CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02890914Updated Sep 8, 2016

Transvaginal Ultrasound Training for Obstetrics and Gynecology Residents

An interventional study of Transvaginal Ultrasound Educational DVD in Ovarian Cysts, sponsored by Thomas Jefferson University. Completed at 3 sites in United States. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-09-08.

Sponsored by Thomas Jefferson University · Not applicable and Interventional

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
57
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Obstetrics and gynecology residents are deemed to be proficient in transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) upon graduation from an accredited program, although TVUS education in residency is not standardized. The objective of this study is to assess for improvement in transvaginal ultrasound knowledge among residents after viewing an educational DVD.

Read the detailed description

This is a multi-site prospective parallel randomized controlled trial using an educational DVD from the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, "Gynecology: Beginners Only"®, compared to routine education. All participants completed a pretest on transvaginal ultrasound images and principles. The intervention group repeated the test after viewing the DVD. During the trial, performing and logging transvaginal ultrasounds were encouraged. All enrolled residents repeated the test at 6-10 months after intervention.

02

Conditions studied

  • Ovarian Cysts

Browse trials for

03

In context

Ovarian Cysts

73 studies on the registry are indexed under Ovarian Cysts; 15 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 57 is below the median of 67 across 48 interventional studies indexed under Ovarian Cysts.

Browse Ovarian Cysts studies →

Lead sponsor

Thomas Jefferson University is the lead sponsor of 384 studies on the registry; 71 are open to participants now.

Of its 44 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 20 (45%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • resident in obstetrics and gynecology at one of three sites

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • unable to consent
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Investigator)
Enrollment
57 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Standard Education

    These residents received their standard residency education and experience.

  • Experimental
    DVD Intervention

    These residents received a one-hour long DVD lecture in addition to standard residency education and experience.

    Other: Transvaginal Ultrasound Educational DVD

Interventions

  • OtherTransvaginal Ultrasound Educational DVD

    American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine, "Gynecology: Beginners Only"®

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Difference in Pre and Post Study Mean Test Scores

    Time frame: 6-10 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Difference in Pre and Post Viewing Mean Test Scores

    Time frame: 1 hour

  2. Difference in Number of Post-Study Logged Transvaginal Ultrasounds

    Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 2 years

  3. Mean test score differences in specific question types (images and principles)

    Time frame: 6-10 months

  4. Difference in mean scores on "orange cards"

    Time frame: 6-10 months

07

Study locations

3 sites
  • Thomas Jefferson University
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107, United States
  • The Reading Hospital
    West Reading, Pennsylvania 19602, United States
  • Lankenau Medical Center
    Wynnewood, Pennsylvania 19096, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Goldstein SR. Accreditation, certification: why all the confusion? Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Dec;110(6):1396-8. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000289225.54215.e9. PubMed 18055738 ↗
  • Chao C, Chalouhi GE, Bouhanna P, Ville Y, Dommergues M. Randomized Clinical Trial of Virtual Reality Simulation Training for Transvaginal Gynecologic Ultrasound Skills. J Ultrasound Med. 2015 Sep;34(9):1663-7. doi: 10.7863/ultra.15.14.09063. Epub 2015 Aug 17. PubMed 26283753 ↗
  • Tolsgaard MG, Ringsted C, Dreisler E, Norgaard LN, Petersen JH, Madsen ME, Freiesleben NL, Sorensen JL, Tabor A. Sustained effect of simulation-based ultrasound training on clinical performance: a randomized trial. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Sep;46(3):312-8. doi: 10.1002/uog.14780. Epub 2015 Aug 6. PubMed 25580809 ↗
  • Carolan-Rees G, Ray AF. The ScanTrainer obstetrics and gynaecology ultrasound virtual reality training simulator: A cost model to determine the cost viability of replacing clinical training with simulation training. Ultrasound. 2015 May;23(2):110-5. doi: 10.1177/1742271X14567498. Epub 2015 Jan 10. PubMed 27433245 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 8, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02890914
Lead sponsor
Thomas Jefferson University
Collaborators
The Reading Hospital and Medical Center, Main Line Health
Responsible party
Rebekah McCurdy (MD, Thomas Jefferson University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 7, 2016
Start date
Sep 2012
Primary completion
Jun 2015
Completion
Jun 2015
Last update
Sep 8, 2016

Study contacts

Rebekah McCurdy, MD
principal investigator · Thomas Jefferson University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion