An interventional study of SPT and SPT Control in Spinal Cord Injury, Blood Pressure and Cerebral Blood Flow, sponsored by James J. Peters Veterans Affairs Medical Center. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 75 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-06-26.
Sponsored by James J. Peters Veterans Affairs Medical Center · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
Multiple studies in the spinal cord injury (SCI) population have documented deficits in learning and memory (LM) and processing speed (PS) that adversely impact daily life and the ability to benefit from rehabilitation. The investigators have previously attributed the cognitive deficits demonstrated in the SCI population to low blood pressure (BP) and cerebral blood flow (CBF) and are currently conducting a study to determine the effect of a 30-day elevation in BP (using midodrine hydrochloride - an alpha agonist) on CBF and cognitive performance compared to placebo in hypotensive individuals with SCI. In addition, the investigators believe that cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) may improve cognition independent of changes in BP and CBF in individuals with SCI. The current randomized clinical trial (RCT) will examine the efficacy of 2 treatment protocols shown to be effective in improving cognitive performance in other neurologically impaired populations for use in persons with SCI demonstrating (1) LM impairment and/or (2) PS impairment on objective measures of cognitive functioning during a complete Neuropsychological assessment. Two methods of outcome assessment will be used to examine treatment impact: (1) a traditional Neuropsychological assessment (NP) and (2) an assessment of global functioning (AGF) composed of broader outcome measures that examine the impact of the treatment on everyday life activities. In this way, the investigators will be able to objectively evaluate the presence or absence of changes in memory performance through a NP assessment, while also evaluating the impact of this treatment protocol on everyday life through the AGF. While most studies evaluating the efficacy of cognitive retraining usually employ a pre- and post-training evaluation, such evaluations have been criticized for their lack of ecological validity (i.e., real world generalizability). The present design allows the assessment of the efficacy of these treatment techniques within an SCI population using traditional measures, as well as the assessment of the impact that treatment has on everyday life. The investigators will additionally evaluate the long-term efficacy by including a 6-month post-treatment follow-up. Few studies examine long-term effects, but given the time, labor and expense involved, it is critical to demonstrate long-term efficacy.
104 individuals with SCI will be recruited for eligibility to participate in the study. Participants will be randomly assigned to 4 groups (n=26 per group) story memory technique (mSMT), mSMT control, speed of processing training (SPT) and SPT control.
The study involves 14 visits spread over 8 months. A screening visit, lasting approximately 1 hour. 3 testing sessions lasting 3-4 hours each (Baseline, Immediate and Long-term follow-ups), and 10 intervention sessions that will last approximately 45 minutes each.
Screening: Prior to enrollment in the study protocol, all potential subjects will undergo cognitive screening to determine eligibility for participation.
Baseline: After passing screening, subjects will be scheduled for the baseline evaluation comprised of a cardiovascular/cerebrovascular assessment and cognitive evaluation.
Intervention: Subjects will undergo 10 sessions of training in one of the 4 randomized groups.
Immediate Follow-up Assessment: Subjects will undergo a repeat of the baseline assessments upon completion of the intervention protocol to document changes in PS, LM, BP and CBF following treatment.
Long-Term Follow-up: Subjects will be asked to return to the laboratory 6 months following the intervention for evaluation of the maintenance of the treatment effect over time. Baseline and Immediate follow-up measures of PS, LM, BP and CBF will be documented.
1,948 studies on the registry are indexed under Spinal Cord Injuries; 505 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 10 is below the median of 24 across 1,566 interventional studies indexed under Spinal Cord Injuries.
Browse Spinal Cord Injuries studies →James J. Peters Veterans Affairs Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 49 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.
Of its 8 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 2 (25%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Speed of Processing Training
Other: SPT
Control group to SPT treatment group
Other: SPT Control
Story Memory Technique
Other: mSMT
Control group to mSMT treatment group
Other: mSMT Control
Participants in the SPT group will receive 10 training sessions over 5 weeks.
Participants in the SPT control group will receive 10 computer-based control sessions over a five-week period during which they will engage in computer-based training. However, they will not be exposed to the training materials central to the SPT.
Participants in the mSMT group will meet with the trainer twice per week for five weeks. Sessions last 45-60 minutes each and are spread over 5 weeks.
Participants in the mSMT control group will meet with the therapist at the same frequency and for the same duration as those in the mSMT experimental group. However, subjects will not be exposed to the training materials central to the mSMT.
Neuropsychological Tests [Change from baseline at immediate follow up (post treatment) and long term follow-up (6months post treatment)]
NP testing will be conducted to document levels of cognitive performance. NP assessment will identify persons who qualifies for study participation.
Time frame: Screening (before baseline measures), Baseline, Immediate Follow-up (about 2 months after baseline), Long-term Follow-up (6 months after immediate follow-up)
Systolic Blood Pressure [Change from baseline at immediate follow up (post treatment) and long term follow-up (6months post treatment)]
Brachial BP will be measured by a trained technician using a standard adult BP cuff (GE Healthcare Information Technologies, Milwaukee, WI) at 60-second intervals. Beat-to-beat finger arteriolar BP will be monitored continuously from the left middle or ring finger using photoplethysmography (FMS: Finometer, model 2; Amsterdam, Netherlands).
Time frame: Baseline, Immediate Follow-up (about 2 months after baseline), Long-term Follow-up (6 months after immediate follow-up)
Diastolic Blood Pressure [Change from baseline at immediate follow up (post treatment) and long term follow-up (6months post treatment)]
Brachial BP will be measured by a trained technician using a standard adult BP cuff (GE Healthcare Information Technologies, Milwaukee, WI) at 60-second intervals. Beat-to-beat finger arteriolar BP will be monitored continuously from the left middle or ring finger using photoplethysmography (FMS: Finometer, model 2; Amsterdam, Netherlands).
Time frame: Baseline, Immediate Follow-up (about 2 months after baseline), Long-term Follow-up (6 months after immediate follow-up)
Cerebral Blood Flow Velocity [Change from baseline at immediate follow up (post treatment) and long term follow-up (6months post treatment)]
A transcranial Doppler (TCD) ultrasound probe will be used to locate the left middle cerebral artery (MCA). Once the MCA is located a head harness will be used to secure probe placement for assessment of resting cerebral blood flow velocity (CBFv).
Time frame: Baseline, Immediate Follow-up (about 2 months after baseline), Long-term Follow-up (6 months after immediate follow-up)
Plan to share: Undecided
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
James J. Peters Veterans Affairs Medical Center