ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03047980Updated Nov 1, 2021Results posted

Trial of Sirolimus for Cognitive Impairment in Sturge-Weber Syndrome

A Phase 2/3 interventional study of Sirolimus in Sturge-Weber Syndrome, sponsored by Anne Comi, MD. Completed at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 3 Years to 31 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-11-01.

Sponsored by Anne Comi, MD · Phase 2/3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2/3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
10
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
3 Years to 31 Years
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 1,418 studies in Cognitive Dysfunction with a site in United States — 328 open to participants now, 432 under way, 13 of them phase 3. Cognitive Dysfunction · United States.

Enrollment
1,036th of 1,143
10 · median 58
Started
2017
with 75 others
Phase 2/3
12 of 1,418
1 open now
Registered
456th of 1,418
by date

Among the 1,418 studies in Cognitive Dysfunction with a site in United States, this one is the 1,036th largest by enrollment of the 1,143 interventional ones, is one of 76 that started in 2017, is one of 12 in phase 2/3, and was the 456th registered.

By phase

1,418 studies; the count open now beside each. This study's row is marked.

No phase713 · 181 open
Observational270 · 67 open
Phase 2198 · 37 open
Phase 1102 · 21 open
Phase 458 · 8 open
Phase 342 · 5 open
Phase 1/223 · 8 open
Phase 2/3this study12 · 1 open

By the year they started

First in 1993; this study’s year is marked. 76 started in 2017.

Size and results

Median enrollment 58 across the 1,143 interventional studies, 150 across the 270 observational. Of the 885 that completed or were terminated, 377 (43%) have results posted.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVWith an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 1,418 studies in Cognitive Dysfunction with a site in United States, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

The purpose of this research study is to gain a preliminary understanding of the safety of sirolimus in Sturge-Weber syndrome (SWS) and determine best outcomes to be used to assess the utility of sirolimus for the treatment of cognitive impairments related to Sturge-Weber syndrome.

Read the detailed description

Sirolimus will be administered as an adjunct to all current medications. The impact of sirolimus upon cognitive functioning in Sturge-Weber syndrome is the primary outcome measure. This outcome will be assessed using a panel of testing selected based upon extensive experience in testing cognitive function in adults and children with SWS at the Kennedy Krieger Sturge-Weber Center. Changes in a quantitative EEG before and after the trial, Sturge-Weber syndrome clinical neuroscore, port-wine birthmark score, and the impact of sirolimus upon seizures will be assessed.

03

Conditions studied

  • Sturge-Weber Syndrome

Keywords

  • SWS
  • Cognitive impairment
  • sirolimus
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
3 Years to 31 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Male or female patients ages 3 to 31 years of age, inclusive.
  2. Cognitive impairment as defined by the following:

    SWS cognitive neuroscore of ≥ 1

  3. Ability to participate in direct neuropsychological and developmental testing.
  4. English as primary language.
  5. Stable anti-epileptic drugs (no changes in medications except dose for >3 months).
  6. Adequate renal function. must be greater than 50 ml/min/m2 as determined by the Schwartz Formula for children and MDRD for adults: http://www.nkdep.nih.gov/professionals/gfr_calculators/index.htm
  7. If female and of child bearing potential, documentation of a negative pregnancy test prior to enrollment determined by a urine test is required. Sexually active pre-menopausal female patients (and female partners of male patients) must use adequate measures, excluding estrogen containing contraceptives, while on the study drug. Abstinence will be considered an adequate contraceptive measure.
  8. ≤1.5 (Anticoagulation is allowed if target INR ≤ 1.5 on a stable dose of warfarin or on a stable dose of LMW heparin for >2 weeks.)
  9. Adequate liver function as shown by:

    • Serum ≤ 1.5x
    • and AST ≤ 2.5x ULN
  10. Written according to local guidelines. Local guidelines for subject assent will also be followed.
  11. Stable dose of medications affecting the cytochrome P 450 3A4 () and p glycoprotein (P gp) systems for at least 3 months prior to consent.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Allergy to sirolimus or other rapamycin analogues.
  2. Patients with seizures secondary to metabolic, toxic, infectious or psychogenic disorder, drug abuse or current seizures related to an acute medical illness.
  3. Inability to keep follow-up appointments, maintain close contact with Principal Investigators, and/or complete all necessary studies to maintain safety.
  4. Patients in need of immediate major surgical intervention.
  5. Concurrent severe and/or uncontrolled medical disease, which could compromise participation in the pilot study (e.g. uncontrolled diabetes, uncontrolled hypertension, severe infection, severe malnutrition, chronic liver or renal disease, active upper GI tract ulceration, impaired or restrictive pulmonary function, pneumonitis or pulmonary infiltrates).
  6. Chronic treatment with systemic or another agent. Patients with endocrine deficiencies are allowed to receive physiologic or stress doses of steroids if necessary. Inhaled steroids are allowed.
  7. Known history of seropositivity or known immunodeficiency. Testing is not required unless a condition is suspected.
  8. Impairment of gastrointestinal function or gastrointestinal disease that may significantly alter the absorption of sirolimus (e.g. ulcerative disease, uncontrolled nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, malabsorption syndrome or small bowel resection). A gastric tube or nasogastric tube is allowed.
  9. Patients with an active, bleeding diathesis.
  10. Patients with uncontrolled hyperlipidemia: fasting serum cholesterol > 300 mg/dL AND fasting triglycerides > 2.5 x .
  11. Patients who have had a major surgery or significant traumatic injury within four weeks of study entry. Patients who have not recovered from the side effects of any major surgery (defined as requiring general anesthesia) or patients that may require major surgery during the course of the pilot study.
  12. Patients with a prior history of organ transplant.
  13. Patients who have received within one week of start of sirolimus and during the pilot study.
  14. Patients who have a history of .
  15. Patients who are currently part of or have participated in any clinical investigation with an drug within one month prior to enrollment.
  16. Patients being treated with felbamate, unless treatment has been continuous for ≥ one year.
  17. Patients currently receiving anticancer therapies or who have received anticancer therapies within four weeks of study entry (including chemotherapy, radiation therapy, antibody based therapy, etc.).
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(14)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

INR, PT and aPTT (clotting tests)

Blood tests of how long blood takes to clot. The INR is the prothrombin time (PT) put on a common scale; about 1 is usual for someone not taking a blood thinner.

Criteria often make an exception for people on a blood thinner such as warfarin, whose INR is raised on purpose.

Bilirubin

A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.

Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

CYP3A (CYP3A4) inhibitors and inducers

CYP3A is a group of enzymes, mainly CYP3A4, in the liver and gut that break down many medicines. Some medicines, supplements and foods (grapefruit, St John’s wort) slow them down or speed them up, which changes how much of a study drug stays in the body.

Studies list them so they can be avoided or switched; bring a list of everything you take, including supplements.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Live vaccines

Vaccines made with a weakened form of the germ, such as measles–mumps–rubella (MMR), chickenpox and yellow fever. They can be risky when the immune system is weakened. Flu injections are not live; the nasal flu spray is.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2 / Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
10 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Sirolimus

    All subjects will receive the sirolimus oral solution to be taken at home twice daily and will be treated on an outpatient basis. The drug will be taken for six months.

    Drug: Sirolimus

Interventions

  • Low dose oral sirolimus

    Also known as: Rapamycin, Rapamune

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Cognitive Function as Assessed by the National Institute of Health (NIH) Toolbox Cognitive Battery

    Change over six months in cognitive functioning in Sturge-Weber syndrome is the primary outcome measure. This outcome will be assessed using the NIH Toolbox Cognitive Battery, a panel of testing which includes the following measures: * the Flanker Inhibitory Control and Attention Test (executive function and attention) * the Dimensional Change Card Sort Test (executive function) * Picture Sequence Memory Test (episodic memory) * Oral Reasoning Recognition Test and Picture Vocabulary Test (language skills) * Pattern Comparison Processing Speed Test (processing speed) * List Sorting Working Memory Test (working memory) * 9-hole Peg Test (dexterity) * Grip Strength Test (grip strength) and * Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) (self-report emotional functioning). These scores are rescaled to T scores (mean = 50, standard deviation (SD) = 10), referenced against the US population. Higher scores indicate better outcome. T scores only were analyzed.

    Time frame: Baseline and at 6 months on the study drug

Secondary outcomes

  1. Difference in Mean Power Asymmetry of the Occipital Alpha Frequency Band

    Change in mean laterality score (by qEEG power analysis) was done comparing hemispheres and occipital lobes in the following frequency bands; delta, theta, alpha, beta, as previously described. As post-hoc analysis, baseline and follow-up qEEG of patients with and without stroke-like episodes were compared. Greater asymmetry with decreased power on the affected side is worse. We calculated a mean Laterality Score (LSb) for each band, averaged over 30 epochs and included channel pairs. Laterality Scores less than zero indicate lower power on the side ipsilateral to the port wine birthmark. In subjects who had a bilateral port wine birthmark, the side of maximal involvement was used (or the side of known involvement by MRI findings, where present).

    Time frame: Baseline and at 6months on the study drug

  2. Change in Sturge-Weber Syndrome Clinical Neuroscore

    Change in clinical neuroscore over the course of the study were measured. The neuroscore is comprised of frequency of seizures (0-4) , extent of hemiparesis (0-4), assessment of visual field cut (0-2) , and degree of cognitive functioning (0-5) with a minimum total score of 0 and a maximum total score of 15. Higher scores mean worsening of symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline and at 6 months on the study drug

  3. Number of Participants With a Change in Sturge-Weber Syndrome Birthmark Score

    Frontal and profile photograph will be taken under standardized conditions with scoring of the port-wine birthmark for percent of face covered, thickness of birthmark, and darkness of birthmark color.

    Time frame: Visits at 2 weeks (baseline) and 28 weeks (study end)

07

Results

Posted Nov 1, 2021

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneSirolimus
Started10
Completed9
Not completed1
Withdrew: Adverse event1

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange in Cognitive Function as Assessed by the National Institute of Health (NIH) Toolbox Cognitive Battery

Change over six months in cognitive functioning in Sturge-Weber syndrome is the primary outcome measure. This outcome will be assessed using the NIH Toolbox Cognitive Battery, a panel of testing which includes the following measures: * the Flanker Inhibitory Control and Attention Test (executive function and attention) * the Dimensional Change Card Sort Test (executive function) * Picture Sequence Memory Test (episodic memory) * Oral Reasoning Recognition Test and Picture Vocabulary Test (language skills) * Pattern Comparison Processing Speed Test (processing speed) * List Sorting Working Memory Test (working memory) * 9-hole Peg Test (dexterity) * Grip Strength Test (grip strength) and * Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) (self-report emotional functioning). These scores are rescaled to T scores (mean = 50, standard deviation (SD) = 10), referenced against the US population. Higher scores indicate better outcome. T scores only were analyzed.

Time frame:
Baseline and at 6 months on the study drug
Reported as:
Mean · T score
Change in Cognitive Function as Assessed by the National Institute of Health (NIH) Toolbox Cognitive Battery
T scoreSirolimus
National Institute of Health Toolbox Vocabulary Baseline44.2 ± 12.5
National Institute of Health Toolbox Vocabulary Follow-up42.3 ± 12.3
National Institute of Health Toolbox Attention Baseline34.1 ± 10.5
National Institute of Health Toolbox Attention Follow-up35.2 ± 14.1
National Institute of Health Toolbox Working Memory Baseline26.3 ± 9.8
National Institute of Health Toolbox Working Memory Follow-up28.1 ± 3.9
National Institute of Health Toolbox Executive Function Baseline33.1 ± 10.2
National Institute of Health Toolbox Executive Function Follow-up35.7 ± 15.4
National Institute of Health Processing Speed Baseline27.0 ± 14.5
National Institute of Health Processing Speed Follow-up36.4 ± 17.6
National Institute of Health Toolbox Sequential Memory Baseline39.3 ± 12.3
National Institute of Health Toolbox Sequential Memory Follow-up40.9 ± 8.6
National Institute of Health Toolbox Recognition Baseline37.7 ± 12.8
National Institute of Health Toolbox Recognition Follow-up36.0 ± 10.4
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Anxiety Baseline43.5 ± 8.3
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Anxiety Follow-up35.4 ± 20.5
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Depression Baseline45.9 ± 7.9
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Depression Follow-up35.7 ± 20.4
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Fatigue Baseline53.8 ± 5.1
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Fatigue Follow-up36.7 ± 15.3
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Interference49.2 ± 11.1
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Pain (PROMIS) Interference Follow-up36.1 ± 18.8
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function Baseline46.9 ± 10.9
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Interference Follow-up41.9 ± 15.7
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Peer Relations Baseline49.8 ± 10.9
Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Peer Relations Follow-up44.1 ± 17.5
Grip Strength Dominant Baseline39.0 ± 14.4
Grip Strength Dominant Follow-up42.0 ± 5.1
Grip Strength Non-Dominant Baseline26.1 ± 28.2
Grip Strength Non-Dominant Follow-up20.6 ± 28.9
Dexterity Dominant Baseline30.6 ± 16.8
Dexterity Dominant Follow-up31.6 ± 14.3
Dexterity Non-Dominant Baseline31.6 ± 14.3
Dexterity Non-Dominant Follow-up30.1 ± 19.9
SecondaryDifference in Mean Power Asymmetry of the Occipital Alpha Frequency Band

Change in mean laterality score (by qEEG power analysis) was done comparing hemispheres and occipital lobes in the following frequency bands; delta, theta, alpha, beta, as previously described. As post-hoc analysis, baseline and follow-up qEEG of patients with and without stroke-like episodes were compared. Greater asymmetry with decreased power on the affected side is worse. We calculated a mean Laterality Score (LSb) for each band, averaged over 30 epochs and included channel pairs. Laterality Scores less than zero indicate lower power on the side ipsilateral to the port wine birthmark. In subjects who had a bilateral port wine birthmark, the side of maximal involvement was used (or the side of known involvement by MRI findings, where present).

Time frame:
Baseline and at 6months on the study drug
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Difference in Mean Power Asymmetry of the Occipital Alpha Frequency Band
score on a scaleSirolimus
Patients with Stroke-Like Episodes Baseline0.686 ± 0.03
Patients with Stroke-Like Episodes Follow-up0.426 ± 0.19
Patients without Stroke-like episodes Baseline0.167 ± 0.23
Patients without stroke-line episodes follow-up0.247 ± 0.13
SecondaryChange in Sturge-Weber Syndrome Clinical Neuroscore

Change in clinical neuroscore over the course of the study were measured. The neuroscore is comprised of frequency of seizures (0-4) , extent of hemiparesis (0-4), assessment of visual field cut (0-2) , and degree of cognitive functioning (0-5) with a minimum total score of 0 and a maximum total score of 15. Higher scores mean worsening of symptoms.

Time frame:
Baseline and at 6 months on the study drug
Reported as:
Median · score on a scale
Change in Sturge-Weber Syndrome Clinical Neuroscore
score on a scaleSirolimus
Composite Score Baseline4.5 (0 to 15)
Composite Score Follow-up4.5 (0 to 15)
Seizure Score Baseline1 (0 to 4)
Seizure Score Follow-Up1 (0 to 4)
Hemiparesis Score Baseline1 (0 to 4)
Hemiparesis Score Follow-up1 (0 to 4)
Visual Field Cut Score Baseline0.5 (0 to 2)
Visual Field Cut Score Follow-up0 (0 to 2)
Cognitive Function Score Baseline2.5 (0 to 5)
Cognitive Function Score Follow-Up2.5 (0 to 5)
SecondaryNumber of Participants With a Change in Sturge-Weber Syndrome Birthmark Score

Frontal and profile photograph will be taken under standardized conditions with scoring of the port-wine birthmark for percent of face covered, thickness of birthmark, and darkness of birthmark color.

Time frame:
Visits at 2 weeks (baseline) and 28 weeks (study end)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With a Change in Sturge-Weber Syndrome Birthmark Score
ParticipantsSirolimus
Improved Port-Wine Score4
No Change Port-Wine Score2
Worsened Port-Wine Score2
No Port-Wine Birthmark2

Adverse events

Collected over 6 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Sirolimus0/10 (0%)2/10 (20%)9/10 (90%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventSirolimus
HeadacheNervous system disorders1/10
HeadacheNervous system disorders1/10
AnemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders1/10
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 15
Most frequent other events
EventSirolimus
HypertriglyceridemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders4/10
Skin Ulceration in MouthSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders3/10
Increased aspartate aminotransferaseInvestigations2/10
Decreased HDL CholesterolInvestigations2/10
HeadacheNervous system disorders2/10
Personality ChangeProduct Issues2/10
Abdominal PainGastrointestinal disorders1/10
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders1/10
Upper Respiratory InfectionInfections and infestations1/10
Increased Alanine AminotransferaseInvestigations1/10

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Sirolimus
<=18 years9
Between 18 and 65 years1
>=65 years0
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Sirolimus
Mean12.58 ± 5.17
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Sirolimus
Female5
Male5
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Sirolimus
Hispanic or Latino0
Not Hispanic or Latino10
Unknown or Not Reported0
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Sirolimus
American Indian or Alaska Native0
Asian0
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0
Black or African American1
White9
More than one race0
Unknown or Not Reported0
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Sirolimus
United States10
08

Study locations

2 sites
  • Kennedy Krieger Institute
    Baltimore, Maryland 21205, United States
  • Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
    Cincinnati, Ohio 45229, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Jan 2017, a primary completion of Jun 2019 and a completion of Oct 2020. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

Results were first posted in Nov 2021, 2 years 4 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 2, 2017
First posted
Feb 9, 2017
Start
Jan 2017
Primary completionActual
Jun 4, 2019
CompletionActual
Oct 27, 2020
Results first posted
Nov 1, 2021
Last update
Nov 1, 2021
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 1, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03047980
Lead sponsor
Anne Comi, MD
Responsible party
Anne Comi, MD (Principal Investigator, Director Sturge-Weber Center, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Professor Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Hugo W. Moser Research Institute at Kennedy Krieger, Inc.) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Feb 9, 2017
Start date
Jan 2017
Primary completion
Jun 4, 2019
Completion
Oct 27, 2020
Results posted
Nov 1, 2021
Last update
Nov 1, 2021

Study contacts

Anne M Comi, M.D.
principal investigator · Hugo W. Moser Research Institute at Kennedy Krieger, Inc.

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Sirolimus

Start the discussion