ClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT02911714Updated Dec 24, 2025

Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound for Kidney Transplant

A Phase 1 interventional study of Lumason Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound in Kidney Transplantation, sponsored by University of Utah. Terminated at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-12-24.

Sponsored by University of Utah · Phase 1, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Why this study was terminated
lack of funding

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was Jun 2022, 4 years 4 months ago, and no results have been posted to the registry.
Phase
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
20
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is a promising non-invasive imaging tool that may aid in the early detection of kidney transplant complications, such as delayed graft function (DGF) and acute allograft rejection. The technique uses an intravenous contrast agent to improve organ visualization with standard duplex ultrasound equipment. A number of FDA-approved agents, including Optison, Definity and Lumason are widely used to improve visualization in technically limited echocardiograms, and Lumason was recently approved for contrast-enhanced ultrasound of the liver. The specific aims of this study are to: develop, implement and refine a contrast-enhanced ultrasound protocol using Lumason to safely maximize kidney allograft visualization; determine associations between contrast-enhanced ultrasound and patterns of allograft injury consistent with delayed graft function; and to compare contrast-enhanced ultrasound with duplex ultrasound for differentiating acute rejection from other causes of dysfunction.

Read the detailed description

Kidney transplantation is the preferred treatment for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) given improved quality of life, longer survival and lower costs compared with chronic dialysis. Despite these long-term benefits, the first year post-transplant is a critical period that influences health care costs for transplantation and long-term patient and allograft survival. The two most common complications in the first year are delayed graft function (DGF), which affects nearly 25% of deceased-donor transplants, and acute allograft rejection, which affects nearly 10% of all transplants (deceased and living donor). DGF is most commonly caused by severe ischemia-reperfusion injury at transplantation and is a known risk factor for acute rejection and premature failure. Driven by an ever-growing transplant waiting list and limited organs, efforts to utilize higher-risk kidneys for increasingly higher-risk recipients may further increase these complication rates. While treatments exist for DGF and acute rejection, the current diagnostic paradigm is to obtain a duplex ultrasound (DUS) of the allograft, based on serial changes in serum creatinine, and then proceed to biopsy if there is clinical concern for rejection. Biopsy is the gold standard to differentiate between causes of allograft dysfunction, but the procedure is invasive and typically takes 24 hours or longer for an interpretation. Thus, early detection of these complications using non-invasive diagnostic methods (a major transplant research goal) could reduce our reliance on biopsies and help improve long-term patient and allograft survival.

Researchers in the United States have safely performed contrast-enhanced ultrasounds of the kidney in healthy participants, and radiologists have used ultrasound contrast agents off-label to better visualize organs other than the heart when clinically indicated. In terms of kidney transplants, European data suggest CEUS of the allograft on post-operative day (POD) 7 is superior to DUS for predicting 12-month allograft function, but there are no published studies using CEUS on POD 1 to diagnose DGF or acute rejection.

The pathophysiology of both DGF and acute rejection involve interactions between the microvasculature, parenchymal cells and inflammatory cells, though with differences in timing and within different zones of the kidney itself. A very important feature of CEUS is its capacity to measure microvascular perfusion, whereas DUS can only estimate flow within larger vessels. This potential innovation for assessing the renal macro- and microvasculature may allow for earlier non-invasive detection of DGF and acute rejection. With additional research, it may ultimately be shown that non-invasive CEUS will revolutionize early DGF and acute rejection diagnosis to enable improvement in long-term patient and allograft survival.

02

Conditions studied

  • Kidney Transplantation

Keywords

  • Kidney Transplantation
  • Delayed Graft Function
  • Acute Allograft Rejection
  • Acute Kidney Injury
03

In context

Delayed Graft Function

83 studies on the registry are indexed under Delayed Graft Function; 15 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 20 is below the median of 90 across 62 interventional studies indexed under Delayed Graft Function.

Browse Delayed Graft Function studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Utah is the lead sponsor of 994 studies on the registry; 175 are open to participants now.

Of its 114 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 69 (61%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult living-donor or deceased-donor kidney transplant recipients

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subject is Pregnant
  • History of non-renal transplant
  • Uncontrolled diabetes or hypertension
  • Symptomatic or significant pulmonary or cardiovascular disease
  • Clinical decision by the treating team to forego the study procedure due to medical/surgical instability
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
20 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    CEUS and Delayed Graft Function

    On the first post-operative day after kidney transplantation, recipients enrolled in the study will undergo CEUS using Lumason to quantify microvascular perfusion within the cortical and medullary zones of the kidney allograft for comparison to the concentration of neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL, an early biomarker of acute kidney injury) measured from recipient urine simultaneously collected on the first post-operative day.

    Drug: Lumason Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound

  • Experimental
    CEUS and Biopsy-Proven Acute Rejection

    We will identify and enroll kidney transplant recipients in need of clinically-indicated duplex ultrasounds and possible biopsy to evaluate allograft dysfunction during hospital admissions and outpatient follow-up. Immediately after the duplex ultrasound, we will perform CEUS using Lumason for allograft perfusion measurements to determine its potential association with biopsy-proven acute rejection according to the most recent Banff criteria.

    Drug: Lumason Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound

Interventions

  • DrugLumason Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound

    In both arms, we will use Lumason to measure kidney allograft perfusion via contrast-enhanced ultrasound.

    Also known as: Sulfur hexafluoride lipid-type A microspheres

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Biomarker-Defined Delayed Graft Function

    A meta-analysis of 19 studies found urine neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) \>150 ng/mL (within hours of the inciting event) had an area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.815 for identifying acute kidney injury (defined as an ensuing rise in serum creatinine by ≥50%). We noted an AUC of 0.82 for predicting the need for dialysis in the first week (i.e., dialysis-defined delayed graft function) with an optimal urine NGAL cutoff of \>350 ng/mL. For this study outcome, we will determine the Spearman correlation between CEUS-assessed allograft perfusion and degree of allograft injury based on post-operative day 1 urine NGAL concentration.

    Time frame: Post-Operative Day 1

  2. Biopsy-Proven Acute Rejection

    The Banff (2013) classification of acute kidney allograft rejection requires histologic evidence of acute tissue injury, evidence of recent antibody interaction with renal vascular endothelium, and serologic evidence of donor-specific antibodies in order to diagnose acute antibody-mediate rejection. Acute T-cell mediated rejection is histologically graded by the extent of interstitial inflammation and vascular involvement.

    Time frame: Any Time After Kidney Transplantation

Secondary outcomes

  1. Dialysis-Defined Delayed Graft Function

    The need for any dialysis in the first week of transplant.

    Time frame: First Post-Operative Week

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Utah Hospital
    Salt Lake City, Utah 84132, United States
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 24, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02911714
Lead sponsor
University of Utah
Collaborators
National Kidney Foundation, United States, American Heart Association, National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS)
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 22, 2016
Start date
Feb 21, 2018
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2022
Completion
Jun 30, 2022
Last update
Dec 24, 2025

Study contacts

Isaac E Hall, M.D.
principal investigator · University of Utah

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Dec 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion