An interventional study of SmartTouch Catheter in Atrial Fibrillation, sponsored by Seoul National University Hospital. Completed at 1 site in Korea, Republic of. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-03-18.
Sponsored by Seoul National University Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
Pulmonary vein (PV) isolation is very important in atrial fibrillation (AF) catheter ablation. PV reconnection is one of the main reasons in AF recurrence. Contact force-sensing catheter is a new catheter which has valuable tools to monitor and increase the efficacy of PV isolation. Previous paper reported the efficacy of contact force-sensing catheter on immediate PV isolation and outcome. However, there might be confounding factor as inter-individual variation. Therefore, we would like to compare the efficacy of contact force-sensing catheter within same patient but different veins.
In this study, we would like to confirm the efficacy of contact force-sensing catheter on immediate PV isolation outcome within same patient. This study randomized the right or left PVs whether to use the contact force-sensing function or not. The study design will minimize the inter-individual variation on evaluating the efficacy of contact force-sensing catheter on immediate PV isolation.
Also, in patients who had recurred AF or AT, we would like to evaluate the long-term efficacy of contact force-sensing catheter on PV isolation.
Sixty patients will be randomized to select right or left pulmonary veins whether to apply contact force-guided ablation or contact force-blinded ablation strategy. Each PV will be ablated with same contact force-sensing catheter (Thermocool Smart Touch Catheter, Biosense Webster Inc. CA). The PV (right or left) which will be randomized to contact force-sensing PV or blind PV. Contact force-sensing PV will be ablated guided by contact force, whereas the blind PVs will be ablated without contact force-sensing information. The change of impedance, total ablation and time to ablate PV will be collected and analysed according to contact force-sensing strategy. After exit and entrance block by conventional method, dormant conduction will be evaluated by using adenosine. The proportion of dormant conduction will be compared between contact force-sensing guided or blinded strategy.
During 1-year follow up, patients who recurred AF or AT will be undergo second ablation procedure. In these patients, PV reconnection rate will be evaluated by a duodecapolar lasso circular mapping catheter. We would like to know whether PVs which have ablated with contact force-sensing information at index procedure have less reconnection than those which was ablated without contact force-sensing information.
3,870 studies on the registry are indexed under Atrial Fibrillation; 924 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 60 is below the median of 144 across 2,380 interventional studies indexed under Atrial Fibrillation.
Browse Atrial Fibrillation studies →Seoul National University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 1,860 studies on the registry; 275 are open to participants now.
Of its 12 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 2 (17%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Fifteen patients will be allocated to this group. Left side pulmonary veins isolation will be performed with contact force information guidance. Then, right side pulmonary veins isolation will be performed without contact force information (using same catheter named SmartTouch Catheter).
Device: SmartTouch Catheter
Fifteen patients will be allocated to this group. Left side pulmonary veins isolation will be performed without contact force information (using same catheter named SmartTouch Catheter).Then, right side pulmonary veins isolation will be performed with contact force information guidance.
Device: SmartTouch Catheter
Fifteen patients will be allocated to this group. Right side pulmonary veins isolation will be performed with contact force information guidance. Then, left side pulmonary veins isolation will be performed without contact force information (using same catheter named SmartTouch Catheter).
Device: SmartTouch Catheter
Fifteen patients will be allocated to this group. Right side pulmonary veins isolation will be performed without contact force information (using same catheter named SmartTouch Catheter). Then, left side pulmonary veins isolation will be performed with contact force information guidance.
Device: SmartTouch Catheter
Pulmonary vein (PV) isolation guided by CF information
Also known as: Contact force guided pulmonary vein isolation
Proportion of immediate PV isolation ratio after final ablation according to contact force-guided ablation, change of impedance, total ablation time, and procedure time according to contact force-guided strategy
Time frame: Immediate after PV isolation (acute result)
Proportion of PV reconnection according to contact force-guided ablation in patients with AF recurrence
Time frame: 1 year
Plan to share: Yes
This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Seoul National University Hospital