CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03048695Updated Feb 10, 2021

Goal Management Training for Patients With Schizophrenia or High Risk for Schizophrenia

An interventional study of GMT in Schizophrenia and Neurocognitive Disorders, sponsored by Sykehuset Innlandet HF. Completed at 1 site in Norway. Open to participants aged 16 Years to 67 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-02-10.

Sponsored by Sykehuset Innlandet HF · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
83
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
16 Years to 67 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

About 85% of patients with schizophrenia have cognitive impairments, executive functions being particularly affected. Executive dysfunction, and cognitive deficits in general, are important predictors of functional outcomes, including social problem solving, activities of daily living, life satisfaction, and the ability to return to work or school.The main objective of the current study is to examine the efficacy of group-based Goal Management Training (GMT) for patients with broad schizophrenia spectrum disorders or high risk individuals with executive deficits. The short term goals are to investigate whether GMT can improve participants' ability to organize and achieve goals in everyday life in addition to improving aspects of emotional health. A long-term goal would be to establish an evidence base for nonpharmacological interventions for patients with broad schizophrenia spectrum disorders or high risk for schizophrenia. Main research questions: (1) Does a RCT with GMT delivered to patients with broad schizophrenia spectrum disorders or high risk for schizophrenia result in improved executive functioning, measured by self-reported and/or objective measures of executive functions? (2) Does GMT result in improved goal attainment in everyday life, social- and real world functioning? (3) Does GMT have a positive impact on the patients' emotional health? (4) Are there specific characteristics in patients with broad schizophrenia spectrum disorders or high risk for schizophrenia that are associated with better treatment benefit from GMT?

02

Conditions studied

  • Schizophrenia
  • Neurocognitive Disorders
03

In context

Schizophrenia

3,471 studies on the registry are indexed under Schizophrenia; 472 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 83 is above the median of 70 across 2,872 interventional studies indexed under Schizophrenia.

Browse Schizophrenia studies →

Lead sponsor

Sykehuset Innlandet HF is the lead sponsor of 50 studies on the registry; 9 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
16 Years to 67 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Being consecutively referred to treatment for a DSM-IV diagnosis of broad schizophrenia spectrum psychosis (schizophrenia, schizophreniform disorder and schizoaffective disorder) or high risk for psychosis or being treated for psychotic disorder for less than 5 years.
  • Reporting executive problems through (a) structured interview, or (b) self-report, i.e. BRIEF scale T-score \< 55.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Reported ongoing alcohol or substance abuse.
  • Premorbid neurological disease or insult and/or comorbid neurological disease. ° Severe cognitive problems interfering with the capacity to participate.
  • IQ below 70.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
83 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Goal Management Training

    Cognitive rehabilitation

    Behavioral: GMT

  • No intervention
    Waiting list

Interventions

  • BehavioralGMT

    Metacognitive strategy training where the primary objective is to stop ongoing behavior to define goal hierarchies and monitor performance

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Behavior Rating Inventory for Executive Functions

    Assessing change

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately post-intervention and 6 months follow-up

  2. Conners Continuous Performance Test III

    Assessing change

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately post-intervention and 6 months follow-up

  3. Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale

    Assessing change

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately post-intervention and 6 months follow-up

Secondary outcomes

  1. Global Assessment of Functioning-Split Version

    Assessing change

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately post-intervention and 6 months follow-up

  2. The Hotel Task

    Assessing change

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately post-intervention and 6 months follow-up

  3. Delis Kaplan Executive Function System (D-KEFS) subtests

    Assessing change

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately post-intervention and 6 months follow-up

  4. Digit span and Letter-number sequencing

    Assessing change

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately post-intervention and 6 months follow-up

  5. Iowa Gambling Task

    Assessing change

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately post-intervention and 6 months follow-up

  6. Dysexecutive Questionnaire (self-and informant)

    Assessing change

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately post-intervention and 6 months follow-up

  7. Cognitive Failures Questionnaire

    Assessing change

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately post-intervention and 6 months follow-up

  8. Goal Attainment Scaling

    Assessing change

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately post-intervention and 6 months follow-up

  9. Everyday Functioning from NORMENT Long time follow up questionnaires

    Assessing change

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately post-intervention and 6 months follow-up

  10. General Perceived Self-Efficacy Scale

    Assessing change

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately post-intervention and 6 months follow-up

  11. Social Functioning Scale

    Assessing change

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately post-intervention and 6 months follow-up

  12. The Perceived Quality of Life Scale

    Assessing change

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately post-intervention and 6 months follow-up

  13. Rosenberg self-esteem scale

    Assessing change

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately post-intervention and 6 months follow-up

  14. Hopkins Symptom Checklist 10

    Assessing change

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately post-intervention and 6 months follow-up

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Sykehuset Innlandet Reinsvoll
    Reinsvoll, 2840, Norway
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Haugen I, Stubberud J, Haug E, McGurk SR, Hovik KT, Ueland T, Oie MG. A randomized controlled trial of Goal Management Training for executive functioning in schizophrenia spectrum disorders or psychosis risk syndromes. BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Aug 28;22(1):575. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-04197-3. PubMed 36031616 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 10, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03048695
Lead sponsor
Sykehuset Innlandet HF
Collaborators
University of Oslo
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 9, 2017
Start date
May 18, 2017
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2020
Completion
Dec 31, 2020
Last update
Feb 10, 2021

Study contacts

Merete G Øie, Phd
principal investigator · Sykehuset Innlandet HF

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion