CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT02945618Updated Aug 30, 2017

Neurocryostimulation for Acute Lateral Ankle Sprain

An interventional study of Neurocryostimulation and Ice in Ankle Sprain, sponsored by Laval University. Status unknown at 1 site in Canada. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-08-30.

Sponsored by Laval University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Aug 2017), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The objective of this exploratory randomized control trial is to compare, in participants with acute lateral ankle sprain (LAS) , the reduction of symptoms and functional limitations between two groups of subjects who undergo a conventional rehabilitation program with (experimental group) or without CRYOFOS (comparison group). The hypothesis is that CRYOFOS will lead to a faster reduction of symptoms and functional limitations, and a faster return to daily living activities.Thirty-six participants of 18 years of age and older with acute LAS (sustained a LAS three days or less before the first evaluation session) will be recruited and randomly assigned to either a group receiving conventional rehabilitation program with the addition of CRYOFOS (experimental group; n=18), or to a group only receiving the conventional rehabilitation program (comparison group; n=18). This single-blind (evaluator), parallel-group RCT will include five evaluation sessions over 6 weeks (baseline, day 7, week 2, week 4 and week 6) and 8 treatment sessions (1st and 2nd weeks: 3 sessions/week; 3rd and 4th weeks: 1 session/week) during a 4-week period. The primary outcome will be the functional limitations, evaluated using the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS).

Read the detailed description

Lateral ankle sprain (LAS) is one of the most common reasons for primary care office and emergency department visits, with an overall incidence of 2.15 per 1,000 person-years in the United States.In its acute phase, LAS is associated with swelling, haematoma and pain over the anterior talofibular and calcaneofibular ligaments, as well as ligamentous laxity of these ligaments. Interventions following acute LAS are based upon the three stages of biological ligament healing: inflammatory phase, proliferation phase (6 weeks to 3 months after trauma) and remodelling or maturation phase (until 1 year after trauma). The initial treatment during inflammatory phase is directed towards avoiding or diminishing excess swelling and ongoing injury, thus optimizing the healing process. Therefore, RICE (Rest, Ice [cryotherapy], Compression, Elevation) is the treatment of choice for the first 7 to 10 days to reduce pain and swelling. Cryotherapy has been used for a long time in rehabilitation; mainly using ice, cool packs or cold water. Lately, a new device, the CRYOFOS, has been developed to provide more performing ways to use cryotherapy. CRYOFOS uses a fluid (hyperbaric CO²) that is sprayed in the form of dry ice on the body region to be treated. It leads to a so-called thermal shock, which sees the skin temperature cooled from 32 ˚C to 2-4 ˚C in 30 sec.While CRYOFOS seems, theoretically, better than other cooling procedures, its superiority has never been determined following acute injuries such as LAS. Considering the extensive use of cold in the management of acute LAS, it would be even more relevant to examine the impact of cryotherapy on both the reduction of symptoms and the functional limitations of subjects who sustained a LAS.

The objective of this exploratory randomized control trial is to compare, in participants with acute lateral ankle sprain (LAS) , the reduction of symptoms and functional limitations between two groups of subjects who undergo a conventional rehabilitation program with (experimental group) or without CRYOFOS (comparison group). The hypothesis is that CRYOFOS will lead to a faster reduction of symptoms and functional limitations, and a faster return to daily living activities.Thirty-six participants of 18 years of age and older with acute LAS (sustained a LAS three days or less before the first evaluation session) will be recruited and randomly assigned to either a group receiving conventional rehabilitation program with the addition of CRYOFOS (experimental group; n=18), or to a group only receiving the conventional rehabilitation program (comparison group; n=18). This single-blind (evaluator), parallel-group RCT will include five evaluation sessions over 6 weeks (baseline, day 7, week 2, week 4 and week 6) and 8 treatment sessions (1st and 2nd weeks: 3 sessions/week; 3rd and 4th weeks: 1 session/week) during a 4-week period. The primary outcome will be the functional limitations, evaluated using the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS). Secondary outcomes will include the level of ankle pain, evaluated using Numeric Pain Rating Scales (NPRS), weight-bearing ankle dorsiflexion range of motion (also called Bent Knee DorsiFlexion test), assessed with the maximal advancement of the tibia over the talus in a weight-bearing position, and joint swelling, using the Figure-of-Eight method.

Both groups will receive the same conventional program consisting of: compression, bracing, early mobilization (including manual therapy), strengthening (isometric and isotonic using elastic bands) and proprioception (using proprioception boards) exercises, according to the grade of the sprain and the stage of biological ligament healing. However, for the experimental group, CRYOFOS will be applied on the ankle at the end of each of the 8 sessions (in accordance to the protocol established).

Descriptive statistics will be used for all outcome measures at each measurement time to summarise results. Baseline demographic data will be compared (independent t-test and Chi-squared tests) to establish the comparability of groups. All data will be tested to check the distributional assumptions for the inferential statistical analyses. An intention-to-treat analysis will be used in which all participants will be analysed in the group to which they were originally assigned. All dropouts and the reason for dropping out of the study will be reported. Any harm or unintended effects during the programs will be recorded. A 2-way ANOVA (2 cryotherapy [CRYOFOS or Ice] x 5 Time [baseline, day 7, week 2, week 4, week 6]) will be used to analyse the effects of CRYOFOS on primary outcome (LEFS) and secondary outcomes (SPSS 22, proc GENLIN [Generalized Estimating Equations for repeated measures]).

02

Conditions studied

  • Ankle Sprain

Keywords

  • cryotherapy
  • physical therapy
03

In context

Sprains and Strains

217 studies on the registry are indexed under Sprains and Strains; 44 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 40 is below the median of 60 across 166 interventional studies indexed under Sprains and Strains.

Browse Sprains and Strains studies →

Lead sponsor

Laval University is the lead sponsor of 371 studies on the registry; 68 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • LAS three days or less before the first evaluation session
  • presence of a lateral hematoma and swelling
  • tenderness at the anterior lateral ligament without or with anterior drawer instability

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • present a bony ankle injury (indicated by Ottawa ankle rules)
  • had sustained a similar injury of the same joint within the last 6 months
  • require bed rest, hospitalisation, casting or surgery
  • had a previous fracture of the same ankle
  • signs or symptoms of a previous injury at any of the other joints of the lower limbs or trunk
  • contraindication to cryotherapy including cryoglobulinemia, peripheral vascular disease or Raynaud's syndrome
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
40 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Neurocryostimulation

    CRYOFOS will be applied on the ankle at the end of each of the 8 sessions (in accordance to the protocol established). The treatment time with the CRYOFOS will take between 1 and 2 minutes, and will be pain-free. Both groups will also receive the same conventional program consisting of: compression, bracing, early mobilization (including manual therapy), strengthening (isometric and isotonic using elastic bands) and proprioception (using proprioception boards) exercises, according to the grade of the sprain and the stage of biological ligament healing.

    Device: Neurocryostimulation

  • Active comparator
    Conventional program with ice

    The control group will receive the same conventional program (as the experimental group) consisting of: compression, bracing, early mobilization (including manual therapy), strengthening (isometric and isotonic using elastic bands) and proprioception (using proprioception boards) exercises, according to the grade of the sprain and the stage of biological ligament healing. Ice will be applied to the ankle for 15 minutes at the end of each of the 8 sessions.

    Other: Ice

Interventions

  • DeviceNeurocryostimulation

    CRYOFOS will be applied on the ankle at the end of each of the 8 sessions (in accordance to the protocol established). The treatment time with the CRYOFOS will take between 1 and 2 minutes, and will be pain-free. Both groups will also receive the same conventional program consisting of: compression, bracing, early mobilization (including manual therapy), strengthening (isometric and isotonic using elastic bands) and proprioception (using proprioception boards) exercises, according to the grade of the sprain and the stage of biological ligament healing.

    Also known as: Hyperbaric gazeous cryotherapy, Cryostimulation

  • OtherIce

    The control group will receive the same conventional program (as the experimental group) consisting of: compression, bracing, early mobilization (including manual therapy), strengthening (isometric and isotonic using elastic bands) and proprioception (using proprioception boards) exercises, according to the grade of the sprain and the stage of biological ligament healing. Ice will be applied to the ankle for 15 minutes at the end of each of the 8 sessions.

    Also known as: Conventional program with ice

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change from Baseline in lower limb functional level at 6 weeks

    Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS), an auto-administered questionnaire of functional capacity

    Time frame: Baseline-6 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change from Baseline in pain level at 6 weeks

    Visual analog scale for pain

    Time frame: Baseline-6 weeks

  2. Change from Baseline in pain level at 1 week

    Visual analog scale for pain

    Time frame: Baseline-1 week

  3. Change from Baseline in pain level at 2 weeks

    Visual analog scale for pain

    Time frame: Baseline-2 weeks

  4. Change from Baseline in pain level at 4 weeks

    Visual analog scale for pain

    Time frame: Baseline-4 weeks

  5. Change from Baseline in ankle oedema at 6 weeks

    Figure-of-eight for ankle oedema

    Time frame: Baseline-6 weeks

  6. Change from Baseline in ankle oedema at 4 weeks

    Figure-of-eight for ankle oedema

    Time frame: Baseline-4 weeks

  7. Change from Baseline in ankle oedema at 2 weeks

    Figure-of-eight for ankle oedema

    Time frame: Baseline-2 weeks

  8. Change from Baseline in ankle oedema at 1 week

    Figure-of-eight for ankle oedema

    Time frame: Baseline-1 week

  9. Change from Baseline in dorsiflexion range of motion at 6 weeks

    Hallux-to-wall distance for dorsiflexion range of motion

    Time frame: Baseline-6 weeks

  10. Change from Baseline in dorsiflexion range of motion at 1 week

    Hallux-to-wall distance for dorsiflexion range of motion

    Time frame: Baseline-1 week

  11. Change from Baseline in dorsiflexion range of motion at 2 weeks

    Hallux-to-wall distance for dorsiflexion range of motion

    Time frame: Baseline-2 weeks

  12. Change from Baseline in dorsiflexion range of motion at 4 weeks

    Hallux-to-wall distance for dorsiflexion range of motion

    Time frame: Baseline-4 weeks

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Laval University
    Québec, G1V 0A6, Canada
    • Jean Tittley, MSc cand. · Contact · jean_tittley@yahoo.com · 418 656-5501
    • Jean Tittley, MSc cand. · Sub investigator
    • Jean-Sébastien Roy, PhD · Principal investigator
    • Luc J Hébert, PhD · Sub investigator
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Tittley J, Hebert LJ, Roy JS. Should ice application be replaced with neurocryostimulation for the treatment of acute lateral ankle sprains? A randomized clinical trial. J Foot Ankle Res. 2020 Dec 1;13(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s13047-020-00436-6. PubMed 33261633 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 30, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02945618
Lead sponsor
Laval University
Responsible party
Jean-Sébastien Roy (Associate Professor, Laval University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 26, 2016
Start date
Jun 2015
Primary completion
Sep 2017 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2017 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 30, 2017

Study contacts

Jean-Sebastien Roy, PT, PhD
Contact
jean-sebastien.roy@rea.ulaval.ca
1-418-529-9141 ext. 6005
Jean-Sebastien Roy, PhD
principal investigator · Universite Laval

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Aug 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion