CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02984267Updated Jul 11, 2018Results posted

Use of Ultrasound Guidance to Assist With Labor Epidural Placement in Patients With a BMI ≥40

An interventional study of Ultrasound and Palpation in Labor Pain, sponsored by Thomas J. Vernon. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-07-11.

Sponsored by Thomas J. Vernon · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
18
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

Placement of labor epidurals is a very common daily practice in obstetrical anesthesia. Currently, these epidurals are placed based upon palpation of landmarks to determine midline and the correct spinal level for placement. Palpation of these landmarks can be difficult, however, particularly in morbidly obese patients who have significant amounts of soft tissue overlying them. This study seeks to use ultrasound guidance to examine the spine prior to epidural placement, and see what effects this has compared to palpation alone with respect to procedure time, number of attempts, success rate in the first attempt, failure rate, complication rate, patient anxiety levels, and patient satisfaction levels.

02

Conditions studied

  • Labor Pain

Browse trials for

03

In context

Labor Pain

396 studies on the registry are indexed under Labor Pain; 66 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 18 is below the median of 100 across 326 interventional studies indexed under Labor Pain.

Browse Labor Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Thomas J. Vernon as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Current (pregnant) BMI ≥ 40
  • Age ≥ 18
  • ASA score of 3 or less
  • Full term pregnancy (37 weeks gestational age or greater)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known scoliosis
  • Known contraindications to neuraxial blockade
  • Intrauterine fetal demise or non-viable fetus.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
18 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Ultrasound Group

    The interventional group that will have their spine evaluated by ultrasound prior to epidural placement

    Device: Ultrasound

  • Other
    Palpation Group

    The control group that will have their epidural placed in the usual fashion based on palpation

    Other: Palpation

Interventions

  • DeviceUltrasound

    Using ultrasound guidance to evaluate the spine prior to epidural placement

  • OtherPalpation

    Using palpation only to evaluate the spine prior to epidural placement

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Total Time Required for Epidural Catheter Placement

    Includes the time required to evaluate the spine (via ultrasound or palpation) plus the time required to successfully place the epidural catheter

    Time frame: Assessed immediately during epidural catheter placement

Secondary outcomes

  1. Epidural Procedure Time

    Time required to successfully place the epidural catheter

    Time frame: Assessed immediately during epidural catheter placement

  2. Number of Attempts at Epidural Catheter Placement

    Time frame: Assessed immediately during epidural catheter placement

  3. Number of Participants Who Had Successful Placement of the Epidural Catheter in the First Attempt

    Time frame: Assessed immediately during epidural catheter placement

  4. Complications

    Any epidural related complication noted to occur including a failed epidural, inadvertent dural puncture, or paresthesia will be documented and reported.

    Time frame: Assessed immediately during epidural catheter placement and within 24 hours after delivery

  5. Epidural Failure Rate

    Any epidural catheter that fails to provide appropriate analgesia requiring them to be replaced with a new epidural catheter will be documented and reported

    Time frame: Assessed within 24 hours after delivery

  6. Epidural Catheter Placement Satisfaction Level

    Immediately following epidural catheter placement, patients will be asked to rate their satisfaction level during the procedure on a 0-10 scale, with 0 being not at all satisfied, and 10 being extremely satisfied.

    Time frame: Assessed immediately following epidural catheter placement

  7. Patient Anxiety Level

    Immediately following epidural catheter placement, patients will be asked to rate their anxiety level during the procedure on a 0-10 scale, where 0 is no anxiety at all, and 10 is the worst anxiety imaginable.

    Time frame: Assessed immediately following epidural catheter placement

  8. Palpation or Ultrasound Time

    The time taken to evaluate the spine, either by palpation or ultrasound guidance, and mark the location for epidural catheter insertion

    Time frame: Assessed immediately prior to epidural catheter placement

  9. Overall Anesthesia Experience Satisfaction

    Within 24 hours after delivery, patients will be given a 13 question survey. The survey is a modified Woman's Views of Birth Labor Satisfaction Questionnaire (WOMBLSQ) which asks patients to rate 13 various satisfaction related statements on a 1-7 scale, with 1 being totally disagree, 4 being neither agree nor disagree, and 7 being totally agree. Each of the 13 questions asked are designed to assess their overall satisfaction with their epidural catheter placement and overall anesthesia care. The total score is reported combining all 13 questions for a possible score range of 13-91. A higher total score indicates a higher overall anesthesia experience satisfaction level. No subscales were used.

    Time frame: Measured within 24 hours of delivery

07

Results

Posted Jul 11, 2018

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneUltrasound GroupPalpation Group
Started810
Completed79
Not completed11
Withdrew: Protocol violation10
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject01

Outcome measures

PrimaryTotal Time Required for Epidural Catheter Placement

Includes the time required to evaluate the spine (via ultrasound or palpation) plus the time required to successfully place the epidural catheter

Time frame:
Assessed immediately during epidural catheter placement
Reported as:
Mean · Minutes
Total Time Required for Epidural Catheter Placement
MinutesUltrasound GroupPalpation Group
Total Time Required for Epidural Catheter Placement6.1 ± 3.511.0 ± 5.3
SecondaryEpidural Procedure Time

Time required to successfully place the epidural catheter

Time frame:
Assessed immediately during epidural catheter placement
Reported as:
Mean · Minutes
Epidural Procedure Time
MinutesUltrasound GroupPalpation Group
Epidural Procedure Time4.33 ± 3.510.1 ± 5.4
SecondaryNumber of Attempts at Epidural Catheter Placement
Time frame:
Assessed immediately during epidural catheter placement
Reported as:
Median · Number of attempts
Number of Attempts at Epidural Catheter Placement
Number of attemptsUltrasound GroupPalpation Group
Number of Attempts at Epidural Catheter Placement1 (1 to 1)5 (3 to 5)
SecondaryNumber of Participants Who Had Successful Placement of the Epidural Catheter in the First Attempt
Time frame:
Assessed immediately during epidural catheter placement
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants Who Had Successful Placement of the Epidural Catheter in the First Attempt
ParticipantsUltrasound GroupPalpation Group
Number of Participants Who Had Successful Placement of the Epidural Catheter in the First Attempt52
SecondaryComplications

Any epidural related complication noted to occur including a failed epidural, inadvertent dural puncture, or paresthesia will be documented and reported.

Time frame:
Assessed immediately during epidural catheter placement and within 24 hours after delivery
Reported as:
Number · Complications
Complications
ComplicationsUltrasound GroupPalpation Group
Complications04
SecondaryEpidural Failure Rate

Any epidural catheter that fails to provide appropriate analgesia requiring them to be replaced with a new epidural catheter will be documented and reported

Time frame:
Assessed within 24 hours after delivery
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Epidural Failure Rate
ParticipantsUltrasound GroupPalpation Group
Epidural Failure Rate00
SecondaryEpidural Catheter Placement Satisfaction Level

Immediately following epidural catheter placement, patients will be asked to rate their satisfaction level during the procedure on a 0-10 scale, with 0 being not at all satisfied, and 10 being extremely satisfied.

Time frame:
Assessed immediately following epidural catheter placement
Reported as:
Mean · Units on a scale
Epidural Catheter Placement Satisfaction Level
Units on a scaleUltrasound GroupPalpation Group
Epidural Catheter Placement Satisfaction Level9 ± 1.27.3 ± 2.8
SecondaryPatient Anxiety Level

Immediately following epidural catheter placement, patients will be asked to rate their anxiety level during the procedure on a 0-10 scale, where 0 is no anxiety at all, and 10 is the worst anxiety imaginable.

Time frame:
Assessed immediately following epidural catheter placement
Reported as:
Mean · Units on a scale
Patient Anxiety Level
Units on a scaleUltrasound GroupPalpation Group
Patient Anxiety Level5.4 ± 1.96.0 ± 2.6
SecondaryPalpation or Ultrasound Time

The time taken to evaluate the spine, either by palpation or ultrasound guidance, and mark the location for epidural catheter insertion

Time frame:
Assessed immediately prior to epidural catheter placement
Reported as:
Mean · Minutes
Palpation or Ultrasound Time
MinutesUltrasound GroupPalpation Group
Palpation or Ultrasound Time1.8 ± 0.60.9 ± 0.1
SecondaryOverall Anesthesia Experience Satisfaction

Within 24 hours after delivery, patients will be given a 13 question survey. The survey is a modified Woman's Views of Birth Labor Satisfaction Questionnaire (WOMBLSQ) which asks patients to rate 13 various satisfaction related statements on a 1-7 scale, with 1 being totally disagree, 4 being neither agree nor disagree, and 7 being totally agree. Each of the 13 questions asked are designed to assess their overall satisfaction with their epidural catheter placement and overall anesthesia care. The total score is reported combining all 13 questions for a possible score range of 13-91. A higher total score indicates a higher overall anesthesia experience satisfaction level. No subscales were used.

Time frame:
Measured within 24 hours of delivery
Reported as:
Mean · Units on a scale
Overall Anesthesia Experience Satisfaction
Units on a scaleUltrasound GroupPalpation Group
Overall Anesthesia Experience Satisfaction79.1 ± 11.874.3 ± 9.4

Adverse events

Collected over During the patients current hospitalization (typically 2-3 days). Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Ultrasound Group0/7 (0%)0/7 (0%)0/7 (0%)
Palpation Group0/9 (0%)0/9 (0%)3/9 (33.3%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventUltrasound GroupPalpation Group
ParesthesiaInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/72/9
Inadvertent dural punctureInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/71/9

Baseline characteristics

Ultrasound 43.75% (7/16); Palpation 56.25% (9/16)

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Ultrasound GroupPalpation GroupTotal
Mean25.3 ± 4.729.9 ± 5.527.9 ± 5.4
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Ultrasound GroupPalpation GroupTotal
Female7916
Male000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Ultrasound GroupPalpation GroupTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American112
White6814
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported000
Gravidity
Gravidity(Number of pregnancies)Ultrasound GroupPalpation GroupTotal
Median1 (1 to 2)2 (1 to 3)2 (1 to 3)
Parity
Parity(Number of children born)Ultrasound GroupPalpation GroupTotal
Median0 (0 to 1)0 (0 to 1)0 (0 to 1)
Estimated gestational age
Estimated gestational age(Weeks)Ultrasound GroupPalpation GroupTotal
Mean39.6 ± 0.838.1 ± 1.138.7 ± 1.1
Weight
Weight(kg)Ultrasound GroupPalpation GroupTotal
Mean122.0 ± 17.1120.6 ± 15.8121.2 ± 15.8
Height
Height(cm)Ultrasound GroupPalpation GroupTotal
Mean163.7 ± 5.3162.1 ± 5.3162.8 ± 5.2

4 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

1 site
  • Magee Women's Hospital
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Statistical analysis plan · Oct 1, 2016
  • Study protocol · Oct 1, 2016

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 11, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02984267
Lead sponsor
Thomas J. Vernon
Collaborators
West Penn Allegheny Health System
Responsible party
Thomas J. Vernon (OB Anesthesia Fellow, University of Pittsburgh) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Dec 6, 2016
Start date
Dec 2016
Primary completion
Apr 15, 2017
Completion
Apr 15, 2017
Results posted
Jul 11, 2018
Last update
Jul 11, 2018

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion