ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02991729DAASUpdated Oct 22, 2020Results posted

Use of a Novel Computerized Decision Aid for Prenatal Aneuploidy Screening

An interventional study of iPad-based decision aid and Genetic counseling appointment in Aneuploidy and Pregnancy Complications, sponsored by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 50 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-10-22.

Sponsored by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
197
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 50 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The investigators aim to assess whether use of a novel, tablet-based computerized decision aid for aneuploidy screening is similar to routine care with a brief genetic counseling visit in improving patient knowledge and decreasing decisional conflict.

Read the detailed description

184 women will be randomized in a 1:1 fashion to use of a novel computerized iPad-based decision aid in addition to routine counseling or routine counseling only during a single study visit. This decision aid was developed at a 10th grade literacy level using input from Maternal Fetal Medicine physicians and certified genetic counselors, and piloted by 20 English and Spanish speaking women of varying education levels. Following completion of genetic counseling, participants will complete several surveys assessing knowledge and decision conflict. Data will be abstracted regarding demographics, screening and diagnostic testing uptake, and testing results.

02

Conditions studied

  • Aneuploidy
  • Pregnancy Complications

Keywords

  • Decision aid
03

In context

Aneuploidy

73 studies on the registry are indexed under Aneuploidy; 10 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 197 is close to the median of 200 across 34 interventional studies indexed under Aneuploidy.

Browse Aneuploidy studies →

Lead sponsor

University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill is the lead sponsor of 1,372 studies on the registry; 133 are open to participants now.

Of its 161 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 139 (86%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 50 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Pregnancy at less than 22 weeks gestation
  • English or Spanish speaking
  • Undergoing genetic counseling at North Carolina Women's Hospital for aneuploidy screening

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known fetal anomalies
  • Known multiple gestations
  • Prior genetic counseling or aneuploidy screening in current pregnancy
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
197 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Routine care

    These patients will receive routine care at our institution for counseling on aneuploidy screening; they will be counseled by a genetic counselor on options, and following counseling, will select their test of choice. All patients will complete a knowledge and demographics questionnaire prior to genetic counseling. Patients in this arm will then complete a knowledge and decisional conflict survey immediately following genetic counseling.

    Other: Genetic counseling appointment

  • Experimental
    Experimental

    These patients will use an iPad-based decision aid explaining options for aneuploidy screening and testing. They will then immediately be counseled by a genetic counselor on their options as is routine at our institution, and following counseling, will select their test of choice. All patients will complete a knowledge and demographics questionnaire prior to genetic counseling. Patients in this arm will then complete a knowledge and decisional conflict survey following use of the decision aid, and again immediately following genetic counseling.

    Other: iPad-based decision aid · Other: Genetic counseling appointment

Interventions

  • OtheriPad-based decision aid

    This is a novel decision aid developed by genetic counselors and Maternal Fetal Medicine physicians. It is used via an iPad and is interactive. It is available in English and Spanish has been piloted by 20 English and Spanish speaking women. It takes approximately 15 minutes to complete.

  • OtherGenetic counseling appointment

    All participants will undergo an approximately 15 minute educational genetic counseling appointment regarding aneuploidy screening options. Should family history concerns be identified on intake, this visit may be extended to include a discussion of additional issues.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Knowledge Score

    All patients in the intervention arm will complete a knowledge questionnaire following completion of the decision and and again immediately following genetic counseling. The investigators will assess noninferiority of the decision aid on participant knowledge, with primary outcome comparing knowledge after completion of the decision aid in the intervention arm, to knowledge following genetic counseling only in the routine care arm. The questionnaire is a modification of the validated Maternal Serum Screening Knowledge Questionnaire. This is on a 12-point scale (values 0-12), with higher score indicating greater knowledge.

    Time frame: At completion of genetic counseling for the Routine Care Group and at completion of decision aid and genetic counseling for Experimental Group, approximately 10-60 minutes

Secondary outcomes

  1. Decisional Conflict Score

    A low-literacy decisional conflict questionnaire will be used. This will be completed by patients in the intervention arm following use of the decision and and again following genetic counseling. It will be completed by patients in the routine care arm following genetic counseling. Decisional conflict at all time points will be compared - specifically, decisional conflict following decision aid completion in the Experimental Group will be compared to decisional conflict following genetic counseling in the Routine Care Group, and decisional conflict following both decision aid completion and genetic counseling in the Experimental Group will be compared to decisional conflict following genetic counseling in the Routine Care Group. This questionnaire is on a 40 point scale (values 0-40), with higher score indicating higher level of decisional conflict.

    Time frame: At completion of decision aid (Experimental group) and completion of genetic counseling (all participants), approximately 10-60 minutes

  2. Test Chosen

    For participants in the intervention arm, initial choice of aneuploidy screening following use of the decision aid will be compared to final test chosen following genetic counseling.

    Time frame: At completion of decision aid and at completion genetic counseling, approximately 10-60 minutes

  3. Supplementary Tests Performed

    Use of additional aneuploidy screening or testing modalities (cell-free DNA, chorionic villus sampling, or amniocentesis in addition to initial screening test) in the current pregnancy will be assessed up to 22 weeks gestation.

    Time frame: 22 weeks gestation

07

Results

Posted Nov 12, 2019

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneRoutine CareExperimental
Started10592
Completed10592
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryKnowledge Score

All patients in the intervention arm will complete a knowledge questionnaire following completion of the decision and and again immediately following genetic counseling. The investigators will assess noninferiority of the decision aid on participant knowledge, with primary outcome comparing knowledge after completion of the decision aid in the intervention arm, to knowledge following genetic counseling only in the routine care arm. The questionnaire is a modification of the validated Maternal Serum Screening Knowledge Questionnaire. This is on a 12-point scale (values 0-12), with higher score indicating greater knowledge.

Time frame:
At completion of genetic counseling for the Routine Care Group and at completion of decision aid and genetic counseling for Experimental Group, approximately 10-60 minutes
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Knowledge Score
score on a scaleRoutine CareExperimental
Knowledge Score10.6 ± 1.910.2 ± 2.4
Statistical analysis
  • Routine Care vs Experimental · Wilcoxon rank-sum · p = 0.929 (a priori threshold for statistical significance was p\<0.05.)
SecondaryDecisional Conflict Score

A low-literacy decisional conflict questionnaire will be used. This will be completed by patients in the intervention arm following use of the decision and and again following genetic counseling. It will be completed by patients in the routine care arm following genetic counseling. Decisional conflict at all time points will be compared - specifically, decisional conflict following decision aid completion in the Experimental Group will be compared to decisional conflict following genetic counseling in the Routine Care Group, and decisional conflict following both decision aid completion and genetic counseling in the Experimental Group will be compared to decisional conflict following genetic counseling in the Routine Care Group. This questionnaire is on a 40 point scale (values 0-40), with higher score indicating higher level of decisional conflict.

Time frame:
At completion of decision aid (Experimental group) and completion of genetic counseling (all participants), approximately 10-60 minutes
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Decisional Conflict Score
score on a scaleRoutine CareExperimental
Pre-genetic counseling/post-decision aidNA ± NA1.6 ± 3.5
Post-Genetic Counseling1.7 ± 4.80.2 ± 3.5
Statistical analysis
  • Routine Care vs Experimental · Wilcoxon rank-sum · p = 0.369
  • Routine Care vs Experimental · Wilcoxon rank-sum · p = 0.003
  • Experimental · Wilcoxon signed-rank · p = 0.003
SecondaryTest Chosen

For participants in the intervention arm, initial choice of aneuploidy screening following use of the decision aid will be compared to final test chosen following genetic counseling.

Time frame:
At completion of decision aid and at completion genetic counseling, approximately 10-60 minutes
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Test Chosen
ParticipantsExperimental: Pre-genetic CounselingExperimental: Post-genetic Counseling
None/US only1711
First trimester screen3528
Cell free DNA2725
Quadruple analyte screen32
Chorionic villus sampling01
Amniocentesis10
Don't know20
SecondarySupplementary Tests Performed

Use of additional aneuploidy screening or testing modalities (cell-free DNA, chorionic villus sampling, or amniocentesis in addition to initial screening test) in the current pregnancy will be assessed up to 22 weeks gestation.

Time frame:
22 weeks gestation
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Supplementary Tests Performed
ParticipantsRoutine CareExperimental
Invasive testing for high-risk results21
No invasive testing for high-risk results21

Adverse events

Collected over Over the course of the study visit, approximately 1 hour. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Routine Care0/105 (0%)0/105 (0%)0/105 (0%)
Experimental0/92 (0%)0/92 (0%)0/92 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Knowledge score (on 12 point scale) for each participant will be analyzed by group.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Routine CareExperimentalTotal
Mean32.4 ± 5.732.7 ± 5.632.6 ± 5.6
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Routine CareExperimentalTotal
Female10592197
Male000
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Routine CareExperimentalTotal
White6347110
Black191029
Hispanic/Latino152439
Asian5914
Unspecified/other325
08

Study locations

1 site
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
    Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Carlson LM, Harris S, Hardisty EE, Hocutt G, Vargo D, Campbell E, Davis E, Gilmore K, Vora NL. Use of a novel computerized decision aid for aneuploidy screening: a randomized controlled trial. Genet Med. 2019 Apr;21(4):923-929. doi: 10.1038/s41436-018-0283-2. Epub 2018 Sep 14. PubMed 30214066 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data will not be shared with other researchers.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 22, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02991729
Collaborators
North Carolina Translational and Clinical Sciences Institute
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 13, 2016
Start date
Jan 20, 2017
Primary completion
Jan 5, 2018
Completion
Jan 12, 2018
Results posted
Nov 12, 2019
Last update
Oct 22, 2020

Study contacts

Laura M Carlson, MD
principal investigator · University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion