CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02981004PARIUpdated Feb 7, 2019

PAR I - Patient-to-Annulus Relation I

An observational study in Aortic Valve Disease, sponsored by Abbott Medical Devices. Completed at 7 sites in Germany. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-02-07.

Sponsored by Abbott Medical Devices · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
304
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The Prosthesis-to-Annulus Relation I (PAR I) trial is a German multicenter study assessing the relation between the prosthetic GOA and the area of LVOT as potentially new parameter for the prediction of hemodynamic outcome. The results may possibly guide future valve size selection an may allow prediction of functionally relevant PPM (Patient-Prosthesis-Mismatch)

Read the detailed description

Great debates revolve around the hemodynamic performance of prosthetic tissue valves. It is influenced by the design and the specific sizing strategy. Design determines the actual geometric orifice area (GOA), sizing strategy the actual size of the selected valve. Currently, hemodynamic performance is generally assessed by determining the effective orifice area (EOA, derived from the continuity equation by relating flow velocities and LVOT area). The question whether a prosthesis patient mismatch (PPM) is present is then addressed by relating EOA to body surface area (EOAi). However, this relation may not be reasonable because EOAi relates flow velocity twice to patient-specific anatomic parameters (LVOT area and body surface area) . Considering this potential methodological flaw, debate and confusion regarding PPM is easily understood, despite the fact that, intuitively leaving a gradient behind after aortic valve replacement cannot be irrelevant. Thus a reliable and comparable method to determine the presence of PPM is needed. In PAR I Trial the relation between true prothetic GOA and LVOT area will be assesses as a potentially new parameter for prediction of hemodynamic outcome, to possibly guide future valve size selection (inclusive valve-in-valve) and to allow the detection of functionally relevant PPM. In the trial it will be assessed how anatomic dimensions of patients and implanted valves relate to each other and whether they allow the prediction of hemodynamic outcome.

02

Conditions studied

  • Aortic Valve Disease

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Aortic valve disease, patient prosthesis mismatch
03

In context

Aortic Valve Disease

231 studies on the registry are indexed under Aortic Valve Disease; 76 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 304 is above the median of 200 across 112 observational studies indexed under Aortic Valve Disease.

Browse Aortic Valve Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

Abbott Medical Devices is the lead sponsor of 525 studies on the registry; 35 are open to participants now.

Of its 52 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 43 (83%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Patients with aortic valve disease selected for tissue valve implantation (routine care)

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria:1.Patient has an indication for primary, isolated aortic valve implantation 2. Patient is above 18 Years old 3. Patient has signed patient informed consent 4. foreseen implantation of an Epic, Epic supra or Trifecta valve 5. Patient has sinus rhythm

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient is younger than 18 years
  2. Patient has active endocarditis
  3. Patient is not able or does not want to participate on follow-up
  4. Patient is pregnant or nursing
  5. Surgical widening of outflow tract is planned
  6. Left ventricular ejection fraction is smaller than 50%
  7. Patient has a mitral valve or tricuspid valve insufficiency or stenosis bigger or equal Grade II
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
304 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. recording of hemodynamic outcome of a aortic valve in mutual dependence of anatomical facts on the basis of echocardiographic parameter

    Echocardiographic evaluation of the anatomical facts e.g. Left ventricular outflow area

    Time frame: postprocedure before discharge (less than 30 days after implant)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mortality 30 days after implant

    Mortality

    Time frame: 30 days

  2. Morbidity 30 days after implant

    Morbidity

    Time frame: 30 days

07

Study locations

7 sites
  • Herzzentrum Dresden
    Dresden, Germany
  • Asklepios St. Georg
    Hamburg, Germany
  • Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery
    Jena, 07747, Germany
  • Hospital Bogenhausen
    Munich, 81925, Germany
  • Herz- und Kreislaufzentrum Rotenburg / Fulda
    Rotenburg, Germany
  • Krankenhaus der Barmherzigen Brüder
    Trier, Germany
  • University Hospital of Ulm
    Ulm, Germany
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 7, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02981004
Lead sponsor
Abbott Medical Devices
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 2, 2016
Start date
Oct 2012
Primary completion
Dec 18, 2017
Completion
Dec 18, 2017
Last update
Feb 7, 2019

Study contacts

Torsten Doenst, M.D.Ph.D.
principal investigator · Head of Cardiac surgery department

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion