A Phase 4 interventional study of Triptorlin or Leuprorelin and Zhibo dihuang pills in Central Precocious Puberty, sponsored by Ruijin Hospital. Completed. Open to female participants aged 2 Years to 14 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-09-30.
Sponsored by Ruijin Hospital · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment
This is a prospective, multicentric, comparative, non-randomized interventional study in which subjects diagnosed with central precocious puberty (CPP) and early puberty (EP) were treated for 6 months to compare the effect with GnRHa and traditional Chinese medicines.
740 girls with CPP and EP participated in this study, all participates were divided into GnRHa group, traditional chinese medicines group and blank group. After at least six months therapy with GnRHa or traditional Chinese medicines, the investigators compare clinical parameters, sex hormone, bone age and ovarian ultrasound in three groups.
77 studies on the registry are indexed under Puberty, Precocious; 20 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 740 is above the median of 64 across 49 interventional studies indexed under Puberty, Precocious.
Browse Puberty, Precocious studies →Ruijin Hospital is the lead sponsor of 667 studies on the registry; 376 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Triptorlin or Leuprelin 100ug/kg per 28 days
Drug: Triptorlin or Leuprorelin
Zhibo dihuang pills: 8 tablets twice a day by mouth for 6 months and Dabu ying pills: 6g twice a day by mouth for 6 months
Drug: Zhibo dihuang pills · Drug: Dabu ying pills
without therapy
Gonadotrophin releasing hormone agonists (GnRHa)
Also known as: Triptorlin, Leuprorelin
Traditional Chinese Medicine
Traditional Chinese Medicine
Comparisons of the height SDS'changes between GnRHa group and traditional chinese medicines group in 6 months.
The change levels of height SDS in the GnRHa group (n=202) is lower than in the traditional chinese medicines group (n=155) ,(P\<0.05).
Time frame: 6 months
Comparisons of the breast stages'changes between GnRHa group and traditional chinese medicines group in 6 months.
The change levels of breast stages in the GnRHa group (n=181) is lower than in the traditional chinese medicines group (n=148) ,(P\<0.05).
Time frame: 6 months
Comparisons of the BA/CA ratio'changes between GnRHa group and traditional chinese medicines group in 6 months.
The change levels of BA/CA ratio in the GnRHa group (n=152) is lower than in the traditional chinese medicines group (n=86) ,(P\<0.05).
Time frame: 6 months
Comparisons of the sex hormone'changes between GnRHa group and traditional chinese medicines group in 6 months.
The change levels of sex hormone(LH,FSH and E2) in the GnRHa group (n=164) is lower than in the traditional chinese medicines group (n=94) ,(P\<0.05).
Time frame: 6 months
Comparisons of the uterine volume'changes between GnRHa group and traditional chinese medicines group in 6 months.
The change levels of uterine volume in the GnRHa group (n=157) is lower than in the traditional chinese medicines group (n=91) ,(P\<0.05).
Time frame: 6 months
Comparisons of the ovarian volume'changes between GnRHa group and traditional chinese medicines group in 6 months.
The change levels of ovarian volume in the GnRHa group (n=152) is lower than in the traditional chinese medicines group (n=88) ,(P\<0.05).
Time frame: 6 months
No study locations are listed for this record.
Plan to share: Yes
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
The record gives a start of Sep 2012, a primary completion of Aug 2015 and a completion of Aug 2015. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Studies of the drug tested here: Leuprolide