CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02997124Updated Dec 22, 2016

Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Iliac Crest harvest-is it Beneficial?

An interventional study of local infiltration and TAP block and local infiltration only in Pain, Postoperative, sponsored by Jubilee Mission Medical College and Research Institute. Completed. Open to participants aged 4 Years to 22 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-12-22.

Sponsored by Jubilee Mission Medical College and Research Institute · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
143
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
4 Years to 22 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether a supplemental Transversus Abdominis Plane block administered intraoperatively improves the postoperative parameters in patients undergoing Alveolar bone grafting with iliac crest harvest. It also aims to find out if there is a decrease in the incidence of chronic pain or numbness at the harvest site.

Read the detailed description

This study is a prospective, randomised, parallel group, single - centre trial evaluating the postoperative parameters in patients receiving supplemental Transversus Abdominis Plane block for anterior iliac crest harvest. It was conducted in 143 patients undergoing Alveolar bone grafting with iliac crest bone graft.

Methodology:

Informed consent and approval of local ethics and research committee in Jubilee Mission Medical College and Research Institute, Thrissur, India was obtained prior to initiation of the study. A pilot study was done to determine the efficacy of the additional TAP block. The results showed that the intervention improved patient analgesia and reduced the requirement for rescue analgesics. A minimum sample size of 65 patients was calculated for each group to obtain a power of 80% and confidence interval of 95%. 143 patients aged between 7 and 22 years posted for Alveolar bone grafting with anterior iliac crest harvest were assessed in the study. Only those undergoing Alveolar bone grafting as a part of the reconstructive procedure for cleft lip and palate were considered for the study. The patients who had difficulty in mentation and communication,bleeding disorders, hepatic problems, infection of the abdominal wall, renal dysfunction as well as allergy to the local anaesthetic were excluded from the study. Patients undergoing revision surgeries were also excluded from the study. All the candidates were randomly alloted to either of the two groups, using a computer - generated number.

All the patients were premedicated with Midazolam 0.15mg kg-1 and Glycopyrolate 0.01mg kg-1 Anaesthesia was induced with Propofol 2 mg kg -1 and Fentanyl 2 mcg kg-1 .Vecuronium 0.1 mg kg-1 was given to facilitate orotracheal intubation with a cuffed tube.Anaesthesia was maintained with oxygen, nitrous oxide and sevoflurane. Prior to incision, all the patients were given wound infiltration with 0.75 ml kg-1 of 0.2% Ropivacaine at the graft harvest site. Those in group A received an additional ultrasound guided Transversus Abdominis Plane block with a similar volume and concentration of Ropivacaine.

At the end of the surgical procedure, the patients were extubated awake, after giving I / V Neostigmine 0.05 mg kg-1. Just prior to extubation, I/V Tramadol 0.5 mg kg-1 was given for the pain in the postoperative period. In the recovery room, the pain and emergence delirium were assessed by an independent observer every ten minutes during the first postoperative hour.These were evaluated using the FLACC Behavioural Pain Assessment Scale and WATCHA Scale respectively. They were subsequently shifted to the postoperative ward.

The next time point of assessment was 24 hours post - surgery, when the patient's pain and ambulatory status were evaluated. The pain was ranked using the five - point verbal ranking score. It was ranked as no pain, light pain, moderate pain, severe pain and intolerable pain, with a score of 0,1,2,3 and 4 respectively. The total number of rescue analgesics demanded by the patient on the first postoperative day was noted.Ambulatory status was graded using one - day Cumulated Ambulatory Score.

The patients were followed up and questioned at six weeks and twelve weeks post operatively for the presence of chronic pain, numbness or wound healing problems at the harvest site.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pain, Postoperative

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Alveolar bone grafting
  • delirium
  • early ambulation
03

In context

Pain, Postoperative

5,089 studies on the registry are indexed under Pain, Postoperative; 1,137 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 143 is above the median of 75 across 4,341 interventional studies indexed under Pain, Postoperative.

Browse Pain, Postoperative studies →

Lead sponsor

Jubilee Mission Medical College and Research Institute is the lead sponsor of 25 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
4 Years to 22 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Must undergo alveolar bone grafting as a part of the reconstructive procedure for cleft lip and palate

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Revision procedure
  • History of difficulty in mentation and communication
  • Bleeding disorders, hepatic problems or renal dysfunction
  • Allergy to local anaesthetic
  • Presence of infection of anterior abdominal wall
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
143 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Local Infiltration with TAP block

    Ultrasound guided Transversus Abdominis Plane block is administered intraoperatively using 0.2% Ropivacaine.

    Procedure: local infiltration and TAP block

  • Experimental
    Local Infiltration only

    Local Infiltration with 0.2% Ropivacaine.

    Procedure: local infiltration only

Interventions

  • Procedurelocal infiltration and TAP block

    Local infiltration of the iliac crest harvest site along with TAP block using 0.2 % Ropivacaine is done

  • Procedurelocal infiltration only

    Only local infiltration with 0.2% Ropivacaine of the iliac crest harvest site is done.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Mean pain scores

    Mean pain scores were assessed using the FLACC Behavioural Pain Assessment Scale,

    Time frame: First hour after extubation

  2. Emergence delirium

    Emergence delirium was assessed using WATCHA Scale during the first hour after extubation

    Time frame: First hour after extubation

  3. Pain scores

    Pain scores using the five - point verbal ranking score 24 hours after surgery

    Time frame: 24 hours after surgery

  4. Ambulatory status

    Ambulatory status was assessed using one - day Cumulated Ambulatory Score 24 hours after surgery

    Time frame: 24 hours after surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Infection and delayed healing at the graft harvest site

    All patients were interviewed for the presence of infection or delayed healing at the graft harvest site 6 weeks after surgery.

    Time frame: 6 weeks after surgery

  2. Chronic pain, numbness or discomfort at graft harvest site

    All the patients were reviewed 12 weeks after surgery for the presence of chronic pain, numbness or discomfort at iliac crest harvest

    Time frame: 12 weeks after the surgery

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Chiono J, Bernard N, Bringuier S, Biboulet P, Choquet O, Morau D, Capdevila X. The ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block for anterior iliac crest bone graft postoperative pain relief: a prospective descriptive study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2010 Nov-Dec;35(6):520-4. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e3181fa117a. PubMed 20975466 ↗
  • Sandhu HS, Grewal HS, Parvataneni H. Bone grafting for spinal fusion. Orthop Clin North Am. 1999 Oct;30(4):685-98. doi: 10.1016/s0030-5898(05)70120-6. PubMed 10471772 ↗
  • Heary RF, Schlenk RP, Sacchieri TA, Barone D, Brotea C. Persistent iliac crest donor site pain: independent outcome assessment. Neurosurgery. 2002 Mar;50(3):510-6; discussion 516-7. doi: 10.1097/00006123-200203000-00015. PubMed 11841718 ↗
  • DeOrio JK, Farber DC. Morbidity associated with anterior iliac crest bone grafting in foot and ankle surgery. Foot Ankle Int. 2005 Feb;26(2):147-51. doi: 10.1177/107110070502600206. PubMed 15737257 ↗
  • Silber JS, Anderson DG, Daffner SD, Brislin BT, Leland JM, Hilibrand AS, Vaccaro AR, Albert TJ. Donor site morbidity after anterior iliac crest bone harvest for single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Jan 15;28(2):134-9. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200301150-00008. PubMed 12544929 ↗
  • Kim DH, Rhim R, Li L, Martha J, Swaim BH, Banco RJ, Jenis LG, Tromanhauser SG. Prospective study of iliac crest bone graft harvest site pain and morbidity. Spine J. 2009 Nov;9(11):886-92. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2009.05.006. Epub 2009 Jun 18. PubMed 19540168 ↗
  • O'Donnell BD, McDonnell JG, McShane AJ. The transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block in open retropubic prostatectomy. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2006 Jan-Feb;31(1):91. doi: 10.1016/j.rapm.2005.10.006. No abstract available. Erratum In: Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2006 May-Jun;31(3):286. McDonnell, John G [added]; McShane, Alan J [added]. PubMed 16418039 ↗
  • McDonnell JG, O'Donnell B, Curley G, Heffernan A, Power C, Laffey JG. The analgesic efficacy of transversus abdominis plane block after abdominal surgery: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg. 2007 Jan;104(1):193-7. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000250223.49963.0f. Erratum In: Anesth Analg. 2007 May;104(5):1108. PubMed 17179269 ↗
  • Kessler P, Thorwarth M, Bloch-Birkholz A, Nkenke E, Neukam FW. Harvesting of bone from the iliac crest--comparison of the anterior and posterior sites. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2005 Feb;43(1):51-6. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2004.08.026. PubMed 15620775 ↗
  • Zijderveld SA, ten Bruggenkate CM, van Den Bergh JP, Schulten EA. Fractures of the iliac crest after split-thickness bone grafting for preprosthetic surgery: report of 3 cases and review of the literature. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004 Jul;62(7):781-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2003.12.018. PubMed 15218554 ↗
  • Rawashdeh MA, Telfah H. Secondary alveolar bone grafting: the dilemma of donor site selection and morbidity. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008 Dec;46(8):665-70. doi: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2008.07.184. Epub 2008 Aug 29. PubMed 18760515 ↗
  • Kalk WW, Raghoebar GM, Jansma J, Boering G. Morbidity from iliac crest bone harvesting. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1996 Dec;54(12):1424-9; discussion 1430. doi: 10.1016/s0278-2391(96)90257-8. PubMed 8957121 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 22, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02997124
Lead sponsor
Jubilee Mission Medical College and Research Institute
Responsible party
Dr. Vigil Peter (Assistant Professor, Department of Anesthesia, Jubilee Mission Medical College and Research Institute) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 19, 2016
Start date
Apr 2016
Primary completion
Aug 2016
Completion
Nov 2016
Last update
Dec 22, 2016

Study contacts

Vigil Peter, MD
principal investigator · Jubilee Mission Medical College and Research Institute

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion