ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02971683Updated Oct 30, 2023Results posted

Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Abatacept in Combination With Standard Therapy Compared to Standard Therapy Alone in Improving Disease Activity in Adults With Active Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathy

A Phase 3 interventional study of Abatacept subcutaneous and Placebo in Polymyositis, Dermatomyositis and Autoimmune Necrotizing Myopathy, sponsored by Bristol-Myers Squibb. Completed at 79 sites in 11 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-10-30.

Primary conditionDermatomyositisRegistry: PolymyositisReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Polymyositis — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Dermatomyositis
Why
  1. The study's listed conditions name Dermatomyositis, a narrower term within Polymyositis.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by Bristol-Myers Squibb · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
149
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Abatacept subcutaneous (SC) in Combination With Standard Therapy Compared to Standard Therapy Alone in Improving Disease Activity in Adults With Active Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathy

02

Conditions studied

  • Polymyositis
  • Dermatomyositis
  • Autoimmune Necrotizing Myopathy
  • Overlap Myositis
  • Juvenile Myositis Above the Age of 18

Browse trials for

03

In context

Dermatomyositis Reclassified

184 studies on the registry are indexed under Dermatomyositis; 63 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 149 is above the median of 35 across 130 interventional studies indexed under Dermatomyositis.

Browse Dermatomyositis studies →

Lead sponsor

Bristol-Myers Squibb is the lead sponsor of 1,561 studies on the registry; 117 are open to participants now.

Of its 436 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 228 (52%) have results posted.

Compared within Dermatomyositis, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Polymyositis. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

-Diagnosis of IIM based on the Bohan and Peter classification criteria: i) Subjects with dermatomyositis (DM) must also have a confirmed myositis-associated rash (Gottron's papules or a heliotrope rash preferably confirmed by skin ) and 2 or more of the remaining 4 criteria.

ii) Subjects with a diagnosis of IIM other than DM include PM, necrotizing myopathy, myositis in association with another connective tissue disease (overlap myositis) and juvenile myositis subjects above the age of 18. These subjects must have a prior muscle biopsy diagnostic for IIM or a positive test for at least one myositis-specific autoantibody (anti-aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (Jo-1, PL-7, PL-12, EJ, OJ, KS, Zo, YRS), anti-Mi-2, anti-SRP, anti-TIF1-g, anti-NXP-2, anti-MDA5, anti-SAE, anti-HMGCR). For subjects with overlap myositis, the myositis must be the principal clinically active manifestation of their disease. Where applicable, documentation of prior skin biopsy, muscle biopsy, and autoantibody results must be obtained and retained by the site.

  • Demonstrable muscle weakness measured by the MMT-8 of ≤ 135 units and any 3 of the following: i) MMT-8 ≤ 125 units; ii) Physician's global assessment (PGA) visual analog scale (VAS) ≥2 cm; iii) Subject's global assessment (SGA) VAS ≥2 cm; iv) HAQ-DI ≥ 0.5; v) One or more muscle enzyme (CK, aldolase, LDH, , ALT) ³ 1.3 times (ULN); vi) MDAAT Extramuscular Global Activity VAS ≥2 cm
  • Demonstration of currently active IIM will be determined by an adjudication committee unless the subject has any one of the following: i) an active myositis-associated rash (Gottron's papules or heliotrope rash), or ii) a recent (within 3 months prior to signing ) biopsy, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), or electromyogram (EMG) demonstrating active disease, or iii) an elevated CK > 5 times the upper limit of normal
  • Active disease despite prior treatment with , , or biologics as determined by the investigator
  • The subject must be on background standard treatment for IIM. The standard treatments that are allowed as background treatment for IIM includes: i) Corticosteroids alone, or ii) One of the following immunosuppressants: methotrexate, azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, tacrolimus, or cyclosporine (combinations of these treatments are not allowed), or iii) A combination of corticosteroids and one of the above immunosuppressants. The subject must have been on the same medication(s) for IIM for 12 weeks prior to randomization and the dose must have been stable for 4 weeks prior to randomization. If using azathioprine, the subject must have been on azathioprine for at least 24 weeks with a stable dose for at least 12 weeks prior to randomization.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects with Inclusion Body Myositis (IBM), or myositis other than IIM, eg, drug-induced myositis and PM associated with
  • Subjects treated with penicillamine or zidovudine in the past 3 months
  • Subjects treated with rituximab in the 6 months prior to randomization (there must be laboratory results indicating the presence of circulating B cells [CD19+]). Any other biologic treatment in the past 3 months or immune globulin (intravenous [IVIG] or subcutaneous [SCIG]) in the past 3 months prior to randomization
  • Subjects with uncontrolled or rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease
  • Subjects with severe muscle damage (Myositis Damage Index > 7/10), permanent weakness due to a non-IIM cause, or myositis with cardiac involvement
  • Cancer-associated myositis (myositis diagnosed within 2 years of a diagnosis of cancer
  • Subjects who are known to be positive for the anti-TIF-1 (p155/140) autoantibody prior to randomization who were diagnosed with IIM \< 1 year prior to randomization.
  • Subjects at risk for tuberculosis
  • Subjects with recent acute infection requiring antibiotics
  • Subjects with history of chronic or recurrent bacterial, viral or systemic fungal infections
  • Subjects who have a present or have had a previous malignancy within the last 5 years prior to screening (except for a documented history of cured non- squamous or basal cell skin carcinoma or cervical carcinoma in situ).

Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria apply

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(10)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Biopsy and archival tissue

A biopsy takes a small piece of tissue to examine. “Archival tissue” is a sample already taken, for example at diagnosis, and kept by the hospital.

Whether a stored sample will do depends on when it was taken, how much there is and what the study needs. Ask whether the study accepts your stored sample or needs a new biopsy.

Autoimmune disease

A condition in which the immune system attacks the body’s own tissues, such as rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, psoriasis, type 1 diabetes or inflammatory bowel disease.

Immunotherapy studies often leave out active autoimmune disease, and some name exceptions, such as thyroid disease on replacement hormone. Check the exceptions this study lists.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Metastases

Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
149 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Abatacept subcutaneous + Standard Treatment

    Abatacept subcutaneous weekly in addition to the subject's current standard treatment for 24 weeks followed by a 28 week open-label period of abatacept treatment plus the subject's current standard treatment.

    Drug: Abatacept subcutaneous

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo of Abatacept subcutaneous + Standard Treatment

    Placebo of Abatacept subcutaneous weekly in addition to the subject's current standard treatment for 24 weeks followed by a 28 week open-label period of abatacept treatment plus the subject's current standard treatment.

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • Specified dose of Abatacept subcutaneous on specified days

  • DrugPlacebo

    Placebo of Abatacept subcutaneous

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants Achieving International Myositis Assessment and Clinical Studies Definition of Improvement (IMACS DOI) at Week 24 Without Rescue

    The number of participants who achieve IMACS DOI (International Myositis Assessment and Clinical Studies definition of improvement) without rescue medication at week 24. The IMACS DOI is: An improvement of \>/= 20% from baseline in 3 IMACS core measures, no more than 2 IMACS core measure scores worsen by \>/= 25% from baseline, and no more than 2 IMACS core measure scores worsen by \>/= 25% from baseline. IMACS core measures are: Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGA), Patient (Subject) Global Assessment of Disease Activity (SGA), Manual Muscle Test (MMT-8), Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), Muscle Enzyme levels, Myositis Disease Activity Assessment Tool (MDAAT) Extramuscular Global Activity.

    Time frame: From first dose to 24 weeks after first dose. (Approximately 169 days)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mean Change in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) From Baseline to Week 24

    The adjusted mean change from baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI). HAQ-DI is a patient-reported outcome measuring disability by asking a total of 20 questions in eight categories of function: dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities. If an aid or device is used or if help is required from another individual, then the minimum score for that section is 2. The highest component score in each category determines the score for the category and scores are averaged to give the disability index. The HAQ scale ranges from 0 (no difficulties) to 3 (unable to do).

    Time frame: From first dose to 24 weeks after first dose. (Approximately 169 days)

  2. Mean Change in Muscle Endurance Using the Myositis Function Index (FI-2) From Baseline to Week 24

    The adjusted mean change from baseline in Myositis FI-2 scores is assessing muscle endurance impairment by testing specific muscle groups. The 3 Score average includes shoulder flexion, hip flexion, and head lift. Each muscle group is scored as the number of correctly performed repetitions with 60 maximal number of repetitions. The total score is based on hip flexion, shoulder flexion (R/L) and neck divided by 3 (range 0-60 repetitions).

    Time frame: From first dose to 24 weeks after first dose. (Approximately 169 days)

  3. Mean Change in Myositis Disease Activity Assessment Tool (MDAAT) Assessment of Extra-muscular From Baseline to Week 24

    The adjusted mean change from baseline in the Myositis Disease Activity Assessment Tool (MDAAT) assessment of extra-muscular uses a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scale. This VAS assesses the overall extra-muscular clinical features based upon: 1) The presence of clinical features or symptoms within the previous 4 weeks that are due to active disease. 2) The judgment that the feature is due to the myositis disease process. 3) The concept that disease activity is defined as a potentially reversible finding. 4) A clinical, functional, and laboratory assessments. The scoring is performed by the investigator and ranges from 0 (absent extra-muscular disease activity) to 100 (maximum extra-muscular disease activity).

    Time frame: From first dose to 24 weeks after first dose. (Approximately 169 days)

  4. Myositis Response Criteria (MRC) Total Improvement Score From Baseline to Week 24

    The Myositis Response Criteria (MRC) is a continuous total improvement score from baseline (range 0-100) based on the sum of the absolute percent change in the 6 core domains (weighted) used in the IMACS DOI (International Myositis Assessment and Clinical Studies definition of improvement) IMACS core measures are: Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGA), Patient (Subject) Global Assessment of Disease Activity (SGA), Manual Muscle Test (MMT-8), Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), Muscle Enzyme levels, Myositis Disease Activity Assessment Tool (MDAAT) Extramuscular Global Activity. The total improvement score ranges between 0 and 100 percent corresponds to the degree of improvement, with higher scores corresponding to a greater degree of improvement ( \>/= 20 represents minimal improvement, a score of \>/= 40 represents moderate improvement, and a score of \>/= 60 represents major improvement).

    Time frame: From first dose to 24 weeks after first dose. (Approximately 169 days)

  5. Number of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events (AE) in the Double-Blind Period

    The number of treated participants experiencing an adverse event. An Adverse Event (AE) is defined as any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a preexisting medical condition in participants administered a study drug and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment.

    Time frame: From first dose up to approximately 56 days post last dose date in double-blind period or first dose in open-label period. (Up to approximately 274 days)

  6. Number of Participants Experiencing Serious Adverse Events (SAE) in the Double-Blind Period

    The number of treated participants experiencing a Serious Adverse Event (SAE). A Serious Adverse Event (SAE) is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or causes prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or is an important medical event.

    Time frame: From first dose up to approximately 56 days post last dose date in double-blind period or first dose in open-label period. (Up to approximately 274 days)

  7. Number of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events (AE) of Special Interest in the Double-Blind Period

    The number of treated participants experiencing adverse events of special interest: infections, malignancies, autoimmune events, local injection site reactions, and systemic injection reactions.

    Time frame: From first dose up to approximately 56 days post last dose date in double-blind period or first dose in open-label period. (Up to approximately 274 days)

  8. Number of Participants Experiencing Laboratory Test Abnormalities in the Double-Blind Period

    The number of participants experiencing laboratory test abnormalities. Laboratory analysis was performed on the following: hematology, liver and kidney function, electrolytes, other chemistry testing (glucose, protein, cardiac), and urine chemistry. Only tests with participants experiencing abnormalities were reported.

    Time frame: From first dose up to approximately 56 days post last dose date in double-blind period or first dose in open-label period. (Up to approximately 274 days)

  9. Number of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events (AE) in the Cumulative Abatacept Period

    The number of treated participants experiencing an adverse event. An Adverse Event (AE) is defined as any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a preexisting medical condition in participants administered a study drug and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment.

    Time frame: From first dose up to approximately 56 days post last dose (up to approximately 54 months)

  10. Number of Participants Experiencing Serious Adverse Events (SAE) in the Cumulative Abatacept Period

    The number of treated participants experiencing a Serious Adverse Event (SAE). A Serious Adverse Event (SAE) is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or causes prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or is an important medical event.

    Time frame: From first dose up to approximately 56 days post last dose (up to approximately 54 months)

  11. Number of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events (AE) of Special Interest in the Cumulative Abatacept Period

    The number of treated participants experiencing adverse events of special interest: infections, malignancies, autoimmune events, local injection site reactions, and systemic injection reactions.

    Time frame: From first dose up to approximately 56 days post last dose (up to approximately 54 months)

  12. Number of Participants Experiencing Laboratory Test Abnormalities in the Open-Label Period

    The number of participants experiencing laboratory test abnormalities. Laboratory analysis was performed on the following: hematology, liver and kidney function, electrolytes, other chemistry testing (glucose, protein, cardiac), and urine chemistry. Only tests with participants experiencing abnormalities were reported. For participants who enter the Japan open-label extension period or long-term extension period, assessments after the first dose in the open-label period and before the first dose date in the subsequent period are included. For participants who prematurely discontinue the open-label period or complete the open-label period but do not enter the Japan open-label extension period or long-term term extension period, assessments after the first dose in the open-label period and up to 56 days post last dose are included.

    Time frame: From first dose in open label period to first dose date in the subsequent period or up to 56 days post last dose (up to approximately 666 days)

  13. Number of Participants Experiencing Laboratory Test Abnormalities in the Long-Term Open Label Period

    The number of participants experiencing laboratory test abnormalities. Laboratory analysis was performed on the following: hematology, liver and kidney function, electrolytes, other chemistry testing (glucose, protein, cardiac), and urine chemistry. Only tests with participants experiencing abnormalities were reported. For participants who completed/discontinued the Long-Term Extension Period, assessments after the first dose in the Long-Term Extension Period and up to 56 days post last dose in the Long-Term Extension Period are included.

    Time frame: From first dose in the Long-Term Open Label Period up to 56 days post last dose in the Long-Term Open Label Period (up to approximately 958 days)

07

Results

Posted Sep 17, 2021

Participant flow

Double-Blind (24 Weeks)
Participant flow — Double-Blind (24 Weeks)
MilestoneAbatacept + Standard TreatmentPlacebo + Standard Treatment
Started7573
Completed6965
Not completed68
Withdrew: Other reasons01
Withdrew: Poor/non-compliance01
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up10
Withdrew: Participant withdrew consent11
Withdrew: Participant request to discontinue study treatment11
Withdrew: Adverse event02
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy22
Withdrew: Participant no longer meets study criteria10
Open-Label
Participant flow — Open-Label
MilestoneAbatacept + Standard TreatmentPlacebo + Standard Treatment
Started6963
Completed6561
Not completed42
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up10
Withdrew: Participants withdrew consent02
Withdrew: Participant request to discontinue study treatment10
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy20
Long-Term Open Label
Participant flow — Long-Term Open Label
MilestoneAbatacept + Standard TreatmentPlacebo + Standard Treatment
Started2521
Completed10
Not completed2421
Withdrew: Administrative reason by sponsor2017
Withdrew: Participant withdrew consent10
Withdrew: Participant request to discontinue study treatment11
Withdrew: Adverse event12
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy11

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Participants Achieving International Myositis Assessment and Clinical Studies Definition of Improvement (IMACS DOI) at Week 24 Without Rescue

The number of participants who achieve IMACS DOI (International Myositis Assessment and Clinical Studies definition of improvement) without rescue medication at week 24. The IMACS DOI is: An improvement of \>/= 20% from baseline in 3 IMACS core measures, no more than 2 IMACS core measure scores worsen by \>/= 25% from baseline, and no more than 2 IMACS core measure scores worsen by \>/= 25% from baseline. IMACS core measures are: Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGA), Patient (Subject) Global Assessment of Disease Activity (SGA), Manual Muscle Test (MMT-8), Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), Muscle Enzyme levels, Myositis Disease Activity Assessment Tool (MDAAT) Extramuscular Global Activity.

Time frame:
From first dose to 24 weeks after first dose. (Approximately 169 days)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants Achieving International Myositis Assessment and Clinical Studies Definition of Improvement (IMACS DOI) at Week 24 Without Rescue
ParticipantsAbatacept + Standard TreatmentPlacebo + Standard Treatment
Number of Participants Achieving International Myositis Assessment and Clinical Studies Definition of Improvement (IMACS DOI) at Week 24 Without Rescue42 (44.8 to 67.2)31 (31.6 to 54.5)
Statistical analysis
  • Abatacept + Standard Treatment · Regression, Logistic · p = 0.083 · Odds ratio (or): 1.8 · 95% CI 0.9 to 3.5
SecondaryMean Change in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) From Baseline to Week 24

The adjusted mean change from baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI). HAQ-DI is a patient-reported outcome measuring disability by asking a total of 20 questions in eight categories of function: dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities. If an aid or device is used or if help is required from another individual, then the minimum score for that section is 2. The highest component score in each category determines the score for the category and scores are averaged to give the disability index. The HAQ scale ranges from 0 (no difficulties) to 3 (unable to do).

Time frame:
From first dose to 24 weeks after first dose. (Approximately 169 days)
Reported as:
Mean · Score on a scale
Mean Change in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) From Baseline to Week 24
Score on a scaleAbatacept + Standard TreatmentPlacebo + Standard Treatment
Mean Change in Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) From Baseline to Week 24-0.31 ± 0.067-0.20 ± 0.069
SecondaryMean Change in Muscle Endurance Using the Myositis Function Index (FI-2) From Baseline to Week 24

The adjusted mean change from baseline in Myositis FI-2 scores is assessing muscle endurance impairment by testing specific muscle groups. The 3 Score average includes shoulder flexion, hip flexion, and head lift. Each muscle group is scored as the number of correctly performed repetitions with 60 maximal number of repetitions. The total score is based on hip flexion, shoulder flexion (R/L) and neck divided by 3 (range 0-60 repetitions).

Time frame:
From first dose to 24 weeks after first dose. (Approximately 169 days)
Reported as:
Mean · Number of repetitions
Mean Change in Muscle Endurance Using the Myositis Function Index (FI-2) From Baseline to Week 24
Number of repetitionsAbatacept + Standard TreatmentPlacebo + Standard Treatment
Mean Change in Muscle Endurance Using the Myositis Function Index (FI-2) From Baseline to Week 244.1 ± 1.331.2 ± 1.38
SecondaryMean Change in Myositis Disease Activity Assessment Tool (MDAAT) Assessment of Extra-muscular From Baseline to Week 24

The adjusted mean change from baseline in the Myositis Disease Activity Assessment Tool (MDAAT) assessment of extra-muscular uses a 100 mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scale. This VAS assesses the overall extra-muscular clinical features based upon: 1) The presence of clinical features or symptoms within the previous 4 weeks that are due to active disease. 2) The judgment that the feature is due to the myositis disease process. 3) The concept that disease activity is defined as a potentially reversible finding. 4) A clinical, functional, and laboratory assessments. The scoring is performed by the investigator and ranges from 0 (absent extra-muscular disease activity) to 100 (maximum extra-muscular disease activity).

Time frame:
From first dose to 24 weeks after first dose. (Approximately 169 days)
Reported as:
Mean · Score on a scale
Mean Change in Myositis Disease Activity Assessment Tool (MDAAT) Assessment of Extra-muscular From Baseline to Week 24
Score on a scaleAbatacept + Standard TreatmentPlacebo + Standard Treatment
Mean Change in Myositis Disease Activity Assessment Tool (MDAAT) Assessment of Extra-muscular From Baseline to Week 24-1.56 ± 0.202-1.40 ± 0.208
SecondaryMyositis Response Criteria (MRC) Total Improvement Score From Baseline to Week 24

The Myositis Response Criteria (MRC) is a continuous total improvement score from baseline (range 0-100) based on the sum of the absolute percent change in the 6 core domains (weighted) used in the IMACS DOI (International Myositis Assessment and Clinical Studies definition of improvement) IMACS core measures are: Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PGA), Patient (Subject) Global Assessment of Disease Activity (SGA), Manual Muscle Test (MMT-8), Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), Muscle Enzyme levels, Myositis Disease Activity Assessment Tool (MDAAT) Extramuscular Global Activity. The total improvement score ranges between 0 and 100 percent corresponds to the degree of improvement, with higher scores corresponding to a greater degree of improvement ( \>/= 20 represents minimal improvement, a score of \>/= 40 represents moderate improvement, and a score of \>/= 60 represents major improvement).

Time frame:
From first dose to 24 weeks after first dose. (Approximately 169 days)
Reported as:
Mean · Score on a scale
Myositis Response Criteria (MRC) Total Improvement Score From Baseline to Week 24
Score on a scaleAbatacept + Standard TreatmentPlacebo + Standard Treatment
Myositis Response Criteria (MRC) Total Improvement Score From Baseline to Week 2440.83 ± 2.87337.22 ± 2.963
SecondaryNumber of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events (AE) in the Double-Blind Period

The number of treated participants experiencing an adverse event. An Adverse Event (AE) is defined as any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a preexisting medical condition in participants administered a study drug and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment.

Time frame:
From first dose up to approximately 56 days post last dose date in double-blind period or first dose in open-label period. (Up to approximately 274 days)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events (AE) in the Double-Blind Period
ParticipantsAbatacept + Standard TreatmentPlacebo + Standard Treatment
Number of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events (AE) in the Double-Blind Period5255
SecondaryNumber of Participants Experiencing Serious Adverse Events (SAE) in the Double-Blind Period

The number of treated participants experiencing a Serious Adverse Event (SAE). A Serious Adverse Event (SAE) is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or causes prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or is an important medical event.

Time frame:
From first dose up to approximately 56 days post last dose date in double-blind period or first dose in open-label period. (Up to approximately 274 days)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants Experiencing Serious Adverse Events (SAE) in the Double-Blind Period
ParticipantsAbatacept + Standard TreatmentPlacebo + Standard Treatment
Number of Participants Experiencing Serious Adverse Events (SAE) in the Double-Blind Period44
SecondaryNumber of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events (AE) of Special Interest in the Double-Blind Period

The number of treated participants experiencing adverse events of special interest: infections, malignancies, autoimmune events, local injection site reactions, and systemic injection reactions.

Time frame:
From first dose up to approximately 56 days post last dose date in double-blind period or first dose in open-label period. (Up to approximately 274 days)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events (AE) of Special Interest in the Double-Blind Period
ParticipantsAbatacept + Standard TreatmentPlacebo + Standard Treatment
Infections1931
Malignancies00
Autoimmune Disorders23
Systemic Injection Reactions45
Local Injection Site Reactions10
SecondaryNumber of Participants Experiencing Laboratory Test Abnormalities in the Double-Blind Period

The number of participants experiencing laboratory test abnormalities. Laboratory analysis was performed on the following: hematology, liver and kidney function, electrolytes, other chemistry testing (glucose, protein, cardiac), and urine chemistry. Only tests with participants experiencing abnormalities were reported.

Time frame:
From first dose up to approximately 56 days post last dose date in double-blind period or first dose in open-label period. (Up to approximately 274 days)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants Experiencing Laboratory Test Abnormalities in the Double-Blind Period
ParticipantsAbatacept + Standard TreatmentPlacebo + Standard Treatment
LOW LEUKOCYTES10
HIGH LEUKOCYTES24
HIGH EOSINOPHILS (ABSOLUTE)32
LOW LYMPHOCYTES (ABSOLUTE)1714
LOW NEUTROPHILS + BANDS (ABSOLUTE)10
HIGH ALANINE AMINOTRANSFERASE (ALT)11
HIGH ASPARTATE AMINOTRANSFERASE (AST)01
HIGH G-GLUTAMYL TRANSFERASE (GGT)41
HIGH BLOOD UREA NITROGEN01
HIGH CREATININE33
HIGH CALCIUM, TOTAL10
LOW PHOSPHORUS, INORGANIC01
HIGH PHOSPHORUS, INORGANIC10
HIGH SODIUM, SERUM01
LOW GLUCOSE, SERUM43
HIGH GLUCOSE, SERUM88
HIGH PROTEIN, TOTAL01
HIGH CREATINE KINASE (CK)04
HIGH LACTATE DEHYDROGENASE (LD)01
SecondaryNumber of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events (AE) in the Cumulative Abatacept Period

The number of treated participants experiencing an adverse event. An Adverse Event (AE) is defined as any new untoward medical occurrence or worsening of a preexisting medical condition in participants administered a study drug and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment.

Time frame:
From first dose up to approximately 56 days post last dose (up to approximately 54 months)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events (AE) in the Cumulative Abatacept Period
ParticipantsAbatacept + Standard TreatmentPlacebo + Standard Treatment
Number of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events (AE) in the Cumulative Abatacept Period6439
SecondaryNumber of Participants Experiencing Serious Adverse Events (SAE) in the Cumulative Abatacept Period

The number of treated participants experiencing a Serious Adverse Event (SAE). A Serious Adverse Event (SAE) is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or causes prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or is an important medical event.

Time frame:
From first dose up to approximately 56 days post last dose (up to approximately 54 months)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants Experiencing Serious Adverse Events (SAE) in the Cumulative Abatacept Period
ParticipantsAbatacept + Standard TreatmentPlacebo + Standard Treatment
Number of Participants Experiencing Serious Adverse Events (SAE) in the Cumulative Abatacept Period148
SecondaryNumber of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events (AE) of Special Interest in the Cumulative Abatacept Period

The number of treated participants experiencing adverse events of special interest: infections, malignancies, autoimmune events, local injection site reactions, and systemic injection reactions.

Time frame:
From first dose up to approximately 56 days post last dose (up to approximately 54 months)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants Experiencing Adverse Events (AE) of Special Interest in the Cumulative Abatacept Period
ParticipantsAbatacept + Standard TreatmentPlacebo + Standard Treatment
Infections and infestations3419
Malignancies00
Autoimmune Disorders54
Systemic Injection Reactions53
Local Injection Site Reactions22
SecondaryNumber of Participants Experiencing Laboratory Test Abnormalities in the Open-Label Period

The number of participants experiencing laboratory test abnormalities. Laboratory analysis was performed on the following: hematology, liver and kidney function, electrolytes, other chemistry testing (glucose, protein, cardiac), and urine chemistry. Only tests with participants experiencing abnormalities were reported. For participants who enter the Japan open-label extension period or long-term extension period, assessments after the first dose in the open-label period and before the first dose date in the subsequent period are included. For participants who prematurely discontinue the open-label period or complete the open-label period but do not enter the Japan open-label extension period or long-term term extension period, assessments after the first dose in the open-label period and up to 56 days post last dose are included.

Time frame:
From first dose in open label period to first dose date in the subsequent period or up to 56 days post last dose (up to approximately 666 days)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants Experiencing Laboratory Test Abnormalities in the Open-Label Period
ParticipantsAbatacept + Standard TreatmentPlacebo + Standard Treatment
LOW HEMOGLOBIN01
LOW LEUKOCYTES21
HIGH LEUKOCYTES20
HIGH EOSINOPHILS (ABSOLUTE)20
LOW LYMPHOCYTES (ABSOLUTE)158
HIGH LYMPHOCYTES (ABSOLUTE)10
LOW NEUTROPHILS + BANDS (ABSOLUTE)20
HIGH ALANINE AMINOTRANSFERASE (ALT)10
HIGH ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE (ALP)02
HIGH ASPARTATE AMINOTRANSFERASE (AST)01
HIGH G-GLUTAMYL TRANSFERASE (GGT)21
HIGH BLOOD UREA NITROGEN21
HIGH CREATININE62
HIGH POTASSIUM, SERUM10
LOW GLUCOSE, SERUM11
HIGH GLUCOSE, SERUM33
LOW ALBUMIN01
HIGH CREATINE KINASE (CK)35
HIGH LACTATE DEHYDROGENASE (LD)01
HIGH BLOOD, URINE2—
HIGH WBC, URINE1—
SecondaryNumber of Participants Experiencing Laboratory Test Abnormalities in the Long-Term Open Label Period

The number of participants experiencing laboratory test abnormalities. Laboratory analysis was performed on the following: hematology, liver and kidney function, electrolytes, other chemistry testing (glucose, protein, cardiac), and urine chemistry. Only tests with participants experiencing abnormalities were reported. For participants who completed/discontinued the Long-Term Extension Period, assessments after the first dose in the Long-Term Extension Period and up to 56 days post last dose in the Long-Term Extension Period are included.

Time frame:
From first dose in the Long-Term Open Label Period up to 56 days post last dose in the Long-Term Open Label Period (up to approximately 958 days)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants Experiencing Laboratory Test Abnormalities in the Long-Term Open Label Period
ParticipantsAbatacept + Standard TreatmentPlacebo + Standard Treatment
LOW HEMOGLOBIN10
LOW LYMPHOCYTES (ABSOLUTE)14
HIGH BLOOD UREA NITROGEN20
HIGH CREATININE21
HIGH GLUCOSE, SERUM10
HIGH CREATINE KINASE (CK)10

Adverse events

Collected over All-cause mortality was assessed from participants first dose to their study completion (up to approximately 55 months) SAEs and Other AEs were assessed from first dose to 100 days following last dose (up to approximately 55 months). Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Abatacept + Standard Treatment0/138 (0%)22/138 (15.9%)31/138 (22.5%)
Placebo + Standard Treatment1/73 (1.4%)5/73 (6.8%)23/73 (31.5%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 29
Most frequent serious events
EventAbatacept + Standard TreatmentPlacebo + Standard Treatment
Urinary tract infectionInfections and infestations3/1380/73
Large intestine polypGastrointestinal disorders2/1380/73
CellulitisInfections and infestations2/1380/73
Spinal compression fractureInjury, poisoning and procedural complications2/1380/73
PolymyositisMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders2/1381/73
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders0/1381/73
Herpes zosterInfections and infestations1/1381/73
Muscular weaknessMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1/1381/73
Acute respiratory failureRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders0/1381/73
Coronary artery diseaseCardiac disorders1/1380/73
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventAbatacept + Standard TreatmentPlacebo + Standard Treatment
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations9/1388/73
HeadacheNervous system disorders8/1387/73
InfluenzaInfections and infestations3/1386/73
FallInjury, poisoning and procedural complications4/1384/73
Back painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders7/1382/73
HypertensionVascular disorders7/1381/73

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(Years)Abatacept + Standard TreatmentPlacebo + Standard TreatmentTotal
Mean49.3 ± 14.4148.1 ± 14.0948.7 ± 14.22
Age, Customized
Age, Customized(Participants)Abatacept + Standard TreatmentPlacebo + Standard TreatmentTotal
16-29 years old9918
30-39 years old81422
40-49 years old141428
50-59 years old311950
>/= 60 years old131730
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Abatacept + Standard TreatmentPlacebo + Standard TreatmentTotal
Female5254106
Male231942
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Abatacept + Standard TreatmentPlacebo + Standard TreatmentTotal
Hispanic or Latino7310
Not Hispanic or Latino191938
Unknown or Not Reported4951100
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Abatacept + Standard TreatmentPlacebo + Standard TreatmentTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native336
Asian10616
Black or African American9817
White424284
Japanese111021
Other033
Unknown011
08

Study locations

79 sites
  • Local Institution - 0015
    Phoenix, Arizona 85028, United States
  • Local Institution - 0075
    Beverly Hills, California 90211, United States
  • Local Institution - 0012
    Orange, California 92868, United States
  • Local Institution - 0057
    Washington, District of Columbia 20037, United States
  • Local Institution - 0018
    Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33309, United States
  • Local Institution - 0013
    Miami, Florida 33136, United States
  • Local Institution - 0006
    Kansas City, Kansas 66160, United States
  • Johns Hopkins University -Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center
    Baltimore, Maryland 21224, United States
  • Local Institution - 0058
    Boston, Massachusetts 02115, United States
  • Local Institution - 0089
    Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States
  • Local Institution - 0002
    Eagan, Minnesota 55121, United States
  • Local Institution - 0011
    Omaha, Nebraska 68198-3025, United States
  • Local Institution - 0004
    Lebanon, New Hampshire 03756, United States
  • Local Institution - 0097
    New York, New York 10021, United States
  • Local Institution - 0010
    Wilmington, North Carolina 28401, United States
  • Local Institution - 0056
    Columbus, Ohio 43203, United States
  • Local Institution - 0094
    Middleburg Heights, Ohio 44130, United States
  • Local Institution - 0059
    Norman, Oklahoma 73072, United States
  • Local Institution - 0055
    Bethlehem, Pennsylvania 18015, United States
  • Local Institution - 0014
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, United States
  • Local Institution - 0005
    Orangeburg, South Carolina 29118, United States
  • Local Institution - 0017
    Jackson, Tennessee 38305, United States
  • Local Institution - 0096
    Austin, Texas 78756, United States
  • Local Institution - 0016
    Houston, Texas 77030, United States
  • Local Institution - 0095
    Seattle, Washington 98195, United States
  • Local Institution - 0051
    Camperdown, New South Wales 2050, Australia
  • Local Institution - 0053
    St Leonards, New South Wales 2065, Australia
  • Local Institution - 0035
    Auchenflower, Queensland 4066, Australia
  • Local Institution - 0036
    Murdoch, Western Australia 6150, Australia
  • Local Institution - 0073
    Salvador, Bahia 40150150, Brazil
  • Local Institution - 0070
    Vitoria, Espirito Santo 29055-450, Brazil
  • Local Institution - 0069
    Juiz de Fora, Minas Gerais 36010570, Brazil
  • Local Institution - 0072
    Porto Alegre, RIO Grande DO SUL 90480-000, Brazil
  • Local Institution - 0074
    Bairro Jardim, SAO Paulo 09090-790, Brazil
  • Local Institution - 0067
    Rio Grande Do Sul, 90035-000, Brazil
  • Local Institution - 0071
    Sao Paulo, 04032-060, Brazil
  • Local Institution - 0029
    Praha 2, 128 50, Czechia
  • Local Institution - 0100
    Brest, 29200, France
  • Local Institution - 0045
    Clermont Ferrand Cedex 1, 63000, France
  • Local Institution - 0043
    Lille Cedex, 59037, France
  • Local Institution - 0042
    Paris, 75651, France
  • Local Institution - 0044
    Strasbourg, 67098, France
  • Local Institution - 0027
    Berlin, 10117, Germany
  • Local Institution - 0054
    Halle (saale), 06120, Germany
  • Local Institution - 0028
    Hamburg, 22763, Germany
  • Local Institution - 0030
    Munchen, 80336, Germany
  • Local Institution - 0023
    Pavia, Lombardia 27100, Italy
  • Local Institution - 0031
    Ferrara, 44124, Italy
  • Local Institution - 0024
    Firenze, 50139, Italy
  • Local Institution - 0020
    Padova, 35128, Italy
  • Local Institution - 0025
    Pisa, 56126, Italy
  • Local Institution - 0091
    Kitakyushu, Fukuoka 807-8555, Japan
  • Local Institution - 0090
    Sapporo-City, Hokkaido 060-0011, Japan
  • Local Institution - 0078
    Sapporo, Hokkaido 060-8648, Japan
  • Local Institution - 0082
    Tsukuba, Ibaraki 3058576, Japan
  • Local Institution - 0083
    Kawasaki-shi, Kanagawa 2168511, Japan
  • Local Institution - 0084
    Kumamoto-city, Kumamoto 8608556, Japan
  • Local Institution - 0088
    Nagasaki-shi, Nagasaki 8528501, Japan
  • Local Institution
    Sasebo city, Nagasaki 857-1195, Japan
  • Local Institution - 0077
    Iruma-gun, Saitama 3500495, Japan
  • Local Institution - 0086
    Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8519, Japan
  • Local Institution - 0079
    Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 1138603, Japan
  • Local Institution - 0081
    Chuo-ku, Tokyo 104-8560, Japan
  • Local Institution - 0092
    Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 1608582, Japan
  • Local Institution - 0093
    Shinjuku-Ku, Tokyo 1628666, Japan
  • Local Institution - 0087
    Ube-shi, Yamaguchi 755-8505, Japan
  • Local Institution - 0076
    Miyagi, 980-8574, Japan
  • Local Institution - 0066
    Seoul, 02447, Korea, Republic of
  • Local Institution - 0065
    Seoul, 03080, Korea, Republic of
  • Local Institution - 0064
    Seoul, 04763, Korea, Republic of
  • Local Institution - 0049
    Mexico City, Distrito Federal 06700, Mexico
  • Local Institution - 0046
    Mexico, Distrito Federal 11850, Mexico
  • Local Institution - 0048
    Guadalajara, Jalisco 44160, Mexico
  • Local Institution - 0047
    San Luis Potosi, 78213, Mexico
  • Local Institution - 0052
    San Luis Potosi, 78290, Mexico
  • Local Institution - 0040
    Lund, 22242, Sweden
  • Local Institution - 0041
    Orebro, 70185, Sweden
  • Local Institution - 0037
    Stockholm, 17176, Sweden
  • Local Institution - 0038
    Vasteras, 72189, Sweden
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from May 2017 to primary completion in Jul 2020, 38 months.

Results were first posted in Sep 2021, 1 year 1 month after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 21, 2016
First posted
Nov 23, 2016
StartActual
May 4, 2017
Primary completionActual
Jul 27, 2020
CompletionActual
Aug 2, 2022
Results first posted
Sep 17, 2021
Last update
Oct 30, 2023
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 30, 2023, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02971683
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 23, 2016
Start date
May 4, 2017
Primary completion
Jul 27, 2020
Completion
Aug 2, 2022
Results posted
Sep 17, 2021
Last update
Oct 30, 2023

Study contacts

Bristol-Myers Squibb
study director · Bristol-Myers Squibb

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion