CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02948465THINKUpdated Aug 14, 2019

Impact of Neutrophil Extracellular Traps (NET) on Thrombolysis in Acute Phase of Cerebral Ischemia

An observational study in Cerebral Infarct, sponsored by Hopital Foch. Completed at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-08-14.

Sponsored by Hopital Foch · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
125
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Cerebral infarcts represent a major cause of morbidity/mortality in spite of therapeutics for a premature recanalisation (intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) and thrombectomy). Thrombolysis failure by the administration of rt-PA is frequent, in particular in proximal occlusion. Experimental studies suggest that neutrophils could play an important role in the thrombus development via the organization of a network (NET) within the thrombus. Targeting this network of NET could, in addition to the fibrinolysis, increase the rate of recanalisation and thus improve the neurological prognostic after a cerebral infarct.

The aim of the research is to Study of the biochemical and histological composition of the stemming thrombi of cerebral thrombectomies with in vitro analysis of the sensibility in the thrombolysis induced by rt-PA +/- Desoxyribonuclease I (DNase I).

02

Conditions studied

  • Cerebral Infarct

Keywords

  • Neutrophil Extracellular Traps
03

In context

Brain Ischemia

353 studies on the registry are indexed under Brain Ischemia; 69 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 125 is above the median of 101 across 126 observational studies indexed under Brain Ischemia.

Browse Brain Ischemia studies →

Lead sponsor

Hopital Foch is the lead sponsor of 208 studies on the registry; 21 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Cerebral infact after wide calibre arterial occlusion

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient over 18
  • Having a cerebral infarct consecutive to a wide calibre arterial occlusion
  • taken care for mechanical thrombectomy

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient benefiting from a legal protective measure
  • Pregnant or breast-feeding woman
  • Opposition of the patient to participate in the study
05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
125 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Correlation coefficient between biochemical and histological composition of the thrombus and the sensibility in the in vitro fibrinolysis and the origin of the thrombus.

    Time frame: 1 day

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Hopital Foch
    Suresnes, 92150, France
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 14, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02948465
Lead sponsor
Hopital Foch
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 28, 2016
Start date
Jul 22, 2016
Primary completion
Dec 10, 2016
Completion
Dec 10, 2016
Last update
Aug 14, 2019

Study contacts

Arturo CONSOLI, MD
principal investigator · Hopital Foch
Bertrand LAPERGUE, MD
study chair · Hopital Foch

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion