ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07215130CUSA-ENDOUpdated Oct 10, 2025

Selective Removal of Endometriotic Lesions Using CUSA Clarity in Ovarian Endometriomas

An observational study in Ovarian Endometrioma and Endometriosis, sponsored by Kanazawa University. Recruiting at 1 site in Japan. Open to female participants aged 20 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-10-10.

Sponsored by Kanazawa University · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jan 2025; still recruiting 1 year 9 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
10
Ages
20 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This study aims to evaluate the feasibility and tissue selectivity of a novel surgical technology, the Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator (CUSA) Clarity, in the management of ovarian endometriomas. Ovarian endometriomas are cysts caused by endometriosis that can damage ovarian reserve when treated by conventional surgery. In this study, ovarian cyst wall specimens are examined ex vivo using different Tissue Select settings of the CUSA device. Histopathological analyses are performed to determine whether endometriotic epithelium can be selectively removed while preserving normal ovarian tissue. The findings may contribute to developing fertility-preserving surgical approaches for women with endometriomas.

Read the detailed description

Endometriomas are one of the most common manifestations of endometriosis and are frequently associated with infertility. Conventional cystectomy often results in inadvertent removal of normal ovarian tissue, which may reduce ovarian reserve. To address this issue, the Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator (CUSA) Clarity system, particularly with the Tissue Select mode, has been proposed as a tissue-selective surgical device.

In this observational histopathological study, ovarian endometrioma wall specimens obtained during surgery are divided into multiple parts. Each part is subjected to ex vivo treatment with the CUSA Clarity device at different Tissue Select settings (0-4). The treated samples are fixed, paraffin-embedded, and stained with hematoxylin-eosin and immunohistochemical markers (e.g., cytokeratin 7, CD10). Pathologists evaluate the extent of removal of endometriotic lesions and preservation of normal ovarian stroma.

The primary objective is to assess whether endometriotic epithelium can be selectively removed while sparing ovarian stromal tissue. Secondary objectives include evaluation of the depth of tissue removal and the presence of residual lesions at unscraped margins. The results are expected to provide histopathological evidence supporting the potential clinical application of CUSA in fertility-preserving surgery for ovarian endometriomas.

02

Conditions studied

  • Ovarian Endometrioma
  • Endometriosis

Keywords

  • Endometriosis
  • Ovarian Cyst
  • CUSA Clarity
  • Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator
  • Fertility Preservation
  • Histopathology
03

In context

Endometriosis

920 studies on the registry are indexed under Endometriosis; 266 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 10 is below the median of 135 across 349 observational studies indexed under Endometriosis.

Browse Endometriosis studies →

Lead sponsor

Kanazawa University is the lead sponsor of 7 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Women aged 20 years or older diagnosed with ovarian endometrioma and treated surgically at Kanazawa University Hospital. Surgically resected ovarian endometrioma specimens are used for ex vivo histopathological evaluation of selective lesion removal using the CUSA® Clarity device.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Female patients diagnosed with ovarian endometrioma who undergo surgical treatment (cystectomy or adnexectomy) at Kanazawa University Hospital between January 1, 2025, and March 31, 2027.
  • Written obtained prior to study participation.
  • Age ≥ 20 years at the time of consent.
  • For patients with previously stored endometrioma specimens under a broad consent, additional written consent for participation in this study will be obtained.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with suspected based on preoperative imaging.
  • Patients judged by the attending physician to be unsuitable for participation in this study for any reason.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Observational model
Case-only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
10 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples without dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Ovarian Endometrioma Cases

    Patients with ovarian endometriomas undergoing surgical excision at Kanazawa University Hospital. Cyst wall specimens are collected and analyzed ex vivo using the Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator (CUSA) Clarity device at different Tissue Select settings. Histopathological evaluation is performed to assess selective removal of endometriotic epithelium and preservation of ovarian stroma.

    Device: Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator (CUSA) Clarity

Interventions

  • DeviceCavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator (CUSA) Clarity

    Ex vivo application of the Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator (CUSA) Clarity device to ovarian endometrioma cyst wall specimens. Tissue Select settings from 0 to 4 are used to evaluate tissue selectivity, specifically removal of endometriotic epithelium while preserving normal ovarian stroma. Samples are subsequently analyzed histopathologically.

    Also known as: CUSA Clarity

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Histopathological confirmation of selective removal of endometriotic epithelium with preservation of ovarian stroma

    Evaluation of hematoxylin-eosin and immunohistochemical stained sections to determine whether endometriotic epithelial lining is removed while normal ovarian stroma is preserved.

    Time frame: Immediately after ex vivo CUSA treatment of specimens (within 1 day of surgery)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Depth of tissue removal at different Tissue Select settings

    Histological measurement of tissue removal depth under Tissue Select settings 0-4 using H\&E and Sirius Red staining.

    Time frame: Immediately after ex vivo treatment

  2. Presence of residual endometriotic lesions at unscraped margins

    Histological evaluation of cyst wall margins not subjected to CUSA scraping to confirm lesion selectivity.

    Time frame: Immediately after ex vivo treatment

  3. Immunohistochemical assessment of epithelial and stromal markers

    Immunostaining with cytokeratin 7 (epithelial) and CD10 (stromal) to assess selective tissue removal.

    Time frame: Within 1 week after sample fixation and processing

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Muzii L, Bianchi A, Bellati F, Cristi E, Pernice M, Zullo MA, Angioli R, Panici PB. Histologic analysis of endometriomas: what the surgeon needs to know. Fertil Steril. 2007 Feb;87(2):362-6. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.06.055. Epub 2006 Nov 13. PubMed 17094980 ↗
  • D'Alterio MN, Nappi L, Vitale SG, Agus M, Fanni D, Malzoni M, Falcone F, Sorrentino F, D'Agate MG, Scibilia G, Mereu L, Scollo P, Angioni S. Evaluation of Ovarian Reserve and Recurrence Rate After DWLS Diode Laser Ovarian Endometrioma Vaporization (OMAlaser): A Prospective, Single-Arm, Multicenter, Clinical Trial. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2025 Mar;32(3):279-287. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2024.10.021. Epub 2024 Oct 28. PubMed 39477011 ↗
  • Ferrari SM, Dolci C, Taccagni G, Congia C, Ottolina J, Schimberni M, Bartiromo L, Candiani M. Histologic findings from ablation of ovarian endometriomas using argon plasma coagulation (APC-ENDO): a pilot study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2025 Aug;312:114532. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2025.114532. Epub 2025 Jun 14. PubMed 40540997 ↗
  • Candiani M, Ottolina J, Posadzka E, Ferrari S, Castellano LM, Tandoi I, Pagliardini L, Nocun A, Jach R. Assessment of ovarian reserve after cystectomy versus 'one-step' laser vaporization in the treatment of ovarian endometrioma: a small randomized clinical trial. Hum Reprod. 2018 Dec 1;33(12):2205-2211. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dey305. PubMed 30299482 ↗
  • Younis JS, Shapso N, Ben-Sira Y, Nelson SM, Izhaki I. Endometrioma surgery-a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect on antral follicle count and anti-Mullerian hormone. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Jan;226(1):33-51.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.06.102. Epub 2021 Jul 13. PubMed 34265271 ↗
  • Muzii L, Di Tucci C, Di Feliciantonio M, Marchetti C, Perniola G, Panici PB. The effect of surgery for endometrioma on ovarian reserve evaluated by antral follicle count: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod. 2014 Oct 10;29(10):2190-8. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu199. Epub 2014 Aug 1. PubMed 25085800 ↗
  • Vasquez JM, Eisenberg E, Osteen KG, Hickerson D, Diamond MP. Laparoscopic ablation of endometriosis using the cavitational ultrasonic surgical aspirator. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1993 Nov;1(1):36-42. doi: 10.1016/s1074-3804(05)80756-x. PubMed 9050458 ↗
  • Adamyan L, Kasyan V, Pivazyan L, Isaeva S, Avetisyan J. Laser vaporization compared with other surgical techniques in women with ovarian endometrioma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023 Aug;308(2):413-425. doi: 10.1007/s00404-022-06799-4. Epub 2022 Sep 29. PubMed 36175684 ↗
  • Matsuzaki S, Houlle C, Darcha C, Pouly JL, Mage G, Canis M. Analysis of risk factors for the removal of normal ovarian tissue during laparoscopic cystectomy for ovarian endometriosis. Hum Reprod. 2009 Jun;24(6):1402-6. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dep043. Epub 2009 Feb 26. PubMed 19246468 ↗
  • Bafort C, Beebeejaun Y, Tomassetti C, Bosteels J, Duffy JM. Laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 23;10(10):CD011031. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011031.pub3. PubMed 33095458 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 10, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07215130
Lead sponsor
Kanazawa University
Responsible party
Takashi IIZUKA (Doctor, Kanazawa University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 10, 2025
Start date
Jan 30, 2025
Primary completion
Mar 31, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 31, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 10, 2025

Study contacts

Tatsuhito Kanda, MD, PhD
Contact
tkanda@staff.kanazawa-u.ac.jp
+81-76-265-2425
Takashi Iizuka, MD, PhD
Contact
zukatti@staff.kanazawa-u.ac.jp
+81-76-265-2425
Kaoru Abiko, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Kanazawa University, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion