CClinicalTrials.gg
WithdrawnNCT02997527ImpedanceUpdated Nov 13, 2018

[Impedance Measurement for Non-Erosive Reflux Disease

An interventional study of Intraluminal Impedance in GERD and Healthy, sponsored by Mayo Clinic. Withdrawn at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 90 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-11-13.

Sponsored by Mayo Clinic · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Why this study was withdrawn
Completed very similar study
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
0
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 90 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study is being done to determine if people with and without GERD or trouble swallowing have increased esophageal mucosa impedance (food getting into the esophageal tissue).

Read the detailed description

In patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) but without gross evidence of esophageal injury, confirmation of acid reflux is typically performed through testing that measures reflux at or proximal to 5 cm above the gastroesophageal junction. These tests such as pH/impedance monitoring and Bravo probe placement in the esophagus have been the gold standard for diagnosing and quantitating the degree of gastroesophageal reflux. This stands in contrast to the concept that the esophagus distal to 5 cm is first and foremost exposed to gastroesophageal reflux and that most injury in the form of erosive esophagitis is seen in the 4cm segment below where this instruments measure reflux. As a result, this type of testing may not allow for full understanding of the pathophysiology of GERD. Furthermore, with refluxed acid exposure limited to the distal esophagus in some patients, use of conventional pH testing could lead to inaccurate diagnosing of GERD.

Esophageal impedance testing measures epithelial integrity as reflected through the ability of the mucosa to conduct electric current. As dilation of intercellular spaces in biopsies from patients with GERD is considered the earliest indication of esophageal injury in response to reflux in the absence of gross endoscopic injury, the measure of increased current conduction through these dilated spaces has been shown to be an accurate means of diagnosing patients with non-erosive reflux disease. To this point, most esophageal impedance has been measured using impedance ports placed at locations similar to the pH probes in a combined intra-esophageal ambulatory catheter. As a result, the most distal point of impedance measurement is also 5 cm above the gastroesophageal junction. Recently, a site specific endoscopically placed impedance probe has been developed that can measure esophageal mucosal impedance at any point of the esophagus.

In this study the Principal Investigator would like to look at patients with and without reflux symptoms measuring impedance at 1,2,3,4 and 5 cm at the 6 o'clock position above the Gastroesophageal Junction.

02

Conditions studied

  • GERD
  • Healthy
03

In context

Non-Erosive Reflux Disease

48 studies on the registry are indexed under Non-Erosive Reflux Disease; 7 are open to participants now.

Browse Non-Erosive Reflux Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

Mayo Clinic is the lead sponsor of 3,218 studies on the registry; 670 are open to participants now.

Of its 445 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 313 (70%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 90 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults ages 18-90
  • Patients with heartburn and no hiatal hernia undergoing clinically indicated endoscopy
  • Patients with heartburn and a hiatal hernia > 3cm undergoing clinically indicated endoscopy
  • Patients undergoing clinically indicated upper endoscopy for indications other than dysphagia or GERD
  • Patients with reflux symptoms, a normal appearing esophagus on clinically indicated endoscopy undergoing clinically indicated ambulatory pH/impedance testing.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous gastric or esophageal surgery.
  • Use of proton pump inhibitors 1 month prior to the study
  • Patients on anticoagulation other than aspirin or clopidogrel
  • Presence of erosive esophagitis or Barrett's esophagus
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
0 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intraluminal impedance testing

    During the participant's clinical endoscopy the 2.13 mm catheter (tiny tube), called an Intraluminal Impedance, will be passed through the channel of the standard endoscope. * The catheter (tiny tube) will be placed through the endoscope in your esophagus 1 cm above where your stomach and esophagus meet for 5 seconds. * At 2 cm above where your stomach and esophagus meet the catheter will be placed for 5 seconds * And at 3 cm above where the participants stomach and esophagus meet the catheter will be placed for 5 seconds. * At 4 cm above where the participants stomach and esophagus meet the catheter will be placed for 5 seconds. * At 5 cm above where the participants stomach and esophagus meet the catheter will be placed for 5 seconds.

    Device: Intraluminal Impedance

Interventions

  • DeviceIntraluminal Impedance

    Esophageal impedance testing measures epithelial integrity as reflected through the ability of the mucosa to conduct electric current. Recently, a site specific endoscopically placed impedance probe has been developed that can measure esophageal mucosal impedance at any point of the esophagus.

    Also known as: Impedance testing

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Epithelial integrity in GERD an Non-GERD subjects

    A special sensor array (Mucosal Impedance) composed of 360_ circumferential sensing rings was engineered and mounted on a 2-mm-diameter soft catheter easily traversable through the working channel of an upper endoscope. The frequency for the measuring circuit was set at 2 kHz. Impedance measurements of the esophageal mucosa were expressed in ohms as the ratio of voltage to the current, according to Ohm's law (voltage ¼ IR). Data will be acquired with a stationary impedance data acquisition system and viewed and analyzed on BioView Analysis software. Impedance measurements will be obtained at 1,2,3,4, 5 cm at the 6 O'clock position above the gastroesophageal junction

    Time frame: 1 year

Secondary outcomes

  1. Epithelial integrity by Mucosal Impedance verses gold standard Ambulatory pH monitoring

    To compare the findings of esophageal impedance probe measurement to those of traditional pH monitoring in patients with NERD undergoing clinically indicated pH/impedance monitoring to determine the accuracy of the impedance probe relative to the gold standard catheter based evaluation.

    Time frame: 1 year

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Mayo Clinic in Rochester
    Rochester, Minnesota 55905, United States
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 13, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02997527
Lead sponsor
Mayo Clinic
Responsible party
David A. Katzka (David A. Kazka, MD, Mayo Clinic) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 20, 2016
Start date
Dec 2016 (estimated)
Primary completion
Oct 22, 2018
Completion
Oct 22, 2018
Last update
Nov 13, 2018

Study contacts

David A Katzka
principal investigator · Mayo Clinic

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is withdrawn, as verified in Nov 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion