD-L1 positive patients). To date, no clinical trial, specifically designed for SCCHN, testing PD-L1 targeted agents has been completed, nor have been initiated combination strategies of CTX, RT and PD1/PD-L1 antibodies in the curative setting. Taken all data together, a strong rationale may support the combination of Durvalumab, anti-EGFR therapy such as CTX and RT in order to revert the SCCHN-induced immune suppression and maximize treatment efficacy, ultimately through enhanced, CTX-mediated immune mechanisms and maximized RT-specific cytotoxicity.
2,344 studies on the registry are indexed under Head and Neck Neoplasms; 551 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 69 is above the median of 47 across 1,751 interventional studies indexed under Head and Neck Neoplasms.
Browse Head and Neck Neoplasms studies →Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi is the lead sponsor of 75 studies on the registry; 22 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Durvalumab, Cetuximab and Radiotherapy followed by adjuvant Durvalumab (6 months)
Biological: Durvalumab · Biological: Cetuximab · Radiation: Intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT)
Durvalumab given intravenously at 1500 mg every 4 weeks; first two cycles concurrent with RT + cetuximab, 6 cycles after the end of RT as adjuvant treatment; treatment will be continued for a maximum of 8 months (concurrent phase included).
Cetuximab given intravenously weekly at 400mg/m2 loading dose 1 week before RT start, then 250 mg/m2 weekly thereafter.
A total dose of 69.9 Gy will be given with 2.12 Gy dose per fraction, delivered in 33 fractions over 7 weeks.
To assess the efficacy of the experimental regimen (Durvalumab, Cetuximab and Radiotherapy)
Progression-free survival according to Recist 1.1
Time frame: 2-year PFS
To assess the number of participants with treatment-related adverse events according to CTCAE v.4
Acute toxicity according to CTCAE v. 4
Time frame: Within 90 days of end of treatment (last infusion of Durvalumab scheduled at 29th week; EoT)
To assess the tolerability of the experimental regimen (Durvalumab, Cetuximab and Radiotherapy)
Relative dose intensity (RDI) of Durvalumab, Cetuximab and Radiotherapy
Time frame: Within 90 days of end of treatment (last infusion of Durvalumab scheduled at 29th week; EoT)
To assess the efficacy of the experimental regimen (Durvalumab, Cetuximab and Radiotherapy)
Locoregional control (LRC) according to Recist 1.1
Time frame: 2-year LRC
To assess the efficacy of the experimental regimen (Durvalumab, Cetuximab and Radiotherapy)
Overall Survival (OS) according to Recist 1.1
Time frame: 2-year OS
To assess the efficacy of the experimental regimen (Durvalumab, Cetuximab and Radiotherapy)
Overall Survival (OS) according to Recist 1.1
Time frame: 5-year OS
To assess the number of participants with treatment-related adverse events
Late toxicity according to CTCAE v.4
Time frame: Beyond 90 days of end of treatment (last infusion of Durvalumab scheduled at 29th week; EoT)
To assess health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients treated with the experimental regimen (Durvalumab, Cetuximab and Radiotherapy)
EORTC-QLQ C30, EORTC-QLQ H\&N35 questionnaires
Time frame: Baseline, within 2 weeks of end of treatment (EoT), 12 months (change over time)
No study locations are listed for this record.
Plan to share: Yes — Clinical and biologic (translational) individual data will be available after the end of study
This study is status unknown, as verified in Nov 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi