ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02933151HELPS-HDUpdated Nov 5, 2024Results posted

Health Effects of oraL Protein Supplements in HD (The HELPS-HD Trial)

An interventional study of Nutritional Supplement in End Stage Renal Disease, sponsored by Dialysis Clinic, Inc.. Completed at 2 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-11-05.

Sponsored by Dialysis Clinic, Inc. · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
10,457
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

To conduct a pragmatic randomized clinical trial in which the researchers will determine the mortality impact of a protocol whereby all hemodialysis patients receive an oral, protein-based nutritional supplement during the dialysis procedure as compared to the existing nutritional protocol whereby only hemodialysis patients with serum albumin below 3.5 g/dL and incident hemodialysis patients during the first months of care receive an oral, intradialytic protein-based nutritional supplement during the dialysis procedure.

Read the detailed description

HELPS-HD is a pragmatic, cluster randomized clinical trial comparing the effectiveness of two different oral nutritional supplement protocols and accompanying education. All participants in participating facilities will be asked to participate in the study unless they do not qualify. Reflecting the pragmatic study design targeting broad generalizability, inclusion criteria are broad and exclusions are minimal.

The trial compares Usual Care versus an Intensive Nutritional Supplement Protocol. Facilities are cluster randomized into one of two protocols:

  1. Usual care protocol which will continue the current nutritional supplement protocol for all patients at the dialysis facility, whereby those with albumin below 3.5 g/dL receive supplement
  2. Intensive nutritional supplement protocol, which will prescribe nutritional supplements for all patients at the dialysis facility regardless of serum albumin levels

The majority of DCI facilities currently have the majority of their patients prescribed the usual care oral nutritional supplement protocol, with 20-30% of patients at any given time receiving an in-center oral nutritional supplement based on either incident hemodialysis status or low serum albumin. Of note, all patients are offered the protocol, but approximately 10-20% refuse the protein supplement, often due to taste and individual preference. Being prescribed the protocol does not affect a patient's ability to consume food or other supplements of their choosing before, during (depending on facility and state regulations) or after dialysis; it simply means that they receive an oral nutritional supplement for consumption during dialysis from the dialysis facility included as a part of their routine dialysis care. The specific nutritional supplement is not specified in the protocol, although many facilities currently use Prostat due to pricing and availability. The protocol prescribes approximately 15 g of oral protein supplement; when Prostat is used, this is accomplished by drinking 30 mL of Prostat. In cases of facility or patient preference, including taste fatigue, other supplements can be used in the current usual care protocol in lieu of Prostat. For example, the PI's facility currently has some patients receiving Prostat while others receive BodyQuest Protein Ice Cream, reflecting patient preference. Nutritional supplements utilized during the trial will vary, but should contain approximately 15 g (range 12 to 20 g) of protein with low sodium, potassium and phosphorus content. Based on current use within DCI and availability as well as prior experiences and cost, the following supplements are anticipated:

  1. BodyQuest Protein Ice Cream, which contains 16 g of protein and 120 kcal per serving
  2. Prostat, Sugar Free, which contains 15 g of protein and 100 kcal per serving
  3. LiquaCel Liquid Protein, which contains 16 g of protein and 90 kcal per serving
  4. ZonePerfect Nutrition Bars ( flavor varied to avoid taste fatigue), which contain \~ 15 g of protein and \~ 210 kcal per serving
  5. Nepro, which contains 19 g of protein and 425 kcal per serving.

As occurs currently in practice, the serum albumin level from routinely drawn monthly labs will automatically feed into the electronic centralized nutritional supplement prescribing protocols, from which supplements are then prescribed and administered. The DCI electronic oral nutritional supplement protocol will be used in the same manner as in current practice and follow the same rules for dosing and stoppage for the usual care arm, while protocol-based administration will continue regardless of serum albumin level for the intensive protocol arm. All new patients at the time of dialysis initiation (first dialysis session) will receive an oral nutritional supplement if prescribed the protocol by their physician, regardless of intensive or usual care protocol assignment based on their facility. The specific supplement is typically based upon what the individual facility has available and on storage space within facilities. For example, one supplement is a frozen protein supplement (BodyQuest Protein Ice Cream) that can only be used in facilities that have adequate space for food freezers.

As a non-blinded study, the treating physicians will be aware of the study allocation of the facility. In facilities assigned to the intensive oral nutritional supplement intervention, an order will be generated in the DCI MIS by DCI Information Services for administration of an oral protein supplement at each dialysis session. Similarly, in patients assigned to the standard oral nutritional supplement intervention, a renewal order of the current supplement protocol will be generated. As with all orders pertaining to in-center hemodialysis care, the order for intensive versus standard nutritional supplement protocol will need to be signed electronically by the physician caring for the patient. If the physician does not sign this order, the patient will not receive nutritional supplements. The physician, regardless of randomization, can elect to discontinue the supplement order at any time.

As is currently done in practice, the dialysis nurse will record in the treatment record that the nutritional supplement has been dispensed and whether and when it was consumed. Supplements should be distributed and consumed within the first 30 minutes of initiation of a dialysis session.

Within all facilities, patients will receive information regarding the nutritional supplement trial. Educational posters will be displayed in public waiting areas, including signs and posters that inform patients that the site is participating in the trial as well as signs and posters that promote the importance of nutrition and adequate protein intake in recipients of hemodialysis. Every dialysis facility, as a condition for coverage by CMS, is required to have a dietician who provides nutritional information to patients. Regardless of randomization assignment, this individual will continue to encourage appropriate protein intake for dialysis patients, including recommendations for protein and other hemodialysis-appropriate diet consumption at home.

Facilities randomized to usual care and to intensive supplements will have slightly different approaches. First, facilities randomized to the usual care arm will have different signs and posters than those randomized to the intensive arm. Usual care arm materials will promote the need for nutrition and encourage supplement consumption when the albumin is low. Patients are informed of their serum albumin levels monthly at dialysis when they receive feedback from the dietician. In these conversations, the dietician will continue to emphasize protein consumption as per prior routine. For intensive facilities, materials will focus on the catabolic stresses induced by dialysis regardless of baseline albumin level, and emphasize that oral nutritional supplements taken early during dialysis may be able to impact catabolism. Reflecting the open nature of dialysis facilities, if neighboring patients are on different treatment regimens, they are likely to overhear the specific counseling given to other patients and are likely to appreciate that others are receiving more or less supplements than they are. Finally, there is a group mentality prevalent among dialysis patients such that they expect to receive similar treatment and interventions. These factors reinforce the hemodialysis environment as best suited to cluster randomization.

02

Conditions studied

  • End Stage Renal Disease
03

In context

Kidney Failure, Chronic

2,121 studies on the registry are indexed under Kidney Failure, Chronic; 264 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 10,457 is above the median of 55 across 1,582 interventional studies indexed under Kidney Failure, Chronic.

Browse Kidney Failure, Chronic studies →

Lead sponsor

Dialysis Clinic, Inc. is the lead sponsor of 3 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Receipt of in-center hemodialysis in a facility participating in the trial
  2. Able to consume oral nutritional supplements
  3. Age ≥18 years

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Tube feed or intravenous feed dependent
  2. Unable to feed oneself or request help with feeding if a supplement is provided
  3. Known allergy to ingredient(s) of the supplement
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
10,457 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    Usual Care Protocol

    Facility randomized to follow the usual care nutritional supplement protocol

    Dietary Supplement: Nutritional Supplement

  • Other
    Intensive Protocol

    Facility randomized to follow the intensive nutritional supplement protocol

    Dietary Supplement: Nutritional Supplement

Interventions

  • Dietary supplementNutritional Supplement

    Selection of which supplement to give to the patients will be left to the dialysis unit's governing body as this study is not interested in a specific supplement's effect on nutrient restoration and subsequent outcomes but rather on oral replacement of amino acids regardless of the agent used.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Mortality

    All-cause mortality, assessed from day 0 of study initiation in prevalent patients and day 120 of study initiation in incident patients as all incident patients are provided nutritional supplements during their first 120 days of hemodialysis. Withdrawal from dialysis was classified as death. Note that AEs and SAEs were not specifically classified given the minimal risk intervention (protocol prescribing a food containing \~15 g of protein in some participants in usual care facilities and all participants in intensive protocol facilities) and the pragmatic trial design.

    Time frame: Intervention discontinued on April 13, 2020 due to Covid-related prohibition on eating in facilities. Event follow-up concluded on August 13, 2020. Follow-up time varied among participants, with the maximum of approximately 3.5 years.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Hospitalization

    Time to First Hospitalization

    Time frame: Median 7.1 months (25th to 75th percentile: 3.0, 10.9 months)

07

Results

Posted Nov 5, 2024
Limitations and caveats
Cluster-randomized pragmatic clinical trial with baseline clinical data and outcome ascertainment dependent on clinical data entered into the EHR with resultant less rigorous data capture of adverse events than in non-pragmatic trials and therefore a focus on the all-cause mortality outcome. With the COVID pandemic, nutritional supplements were banned during dialysis in all dialysis facilities in April 2020, resulting in cessation of the trial intervention 3 months earlier than planned.

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneUsual Care ProtocolIntensive Protocol
Started47635133
Completed22152320
Not completed25482813
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up1918
Withdrew: Death17321827
Withdrew: Transplant210278
Withdrew: Withdrawal from hd (death equivalent analytically)2429
Withdrew: Transferred to pd or a non-dci facility516632
Withdrew: Recovered kidney function4729

Outcome measures

PrimaryMortality

All-cause mortality, assessed from day 0 of study initiation in prevalent patients and day 120 of study initiation in incident patients as all incident patients are provided nutritional supplements during their first 120 days of hemodialysis. Withdrawal from dialysis was classified as death. Note that AEs and SAEs were not specifically classified given the minimal risk intervention (protocol prescribing a food containing \~15 g of protein in some participants in usual care facilities and all participants in intensive protocol facilities) and the pragmatic trial design.

Time frame:
Intervention discontinued on April 13, 2020 due to Covid-related prohibition on eating in facilities. Event follow-up concluded on August 13, 2020. Follow-up time varied among participants, with the maximum of approximately 3.5 years.
Reported as:
Number · participants
Mortality
participantsUsual Care ProtocolIntensive Protocol
Mortality17561856
Statistical analysis
  • Usual Care Protocol vs Intensive Protocol · Cox proportional hazard: 1.03 · 95% CI 0.92 to 1.14Reference group is usual care
SecondaryHospitalization

Time to First Hospitalization

Time frame:
Median 7.1 months (25th to 75th percentile: 3.0, 10.9 months)
Reported as:
Number · Patient level hospitalizations
Hospitalization
Patient level hospitalizationsUsual Care ProtocolIntensive Protocol
Hospitalization36553916

Adverse events

Collected over Median follow-up time was 21.4 months, with a 25th percentile of 10.4 months and a 75th percentile of 37.4 months.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Usual Care Protocol1,732/4,763 (36.4%)0/4,763 (0%)0/4,763 (0%)
Intensive Protocol1,827/5,133 (35.6%)0/5,133 (0%)0/5,133 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Primary analyses incorporate a 120 day lag for incident dialysis patients as the usual care and intensive protocols were identical during the time of hemodialysis initiation, such that 9896 participants were in the analytic dataset (4763 in usual care and 5133 in intensive nutritional supplement protocols) received the intervention of a total of 10457 participants allocated to a trial intervention. There were 561 incident hemodialysis patients who did not remain in the DCI facility past day 120.

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Usual Care ProtocolIntensive ProtocolTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years235725914948
>=65 years240625424948
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Usual Care ProtocolIntensive ProtocolTotal
Mean63.4 ± 14.262.6 ± 14.863.0 ± 14.5
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Usual Care ProtocolIntensive ProtocolTotal
Female208122484329
Male268228855567
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Usual Care ProtocolIntensive ProtocolTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian183379562
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American164819303578
White263123654996
More than one race000
Unknown or Not Reported301459760
08

Study locations

2 sites
  • DCI Jacksonville
    Jacksonville, Florida 32204, United States
  • Dialysis Clinic, Inc (Corporate)
    Nashville, Tennessee 37211, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Mah JY, Choy SW, Roberts MA, Desai AM, Corken M, Gwini SM, McMahon LP. Oral protein-based supplements versus placebo or no treatment for people with chronic kidney disease requiring dialysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 May 11;5(5):CD012616. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012616.pub2. PubMed 32390133 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Nov 11, 2019

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Jan 2017 to primary completion in Aug 2020, 43 months.

Results were first posted in Nov 2024, 4 years 2 months after primary completion.

Of 79 industry-sponsored interventional studies with no phase under Kidney Failure, Chronic, half reached primary completion within 18 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 7 and three quarters within 40. This study's 43 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 434 studies reached it within 23 months; a quarter within 8 and three quarters within 45.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 12, 2016
First posted
Oct 14, 2016
StartActual
Jan 23, 2017
Primary completionActual
Aug 31, 2020
CompletionActual
Aug 31, 2020
Results first posted
Nov 5, 2024
Last update
Nov 5, 2024
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 5, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02933151
Lead sponsor
Dialysis Clinic, Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 14, 2016
Start date
Jan 23, 2017
Primary completion
Aug 31, 2020
Completion
Aug 31, 2020
Results posted
Nov 5, 2024
Last update
Nov 5, 2024

Study contacts

Daniel Weiner, MD
principal investigator · DCI/Tufts

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion