CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT02967692COMBI-iUpdated Sep 18, 2025Results posted

A Study of the Anti-PD1 Antibody PDR001, in Combination With Dabrafenib and Trametinib in Advanced Melanoma

A Phase 3 interventional study of Spartalizumab and Placebo in Melanoma, sponsored by Novartis Pharmaceuticals. Terminated at 179 sites in 29 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 100 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-09-18.

Sponsored by Novartis Pharmaceuticals · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Sponsor decision
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
568
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 100 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study was to evaluate safety and efficacy of the combination of an anti-PD-1 antibody (PDR001), a BRAF inhibitor (dabrafenib) and a MEK inhibitor (trametinib) in patients with BRAF V600 mutant, unresectable and metastatic melanoma.

Read the detailed description

This study was designed as a phase III, multi-center study consisting of 3 parts:

  • Part 1: Safety run-in part The safety run-in part aimed to determine the recommended regimen of PDR001 in combination with dabrafenib and trametinib for previously untreated patients with BRAF V600 mutant unresectable or metastatic melanoma (stage IIIC/IV). Spartalizumab was administered at a starting dose level (DL1) of 400 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W), along with fixed doses of dabrafenib (150 mg twice daily) and trametinib (2 mg once daily). The RP3R for Part 3 was determined using the Bayesian Logistic Regression Model (BLRM) with escalation with overdose control (EWOC) criteria.
  • Part 2: Biomarker cohort Part 2 was run to explore changes in the immune microenvironment and biomarker modulations upon treatment with the combination of dabrafenib, trametinib and PDR001. Part 2 started when the fourth subject in dose level 1 (DL1) of Part 1 completed approximately 4 weeks of study treatment, and fewer than 3 dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed. Participants in Part 2 received PDR001 (spartalizumab) at a dosage of 400 mg Q4W, in combination with dabrafenib (150 mg BID) and trametinib (2 mg QD).
  • Part 3: Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled part Part 3 was comparing the efficacy and safety of spartalizumab in combination with dabrafenib and trametinib to placebo in combination with dabrafenib and trametinib. Part 3 was initiated after determining the RP3R for the combination of spartalizumab with dabrafenib and trametinib in Part 1. Subjects were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either the RP3R dose of spartalizumab identified in Part 1 or placebo, along with dabrafenib (150 mg BID) and trametinib (2 mg QD).

For all parts of the study, the treatment continued until the subject experiences any of the following events: disease progression according to RECIST 1.1 as determined by the Investigator, unacceptable toxicity, initiation of a new anti-neoplastic therapy, pregnancy, withdrawal of consent, physician's decision, loss to follow-up, death, or termination of the study by the Sponsor. Safety evaluations are conducted for all subjects for up to 150 days after the last dose of spartalizumab/placebo (safety follow-up period).

Subjects who discontinued study treatment without disease progression as per RECIST 1.1 continued with tumor assessments according to the protocol until documented disease progression, withdrawal of consent, loss to follow-up, or death, regardless of the initiation of new anti-neoplastic therapy (efficacy follow-up period).

Subjects entered the survival follow-up period after completing the safety follow-up period or experiencing disease progression as per RECIST 1.1 or response criteria for immunotherapy, whichever period is longer (survival follow-up period).

02

Conditions studied

  • Melanoma

Keywords

  • Spartalizumab (PDR001)
  • dabrafenib
  • trametinib
  • melanoma
  • immunotherapy
  • PD 1 inhibitor
  • anti PD1
  • PD-1
  • anti-PD-1
  • combination treatment
  • malignant skin cancer
  • skin cancer
  • BRAF V600
  • unresectable BRAF V600 mutated melanoma
  • metastatic BRAF V600 mutated melanoma
03

In context

Melanoma

3,006 studies on the registry are indexed under Melanoma; 520 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 568 is above the median of 38 across 2,351 interventional studies indexed under Melanoma.

Browse Melanoma studies →

Lead sponsor

Novartis Pharmaceuticals is the lead sponsor of 2,673 studies on the registry; 228 are open to participants now.

Of its 576 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 431 (75%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 100 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria Part 1: Safety run-in

  • Histologically confirmed, unresectable or metastatic melanoma with BRAF V600 mutation
  • Aspartate transaminase (AST) \< 2.5× ULN and Alanine transaminase (ALT) \< 2.5× ULN
  • Measurable disease according to RECIST 1.1
  • ECOG performance status ≤ 1

Part 2: Biomarker cohort

  • Histologically confirmed, unresectable or metastatic melanoma with BRAF V600 mutation
  • At least two cutaneous or subcutaneous or nodal lesions for tumor sample collection
  • Measurable disease according to RECIST 1.1
  • ECOG performance status ≤ 2

Part 3: Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled part

  • Histologically confirmed, unresectable or metastatic melanoma with BRAF V600 mutation
  • ECOG performance status ≤ 2
  • Measurable disease according to RECIST 1.1

Exclusion Criteria:

Part 1: Safety run-in

  • Subjects with uveal or mucosal melanoma
  • Any history of CNS metastases
  • Prior systemic anti-cancer treatment for unresectable or metastatic melanoma
  • Neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant therapy for melanoma completed less than 6 months prior to enrollmen
  • Radiation therapy within 4 weeks prior to start of study treatment
  • Active autoimmune disease, and/or history of autoimmune disease(s) that required treatment

Parts 2 \& 3: Biomarker cohort \& double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled part

  • Subjects with uveal or mucosal melanoma
  • Prior systemic anti-cancer treatment for unresectable or metastatic melanoma
  • Neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant therapy for melanoma completed less than 6 months prior to enrollment
  • Radiation therapy within 4 weeks prior to start of study treatment
  • Clinically active cerebral melanoma metastasis.
  • Active autoimmune disease, and/or history of autoimmune disease(s) that required treatment

Other protocol-defined Inclusion/Exclusion may apply.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
568 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Part 1: Safety run-in Cohort

    In Part 1, participants are treated at different dose levels to determine the recommended Phase 3 regimen of spartalizumab in combination with dabrafenib and trametinib. The starting dose of spartalizumab is 400 mg Q4W in combination with the approved dose of dabrafenib (150 mg BID) and trametinib (2 mg QD).

    Biological: Spartalizumab · Drug: Dabrafenib · Drug: Trametinib

  • Experimental
    Part 2: Biomarker cohort

    In Part 2, participants are treated with spartalizumab 400 mg Q4W in combination with the approved dose of dabrafenib (150 mg BID) and trametinib (2 mg QD).

    Biological: Spartalizumab · Drug: Dabrafenib · Drug: Trametinib

  • Experimental
    Part 3- Arm 1: Spartalizumab in combination with dabrafenib and trametinib

    In Part 3, participants are randomized to receive spartalizumab at the RP3R identified in Part 1 (400 mg Q4W) in combination with approved dose of dabrafenib (150 mg BID) and trametinib (2 mg QD)

    Biological: Spartalizumab · Drug: Dabrafenib · Drug: Trametinib

  • Placebo comparator
    Part 3- Arm 2: Placebo in combination with dabrafenib and trametinib

    In Part 3, participants are randomized to receive matching placebo in combination with the approved dose of dabrafenib (150 mg BID) and trametinib (2 mg QD)

    Other: Placebo · Drug: Dabrafenib · Drug: Trametinib

Interventions

  • BiologicalSpartalizumab

    Spartalizumab powder for solution is used in Part 1 and Part 2, and as concentrate for solution for infusion for Part 3. Spartalizumab is administered via intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once every 4 weeks

    Also known as: PDR001

  • OtherPlacebo

    Placebo is administered via intravenous infusion over 30 minutes once every 4 weeks

  • DrugDabrafenib

    Dabrafenib 150 mg capsules BID is administered orally for Days 1-28 of a 28-day cycle, in fasting conditions.

  • DrugTrametinib

    Trametinib 2 mg tablets QD is administered orally for Days 1-28 of a 28-day cycle, in fasting conditions

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Safety Run-In (Part 1): Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)

    DLT was defined as an adverse event or abnormal laboratory value that was unrelated to disease, disease progression, inter-current illness, or concomitant medications and occured within 8 weeks of treatment with spartalizumab in combination with dabrafenib and trametinib. The DLT criteria included Grade 4 hematological adverse events, Grade 4 bilirubin elevation, specific gastrointestinal adverse events, symptomatic serum amylase or lipase elevation, Grade 3 or higher hypertension, Grade 3 or higher cardiac events, Grade 2 or higher pneumonitis, Grade 3 or higher immune-related toxicities, infusion-related reactions, other clinically significant adverse events, and toxicities leading to a dosing delay of over 12 weeks. NCI CTCAE v4.03 was used for grading DLTs

    Time frame: Up to 8 weeks (Part 1)

  2. Biomarker Cohort (Part 2): Change From Baseline in Programmed Cell Death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) Expression Upon Treatment With Spartalizumab in Combination With Dabrafenib and Trametinib

    Change from baseline in PD-L1 expression (as determined by immunohistochemistry in tissue samples) upon treatment with spartalizumab in combination with dabrafenib and trametinib in participants from Part 2

    Time frame: Baseline, Cycle 1 Day 15 and Cycle 3 Day 1 (Part 2). Each cycle is 28 days

  3. Biomarker Cohort (Part 2): Change From Baseline in CD8+ Cells Upon Treatment With Spartalizumab in Combination With Dabrafenib and Trametinib

    Change from baseline in CD8+ cells (as determined by flow cytometry in blood samples) upon treatment with spartalizumab in combination with dabrafenib and trametinib in participants from Part 2

    Time frame: Baseline, Cycle 1 Day 15 and Cycle 3 Day 1 (Part 2). Each cycle is 28 days

  4. Randomized (Part 3): Progression-Free Survival (PFS) as Per Investigator's Assessment by RECIST 1.1

    Progression-free survival was defined as the time from the date of first dose to the date of the first documented radiological progression per investigator's assessment according to RECIST 1.1 or death due to any cause. The distribution of PFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier (KM) method. If a patient had not had an event at the time of data cut-off, progression-free survival was censored at the date of last adequate tumor assessment.

    Time frame: Up to disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first, assessed up to 2.8 years (Part 3)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Overall Survival (OS)

    Overall survival was defined as the time from date of randomization to date of death due to any cause

    Time frame: Up to death due to any cause, assessed up to approximately 7 years

  2. Overall Response Rate (ORR) as Per Investigator's Assessment by RECIST 1.1

    ORR was defined as the percentage of subjects with confirmed best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR), as per investigator's assessment by RECIST 1.1. CR: Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to \<10 mm PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters

    Time frame: Part 1: Up to 3.3 years. Part 2: Up to 3 years. Part 3: Up to 2.8 years

  3. Duration of Response (DOR) as Per Investigator's Assessment by RECIST 1.1

    DOR was defined as the time from first documented response of CR or PR to date of first documented progression or death, according to RECIST 1.1 criteria. The distribution of DOR was estimated using the KM method. CR: Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to \<10 mm PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters

    Time frame: From first documented response to date of first documented progression or death, up to 3.3 years (Part 1), 3 years (Part 2) and 2.8 years (Part 3)

  4. Disease Control Rate (DCR) as Per Investigator's Assessment by RECIST 1.1

    DCR was defined as the percentage of participants with CR or PR or subjects with stable disease (SD) lasting for a duration of at least 24 weeks as per local review according to RECIST 1.1 criteria. CR: Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to \<10 mm PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters SD: Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR or CR nor an increase in lesions which would qualify for progressive disease.

    Time frame: Part 1: Up to 3.3 years. Part 2: Up to 3 years. Part 3: Up to 2.8 year

  5. Randomized (Part 3): Change From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ) C30- Global Health Status Scores

    The EORTC QLQ-C30 was a 30-item questionnaire that patients complete, consisting of both multi-item scales and single-item measures. It included five functional scales, three symptom scales, six single items, and a Global Health Status/Quality of Life (GHS/QoL) scale. The GHS/QoL scale had seven possible response scores ranging from 1 (very poor) to 7 (excellent), which were averaged and transformed to a 0-100 scale. A higher score on this scale indicated a better quality of life. The change from baseline in GHS/QoL scores was calculated. A positive change from baseline indicated improvement in the patient's quality of life.

    Time frame: From baseline to 60 days post progression, assessed up to 2.8 years (Part 3)

  6. Randomized (Part 3): Change From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ) C30- Physical Functioning Scale Scores

    The EORTC QLQ-C30 was a patient completed 30 item questionnaire that was composed of both multi-item scales and single-item measures. These included five functional scales, three symptom scales, six single items and a global health status/QoL scale. The EORTC QLQ-C30 physical functioning scale measured a patient's ability to carry out daily activities and tasks requiring physical exertion. It consisted of five questions asking patients to rate their level of physical functioning, with response options ranging from 1="not at all" to 4="very much". The scores for each item were summed and transformed to a 0 to 100 scale, with higher scores indicating better physical functioning. The change from baseline in physical functioning scale scores was calculated. A positive change from baseline indicated improvement in physical functioning.

    Time frame: From baseline to 60 days post progression, assessed up to 2.8 years (Part 3)

  7. Randomized (Part 3): Change From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ) C30- Pain Symptom Scale Scores

    The EORTC QLQ-C30 was a patient completed 30 item questionnaire that was composed of both multi-item scales and single-item measures. These included five functional scales, three symptom scales, six single items and a global health status/QoL scale. The EORTC QLQ-C30 pain symptom scale was one of the symptom scales in the questionnaire, which measured the severity of pain experienced by the patient. The pain symptom scale consisted of two items, one measuring the severity of pain and the other measuring the use of painkillers. The items were rated on a 4-point scale ranging from 1="not at all" to 4="very much". The scores for each item were summed and transformed to a 0 to 100 scale, with higher scores indicating more severe pain. The change from baseline in pain symptom scale scores was calculated. A negative change from baseline indicated improvement.

    Time frame: From baseline to 60 days post progression, assessed up to 2.8 years (Part 3)

  8. Randomized (Part 3): Time to 10 Point Definitive Deterioration in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ) C30- Global Health Status

    The EORTC QLQ-C30 was a patient completed 30 item questionnaire that was composed of both multi-item scales and single-item measures. These included five functional scales, three symptom scales, six single items and a global health status/QoL scale. The GHS/QoL scale had seven possible response scores ranging from 1 (very poor) to 7 (excellent), which were averaged and transformed to a 0-100 scale. A higher score on this scale indicated a better quality of life. The time to definitive 10 point deterioration is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of event, which is defined as at least 10 points relative to baseline worsening of the GHS/QoL score or death due to any cause. If a subject had not had an event, the time to deterioration was censored at the date of the last adequate assessment. The distribution was estimated using KM method.

    Time frame: From baseline to date of at least 10 points relative to baseline worsening of the global health status score or death due to any cause, up to 2.8 years (Part 3)

  9. Randomized (Part 3): Change From Baseline in Function Assessment Cancer Therapy-melanoma (FACT-M) Melanoma Subscale Score

    The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Melanoma (FACT-M) quality of life questionnaire was composed of the FACT-General (FACT-G) plus the Melanoma Subscale and the Melanoma Surgery Subscale, which complemented the general scale with items specific to quality of life (QoL) in melanoma. The Melanoma Subscale of FACT-M included 16 questions, with response options of 0= "Not at all", 1= "a little bit", 2= "somewhat", 3= "quite a bit" and 4= "very much". The FACT-M melanoma subscale score ranged from 0 to 64, with higher scores indicating a higher quality of life in relation to melanoma. The change from baseline in melanoma subscale scores was calculated. A positive change from baseline indicated improvement.

    Time frame: From baseline to 60 days post progression, assessed up to 2.8 years (Part 3)

  10. Randomized (Part 3): Change From Baseline in EuroQoL 5-level Instrument (EQ-5D-5L)- Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score

    The EQ-5D-5L is a standardized questionnaire used to assess health-related quality of life, and it includes a Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The VAS score is obtained by asking the individual to rate their current health status on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst possible health state and 100 represents the best possible health state. The change from baseline in EQ-5D-5L VAS score was calculated. A positive change from baseline indicates improvement in the health status.

    Time frame: From baseline to 60 days post progression, assessed up to 2.8 years (Part 3)

  11. Randomized (Part 3): PFS as Per Investigator's Assessment by RECIST 1.1 by PD-L1 Expression

    PFS was defined as the time from the date of first dose to the date of the first documented radiological progression as per investigator's assessment using RECIST 1.1 response criteria or death due to any cause. The distribution of PFS was estimated using the KM method. If a patient had not had an event at the time of data cut-off, progression-free survival was censored at the date of last adequate tumor assessment. PFS analysis was performed by PD-L1 status (positive, negative) where a positive status was defined as having ≥ 1% expression and a negative status was defined as having \< 1% expression.

    Time frame: Up to disease progression or death due to any cause, up to 2.8 years (Part 3)

  12. Randomized (Part 3): OS by PD-L1 Expression

    Overall survival was defined as the time from date of randomization to date of death due to any cause. OS analysis was performed by PD-L1 subgroup (positive, negative) where a positive status was defined as having ≥ 1% expression and a negative status was defined as having \< 1% expression.

    Time frame: Up to death due to any cause, assessed up to approximately 7 years

  13. Spartalizumab Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) Prevalence at Baseline

    Spartalizumab ADA prevalence at baseline was calculated as the percentage of participants who had an spartalizumab ADA positive result at baseline.

    Time frame: Baseline

  14. Spartalizumab ADA Incidence

    Spartalizumab ADA incidence was calculated as the percentage of participants who were treatment-induced spartalizumab ADA positive (post-baseline ADA positive with ADA-negative sample at baseline) and treatment-boosted spartalizumab ADA positive (post-baseline ADA positive with titer that is at least the fold titer change greater than the ADA-positive baseline titer)

    Time frame: Throughout study until 150 days after the last dose of spartalizumab, up to 3.3 years (Part 1), 3 years (Part 2) and 2.8 years (Part 3).

  15. Trough Concentration (Ctrough) for Spartalizumab

    Ctrough for spartalizumab refers to the serum concentration of spartalizumab immediately prior to the administration of a dose of spartalizumab on Day 1 of Cycle 2 and later cycles.

    Time frame: Pre-infusion on Day 1 of each Cycle starting from Cycle 2, up to 3.3 years (Part 1), 3 years (Part 2) and 2.8 years (Part 3). Cycle=28 days

  16. Pre-dose Plasma Concentration for Dabrafenib

    Plasma concentration of dabrafenib immediately prior to the administration of a dose of dabrafenib.

    Time frame: Pre-infusion on Day 1 of every cycle from Cycle 2 to 12, and then every 6 cycles from Cycle 18 to 36, up to 3.3 years (Part 1), 3 years (Part 2) and 2.8 years (Part 3). Cycle=28 days

  17. Pre-dose Plasma Concentration for Trametinib

    Plasma concentration of trametinib immediately prior to the administration of a dose of trametinib.

    Time frame: Pre-infusion on Day 1 of every cycle from Cycle 2 to 12, and then every 6 cycles from Cycle 18 to 36, up to 3.3 years (Part 1), 3 years (Part 2) and 2.8 years (Part 3). Cycle=28 days

  18. Number of Participants With Dose Interruptions

    Number of participants with dose interruptions for spartalizumab, dabrafenib and trametinib

    Time frame: From baseline to end of treatment, assessed up to approximately 7 years

  19. Number of Participants With Dose Reductions

    Number of patients with dose reductions for spartalizumab, dabrafenib and trametinib

    Time frame: From baseline to end of treatment, assessed up to approximately 7 years

  20. Relative Dose Intensity

    Relative dose intensity for spartalizumab, dabrafenib and trametinib computed as the ratio (expressed as percentage) of dose intensity and planned dose intensity: * Spartalizumab (PDR001) = \[Dose intensity (mg/4W) / planned dose intensity (mg/4W)\]\*100. * Trametinib and Dabrafenib = \[Dose intensity (mg/day) / planned dose intensity (mg/day)\]\*100.

    Time frame: From baseline to end of treatment, assessed up to approximately 7 years

07

Results

Posted Jul 24, 2023

Participant flow

Part 1 and 2 were conducted in 18 centers across 12 countries. Part 3 is conducted in 190 centers across 29 countries

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePart 1- Safety run-in: PDR001 400 mg Q4W + Dabrafenib 150 mg BID + Trametinib 2 mg QDPart 2- Biomarker Cohort: PDR001 400 mg Q4W + Dabrafenib 150 mg BID + Trametinib 2 mg QDPart 3- Arm 1: PDR001 400 mg Q4W + Dabrafenib 150 mg BID + Trametinib 2 mg QDPart 3- Arm 2: Placebo + Dabrafenib 150 mg BID + Trametinib 2 mg QD
Started927267265
Treated927267264
Completed0000
Not completed927267265
Withdrew: Progressive disease315114151
Withdrew: Subject/guardian decision111422
Withdrew: Death011313
Withdrew: Protocol deviation1011
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up0010
Withdrew: Physician decision002213
Withdrew: Adverse event296028
Withdrew: Study terminated by sponsor214237

Outcome measures

PrimarySafety Run-In (Part 1): Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)

DLT was defined as an adverse event or abnormal laboratory value that was unrelated to disease, disease progression, inter-current illness, or concomitant medications and occured within 8 weeks of treatment with spartalizumab in combination with dabrafenib and trametinib. The DLT criteria included Grade 4 hematological adverse events, Grade 4 bilirubin elevation, specific gastrointestinal adverse events, symptomatic serum amylase or lipase elevation, Grade 3 or higher hypertension, Grade 3 or higher cardiac events, Grade 2 or higher pneumonitis, Grade 3 or higher immune-related toxicities, infusion-related reactions, other clinically significant adverse events, and toxicities leading to a dosing delay of over 12 weeks. NCI CTCAE v4.03 was used for grading DLTs

Time frame:
Up to 8 weeks (Part 1)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Safety Run-In (Part 1): Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)
ParticipantsPart 1- Safety run-in: PDR001 400 mg Q4W + Dabrafenib 150 mg BID + Trametinib 2 mg QD
Safety Run-In (Part 1): Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)1
PrimaryBiomarker Cohort (Part 2): Change From Baseline in Programmed Cell Death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) Expression Upon Treatment With Spartalizumab in Combination With Dabrafenib and Trametinib

Change from baseline in PD-L1 expression (as determined by immunohistochemistry in tissue samples) upon treatment with spartalizumab in combination with dabrafenib and trametinib in participants from Part 2

Time frame:
Baseline, Cycle 1 Day 15 and Cycle 3 Day 1 (Part 2). Each cycle is 28 days
Reported as:
Mean · Percentage of positive tumor cells
Biomarker Cohort (Part 2): Change From Baseline in Programmed Cell Death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) Expression Upon Treatment With Spartalizumab in Combination With Dabrafenib and Trametinib
Percentage of positive tumor cellsPart 2- Biomarker Cohort: PDR001 400 mg Q4W + Dabrafenib 150 mg BID + Trametinib 2 mg QD
Cycle 1 Day 151.7 ± 13.05
Cycle 3 Day 12.7 ± 7.63
PrimaryBiomarker Cohort (Part 2): Change From Baseline in CD8+ Cells Upon Treatment With Spartalizumab in Combination With Dabrafenib and Trametinib

Change from baseline in CD8+ cells (as determined by flow cytometry in blood samples) upon treatment with spartalizumab in combination with dabrafenib and trametinib in participants from Part 2

Time frame:
Baseline, Cycle 1 Day 15 and Cycle 3 Day 1 (Part 2). Each cycle is 28 days
Reported as:
Mean · Percentage Marker Area
Biomarker Cohort (Part 2): Change From Baseline in CD8+ Cells Upon Treatment With Spartalizumab in Combination With Dabrafenib and Trametinib
Percentage Marker AreaPart 2- Biomarker Cohort: PDR001 400 mg Q4W + Dabrafenib 150 mg BID + Trametinib 2 mg QD
Cycle 1 Day 150.4 ± 3.22
Cycle 3 Day 11.2 ± 2.43
PrimaryRandomized (Part 3): Progression-Free Survival (PFS) as Per Investigator's Assessment by RECIST 1.1

Progression-free survival was defined as the time from the date of first dose to the date of the first documented radiological progression per investigator's assessment according to RECIST 1.1 or death due to any cause. The distribution of PFS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier (KM) method. If a patient had not had an event at the time of data cut-off, progression-free survival was censored at the date of last adequate tumor assessment.

Time frame:
Up to disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first, assessed up to 2.8 years (Part 3)
Reported as:
Median · Months
Randomized (Part 3): Progression-Free Survival (PFS) as Per Investigator's Assessment by RECIST 1.1
MonthsPart 3- Arm 1: PDR001 400 mg Q4W + Dabrafenib 150 mg BID + Trametinib 2 mg QDPart 3- Arm 2: Placebo + Dabrafenib 150 mg BID + Trametinib 2 mg QD
Randomized (Part 3): Progression-Free Survival (PFS) as Per Investigator's Assessment by RECIST 1.116.2 (12.7 to 23.9)12.0 (10.2 to 15.4)
Statistical analysis
  • Part 3- Arm 1: PDR001 400 mg Q4W + Dabrafenib 150 mg BID + Trametinib 2 mg QD vs Part 3- Arm 2: Placebo + Dabrafenib 150 mg BID + Trametinib 2 mg QD · Log Rank · p = 0.042 · Hazard ratio (hr): 0.820 · 95% CI 0.655 to 1.027
SecondaryOverall Survival (OS)

Overall survival was defined as the time from date of randomization to date of death due to any cause

Time frame:
Up to death due to any cause, assessed up to approximately 7 years
Reported as:
Median · Months
Overall Survival (OS)
MonthsPart 1- Safety run-in: PDR001 400 mg Q4W + Dabrafenib 150 mg BID + Trametinib 2 mg QDPart 2- Biomarker Cohort: PDR001 400 mg Q4W + Dabrafenib 150 mg BID + Trametinib 2 mg QDPart 3- Arm 1: PDR001 400 mg Q4W + Dabrafenib 150 mg BID + Trametinib 2 mg QDPart 3- Arm 2: Placebo + Dabrafenib 150 mg BID + Trametinib 2 mg QD
Overall Survival (OS)NA (12.2 to NA)30.7 (21.3 to 67.4)61.5 (41.6 to NA)41.6 (30.6 to 56.9)
SecondaryOverall Response Rate (ORR) as Per Investigator's Assessment by RECIST 1.1

ORR was defined as the percentage of subjects with confirmed best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR), as per investigator's assessment by RECIST 1.1. CR: Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to \<10 mm PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters

Time frame:
Part 1: Up to 3.3 years. Part 2: Up to 3 years. Part 3: Up to 2.8 years
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Overall Response Rate (ORR) as Per Investigator's Assessment by RECIST 1.1
Percentage of participantsPart 1- Safety run-in: PDR001 400 mg Q4W + Dabrafenib 150 mg BID + Trametinib 2 mg QDPart 2- Biomarker Cohort: PDR001 400 mg Q4W + Dabrafenib 150 mg BID + Trametinib 2 mg QDPart 3- Arm 1: PDR001 400 mg Q4W + Dabrafenib 150 mg BID + Trametinib 2 mg QDPart 3- Arm 2: Placebo + Dabrafenib 150 mg BID + Trametinib 2 mg QD
Overall Response Rate (ORR) as Per Investigator's Assessment by RECIST 1.1100.0 (66.4 to 100.0)70.4 (49.8 to 86.2)68.5 (62.6 to 74.1)64.2 (58.1 to 69.9)
SecondaryDuration of Response (DOR) as Per Investigator's Assessment by RECIST 1.1

DOR was defined as the time from first documented response of CR or PR to date of first documented progression or death, according to RECIST 1.1 criteria. The distribution of DOR was estimated using the KM method. CR: Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to \<10 mm PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters

Time frame:
From first documented response to date of first documented progression or death, up to 3.3 years (Part 1), 3 years (Part 2) and 2.8 years (Part 3)
Reported as:
Median · Months
Duration of Response (DOR) as Per Investigator's Assessment by RECIST 1.1
MonthsPart 1- Safety run-in: PDR001 400 mg Q4W + Dabrafenib 150 mg BID + Trametinib 2 mg QDPart 2- Biomarker Cohort: PDR001 400 mg Q4W + Dabrafenib 150 mg BID + Trametinib 2 mg QDPart 3- Arm 1: PDR001 400 mg Q4W + Dabrafenib 150 mg BID + Trametinib 2 mg QDPart 3- Arm 2: Placebo + Dabrafenib 150 mg BID + Trametinib 2 mg QD
Duration of Response (DOR) as Per Investigator's Assessment by RECIST 1.1NA (8.3 to NA)20.0 (9.4 to NA)NA (18.6 to NA)20.7 (13.0 to NA)
SecondaryDisease Control Rate (DCR) as Per Investigator's Assessment by RECIST 1.1

DCR was defined as the percentage of participants with CR or PR or subjects with stable disease (SD) lasting for a duration of at least 24 weeks as per local review according to RECIST 1.1 criteria. CR: Disappearance of all non-nodal target lesions. In addition, any pathological lymph nodes assigned as target lesions must have a reduction in short axis to \<10 mm PR: At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameter of all target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters SD: Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR or CR nor an increase in lesions which would qualify for progressive disease.

Time frame:
Part 1: Up to 3.3 years. Part 2: Up to 3 years. Part 3: Up to 2.8 year
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Disease Control Rate (DCR) as Per Investigator's Assessment by RECIST 1.1
Percentage of participantsPart 1- Safety run-in: PDR001 400 mg Q4W + Dabrafenib 150 mg BID + Trametinib 2 mg QDPart 2- Biomarker Cohort: PDR001 400 mg Q4W + Dabrafenib 150 mg BID + Trametinib 2 mg QDPart 3- Arm 1: PDR001 400 mg Q4W + Dabrafenib 150 mg BID + Trametinib 2 mg QDPart 3- Arm 2: Placebo + Dabrafenib 150 mg BID + Trametinib 2 mg QD
Disease Control Rate (DCR) as Per Investigator's Assessment by RECIST 1.1100.0 (66.4 to 100.0)92.6 (75.7 to 99.1)84.3 (79.3 to 88.4)86.4 (81.7 to 90.3)
SecondaryRandomized (Part 3): Change From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ) C30- Global Health Status Scores

The EORTC QLQ-C30 was a 30-item questionnaire that patients complete, consisting of both multi-item scales and single-item measures. It included five functional scales, three symptom scales, six single items, and a Global Health Status/Quality of Life (GHS/QoL) scale. The GHS/QoL scale had seven possible response scores ranging from 1 (very poor) to 7 (excellent), which were averaged and transformed to a 0-100 scale. A higher score on this scale indicated a better quality of life. The change from baseline in GHS/QoL scores was calculated. A positive change from baseline indicated improvement in the patient's quality of life.

Time frame:
From baseline to 60 days post progression, assessed up to 2.8 years (Part 3)
Reported as:
Mean · Score on a Scale
Randomized (Part 3): Change From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ) C30- Global Health Status Scores
Score on a ScalePart 3- Arm 1: PDR001 400 mg Q4W + Dabrafenib 150 mg BID + Trametinib 2 mg QDPart 3- Arm 2: Placebo + Dabrafenib 150 mg BID + Trametinib 2 mg QD
Cycle 4 Day 10.81 ± 19.3002.20 ± 24.918
Cycle 6 Day 11.22 ± 25.0501.90 ± 21.197
Cycle 8 Day 10.00 ± 24.5260.50 ± 19.608
Cycle 10 Day 11.88 ± 23.0880.27 ± 18.752
Cycle 12 Day 10.61 ± 25.9060.00 ± 24.541
Cycle 14 Day 10.65 ± 23.561-0.89 ± 23.306
Cycle 16 Day 10.82 ± 25.1861.76 ± 24.142
Cycle 18 Day 1-0.46 ± 24.106-0.10 ± 19.193
Cycle 20 Day 11.93 ± 21.766-1.02 ± 23.144
Cycle 22 Day 10.95 ± 22.0472.29 ± 21.947
Cycle 25 Day 13.57 ± 23.981-0.24 ± 25.497
Cycle 28 Day 14.50 ± 19.7931.06 ± 22.513
Cycle 31 Day 111.59 ± 24.9676.73 ± 21.084
Cycle 34 Day 116.67 ± 47.14013.89 ± 20.184
30 days post-progression-11.59 ± 24.967-7.78 ± 29.274
60 days post-progression-11.54 ± 16.506-17.19 ± 24.050
SecondaryRandomized (Part 3): Change From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ) C30- Physical Functioning Scale Scores

The EORTC QLQ-C30 was a patient completed 30 item questionnaire that was composed of both multi-item scales and single-item measures. These included five functional scales, three symptom scales, six single items and a global health status/QoL scale. The EORTC QLQ-C30 physical functioning scale measured a patient's ability to carry out daily activities and tasks requiring physical exertion. It consisted of five questions asking patients to rate their level of physical functioning, with response options ranging from 1="not at all" to 4="very much". The scores for each item were summed and transformed to a 0 to 100 scale, with higher scores indicating better physical functioning. The change from baseline in physical functioning scale scores was calculated. A positive change from baseline indicated improvement in physical functioning.

Time frame:
From baseline to 60 days post progression, assessed up to 2.8 years (Part 3)
Reported as:
Mean · Score on a Scale
Randomized (Part 3): Change From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ) C30- Physical Functioning Scale Scores
Score on a ScalePart 3- Arm 1: PDR001 400 mg Q4W + Dabrafenib 150 mg BID + Trametinib 2 mg QDPart 3- Arm 2: Placebo + Dabrafenib 150 mg BID + Trametinib 2 mg QD
Cycle 4 Day 1-1.52 ± 16.243-0.70 ± 17.618
Cycle 6 Day 1-2.38 ± 16.121-0.60 ± 14.824
Cycle 8 Day 1-1.29 ± 18.350-0.59 ± 15.687
Cycle 10 Day 1-0.18 ± 17.985-1.11 ± 13.736
Cycle 12 Day 1-1.39 ± 18.108-0.85 ± 10.652
Cycle 14 Day 1-2.42 ± 16.720-2.61 ± 12.320
Cycle 16 Day 1-4.19 ± 20.301-2.24 ± 13.331
Cycle 18 Day 1-3.48 ± 18.862-3.55 ± 13.474
Cycle 20 Day 1-4.07 ± 15.316-1.73 ± 11.536
Cycle 22 Day 1-3.21 ± 15.538-0.85 ± 11.157
Cycle 25 Day 1-1.35 ± 16.510-2.67 ± 13.158
Cycle 28 Day 1-0.80 ± 13.843-2.67 ± 15.953
Cycle 31 Day 1-2.03 ± 10.719-1.79 ± 9.533
Cycle 34 Day 10.00 ± 0.000-3.33 ± 5.578
30 days post-progression-6.67 ± 18.641-8.67 ± 19.973
60 days post-progression-13.85 ± 15.977-21.25 ± 27.991
SecondaryRandomized (Part 3): Change From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ) C30- Pain Symptom Scale Scores

The EORTC QLQ-C30 was a patient completed 30 item questionnaire that was composed of both multi-item scales and single-item measures. These included five functional scales, three symptom scales, six single items and a global health status/QoL scale. The EORTC QLQ-C30 pain symptom scale was one of the symptom scales in the questionnaire, which measured the severity of pain experienced by the patient. The pain symptom scale consisted of two items, one measuring the severity of pain and the other measuring the use of painkillers. The items were rated on a 4-point scale ranging from 1="not at all" to 4="very much". The scores for each item were summed and transformed to a 0 to 100 scale, with higher scores indicating more severe pain. The change from baseline in pain symptom scale scores was calculated. A negative change from baseline indicated improvement.

Time frame:
From baseline to 60 days post progression, assessed up to 2.8 years (Part 3)
Reported as:
Mean · Score on a Scale
Randomized (Part 3): Change From Baseline in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ) C30- Pain Symptom Scale Scores
Score on a ScalePart 3- Arm 1: PDR001 400 mg Q4W + Dabrafenib 150 mg BID + Trametinib 2 mg QDPart 3- Arm 2: Placebo + Dabrafenib 150 mg BID + Trametinib 2 mg QD
Cycle 4 Day 1-5.24 ± 26.434-5.29 ± 24.881
Cycle 6 Day 1-6.43 ± 28.820-7.49 ± 23.611
Cycle 8 Day 1-4.91 ± 29.176-4.11 ± 24.420
Cycle 10 Day 1-7.95 ± 28.346-4.76 ± 23.557
Cycle 12 Day 1-8.33 ± 28.890-5.26 ± 22.646
Cycle 14 Day 1-5.50 ± 28.140-3.56 ± 23.062
Cycle 16 Day 1-5.86 ± 26.220-4.44 ± 25.820
Cycle 18 Day 1-3.15 ± 30.178-3.21 ± 20.898
Cycle 20 Day 1-4.47 ± 30.659-2.85 ± 23.249
Cycle 22 Day 1-5.49 ± 27.049-3.54 ± 23.969
Cycle 25 Day 1-6.25 ± 28.868-4.76 ± 20.685
Cycle 28 Day 1-3.00 ± 26.872-3.03 ± 22.701
Cycle 31 Day 1-10.14 ± 24.995-7.05 ± 34.696
Cycle 34 Day 1-8.33 ± 11.785-5.56 ± 8.607
30 days post-progression9.42 ± 28.7910.56 ± 28.190
60 days post-progression15.38 ± 19.79211.46 ± 24.884
SecondaryRandomized (Part 3): Time to 10 Point Definitive Deterioration in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ) C30- Global Health Status

The EORTC QLQ-C30 was a patient completed 30 item questionnaire that was composed of both multi-item scales and single-item measures. These included five functional scales, three symptom scales, six single items and a global health status/QoL scale. The GHS/QoL scale had seven possible response scores ranging from 1 (very poor) to 7 (excellent), which were averaged and transformed to a 0-100 scale. A higher score on this scale indicated a better quality of life. The time to definitive 10 point deterioration is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of event, which is defined as at least 10 points relative to baseline worsening of the GHS/QoL score or death due to any cause. If a subject had not had an event, the time to deterioration was censored at the date of the last adequate assessment. The distribution was estimated using KM method.

Time frame:
From baseline to date of at least 10 points relative to baseline worsening of the global health status score or death due to any cause, up to 2.8 years (Part 3)
Reported as:
Median · Months
Randomized (Part 3): Time to 10 Point Definitive Deterioration in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ) C30- Global Health Status
MonthsPart 3- Arm 1: PDR001 400 mg Q4W + Dabrafenib 150 mg BID + Trametinib 2 mg QDPart 3- Arm 2: Placebo + Dabrafenib 150 mg BID + Trametinib 2 mg QD
Randomized (Part 3): Time to 10 Point Definitive Deterioration in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ) C30- Global Health Status19.4 (15.7 to 24.9)22.1 (17.5 to NA)
Statistical analysis
  • Part 3- Arm 1: PDR001 400 mg Q4W + Dabrafenib 150 mg BID + Trametinib 2 mg QD vs Part 3- Arm 2: Placebo + Dabrafenib 150 mg BID + Trametinib 2 mg QD · Log Rank · p = 0.2975 · Hazard ratio (hr): 1.183 · 95% CI 0.865 to 1.619
SecondaryRandomized (Part 3): Change From Baseline in Function Assessment Cancer Therapy-melanoma (FACT-M) Melanoma Subscale Score

The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Melanoma (FACT-M) quality of life questionnaire was composed of the FACT-General (FACT-G) plus the Melanoma Subscale and the Melanoma Surgery Subscale, which complemented the general scale with items specific to quality of life (QoL) in melanoma. The Melanoma Subscale of FACT-M included 16 questions, with response options of 0= "Not at all", 1= "a little bit", 2= "somewhat", 3= "quite a bit" and 4= "very much". The FACT-M melanoma subscale score ranged from 0 to 64, with higher scores indicating a higher quality of life in relation to melanoma. The change from baseline in melanoma subscale scores was calculated. A positive change from baseline indicated improvement.

Time frame:
From baseline to 60 days post progression, assessed up to 2.8 years (Part 3)
Reported as:
Mean · Score on a scale
Randomized (Part 3): Change From Baseline in Function Assessment Cancer Therapy-melanoma (FACT-M) Melanoma Subscale Score
Score on a scalePart 3- Arm 1: PDR001 400 mg Q4W + Dabrafenib 150 mg BID + Trametinib 2 mg QDPart 3- Arm 2: Placebo + Dabrafenib 150 mg BID + Trametinib 2 mg QD
Cycle 4 Day 10.83 ± 6.6000.87 ± 6.185
Cycle 6 Day 11.01 ± 7.3701.18 ± 6.219
Cycle 8 Day 11.14 ± 7.2841.09 ± 5.742
Cycle 10 Day 11.52 ± 7.3140.54 ± 6.492
Cycle 12 Day 11.21 ± 7.5150.47 ± 5.974
Cycle 14 Day 10.77 ± 7.0710.65 ± 6.681
Cycle 16 Day 10.93 ± 6.4510.71 ± 6.374
Cycle 18 Day 11.23 ± 7.0950.47 ± 6.152
Cycle 20 Day 11.28 ± 6.6340.53 ± 5.875
Cycle 22 Day 11.87 ± 6.2150.79 ± 5.970
Cycle 25 Day 12.73 ± 5.9500.74 ± 6.792
Cycle 28 Day 12.46 ± 5.1950.61 ± 8.020
Cycle 31 Day 13.29 ± 5.7021.88 ± 6.154
Cycle 34 Day 1-0.50 ± 2.1214.60 ± 3.578
30 days post-progression0.33 ± 7.620-1.07 ± 8.590
60 days post-progression-2.60 ± 5.734-3.06 ± 8.948
SecondaryRandomized (Part 3): Change From Baseline in EuroQoL 5-level Instrument (EQ-5D-5L)- Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score

The EQ-5D-5L is a standardized questionnaire used to assess health-related quality of life, and it includes a Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The VAS score is obtained by asking the individual to rate their current health status on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst possible health state and 100 represents the best possible health state. The change from baseline in EQ-5D-5L VAS score was calculated. A positive change from baseline indicates improvement in the health status.

Time frame:
From baseline to 60 days post progression, assessed up to 2.8 years (Part 3)
Reported as:
Mean · Score on a Scale
Randomized (Part 3): Change From Baseline in EuroQoL 5-level Instrument (EQ-5D-5L)- Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score
Score on a ScalePart 3- Arm 1: PDR001 400 mg Q4W + Dabrafenib 150 mg BID + Trametinib 2 mg QDPart 3- Arm 2: Placebo + Dabrafenib 150 mg BID + Trametinib 2 mg QD
Cycle 4 Day 11.85 ± 16.5672.16 ± 19.733
Cycle 6 Day 11.55 ± 20.7513.10 ± 16.095
Cycle 8 Day 10.39 ± 20.2462.60 ± 15.200
Cycle 10 Day 12.45 ± 19.0502.52 ± 16.144
Cycle 12 Day 11.88 ± 24.6531.42 ± 15.695
Cycle 14 Day 12.62 ± 19.4551.71 ± 14.337
Cycle 16 Day 11.30 ± 18.6402.79 ± 16.996
Cycle 18 Day 12.16 ± 20.7621.91 ± 16.743
Cycle 20 Day 11.34 ± 17.8311.28 ± 16.108
Cycle 22 Day 13.01 ± 19.1021.55 ± 14.973
Cycle 25 Day 14.47 ± 19.4890.26 ± 14.784
Cycle 28 Day 14.20 ± 17.545-0.39 ± 18.529
Cycle 31 Day 16.45 ± 19.561-0.08 ± 16.747
Cycle 34 Day 1-9.50 ± 14.8495.60 ± 19.008
30 days post-progression-4.04 ± 22.033-10.24 ± 23.532
60 days post-progression-19.25 ± 19.923-8.19 ± 21.192
SecondaryRandomized (Part 3): PFS as Per Investigator's Assessment by RECIST 1.1 by PD-L1 Expression

PFS was defined as the time from the date of first dose to the date of the first documented radiological progression as per investigator's assessment using RECIST 1.1 response criteria or death due to any cause. The distribution of PFS was estimated using the KM method. If a patient had not had an event at the time of data cut-off, progression-free survival was censored at the date of last adequate tumor assessment. PFS analysis was performed by PD-L1 status (positive, negative) where a positive status was defined as having ≥ 1% expression and a negative status was defined as having \< 1% expression.

Time frame:
Up to disease progression or death due to any cause, up to 2.8 years (Part 3)
Reported as:
Median · Months
Randomized (Part 3): PFS as Per Investigator's Assessment by RECIST 1.1 by PD-L1 Expression
MonthsPart 3- Arm 1: PDR001 400 mg Q4W + Dabrafenib 150 mg BID + Trametinib 2 mg QDPart 3- Arm 2: Placebo + Dabrafenib 150 mg BID + Trametinib 2 mg QD
PD-L1 negative (<1%)12.0 (10.1 to 15.7)10.3 (7.5 to 13.0)
PD-L1 positive (>=1%)26.6 (17.4 to NA)15.4 (10.2 to 25.3)
SecondaryRandomized (Part 3): OS by PD-L1 Expression

Overall survival was defined as the time from date of randomization to date of death due to any cause. OS analysis was performed by PD-L1 subgroup (positive, negative) where a positive status was defined as having ≥ 1% expression and a negative status was defined as having \< 1% expression.

Time frame:
Up to death due to any cause, assessed up to approximately 7 years
Reported as:
Median · Months
Randomized (Part 3): OS by PD-L1 Expression
MonthsPart 3- Arm 1: PDR001 400 mg Q4W + Dabrafenib 150 mg BID + Trametinib 2 mg QDPart 3- Arm 2: Placebo + Dabrafenib 150 mg BID + Trametinib 2 mg QD
PD-L1 negative (<1%)41.6 (27.6 to NA)21.0 (16.9 to 33.4)
PD-L1 positive (>=1%)NA (45.4 to NA)61.3 (41.2 to NA)
SecondarySpartalizumab Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) Prevalence at Baseline

Spartalizumab ADA prevalence at baseline was calculated as the percentage of participants who had an spartalizumab ADA positive result at baseline.

Time frame:
Baseline
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Spartalizumab Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) Prevalence at Baseline
ParticipantsPart 1- Safety run-in: PDR001 400 mg Q4W + Dabrafenib 150 mg BID + Trametinib 2 mg QDPart 2- Biomarker Cohort: PDR001 400 mg Q4W + Dabrafenib 150 mg BID + Trametinib 2 mg QDPart 3- Arm 1: PDR001 400 mg Q4W + Dabrafenib 150 mg BID + Trametinib 2 mg QD
Spartalizumab Anti-drug Antibody (ADA) Prevalence at Baseline004
SecondarySpartalizumab ADA Incidence

Spartalizumab ADA incidence was calculated as the percentage of participants who were treatment-induced spartalizumab ADA positive (post-baseline ADA positive with ADA-negative sample at baseline) and treatment-boosted spartalizumab ADA positive (post-baseline ADA positive with titer that is at least the fold titer change greater than the ADA-positive baseline titer)

Time frame:
Throughout study until 150 days after the last dose of spartalizumab, up to 3.3 years (Part 1), 3 years (Part 2) and 2.8 years (Part 3).
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Spartalizumab ADA Incidence
ParticipantsPart 1- Safety run-in: PDR001 400 mg Q4W + Dabrafenib 150 mg BID + Trametinib 2 mg QDPart 2- Biomarker Cohort: PDR001 400 mg Q4W + Dabrafenib 150 mg BID + Trametinib 2 mg QDPart 3- Arm 1: PDR001 400 mg Q4W + Dabrafenib 150 mg BID + Trametinib 2 mg QD
Spartalizumab ADA Incidence0555
SecondaryTrough Concentration (Ctrough) for Spartalizumab

Ctrough for spartalizumab refers to the serum concentration of spartalizumab immediately prior to the administration of a dose of spartalizumab on Day 1 of Cycle 2 and later cycles.

Time frame:
Pre-infusion on Day 1 of each Cycle starting from Cycle 2, up to 3.3 years (Part 1), 3 years (Part 2) and 2.8 years (Part 3). Cycle=28 days
Reported as:
Mean · microgram (μg)/miliLiter (mL)
Trough Concentration (Ctrough) for Spartalizumab
microgram (μg)/miliLiter (mL)Part 1- Safety run-in: PDR001 400 mg Q4W + Dabrafenib 150 mg BID + Trametinib 2 mg QDPart 2- Biomarker Cohort: PDR001 400 mg Q4W + Dabrafenib 150 mg BID + Trametinib 2 mg QDPart 3- Arm 1: PDR001 400 mg Q4W + Dabrafenib 150 mg BID + Trametinib 2 mg QD
Cycle 231.9 ± 4.5931.5 ± 20.328.4 ± 13.4
Cycle 341.1 ± 7.0756.1 ± 34.243.5 ± 19.1
Cycle 447.846.9 ± 18.850.5 ± 24.2
Cycle 546.356.7 ± 19.556.4 ± 24.5
Cycle 653.8 ± 16.960.9 ± 23.658.8 ± 26.5
Cycle 756.1 ± 12.162.2 ± 33.363.7 ± 29.6
Cycle 857.9 ± 12.765.8 ± 32.864.1 ± 29.9
Cycle 960.2 ± 30.969.5 ± 25.267.8 ± 33.5
Cycle 1062.1 ± 22.568.4 ± 33.263.8 ± 28.4
Cycle 1166.9 ± 15.863.2 ± 35.862.1 ± 27.9
Cycle 1267.0 ± 16.561.6 ± 29.360.7 ± 27.2
SecondaryPre-dose Plasma Concentration for Dabrafenib

Plasma concentration of dabrafenib immediately prior to the administration of a dose of dabrafenib.

Time frame:
Pre-infusion on Day 1 of every cycle from Cycle 2 to 12, and then every 6 cycles from Cycle 18 to 36, up to 3.3 years (Part 1), 3 years (Part 2) and 2.8 years (Part 3). Cycle=28 days
Reported as:
Mean · nanogram (ng)/ miliLiter (mL)
Pre-dose Plasma Concentration for Dabrafenib
nanogram (ng)/ miliLiter (mL)Part 1- Safety run-in: PDR001 400 mg Q4W + Dabrafenib 150 mg BID + Trametinib 2 mg QDPart 2- Biomarker Cohort: PDR001 400 mg Q4W + Dabrafenib 150 mg BID + Trametinib 2 mg QDPart 3- Arm 1: PDR001 400 mg Q4W + Dabrafenib 150 mg BID + Trametinib 2 mg QDPart 3- Arm 2: Placebo + Dabrafenib 150 mg BID + Trametinib 2 mg QD
Cycle 233.7 ± 27.4149 ± 391208 ± 473234 ± 475
Cycle 325.5 ± 10.4183 ± 469192 ± 607135 ± 266
Cycle 423.0 ± 15.8372 ± 811169 ± 404167 ± 328
Cycle 528.8 ± 30.6152 ± 293130 ± 317152 ± 363
Cycle 615.1 ± 16.373.7 ± 131198 ± 52194.6 ± 186
Cycle 720.9 ± 13.940.0 ± 20.0180 ± 510121 ± 279
Cycle 822.9 ± 16.828.0 ± 10.4173 ± 53297.2 ± 177
Cycle 922.3 ± 7.5943.3 ± 40.6143 ± 394133 ± 259
Cycle 1024.5 ± 9.1960.0 ± 28.3167 ± 472122 ± 266
Cycle 11154 ± 25033.8 ± 22.6174 ± 667119 ± 238
Cycle 1210.9 ± 10.341.3 ± 37.2148 ± 396146 ± 295
Cycle 1819.050.6 ± 49.7180 ± 618167 ± 385
Cycle 24—91.5 ± 98.3147 ± 34460.2 ± 67.9
Cycle 3040.2—226 ± 48847.6 ± 23.2
Cycle 3647.6———
SecondaryPre-dose Plasma Concentration for Trametinib

Plasma concentration of trametinib immediately prior to the administration of a dose of trametinib.

Time frame:
Pre-infusion on Day 1 of every cycle from Cycle 2 to 12, and then every 6 cycles from Cycle 18 to 36, up to 3.3 years (Part 1), 3 years (Part 2) and 2.8 years (Part 3). Cycle=28 days
Reported as:
Mean · ng/mL
Pre-dose Plasma Concentration for Trametinib
ng/mLPart 1- Safety run-in: PDR001 400 mg Q4W + Dabrafenib 150 mg BID + Trametinib 2 mg QDPart 2- Biomarker Cohort: PDR001 400 mg Q4W + Dabrafenib 150 mg BID + Trametinib 2 mg QDPart 3- Arm 1: PDR001 400 mg Q4W + Dabrafenib 150 mg BID + Trametinib 2 mg QDPart 3- Arm 2: Placebo + Dabrafenib 150 mg BID + Trametinib 2 mg QD
Cycle 211.7 ± 4.0911.2 ± 3.411.5 ± 4.7313.9 ± 9.36
Cycle 38.34 ± 0.35412.2 ± 2.5511.4 ± 5.9812.3 ± 5.59
Cycle 410.7 ± 1.6412.5 ± 4.8411.7 ± 4.6211.9 ± 5.04
Cycle 510.112.6 ± 5.0311.3 ± 4.9111.6 ± 4.49
Cycle 610.0 ± 1.3811.8 ± 3.7311.6 ± 5.1210.9 ± 3.52
Cycle 711.6 ± 3.811.8 ± 5.2412.0 ± 4.8611.0 ± 4.26
Cycle 89.24 ± 3.0610.2 ± 4.1310.3 ± 3.9211.3 ± 4.08
Cycle 98.73 ± 3.3510.5 ± 4.4310.9 ± 4.5711.6 ± 4.22
Cycle 108.2410.5 ± 4.0210.9 ± 4.4711.8 ± 4.26
Cycle 1110.711.6 ± 4.6910.3 ± 3.6711.4 ± 3.57
Cycle 1210.6 ± 3.9211.0 ± 4.5310.6 ± 4.3111.2 ± 3.82
Cycle 1810.113.0 ± 4.69.66 ± 3.4912.1 ± 5.13
Cycle 24—13.4 ± 8.0310.7 ± 4.8910.7 ± 2.21
Cycle 3010.8—9.34 ± 7.5610.1 ± 2.76
Cycle 368.97———
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Dose Interruptions

Number of participants with dose interruptions for spartalizumab, dabrafenib and trametinib

Time frame:
From baseline to end of treatment, assessed up to approximately 7 years
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Dose Interruptions
ParticipantsPart 1- Safety run-in: PDR001 400 mg Q4W + Dabrafenib 150 mg BID + Trametinib 2 mg QDPart 2- Biomarker Cohort: PDR001 400 mg Q4W + Dabrafenib 150 mg BID + Trametinib 2 mg QDPart 3- Arm 1: PDR001 400 mg Q4W + Dabrafenib 150 mg BID + Trametinib 2 mg QDPart 3- Arm 2: Placebo + Dabrafenib 150 mg BID + Trametinib 2 mg QD
Spartalizumab (PDR001) — With no dose interruption411120170
Spartalizumab (PDR001) — With at least one dose interruption51614794
Dabrafenib — With no dose interruption022974
Dabrafenib — With at least one dose interruption925238190
Trametinib — With no dose interruption012964
Trametinib — With at least one dose interruption926238200
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Dose Reductions

Number of patients with dose reductions for spartalizumab, dabrafenib and trametinib

Time frame:
From baseline to end of treatment, assessed up to approximately 7 years
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Dose Reductions
ParticipantsPart 1- Safety run-in: PDR001 400 mg Q4W + Dabrafenib 150 mg BID + Trametinib 2 mg QDPart 2- Biomarker Cohort: PDR001 400 mg Q4W + Dabrafenib 150 mg BID + Trametinib 2 mg QDPart 3- Arm 1: PDR001 400 mg Q4W + Dabrafenib 150 mg BID + Trametinib 2 mg QDPart 3- Arm 2: Placebo + Dabrafenib 150 mg BID + Trametinib 2 mg QD
Dabrafenib — With neither dose reduction nor interruption022568
Dabrafenib — With at least one dose reduction and/or interruption925242196
Trametinib — With neither dose reduction nor interruption012863
Trametinib — With at least one dose reduction and/or interruption926239201
SecondaryRelative Dose Intensity

Relative dose intensity for spartalizumab, dabrafenib and trametinib computed as the ratio (expressed as percentage) of dose intensity and planned dose intensity: * Spartalizumab (PDR001) = \[Dose intensity (mg/4W) / planned dose intensity (mg/4W)\]\*100. * Trametinib and Dabrafenib = \[Dose intensity (mg/day) / planned dose intensity (mg/day)\]\*100.

Time frame:
From baseline to end of treatment, assessed up to approximately 7 years
Reported as:
Mean · Percentage of planned dose intensity
Relative Dose Intensity
Percentage of planned dose intensityPart 1- Safety run-in: PDR001 400 mg Q4W + Dabrafenib 150 mg BID + Trametinib 2 mg QDPart 2- Biomarker Cohort: PDR001 400 mg Q4W + Dabrafenib 150 mg BID + Trametinib 2 mg QDPart 3- Arm 1: PDR001 400 mg Q4W + Dabrafenib 150 mg BID + Trametinib 2 mg QDPart 3- Arm 2: Placebo + Dabrafenib 150 mg BID + Trametinib 2 mg QD
Spartalizumab (PDR001)90.7 ± 16.8391.7 ± 10.4194.4 ± 9.2197.5 ± 5.33
Dabrafenib62.2 ± 26.3671.3 ± 21.1378.1 ± 21.2189.6 ± 15.10
Trametinib65.9 ± 16.9076.2 ± 17.1979.8 ± 19.5889.5 ± 14.86

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from first dose of study medication until the last dose plus 30 days safety follow-up, assessed up to approximately 86 months. Deaths were recorded from study start date until end of extended follow-up phase (end of study), assessed up to approximately 90 months.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Part 1- Safety run-in: PDR001 400 mg Q4W + Dabrafenib 150 mg BID + Trametinib 2 mg QD2/9 (22.2%)7/9 (77.8%)9/9 (100%)
Part 2- Biomarker Cohort: PDR001 400 mg Q4W + Dabrafenib 150 mg BID + Trametinib 2 mg QD3/27 (11.1%)18/27 (66.7%)27/27 (100%)
Part 3- Arm 1: PDR001 400 mg Q4W + Dabrafenib 150 mg BID + Trametinib 2 mg QD28/267 (10.5%)150/267 (56.2%)262/267 (98.1%)
Part 3- Arm 2: Placebo + Dabrafenib 150 mg BID + Trametinib 2 mg QD33/265 (12.5%)123/264 (46.6%)250/264 (94.7%)
Part 1- Safety run-in: PDR001 400 mg Q4W+Dabrafenib 150 mg BID+Trametinib 2 mg QD (Extended F/Up)1/7 (14.3%)——
Part 2- Biomarker Cohort: PDR001 400 mg Q4W+Dabrafenib 150 mg BID+Trametinib 2 mg QD(Extended F/Up)15/24 (62.5%)——
Part 3- Arm 1: PDR001 400 mg Q4W+Dabrafenib 150 mg BID+Trametinib 2 mg QD (Extended F/Up)99/239 (41.4%)——
Part 3- Arm 2: Placebo+Dabrafenib 150 mg BID+Trametinib 2 mg QD (Extended F/Up)117/232 (50.4%)——
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 274
Most frequent serious events
EventPart 1- Safety run-in: PDR001 400 mg Q4W + Dabrafenib 150 mg BID + Trametinib 2 mg QDPart 2- Biomarker Cohort: PDR001 400 mg Q4W + Dabrafenib 150 mg BID + Trametinib 2 mg QDPart 3- Arm 1: PDR001 400 mg Q4W + Dabrafenib 150 mg BID + Trametinib 2 mg QDPart 3- Arm 2: Placebo + Dabrafenib 150 mg BID + Trametinib 2 mg QDPart 1- Safety run-in: PDR001 400 mg Q4W+Dabrafenib 150 mg BID+Trametinib 2 mg QD (Extended F/Up)Part 2- Biomarker Cohort: PDR001 400 mg Q4W+Dabrafenib 150 mg BID+Trametinib 2 mg QD(Extended F/Up)Part 3- Arm 1: PDR001 400 mg Q4W+Dabrafenib 150 mg BID+Trametinib 2 mg QD (Extended F/Up)Part 3- Arm 2: Placebo+Dabrafenib 150 mg BID+Trametinib 2 mg QD (Extended F/Up)
PyrexiaGeneral disorders4/94/2746/26716/264————
HypophysitisEndocrine disorders1/90/271/2670/264————
DiarrhoeaGastrointestinal disorders1/90/273/2672/264————
Umbilical herniaGastrointestinal disorders1/90/270/2670/264————
CholelithiasisHepatobiliary disorders1/90/271/2670/264————
HepatitisHepatobiliary disorders1/90/270/2670/264————
HypertransaminasaemiaHepatobiliary disorders1/90/271/2670/264————
CellulitisInfections and infestations1/91/275/2671/264————
PneumoniaInfections and infestations1/91/275/2673/264————
Hip fractureInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1/90/271/2670/264————
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 210
Most frequent other events
EventPart 1- Safety run-in: PDR001 400 mg Q4W + Dabrafenib 150 mg BID + Trametinib 2 mg QDPart 2- Biomarker Cohort: PDR001 400 mg Q4W + Dabrafenib 150 mg BID + Trametinib 2 mg QDPart 3- Arm 1: PDR001 400 mg Q4W + Dabrafenib 150 mg BID + Trametinib 2 mg QDPart 3- Arm 2: Placebo + Dabrafenib 150 mg BID + Trametinib 2 mg QDPart 1- Safety run-in: PDR001 400 mg Q4W+Dabrafenib 150 mg BID+Trametinib 2 mg QD (Extended F/Up)Part 2- Biomarker Cohort: PDR001 400 mg Q4W+Dabrafenib 150 mg BID+Trametinib 2 mg QD(Extended F/Up)Part 3- Arm 1: PDR001 400 mg Q4W+Dabrafenib 150 mg BID+Trametinib 2 mg QD (Extended F/Up)Part 3- Arm 2: Placebo+Dabrafenib 150 mg BID+Trametinib 2 mg QD (Extended F/Up)
PyrexiaGeneral disorders9/923/27189/267145/264————
ChillsGeneral disorders8/99/2786/26763/264————
FatigueGeneral disorders7/911/2771/26769/264————
ArthralgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders6/915/2787/26780/264————
CoughRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders6/912/2763/26749/264————
Lipase increasedInvestigations5/95/2766/26738/264————
HeadacheNervous system disorders5/98/2780/26774/264————
RashSkin and subcutaneous tissue disorders4/913/2776/26768/264————
AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders4/910/2749/26731/264————
NeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders4/93/2744/26737/264————

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Part 1- Safety run-in: PDR001 400 mg Q4W + Dabrafenib 150 mg BID + Trametinib 2 mg QDPart 2- Biomarker Cohort: PDR001 400 mg Q4W + Dabrafenib 150 mg BID + Trametinib 2 mg QDPart 3- Arm 1: PDR001 400 mg Q4W + Dabrafenib 150 mg BID + Trametinib 2 mg QDPart 3- Arm 2: Placebo + Dabrafenib 150 mg BID + Trametinib 2 mg QDTotal
<=18 years00000
Between 18 and 65 years718189195409
>=65 years297870159
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Part 1- Safety run-in: PDR001 400 mg Q4W + Dabrafenib 150 mg BID + Trametinib 2 mg QDPart 2- Biomarker Cohort: PDR001 400 mg Q4W + Dabrafenib 150 mg BID + Trametinib 2 mg QDPart 3- Arm 1: PDR001 400 mg Q4W + Dabrafenib 150 mg BID + Trametinib 2 mg QDPart 3- Arm 2: Placebo + Dabrafenib 150 mg BID + Trametinib 2 mg QDTotal
Female212119106239
Male715148159329
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Part 1- Safety run-in: PDR001 400 mg Q4W + Dabrafenib 150 mg BID + Trametinib 2 mg QDPart 2- Biomarker Cohort: PDR001 400 mg Q4W + Dabrafenib 150 mg BID + Trametinib 2 mg QDPart 3- Arm 1: PDR001 400 mg Q4W + Dabrafenib 150 mg BID + Trametinib 2 mg QDPart 3- Arm 2: Placebo + Dabrafenib 150 mg BID + Trametinib 2 mg QDTotal
White924225227485
Asian025512
Other01151430
Unknown00221941
08

Study locations

179 sites
  • California Cancer Associates for Research and Excellence
    Encinitas, California 92024, United States
  • UC Irvine Medical Center
    Orange, California 92613-4091, United States
  • California Pacific Medical Center
    San Francisco, California 94115, United States
  • Stanford Cancer Center
    Stanford, California 94305, United States
  • University of Kansas Cancer Center
    Westwood, Kansas 66205, United States
  • Johns Hopkins U
    Lutherville, Maryland 21093, United States
  • Nebraska Cancer Specialists
    Omaha, Nebraska 68130, United States
  • NYU Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center
    New York, New York 10016, United States
  • University of Pittsburgh Med Center
    Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, United States
  • University of Tennessee Medical Ctr
    Knoxville, Tennessee 37920, United States
  • Univ of TX MD Anderson Cancer Cntr
    Houston, Texas 77030, United States
  • Utah Cancer Specialists
    Salt Lake City, Utah 84106, United States
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    CABA, Buenos Aires C1125ABD, Argentina
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    CABA, Buenos Aires C1426ANZ, Argentina
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Rosario, Santa Fe Province S2000KZE, Argentina
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Caba, C1431FWO, Argentina
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Gateshead, New South Wales 2290, Australia
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    North Sydney, New South Wales 2060, Australia
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Greenslopes, Queensland 4120, Australia
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Melbourne, Victoria 3004, Australia
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Nedlands, Western Australia 6009, Australia
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Innsbruck, Tyrol 6020, Austria
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Graz, 8036, Austria
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Linz, 4020, Austria
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Salzburg, A-5020, Austria
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Sankt Pölten, 3100, Austria
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Brussels, 1090, Belgium
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Brussels, 1200, Belgium
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Curitiba, Paraná 80530 010, Brazil
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul 90035-003, Brazil
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    São Paulo, São Paulo 01246 000, Brazil
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Rio de Janeiro, 20560-120, Brazil
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Plovdiv, 4004, Bulgaria
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Sofia, 1303, Bulgaria
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Vancouver, British Columbia V5Z 4E6, Canada
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Toronto, Ontario M4N 3M5, Canada
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Montreal, Quebec H3T 1E2, Canada
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Montreal, Quebec H4A 3J1, Canada
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Sherbrooke, Quebec J1H 5N4, Canada
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Temuco, Araucania 4810469, Chile
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Santiago, 7500921, Chile
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Santiago, 8420383, Chile
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Brno, Czech Republic 656 53, Czechia
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Zlín, Czech Republic 762 75, Czechia
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Hradec Králové, CZE 500 05, Czechia
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Ostrava, Poruba 708 52, Czechia
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Olomouc, 779 00, Czechia
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Prague, 100 34, Czechia
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Prague, 12808, Czechia
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Aarhus N, 8200, Denmark
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Limoges, Haute Vienne 87000, France
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Amiens, 80054, France
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Besançon, 25030, France
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Bobigny, 93009, France
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Bordeaux, 33075, France
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Boulogne-Billancourt, 92104, France
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Caen, 14033, France
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Clermont-Ferrand, 63003, France
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Dijon, 21034, France
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Grenoble, 38043, France
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Le Mans, 72000, France
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Lille, 59037, France
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Lorient, 56322, France
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Lyon, 69373, France
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Marseille, 13885, France
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Mulhouse, 68070, France
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Nice, 06202, France
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Paris, 75475, France
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Pierre-Bénite, 69495, France
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Poitiers, 86021, France
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Reims, 51092, France
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Rouen, 76031, France
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Strasbourg, 67091, France
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Toulouse, 31059, France
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, 54519, France
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Villejuif, 94800, France
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Mannheim, Baden-Wurttemberg 68305, Germany
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Regensburg, Bavaria 93053, Germany
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Leipzig, Saxony 04103, Germany
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Halle, Saxony-Anhalt 06120, Germany
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Berlin, 13353, Germany
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Berlin, 13578, Germany
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Bonn, 53105, Germany
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Chemnitz, 09117, Germany
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Dresden, 01307, Germany
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Düsseldorf, 40225, Germany
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Erfurt, 99089, Germany
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Essen, 45147, Germany
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Freiburg im Breisgau, 79106, Germany
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Gera, 07548, Germany
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Hamburg, 20246, Germany
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Hanover, 30625, Germany
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Heidelberg, 69120, Germany
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Homburg, 66421, Germany
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Kiel, 24105, Germany
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Mainz, 55131, Germany
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Marburg, 35039, Germany
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Minden, 32429, Germany
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    München, 81377, Germany
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Münster, 48157, Germany

Showing the first 100 of 179 sites across 29 countries.

09

References and documents

Publications

  • Tawbi HA, Robert C, Brase JC, Gusenleitner D, Gasal E, Garrett J, Savchenko A, Gorgun G, Flaherty KT, Ribas A, Dummer R, Schadendorf D, Long GV, Nathan PD, Ascierto PA. Spartalizumab or placebo in combination with dabrafenib and trametinib in patients with BRAF V600-mutant melanoma: exploratory biomarker analyses from a randomized phase 3 trial (COMBI-i). J Immunother Cancer. 2022 Jun;10(6):e004226. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2021-004226. PubMed 35728875 ↗
  • Dummer R, Long GV, Robert C, Tawbi HA, Flaherty KT, Ascierto PA, Nathan PD, Rutkowski P, Leonov O, Dutriaux C, Mandala M, Lorigan P, Ferrucci PF, Grob JJ, Meyer N, Gogas H, Stroyakovskiy D, Arance A, Brase JC, Green S, Haas T, Masood A, Gasal E, Ribas A, Schadendorf D. Randomized Phase III Trial Evaluating Spartalizumab Plus Dabrafenib and Trametinib for BRAF V600-Mutant Unresectable or Metastatic Melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 2022 May 1;40(13):1428-1438. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.01601. Epub 2022 Jan 14. PubMed 35030011 ↗
  • Dummer R, Lebbe C, Atkinson V, Mandala M, Nathan PD, Arance A, Richtig E, Yamazaki N, Robert C, Schadendorf D, Tawbi HA, Ascierto PA, Ribas A, Flaherty KT, Pakhle N, Campbell CD, Gusenleitner D, Masood A, Brase JC, Gasal E, Long GV. Combined PD-1, BRAF and MEK inhibition in advanced BRAF-mutant melanoma: safety run-in and biomarker cohorts of COMBI-i. Nat Med. 2020 Oct;26(10):1557-1563. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-1082-2. Epub 2020 Oct 5. PubMed 33020648 ↗

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Jan 27, 2023
  • Statistical analysis plan · Aug 21, 2024

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Novartis is committed to sharing with qualified external researchers, access to patient-level data and supporting clinical documents from eligible studies. These requests are reviewed and approved by an independent review panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to respect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations. This trial data availability is according to the criteria and process described on www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 18, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02967692
Lead sponsor
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 18, 2016
Start date
Feb 17, 2017
Primary completion
Aug 11, 2020
Completion
Aug 21, 2024
Results posted
Jul 24, 2023
Last update
Sep 18, 2025

Study contacts

Novartis Pharmaceuticals
study director · Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Sep 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion