CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02962765Updated Oct 21, 2021Results posted

Non-interventional Post-authorisation Study to Document the Immunogenicity, Safety, and Efficacy of NUWIQ

An observational study in Hemophilia A, sponsored by Octapharma. Completed at 39 sites in 13 countries. Open to male participants. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-10-21.

Sponsored by Octapharma · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
80
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

Prospective, multinational, non-interventional post-authorisation study to collect additional clinical data and to ensure consistency in the long-term between the outcome from pre-authorisation clinical studies (in 135 previously treated paediatric and adult patients) and routine clinical practice. Besides aspects such as general product safety and efficacy, there will be a focus on immunogenicity, particularly on inhibitor development. The diagnosis of FVIII inhibitor will be based on clinical observations and confirmed by FVIII inhibitor testing in the laboratory.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hemophilia A

Browse trials for

03

In context

Hemophilia A

866 studies on the registry are indexed under Hemophilia A; 137 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 80 is close to the median of 80 across 314 observational studies indexed under Hemophilia A.

Browse Hemophilia A studies →

Lead sponsor

Octapharma is the lead sponsor of 69 studies on the registry; 8 are open to participants now.

Of its 16 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 14 (88%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The goal is to collect data on 200 previously treated male patients of any age with haemophilia (FVIII:C ≤ 2%). Patients from pre-authorisation studies can be followed up to at least 100 EDs. Newly enrolled patients have to be treated and followed for at least 100 EDs.

  • Of the 200 enrolled patients, at least 100 patients should have severe haemophilia A (FVIII:C \< 1%).
  • Of the 200 enrolled patients, approx. 60 patients should be \< 12 years of age. At least 10 patients should be aged between 14-18 years.
  • Patients with severe haemophilia A after successful immune tolerance induction (ITI) can also be included; the proportion of these ITI patients should not exceed 25% of the entire cohort.

Inclusion criteria

  • Haemophilia A (FVIII:C ≤ 2%) based on medical history; at least 100 patients should have severe haemophilia A (FVIII:C \< 1%)
  • Male patients of any age
  • Previous treatment with a FVIII concentrate for more than 150 EDs
  • Availability of detailed documentation (patient diary, log book, etc.) covering either the last 50 EDs or the last 2 years per patient to confirm treatment modality (i.e., prophylaxis, on-demand, recent surgery, or immune tolerance induction)
  • Inhibitor negative (\< 0.6 BU) at study entry as confirmed by a recovery test with previous FVIII product and inhibitor test in a central laboratory
  • Immunocompetence (CD4+ count > 200/µL), HIV-negative, or having a viral load \< 200 particles/µL or \< 400,000 copies/mL
  • Decision to prescribe Human-cl rhFVIII before enrolment into the study
  • Written informed consent by the patient or the patient's parent or legal guardian

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients treated with any investigational medicinal product (IMP) except FVIII IMP within 30 days prior to the Screening Visit or patients planning to undergo treatment with any IMP other than Human-cl rhFVIII are not eligible for enrolment into the study.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
80 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples without dna
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Patients With FVIII Inhibitors

    FVIII inhibitors will be determined based on clinical observations and confirmed by FVIII inhibitor testing in the laboratory.

    Time frame: Screening through to study completion (minimum 1.7 months; maximum 31.6 months)

  2. Number of Patients With Adverse Drug Reactions

    Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) including hypersensitivity reactions will be recorded by patients in treatment diaries which will be reviewed at each Follow-up Visit.

    Time frame: Recorded from screening through to study completion (minimum 1.7 months; maximum 31.6 months)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Annualized Rate of Breakthrough Bleeds to Assess Efficacy in Prophylactic Treatment

    Total number of bleeding episodes under prophylaxis treatment divided by the duration of prophylactic phase (in years)

    Time frame: Monitored throughout the study from screening through to study completion (minimum 3.7 months; maximum 21.2 months)

  2. Assessment of the Efficacy of On-demand Treatment of Bleeding Episodes (BEs) Based on a 4-point Efficacy Scale

    At the end of a BE, treatment efficacy was to be assessed either by the patient (or the patient's parent or legal guardian) or by the treating physician in case of on-site treatment using a 4-point scale including the four items 'excellent,' 'good,' moderate,' and 'none.' Excellent result was defined as abrupt pain relief and/or unequivocal improvement in objective signs of bleeding within approximately 8 hours after a single injection. Good was definite pain relief and/or improvement in signs of bleeding within approximately 8-12 hours after an injection requiring up to 2 injections for complete resolution. Moderate was probable or slight beneficial effect within approximately 12 hours after the first injection requiring more than two injections for complete resolution. None was no improvement after 12 hours, or worsening of symptoms, requiring more than 2 injections for complete resolution.

    Time frame: Monitored throughout the study from screening through to study completion (minimum 1.7 months; maximum 31.6 months)

  3. Overall Assessment of the Effectiveness of Surgical Prophylaxis by the Treating Physicians

    At the end of the postoperative period, an overall assessment of the efficacy of treatment in the pre-, peri-, and postoperative periods using the 'excellent,' 'good,' moderate,' and 'none' scale will be done jointly by the surgeon and the hematologist. Based on this assessment, efficacy ratings assessed as either 'excellent' or 'good' will be considered 'successfully treated'.

    Time frame: From start of surgery until end of post-operative period

  4. Assessment of the Efficacy of Treatment of Bleeding Episodes (BEs) Based on a 4-point Efficacy Scale

    At the end of a BE, treatment efficacy was to be assessed either by the patient (or the patient's parent or legal guardian) or by the treating physician in case of on-site treatment using a 4-point scale including the four items 'excellent', 'good', 'moderate', and 'none.' Excellent result was defined as abrupt pain relief and/or unequivocal improvement in objective signs of bleeding within approximately 8 hours after a single injection. Good was definite pain relief and/or improvement in signs of bleeding within approximately 8-12 hours after an injection requiring up to 2 injections for complete resolution. Moderate was probable or slight beneficial effect within approximately 12 hours after the first injection requiring more than two injections for complete resolution. None was no improvement after 12 hours, or worsening of symptoms, requiring more than 2 injections for complete resolution.

    Time frame: Recorded from screening through to study completion (minimum 1.7 months; maximum 31.6 months)

07

Results

Posted Sep 28, 2021

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneNuwiq® (Human-cl rhFVIII)
Started78
Fas population78
Saf population78
Prophylactic treatment group77
On demand treatment group2
Surg population4
Completed61
Not completed17
Withdrew: Protocol violation9
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject3
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up1
Withdrew: Death1
Withdrew: Limited access to study medication3

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Patients With FVIII Inhibitors

FVIII inhibitors will be determined based on clinical observations and confirmed by FVIII inhibitor testing in the laboratory.

Time frame:
Screening through to study completion (minimum 1.7 months; maximum 31.6 months)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Patients With FVIII Inhibitors
ParticipantsFVIII Inhibitors Detected at Screening in Patients Treated With Nuwiq®FVIII Inhibitors Detected Between Screening and Completion in Patients Treated With Nuwiq®FVIII Inhibitors Detected at Completion in Patients Treated With Nuwiq® (Human-cl rhFVIII)
Number of Patients With FVIII Inhibitors000
PrimaryNumber of Patients With Adverse Drug Reactions

Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) including hypersensitivity reactions will be recorded by patients in treatment diaries which will be reviewed at each Follow-up Visit.

Time frame:
Recorded from screening through to study completion (minimum 1.7 months; maximum 31.6 months)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Patients With Adverse Drug Reactions
ParticipantsNuwiq® (Human-cl rhFVIII) FAS Population
Number of Patients With Adverse Drug Reactions0
SecondaryAnnualized Rate of Breakthrough Bleeds to Assess Efficacy in Prophylactic Treatment

Total number of bleeding episodes under prophylaxis treatment divided by the duration of prophylactic phase (in years)

Time frame:
Monitored throughout the study from screening through to study completion (minimum 3.7 months; maximum 21.2 months)
Reported as:
Median · Number of bleeding episodes per year
Annualized Rate of Breakthrough Bleeds to Assess Efficacy in Prophylactic Treatment
Number of bleeding episodes per yearNuwiq® in Prophylactic Treatment
All bleeding events2.39 (0 to 4.87)
Spontaneous bleeding events0.00 (0 to 2.47)
Traumatic bleeding events0.00 (0 to 1.93)
SecondaryAssessment of the Efficacy of On-demand Treatment of Bleeding Episodes (BEs) Based on a 4-point Efficacy Scale

At the end of a BE, treatment efficacy was to be assessed either by the patient (or the patient's parent or legal guardian) or by the treating physician in case of on-site treatment using a 4-point scale including the four items 'excellent,' 'good,' moderate,' and 'none.' Excellent result was defined as abrupt pain relief and/or unequivocal improvement in objective signs of bleeding within approximately 8 hours after a single injection. Good was definite pain relief and/or improvement in signs of bleeding within approximately 8-12 hours after an injection requiring up to 2 injections for complete resolution. Moderate was probable or slight beneficial effect within approximately 12 hours after the first injection requiring more than two injections for complete resolution. None was no improvement after 12 hours, or worsening of symptoms, requiring more than 2 injections for complete resolution.

Time frame:
Monitored throughout the study from screening through to study completion (minimum 1.7 months; maximum 31.6 months)
Reported as:
Number · Number of Bleeding episodes
Assessment of the Efficacy of On-demand Treatment of Bleeding Episodes (BEs) Based on a 4-point Efficacy Scale
Number of Bleeding episodesNuwiq® (Human-cl rhFVIII) in On Demand Population
Excellent50
Good4
Moderate1
None0
SecondaryOverall Assessment of the Effectiveness of Surgical Prophylaxis by the Treating Physicians

At the end of the postoperative period, an overall assessment of the efficacy of treatment in the pre-, peri-, and postoperative periods using the 'excellent,' 'good,' moderate,' and 'none' scale will be done jointly by the surgeon and the hematologist. Based on this assessment, efficacy ratings assessed as either 'excellent' or 'good' will be considered 'successfully treated'.

Time frame:
From start of surgery until end of post-operative period
Reported as:
Number · Surgeries
Overall Assessment of the Effectiveness of Surgical Prophylaxis by the Treating Physicians
SurgeriesNuwiq® (Human-cl rhFVIII) Surgical Prophylaxis
Excellent5
Good0
Moderate0
None0
SecondaryAssessment of the Efficacy of Treatment of Bleeding Episodes (BEs) Based on a 4-point Efficacy Scale

At the end of a BE, treatment efficacy was to be assessed either by the patient (or the patient's parent or legal guardian) or by the treating physician in case of on-site treatment using a 4-point scale including the four items 'excellent', 'good', 'moderate', and 'none.' Excellent result was defined as abrupt pain relief and/or unequivocal improvement in objective signs of bleeding within approximately 8 hours after a single injection. Good was definite pain relief and/or improvement in signs of bleeding within approximately 8-12 hours after an injection requiring up to 2 injections for complete resolution. Moderate was probable or slight beneficial effect within approximately 12 hours after the first injection requiring more than two injections for complete resolution. None was no improvement after 12 hours, or worsening of symptoms, requiring more than 2 injections for complete resolution.

Time frame:
Recorded from screening through to study completion (minimum 1.7 months; maximum 31.6 months)
Reported as:
Number · Bleeding episodes
Assessment of the Efficacy of Treatment of Bleeding Episodes (BEs) Based on a 4-point Efficacy Scale
Bleeding episodesNuwiq in Prophylactic Population
Excellent167
Good50
Moderate26
None3

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse drug reactions were monitored throughout the study from first treatment through to study completion (minimum 1.7 months; maximum 31.6 months). Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Nuwiq® (Human-cl rhFVIII) SAF Population1/78 (1.3%)0/78 (0%)0/78 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Customized
Age, Customized(Participants)Nuwiq® (Human-cl rhFVIII) SAF Population
Age — <12 yrs40
Age — 12-<18 yrs12
Age — >18 yrs26
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Nuwiq® (Human-cl rhFVIII) SAF Population
Female0
Male78
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Nuwiq® (Human-cl rhFVIII) SAF Population
Hispanic or Latino25
Not Hispanic or Latino53
Unknown or Not Reported0
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Nuwiq® (Human-cl rhFVIII) SAF Population
Patient race — American Indian or Alaska Native7
Patient race — Asian0
Patient race — Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0
Patient race — Black or African American1
Patient race — White61
Patient race — More than one race0
Patient race — Other9
Height
Height(centimeters)Nuwiq® (Human-cl rhFVIII) SAF Population
<12 yrs112 ± 17.59
12-<18 yrs168.8 ± 9.73
>18 yrs172.9 ± 7.88
Weight
Weight(kilograms)Nuwiq® (Human-cl rhFVIII) SAF Population
<12 yrs21.7 ± 8.30
12-<18 yrs67.1 ± 15.55
>18 yrs76.6 ± 17.21
BMI
BMI(kg/m^2)Nuwiq® (Human-cl rhFVIII) SAF Population
<12 yrs17.0 ± 3.34
12-<18 yrs23.6 ± 5.46
>18 yrs25.5 ± 4.65
Severity of Haemophilia A
Severity of Haemophilia A(Participants)Nuwiq® (Human-cl rhFVIII) SAF Population
Moderate10
Severe68

3 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

39 sites
  • University of Florida
    Gainesville, Florida 32610, United States
  • Nicklaus Children's Hospital
    Miami, Florida 33155, United States
  • Tulane University
    New Orleans, Louisiana 70112, United States
  • Hemophilia Treatment Center of Nevada
    Las Vegas, Nevada 89109, United States
  • Gulf States Hemophilia and Thrombophilia
    Houston, Texas 77030, United States
  • Centro de Tratamiento de la Hemofilia Cordoba
    Córdoba, Argentina
  • CTH Centro de Tratamiento de Hematologia y Hemoterapia Córdoba S.A.
    Córdoba, Argentina
  • Fundación de Hemofilia de Salta
    Salta, Argentina
  • Centro Mayo
    Santiago del Estero, Argentina
  • Belarusian Research Center for Pediatric Oncology, Hematology and Immunology
    Borovlyany, Belarus
  • Fakultní nemocnice Brno
    Brno, Czechia
  • Blood Centre, University Hospital
    Ostrava, Czechia
  • Hospital de Especialidades Teodoro Maldonado Carbo
    Guayaquil, 090203, Ecuador
  • CHU Hôtel Dieu
    Nantes, France
  • Hopital Pontchaillou
    Rennes, France
  • CHRU Hôpital Nord
    Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, France
  • CRTH, Hopital Purpan
    Toulouse, France
  • Pedias Inc. Centro Hospitalario La Paz
    Guatemala, Guatemala
  • L'Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Consorziale Policlinico, U.O. di Medicina Trasfusionale, Centro Emofilia e Trombosi
    Bari, Italy
  • U.O.C. Ematologia, Ospedale San Giacomo Apostolo
    Castelfranco Veneto, Italy
  • UOC Malattie emorragiche e della coagulazione, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi
    Firenze, Italy
  • Fondazione IRCCS Ca Granda
    Milan, Italy
  • AOU Federico II - Dipartimento di Medicina Clinica e Chirurgica
    Naples, Italy
  • Azienda Sanitaria Locale Napoli 1 Centro
    Naples, Italy
  • Azienda Ospedaliera di Padova
    Padova, Italy
  • AOU Policlinico di Palermo
    Palermo, Italy
  • Ospedale ARNAS Civico
    Palermo, Italy
  • Dipartimento Di Medicina dell'Universita degli Studi di Perugia
    Perugia, Italy
  • Dipartimento di Biotecnologie Cellulari ed Ematologia -"Sapienza" Università di Roma
    Rome, Italy
  • A.O. Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino - Ospedale Regina Margherita
    Torino, Italy
  • S.C. Ematologia U, A.O.U. Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino
    Torino, Italy
  • Vilnius University Hospital, Santariskiu Klinikos-Children's Hospital
    Vilnius, Lithuania
  • Oslo University Hospital
    Oslo, Norway
  • Centro Hospitalar Cova da Beira
    Covilhã, Portugal
  • National Haemophilia Center
    Bratislava, Slovakia
  • Great Ormond Street Hospital (GOSH)
    London, United Kingdom
  • St. Thomas' Hospital
    London, United Kingdom
  • The Royal London Hospital
    London, United Kingdom
  • Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust
    Nottingham, United Kingdom
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Sep 26, 2017
  • Statistical analysis plan · Oct 30, 2020

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 21, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02962765
Lead sponsor
Octapharma
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 11, 2016
Start date
Jan 2015
Primary completion
Aug 20, 2020
Completion
Aug 20, 2020
Results posted
Sep 28, 2021
Last update
Oct 21, 2021

Study contacts

Kate Khair, PhD
principal investigator · Great Ormond Street Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion