CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02974452SEMGUpdated Nov 28, 2016

Age-related Changes of Shoulder Muscles

An observational study in Electromyography, sponsored by University of Alcala. Completed. Open to participants aged 20 Years to 90 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-11-28.

Sponsored by University of Alcala · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Ecologic or community
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
60
Ages
20 Years to 90 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

A cross-sectional descriptive study, in which the surface electromyographic activity of five shoulder muscles was compared in three populations: older adults, middle-aged adults and young adults. The evaluation of the electromyographic data offers a suitable foundation to understand aging process.

This supports that surface electromyography provide information about the aged shoulder muscles. Loss of functionality is suffered by a high percentage of older adults, which greatly limits their physical activity. In this sense, this paper presents findings that might be related with possible therapeutic approaches in subsequent studies.

Read the detailed description

The purpose of the present work was to assess neuromotor abnormalities in aging shoulder. Twenty young adults (20-42), 20 middle-aged adults (43-67) and 20older adults (>68) were recruited. A comparative electromyography (EMG) study was performed on the upper and lower trapezius, middle deltoid, infraspinatus and serratus anterior. The EMG measurement (root mean square (RMS)) and onset time of isometric contractions were analyzed. Body mass index and strength were also tested.

02

Conditions studied

  • Electromyography
03

In context

Lead sponsor

University of Alcala is the lead sponsor of 123 studies on the registry; 36 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years to 90 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Participants came from Madrid and Castilla La Mancha (Spain) and voluntarily attended the Unit of the Research Group "Physical Therapy in Women´s Health Processes" in the Department of Physical Therapy, University of Alcalá, and the Ocaña Senior Center.

Inclusion criteria

  • Healthy subjects with no previously manifested symptoms in the shoulder joint and/or the neck during the past year,

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • moderate or severe cognitive impairment, rheumatologic diseases, massive osteoarthritis, tumors, shoulder joint instability, circulatory disorders (hemophilia clotting problems) and dermatological problems exacerbated by contact with skin
05

Study design

Observational model
Ecologic or community
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
60 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Group I: Older adults

    healthy subjects older than 68 years old whose shoulder muscle are measured by surface electromyography

  • Group II: Adults

    healthy subjects 43 to 67 years old, whose shoulder muscle are measured by surface electromyography

  • Group III: Young adults

    healthy subjects 20 to 42 years old, whose shoulder muscle are measured by surface electromyography

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The mean Root Mean Square (RMS) value

    The electromyographic data were captured simultaneously on a PC by using the LabChart® software. Within the time interval from 2 to 4 seconds after contraction initiation a power spectrum analysis was performed together with the determination of RMS values. The mean RMS values were automatically obtained from the software

    Time frame: 30 minutes

  2. onset latency

    Start of contraction on the basis of 15% of RMS

    Time frame: 30 minutes

Secondary outcomes

  1. maximal isometric voluntary contraction

    Using hand-held dynamometer

    Time frame: 5 minutes

  2. body mass index

    Time frame: 5 minutes

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Lirio Romero C, Torres Lacomba M, Castilla Montoro Y, Prieto Merino D, Pacheco da Costa S, Velasco Marchante MJ, Bodes Pardo G. Mobilization With Movement for Shoulder Dysfunction in Older Adults: A Pilot Trial. J Chiropr Med. 2015 Dec;14(4):249-58. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2015.03.001. Epub 2015 Nov 24. PubMed 26793036 ↗
  • Phadke V, Camargo P, Ludewig P. Scapular and rotator cuff muscle activity during arm elevation: A review of normal function and alterations with shoulder impingement. Rev Bras Fisioter. 2009 Feb 1;13(1):1-9. doi: 10.1590/S1413-35552009005000012. PubMed 20411160 ↗
  • Hermens HJ, Freriks B, Disselhorst-Klug C, Rau G. Development of recommendations for SEMG sensors and sensor placement procedures. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2000 Oct;10(5):361-74. doi: 10.1016/s1050-6411(00)00027-4. PubMed 11018445 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 28, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02974452
Lead sponsor
University of Alcala
Responsible party
Cristina Lirio Romero (Physiotherapist, University of Alcala) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 28, 2016
Start date
Jan 2014
Primary completion
Mar 2015
Completion
Jan 2016
Last update
Nov 28, 2016

Study contacts

Maria Tommes Lacomba, PhD
study director · University of Alcalá

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion