An interventional study of Cone-beam CT in Ear Diseases, sponsored by Fondation Ophtalmologique Adolphe de Rothschild. Completed at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-09-12.
Sponsored by Fondation Ophtalmologique Adolphe de Rothschild · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic
Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), is a recent medical imaging technique where the X-rays are divergent, forming a cone.
As a result, this technique is less irradiating that the scanner. The purpose of this exploratory study is to compare the performance of the scanner and the cone beam in the detection of anatomical structures of the ear.
48 studies on the registry are indexed under Ear Diseases; 10 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 61 is close to the median of 61 across 37 interventional studies indexed under Ear Diseases.
Browse Ear Diseases studies →Fondation Ophtalmologique Adolphe de Rothschild is the lead sponsor of 316 studies on the registry; 78 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Informed consent
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
A cone-beam CT will be offered to the patient undergoing a CT scan of the middle ear
Device: Cone-beam CT
Sensitivity of the cone-beam CT vs CT scan
Correlation coefficient measuring the concordance for a given radiologist, between the number of anatomical structures of the ear viewed by the cone beam CT and the CT scanner on a total of 24 studied structures
Time frame: 1 minute
The record gives a start of Oct 2014 and a primary completion of Feb 2015. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Fondation Ophtalmologique Adolphe de Rothschild →