ClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT02987660Updated Jan 14, 2019Results posted

Comparison of Topography Guided LASIK With WaveLight® EX500 to SMILE With Zeiss VisuMax

An interventional study of Topography Guided LASIK and Small Incision Lenticular Extraction in Myopia and Astigmatism, sponsored by Alcon, a Novartis Company. Terminated at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-01-14.

Sponsored by Alcon, a Novartis Company (formerly part of Novartis) · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
management decision; non patient safety related reason
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
21
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to compare Topography Guided Laser In Situ Keratomileusis (LASIK) corneal surgery to Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) corneal surgery for the treatment of myopia with astigmatism.

02

Conditions studied

  • Myopia
  • Astigmatism
03

In context

Myopia

1,159 studies on the registry are indexed under Myopia; 225 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 21 is below the median of 78 across 923 interventional studies indexed under Myopia.

Browse Myopia studies →

Lead sponsor

Alcon, a Novartis Company is the lead sponsor of 13 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

First submitted before Alcon left Novartis.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Subjects in Singapore must be 21 years of age or older and subjects in Korea must be upon completion of 19 years of age or older due to local regulations;
  • Able to comprehend and sign an form;
  • Willing and able to complete all postoperative visits;
  • Myopia requiring (a) refractive error correction of -0.5 to -8.0 D optical infinity adjusted manifest refraction sphere with (b) astigmatism correction of -0.75 to -5.0 D manifest refraction cylinder and (c) at least 0.75 D of corneal astigmatism.
  • Intended treatment targeted for emmetropia;
  • Preoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 0 logMAR or better;
  • Other protocol-defined inclusion criteria may apply.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant or lactating, current or planned, during the course of the study;
  • Dry eye;
  • Corneal disease;
  • Diagnosis of advanced glaucoma;
  • Uncontrolled diabetes;
  • Other protocol-defined exclusion criteria may apply.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
21 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    LASIK with EX500

    Topography Guided LASIK with WaveLight EX500 excimer laser system in bilateral surgery

    Procedure: Topography Guided LASIK · Device: WaveLight EX500 Excimer Laser System

  • Active comparator
    SMILE with VisuMax

    Small incision lenticular extraction (SMILE) with VisuMax laser in bilateral surgery

    Procedure: Small Incision Lenticular Extraction · Device: VisuMax Surgical Laser

Interventions

  • ProcedureTopography Guided LASIK

    Corneal surgery for refractive error correction

  • ProcedureSmall Incision Lenticular Extraction

    Refractive surgical procedure for the correction of myopia with or without astigmatism

    Also known as: SMILE

  • DeviceWaveLight EX500 Excimer Laser System

    As used for corneal stroma ablation (refractive error correction). The treatment is intended to last the subject's lifetime.

  • DeviceVisuMax Surgical Laser

    As used for lenticule creation/removal (refractive error correction). The treatment is intended to last the subject's lifetime.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Eyes With Manifest Refraction Cylinder Less Than or Equal to 0.5 Diopter (D) at 3 Months

    Manifest refraction cylinder was measured monocularly (each eye separately) at 3 or 4 meters (m) under photopic lighting conditions using a phoropter and Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart. The manifest refraction at 4 m or 3 m was adjusted for optical infinity by adding -0.25 D to the sphere value. Both eyes contributed to the analysis. Since the study was terminated early, inferential statistics could not be completed.

    Time frame: Month 3

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mean Manifest Refraction Cylinder at 3 Months

    Manifest refraction cylinder was measured monocularly at 3 or 4 meters under photopic lighting conditions using a phoropter and ETDRS chart. The manifest refraction at 4 m or 3 m was adjusted for optical infinity by adding -0.25 D to the sphere value. Both eyes contributed to the analysis. Since the study was terminated early, inferential statistics could not be completed.

    Time frame: Month 3

  2. Mean Uncorrected Visual Acuity (UCVA) at 3 Months

    Uncorrected (without spectacles or other visual corrective devices) Visual Acuity (UCVA) testing was conducted monocularly in photopic conditions without glare at 3 or 4 meters. Visual Acuity (VA) is measured in "logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution" (logMAR). A lower logMAR value indicates better visual acuity. The Precision Vision illuminator cabinets and ETDRS charts were used. For subjects who could not read English letters, a numerical, Tumbling E logMAR chart was used. Since the study was terminated early, inferential statistics could not be completed.

    Time frame: Month 3

07

Results

Posted Jan 14, 2019

Participant flow

Subjects were recruited from 1 study center located in France.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneLASIKSMILE
Started1010
Completed00
Not completed1010
Withdrew: Study terminated by sponsor1010

Outcome measures

PrimaryPercentage of Eyes With Manifest Refraction Cylinder Less Than or Equal to 0.5 Diopter (D) at 3 Months

Manifest refraction cylinder was measured monocularly (each eye separately) at 3 or 4 meters (m) under photopic lighting conditions using a phoropter and Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) chart. The manifest refraction at 4 m or 3 m was adjusted for optical infinity by adding -0.25 D to the sphere value. Both eyes contributed to the analysis. Since the study was terminated early, inferential statistics could not be completed.

Time frame:
Month 3
Reported as:
Number · percentage of eyes
Percentage of Eyes With Manifest Refraction Cylinder Less Than or Equal to 0.5 Diopter (D) at 3 Months
percentage of eyesLASIKSMILE
Percentage of Eyes With Manifest Refraction Cylinder Less Than or Equal to 0.5 Diopter (D) at 3 Months60 (26.2 to 87.8)100.0 (76.8 to 100.0)
SecondaryMean Manifest Refraction Cylinder at 3 Months

Manifest refraction cylinder was measured monocularly at 3 or 4 meters under photopic lighting conditions using a phoropter and ETDRS chart. The manifest refraction at 4 m or 3 m was adjusted for optical infinity by adding -0.25 D to the sphere value. Both eyes contributed to the analysis. Since the study was terminated early, inferential statistics could not be completed.

Time frame:
Month 3
Reported as:
Mean · Diopters
Mean Manifest Refraction Cylinder at 3 Months
DioptersLASIKSMILE
Mean Manifest Refraction Cylinder at 3 Months-0.575 ± 0.4091-0.232 ± 0.1539
SecondaryMean Uncorrected Visual Acuity (UCVA) at 3 Months

Uncorrected (without spectacles or other visual corrective devices) Visual Acuity (UCVA) testing was conducted monocularly in photopic conditions without glare at 3 or 4 meters. Visual Acuity (VA) is measured in "logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution" (logMAR). A lower logMAR value indicates better visual acuity. The Precision Vision illuminator cabinets and ETDRS charts were used. For subjects who could not read English letters, a numerical, Tumbling E logMAR chart was used. Since the study was terminated early, inferential statistics could not be completed.

Time frame:
Month 3
Reported as:
Mean · logMAR
Mean Uncorrected Visual Acuity (UCVA) at 3 Months
logMARLASIKSMILE
Mean Uncorrected Visual Acuity (UCVA) at 3 Months-0.100 ± 0.1360-0.164 ± 0.0769

Adverse events

Collected over Surgery through study completion, an average of 3 months, per the early termination criteria.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
LASIK0/10 (0%)0/10 (0%)0/10 (0%)
SMILE0/10 (0%)0/10 (0%)0/10 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

This analysis population includes all eyes of randomized subjects for whom the treatment was initiated (Intent to treat Analysis Set) (ITT).

Age, Customized
Age, Customized(Participants)LASIKSMILETotal
< 65 years101020
≥ 65 years000
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)LASIKSMILETotal
Female7613
Male347
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)LASIKSMILETotal
Hispanic or Latino101
Not Hispanic or Latino358
Unknown or Not Reported6511
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Alcon Investigative Site
    Paris, 75008, France
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Mar 2017 to primary completion in Jul 2017, 4 months.

Results were first posted in Jan 2019, 1 year 5 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 7, 2016
First posted
Dec 9, 2016
StartActual
Mar 3, 2017
Primary completionActual
Jul 26, 2017
CompletionActual
Jul 26, 2017
Results first posted
Jan 14, 2019
Last update
Jan 14, 2019
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 14, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02987660
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 9, 2016
Start date
Mar 3, 2017
Primary completion
Jul 26, 2017
Completion
Jul 26, 2017
Results posted
Jan 14, 2019
Last update
Jan 14, 2019

Study contacts

Alcon, A Novartis Division
study director · Alcon, A Novartis Division

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Jul 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion