ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07324421SCULPTUpdated Sep 4, 2026

Comparison of Ultrasound Cerebral Perfusion Imaging With Routine Perfusion CT

An interventional study of Ultrasound contrast agent (Contrast-enhanced ultrasound) in Neuro ICU, Sub Arachnoid Hemorrhage and Neurological Complication, sponsored by Resolve Stroke. Recruiting at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-04.

Sponsored by Resolve Stroke · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Oct 2025; still recruiting 1 year later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
50
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The primary goal of neurocritical care is to prevent secondary brain injury, which worsens neurological outcomes. Because clinical monitoring is often insufficient due to the patient's condition and medical treatments, multimodal monitoring using biophysical, electrophysiological, and imaging data is essential. In patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), the most frequent and severe complication is delayed cerebral ischemia, often linked to arterial vasospasm and potentially leading to infarction. Early diagnosis combines transcranial Doppler (TCD), sensitive to vasospasm, with perfusion CT (CTP), which measures cerebral perfusion; this approach guides therapy and improves prognosis. Ultrasound, especially when enhanced with contrast agents (CEUS), allows non-invasive, bedside, repeated visualization of cerebral blood flow and perfusion-even through the skull. Agents like SonoVue® help quantify perfusion using time-intensity curves. The study aims to assess whether cerebral perfusion measurements from the SYLVER device are equivalent to those from CTP in ICU or CCU patients.

02

Conditions studied

  • Neuro ICU
  • Sub Arachnoid Hemorrhage
  • Neurological Complication
  • Cerebral Ischemia
  • Brain Injuries, Vascular

Browse trials for

03

In context

Brain Ischemia

217 studies on the registry are indexed under Brain Ischemia; 42 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 50 is below the median of 73 across 140 interventional studies indexed under Brain Ischemia.

Browse Brain Ischemia studies →

Lead sponsor

Resolve Stroke is the lead sponsor of 2 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patient ≥ 18 years old
  • Patient , or from his/her relative if the patient is not conscious and able to consent
  • Admission to ICU or CCU with indication to perform at least one CTP
  • Affiliated with or benefiting from a social security scheme
  • The subject's current clinical status, as assessed by medical history, physical examination, and/or relevant tests, indicates that they do not require immediate medical treatment or emergency care at the time of enrolment.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Guardianship, curatorship or any deprivation of liberty by judicial or administrative decision
  • Pregnant or breast-feeding women
  • Known or to SonoVue® (to sulfur hexafluoride microbubbles or to one of its such as polyethylene glycol (PEG))
  • Right-to-left shunts
  • Patients who have undergone craniectomy in the temporal region
  • Patients with open wounds or recent scars in the temporal region
  • Unstable hemodynamic or respiratory state contraindicating transportation to CTP scanner
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Excipients

The other ingredients in a medicine besides the active drug, such as fillers, colours or preservatives.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
50 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Patients admitted to the ICU or CCU

    Indication for at least one CTP to assess the risk of cerebral hypoperfusion.

    Device: Ultrasound contrast agent (Contrast-enhanced ultrasound)

Interventions

  • DeviceUltrasound contrast agent (Contrast-enhanced ultrasound)

    The V0 (screening) visit occurs during ICU/CCU hospitalization, with routine clinical exam, eligibility check, and informed consent from the patient or a relative. Assessments include demographics, medical history, clinical exam, treatments, cerebral perfusion by CTP, anatomy by CTA, SYLVER perfusion/anatomy, TCD velocities, and AE/device deficiency recording. V0 lasts \~30 min. V1 (Day 1 or possibly Day 0 in urgent cases) includes clinical exam, TCD, CTP/CTA, and SYLVER use (\~30 min extra; total \~1h30). Imaging order is flexible but times are logged. V2-V5 occur if, by Day 21, ICU/CCU stay continues and care requires further CTP for suspected hypoperfusion (max once/day).

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Performance of SYLVER system by determining the concordance with CT for principal vascular network localization and perfusion parameters.

    On all the patients recruited during the study, assess the performance of the SYLVER system by determining the concordance between the cerebral perfusion parameters from the evaluated medical device and those provided by CTP.

    Time frame: The primary outcome will be measured by gathering Perfusion CT and study device's information (anatomical and perfusion mapping) at each visit in which the patient can be enrolled, from V0 to V5 (maximum) and for 21 days inclusion maximum.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Calibration Function Between SYLVER Perfusion Metrics and CTP Measurements

    Mathematical calibration function describing the relationship between perfusion parameters measured by the SYLVER device and corresponding perfusion parameters measured by CT perfusion (CTP). For each paired assessment (SYLVER + CTP), the following will be derived and reported at the subject level and/or aggregated level (as applicable): i) Estimated functional form of the calibration model (e.g., linear or non-linear relationship between SYLVER and CTP perfusion parameters). ii) Estimated calibration parameters of the model (e.g., slope, intercept, and other model coefficients linking SYLVER values to CTP values). iii) Goodness-of-fit metrics for the calibration model (e.g., correlation coefficients, error metrics) if pre-specified in the analysis plan. iv) Calibration parameters and model characteristics will be obtained from all available paired SYLVER and CTP measurements collected between V0 and V5.

    Time frame: From Visit V0 to Visit V5 (maximum 5 visits with SYLVER scan) within 21 days after inclusion.

  2. Correlation Between SYLVER-Reference Parameters Mismatch and Clinical and Technical Variables

    Mismatch between parameters measured by SYLVER and reference modalities, and its correlation with routine clinical variables. Parameters mismatch includes: (1) Time to Peak (TTP, seconds) SYLVER vs CT perfusion; (2) systolic and diastolic cerebral blood flow (cm/s) SYLVER vs transcranial Doppler; (3) anatomical visualization of brain vessels (vessel visualization score / agreement) SYLVER vs CT angiography; (4) hypoperfusion zone identification (presence, number, and/or volume of hypoperfused areas) SYLVER vs CT perfusion. Correlated variables include heart rate (bpm), blood pressure (mmHg), medication use, Glasgow Coma Scale score, neurological deficits. Correlation coefficients (dimensionless) will be reported.

    Time frame: From Visit V0 to Visit V5 (maximum 5 visits including SYLVER scan) within 21 days after inclusion.

  3. Sensitivity and Specificity of SYLVER for Detecting Hypoperfusion Compared With CT Perfusion

    Concordance of areas reported hypoperfused or healthy, with the volume analyzed by SYLVER superimposed on the equivalent volume sample given by CTP

    Time frame: The outcome will be measured by gathering Perfusion CT and study device's information (anatomical and perfusion mapping) at each visit in which the patient can be enrolled, from V0 to V5 (maximum) and for 21 days inclusion maximum.

  4. Agreement of Brain Vessel Morphological Reconstruction Between SYLVER and CT Angiography

    Concordance of major cerebral morphological structures visualization assessed by an investigator, or by a qualitative assessment according to the morphological atlas for optimized parameter analysis

    Time frame: The outcome will be measured by gathering Perfusion CT and study device's information (anatomical and perfusion mapping) at each visit in which the patient can be enrolled, from V0 to V5 (maximum) and for 21 days inclusion maximum.

  5. Difference in Cerebral Blood Flow Velocities Between SYLVER and Transcranial Doppler

    Concordance of Doppler velocities in the Middle Cerebral Artery (MCA) provided by TCD acquisitions and the ones calculated from SYLVER parameters

    Time frame: The outcome will be measured by gathering Perfusion CT and study device's information (anatomical and perfusion mapping) at each visit in which the patient can be enrolled, from V0 to V5 (maximum) and for 21 days inclusion maximum.

  6. Total Diagnostic Care Cost per Patient With and Without Use of SYLVER

    Total diagnostic care cost per patient with and without use of SYLVER as a diagnostic tool. The measure aggregates: (1) physician time, (2) nursing-assistant time, (3) radiology technician ("radio manipulator") time, and (4) radiological inteprentation time, each recorded in minutes and multiplied by the corresponding unit cost (cost per minute) to obtain a total personnel cost. Additional diagnostic resource costs directly related to the diagnostic strategy (e.g., imaging procedures) may be included according to a predefined cost schedule. The primary reported value will be the mean total diagnostic cost per patient (in local currency) in the SYLVER vs non-SYLVER pathways, and the difference between groups.

    Time frame: The outcome will be measured by gathering Perfusion CT and study device's information (anatomical and perfusion mapping) at each visit in which the patient can be enrolled, from V0 to V5 (maximum) and for 21 days inclusion maximum.

  7. Incidence of Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Events, and Device Deficiencies Related to SYLVER Use

    Number and proportion of participants with at least one adverse event (AE), serious adverse event (SAE), or device deficiency occurring during use of the SYLVER device. AEs and SAEs will be collected from inclusion to the end of follow-up and classified by seriousness, severity, and relationship to the device or procedures, according to applicable regulatory definitions. Device deficiencies (e.g., malfunction, use error, or failure of the device to perform as intended) will be collected and summarized. Results will be reported as counts and percentages of participants with AEs, SAEs, and device deficiencies.

    Time frame: The outcome will be measured by gathering study device's information at each visit in which the patient can be enrolled, from V0 to V5 (maximum) and for 21 days inclusion maximum.

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Centre Hospitalo-Universitaire Gui de Chauliac
    Montpellier, Herault 34000, France
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 4, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07324421
Lead sponsor
Resolve Stroke
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 7, 2026
Start date
Oct 25, 2025
Primary completion
Oct 4, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 15, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 4, 2026

Study contacts

Vivien Szabo, MD, PHD
Contact
v-szabo@chu-montpellier.fr
+33467336733

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion