An interventional study of Nutritional Supplement in End Stage Renal Disease, sponsored by Dialysis Clinic, Inc.. Completed at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-11-05.
Sponsored by Dialysis Clinic, Inc. · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other
To conduct a pragmatic randomized clinical trial in which the researchers will determine the mortality impact of a protocol whereby all hemodialysis patients receive an oral, protein-based nutritional supplement during the dialysis procedure as compared to the existing nutritional protocol whereby only hemodialysis patients with serum albumin below 3.5 g/dL and incident hemodialysis patients during the first months of care receive an oral, intradialytic protein-based nutritional supplement during the dialysis procedure.
HELPS-HD is a pragmatic, cluster randomized clinical trial comparing the effectiveness of two different oral nutritional supplement protocols and accompanying education. All participants in participating facilities will be asked to participate in the study unless they do not qualify. Reflecting the pragmatic study design targeting broad generalizability, inclusion criteria are broad and exclusions are minimal.
The trial compares Usual Care versus an Intensive Nutritional Supplement Protocol. Facilities are cluster randomized into one of two protocols:
The majority of DCI facilities currently have the majority of their patients prescribed the usual care oral nutritional supplement protocol, with 20-30% of patients at any given time receiving an in-center oral nutritional supplement based on either incident hemodialysis status or low serum albumin. Of note, all patients are offered the protocol, but approximately 10-20% refuse the protein supplement, often due to taste and individual preference. Being prescribed the protocol does not affect a patient's ability to consume food or other supplements of their choosing before, during (depending on facility and state regulations) or after dialysis; it simply means that they receive an oral nutritional supplement for consumption during dialysis from the dialysis facility included as a part of their routine dialysis care. The specific nutritional supplement is not specified in the protocol, although many facilities currently use Prostat due to pricing and availability. The protocol prescribes approximately 15 g of oral protein supplement; when Prostat is used, this is accomplished by drinking 30 mL of Prostat. In cases of facility or patient preference, including taste fatigue, other supplements can be used in the current usual care protocol in lieu of Prostat. For example, the PI's facility currently has some patients receiving Prostat while others receive BodyQuest Protein Ice Cream, reflecting patient preference. Nutritional supplements utilized during the trial will vary, but should contain approximately 15 g (range 12 to 20 g) of protein with low sodium, potassium and phosphorus content. Based on current use within DCI and availability as well as prior experiences and cost, the following supplements are anticipated:
As occurs currently in practice, the serum albumin level from routinely drawn monthly labs will automatically feed into the electronic centralized nutritional supplement prescribing protocols, from which supplements are then prescribed and administered. The DCI electronic oral nutritional supplement protocol will be used in the same manner as in current practice and follow the same rules for dosing and stoppage for the usual care arm, while protocol-based administration will continue regardless of serum albumin level for the intensive protocol arm. All new patients at the time of dialysis initiation (first dialysis session) will receive an oral nutritional supplement if prescribed the protocol by their physician, regardless of intensive or usual care protocol assignment based on their facility. The specific supplement is typically based upon what the individual facility has available and on storage space within facilities. For example, one supplement is a frozen protein supplement (BodyQuest Protein Ice Cream) that can only be used in facilities that have adequate space for food freezers.
As a non-blinded study, the treating physicians will be aware of the study allocation of the facility. In facilities assigned to the intensive oral nutritional supplement intervention, an order will be generated in the DCI MIS by DCI Information Services for administration of an oral protein supplement at each dialysis session. Similarly, in patients assigned to the standard oral nutritional supplement intervention, a renewal order of the current supplement protocol will be generated. As with all orders pertaining to in-center hemodialysis care, the order for intensive versus standard nutritional supplement protocol will need to be signed electronically by the physician caring for the patient. If the physician does not sign this order, the patient will not receive nutritional supplements. The physician, regardless of randomization, can elect to discontinue the supplement order at any time.
As is currently done in practice, the dialysis nurse will record in the treatment record that the nutritional supplement has been dispensed and whether and when it was consumed. Supplements should be distributed and consumed within the first 30 minutes of initiation of a dialysis session.
Within all facilities, patients will receive information regarding the nutritional supplement trial. Educational posters will be displayed in public waiting areas, including signs and posters that inform patients that the site is participating in the trial as well as signs and posters that promote the importance of nutrition and adequate protein intake in recipients of hemodialysis. Every dialysis facility, as a condition for coverage by CMS, is required to have a dietician who provides nutritional information to patients. Regardless of randomization assignment, this individual will continue to encourage appropriate protein intake for dialysis patients, including recommendations for protein and other hemodialysis-appropriate diet consumption at home.
Facilities randomized to usual care and to intensive supplements will have slightly different approaches. First, facilities randomized to the usual care arm will have different signs and posters than those randomized to the intensive arm. Usual care arm materials will promote the need for nutrition and encourage supplement consumption when the albumin is low. Patients are informed of their serum albumin levels monthly at dialysis when they receive feedback from the dietician. In these conversations, the dietician will continue to emphasize protein consumption as per prior routine. For intensive facilities, materials will focus on the catabolic stresses induced by dialysis regardless of baseline albumin level, and emphasize that oral nutritional supplements taken early during dialysis may be able to impact catabolism. Reflecting the open nature of dialysis facilities, if neighboring patients are on different treatment regimens, they are likely to overhear the specific counseling given to other patients and are likely to appreciate that others are receiving more or less supplements than they are. Finally, there is a group mentality prevalent among dialysis patients such that they expect to receive similar treatment and interventions. These factors reinforce the hemodialysis environment as best suited to cluster randomization.
2,121 studies on the registry are indexed under Kidney Failure, Chronic; 264 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 10,457 is above the median of 55 across 1,582 interventional studies indexed under Kidney Failure, Chronic.
Browse Kidney Failure, Chronic studies →Dialysis Clinic, Inc. is the lead sponsor of 3 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Facility randomized to follow the usual care nutritional supplement protocol
Dietary Supplement: Nutritional Supplement
Facility randomized to follow the intensive nutritional supplement protocol
Dietary Supplement: Nutritional Supplement
Selection of which supplement to give to the patients will be left to the dialysis unit's governing body as this study is not interested in a specific supplement's effect on nutrient restoration and subsequent outcomes but rather on oral replacement of amino acids regardless of the agent used.
Mortality
All-cause mortality, assessed from day 0 of study initiation in prevalent patients and day 120 of study initiation in incident patients as all incident patients are provided nutritional supplements during their first 120 days of hemodialysis. Withdrawal from dialysis was classified as death. Note that AEs and SAEs were not specifically classified given the minimal risk intervention (protocol prescribing a food containing \~15 g of protein in some participants in usual care facilities and all participants in intensive protocol facilities) and the pragmatic trial design.
Time frame: Intervention discontinued on April 13, 2020 due to Covid-related prohibition on eating in facilities. Event follow-up concluded on August 13, 2020. Follow-up time varied among participants, with the maximum of approximately 3.5 years.
Hospitalization
Time to First Hospitalization
Time frame: Median 7.1 months (25th to 75th percentile: 3.0, 10.9 months)
| Milestone | Usual Care Protocol | Intensive Protocol |
|---|---|---|
| Started | 4763 | 5133 |
| Completed | 2215 | 2320 |
| Not completed | 2548 | 2813 |
| Withdrew: Lost to follow-up | 19 | 18 |
| Withdrew: Death | 1732 | 1827 |
| Withdrew: Transplant | 210 | 278 |
| Withdrew: Withdrawal from hd (death equivalent analytically) | 24 | 29 |
| Withdrew: Transferred to pd or a non-dci facility | 516 | 632 |
| Withdrew: Recovered kidney function | 47 | 29 |
All-cause mortality, assessed from day 0 of study initiation in prevalent patients and day 120 of study initiation in incident patients as all incident patients are provided nutritional supplements during their first 120 days of hemodialysis. Withdrawal from dialysis was classified as death. Note that AEs and SAEs were not specifically classified given the minimal risk intervention (protocol prescribing a food containing \~15 g of protein in some participants in usual care facilities and all participants in intensive protocol facilities) and the pragmatic trial design.
| participants | Usual Care Protocol | Intensive Protocol |
|---|---|---|
| Mortality | 1756 | 1856 |
Time to First Hospitalization
| Patient level hospitalizations | Usual Care Protocol | Intensive Protocol |
|---|---|---|
| Hospitalization | 3655 | 3916 |
Collected over Median follow-up time was 21.4 months, with a 25th percentile of 10.4 months and a 75th percentile of 37.4 months.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| Usual Care Protocol | 1,732/4,763 (36.4%) | 0/4,763 (0%) | 0/4,763 (0%) |
| Intensive Protocol | 1,827/5,133 (35.6%) | 0/5,133 (0%) | 0/5,133 (0%) |
Primary analyses incorporate a 120 day lag for incident dialysis patients as the usual care and intensive protocols were identical during the time of hemodialysis initiation, such that 9896 participants were in the analytic dataset (4763 in usual care and 5133 in intensive nutritional supplement protocols) received the intervention of a total of 10457 participants allocated to a trial intervention. There were 561 incident hemodialysis patients who did not remain in the DCI facility past day 120.
| Age, Categorical(Participants) | Usual Care Protocol | Intensive Protocol | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| <=18 years | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Between 18 and 65 years | 2357 | 2591 | 4948 |
| >=65 years | 2406 | 2542 | 4948 |
| Age, Continuous(years) | Usual Care Protocol | Intensive Protocol | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 63.4 ± 14.2 | 62.6 ± 14.8 | 63.0 ± 14.5 |
| Sex: Female, Male(Participants) | Usual Care Protocol | Intensive Protocol | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 2081 | 2248 | 4329 |
| Male | 2682 | 2885 | 5567 |
| Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants) | Usual Care Protocol | Intensive Protocol | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Asian | 183 | 379 | 562 |
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Black or African American | 1648 | 1930 | 3578 |
| White | 2631 | 2365 | 4996 |
| More than one race | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unknown or Not Reported | 301 | 459 | 760 |
Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.
Plan to share: No
Ran from Jan 2017 to primary completion in Aug 2020, 43 months.
Results were first posted in Nov 2024, 4 years 2 months after primary completion.
Of 79 industry-sponsored interventional studies with no phase under Kidney Failure, Chronic, half reached primary completion within 18 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 7 and three quarters within 40. This study's 43 months is above that.
Counting every sponsor, half of 434 studies reached it within 23 months; a quarter within 8 and three quarters within 45.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.