ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT06964594ADNOLAUpdated May 9, 2025

A Randomized Controlled Trial Study Comparing Adnexal Surgery by vNOTES or Laparoscopy

An interventional study of vNOTES adnexal surgery in Ovarian Cysts, Laparoscopic Gynecologic Surgery and vNOTES, sponsored by Region Skane. Not yet recruiting. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-05-09.

Sponsored by Region Skane · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
200
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The aim with the study is to compare postoperative pain after vNOTES adnexal surgery versus laparoscopic adnexal surgery.

Women aged 18 and above with an indication for adnexal surgery for benign gynecological pathology or prophylactic reasons will be able to participate.

After surgery the participants will answer a questioner, twice a day in seven days, about postoperative pain and how many units of analgesics they used.

Adnexal surgery is one of the most common surgical procedures performed in women and can either be performed to treat pathology as ovarian cysts or prophylactically in case of hereditary genetic alterations.

A laparoscopic technique is currently considered as gold standard for adnexal procedures. The latest advancement in minimally invasive surgery is vNOTES (vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopy), in which the entrance to the abdomen is performed by an anterior or more commonly posterior colpotomy rather than via the abdominal wall. The NOTABLE trial was a RCT showing that vNOTES adnexectomy was non-inferior to laparoscopy for successful removal of benign adnexa without conversion (Baekelandt). vNOTES adnexectomy had shorter surgical time, less use of analgesics and lower self-assessed VAS scores the first week post-operatively. The aim with our study is to compare postoperative pain after vNOTES versus laparoscopic adnexal surgery.

02

Conditions studied

  • Ovarian Cysts
  • Laparoscopic Gynecologic Surgery
  • vNOTES

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • ADNOLA - A randomized controlled trial study comparing adnexal surgery by vNOTES or laparoscopy
03

In context

Ovarian Cysts

80 studies on the registry are indexed under Ovarian Cysts; 16 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 200 is above the median of 74 across 51 interventional studies indexed under Ovarian Cysts.

Browse Ovarian Cysts studies →

Lead sponsor

Region Skane is the lead sponsor of 386 studies on the registry; 122 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Participant is willing and able to give for participation in the trial.
  • Female aged 18 years or above.
  • Diagnosed with adnexal pathology or subject for prophylactic BSO.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Female participant who is pregnant or planning pregnancy during course of the trial.
  • Scheduled elective surgery or other procedures requiring general anaesthesia during the trial.
  • Any other significant disease or disorder which, in the opinion of the Investigator, may either put the participant at risk because of participation in the trial, or may influence the result of the trial, or the participant's ability to participate in the trial.
  • Patients taking opioids or other painkillers routinely pre-operatively.
  • Patients with chronic pelvic pain.
  • Patients with surgical ; previous hysterectomy, history of rectal surgery, suspected or confirmed endometriosis, suspected , suspected obliteration of the pouch of Douglas following severe PID or other causes, active lower genital tract infection, pregnancy.
  • Failure to provide written prior to surgery
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
200 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Laparoscopic Adnexal surgery

    Procedure: vNOTES adnexal surgery

Interventions

  • ProcedurevNOTES adnexal surgery

    New minimalinvasive technique

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Pain postoperatively by a VAS-scale

    To compare postoperative pain after adnexal surgery performed by vNOTES or laparoscopy

    Time frame: 7 days postoperative

Secondary outcomes

  1. Painkillers used (amount)

    Units of non-opioid analgesics Units of postoperative opioids

    Time frame: 7 days postoperatively

  2. Perioperatively complications

    The incidence of intra-operative complications, i.e. any adverse event before the end of the surgical intervention including injury to the bladder, ureter, bowel, or intrapelvic/intra-abdominal vessels, as a dichotomous outcome.

    Time frame: Perioperatively

  3. Operation time

    Operation time, measured as the time in minutes from the insertion of the bladder catheter to the end of vaginal/abdominal wound closure, as a continuous outcome.

    Time frame: Perioperatively

  4. Postoperative complications

    Postoperative complications: major bleeding or pelvic hematoma requiring transfusion. Infections of the vaginal incision, abdominal wall or wound, urinary tract, chest, or febrile episodes/unspecified infections. Thromboembolism. Postoperative ileus or wound dehiscence. Classified according to the Clavien- Dindo, classification as a dichotomous outcome.

    Time frame: 6 weeks postoperatively

  5. Readmission

    The rates of readmission requiring hospitalization for at least 24 hours for any adverse event causally related to the gynaecological intervention during the first six weeks after surgery, as a dichotomous outcome.

    Time frame: 6 weeks after surgery

  6. Conversion rate

    Conversion rates: the proportion of women treated by any other approach than the allocated technique as randomized, as a dichotomous outcome. vNOTES will most likely be converted to LSC and LSC to open surgery

    Time frame: Perioperatively

  7. Surgeon's experience

    Surgeon's experience of comfort and flow measured by a 0 to 10 mm VAS scale

    Time frame: Perioperatively

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 9, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06964594
Lead sponsor
Region Skane
Responsible party
Andrea Stuart (Associate Professor, Region Skane) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 9, 2025
Start date
Oct 1, 2025 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jan 1, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2028 (estimated)
Last update
May 9, 2025

Study contacts

Andrea E Stuart, M.D Associate Professor
Contact
andrea.stuart@skane.se
0046736400760

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Apr 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion