CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT02889757Updated Sep 13, 2016

The Protective Effect for Liver Organ in Patients With Anti-TB Drugs Using of Acetylcysteine (NAC)

A Phase 4 interventional study of Acteylcysteine in Protective Effect in TB-DIH and TB-DIH Means: Drug Induced Liver Function Abnormalities, sponsored by Far Eastern Memorial Hospital. Status unknown at 1 site in Taiwan. Open to participants aged 20 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-09-13.

Sponsored by Far Eastern Memorial Hospital · Phase 4, Interventional, and Prevention

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Sep 2016), so the status shown — last known as Not yet recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
400
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
20 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Animal studies have shown that INH-RIF-induced oxidative injury can be prevented by supporting the cellular antioxidant defense mechanism by N-acetylcysteine (NAC). However, there are few published data and large sample sizes regarding the protective effect of NAC against hepatotoxicty induced by anti-TB drugs in humans, to our knowledge.

Therefore, the investigators designed a clinical trial with the aim to see whether NAC could protect against anti-TB drug-induced hepatotoxicity (DIH)

Read the detailed description

Isoniazid (INH), rifampicin (RIF), and pyrazinamide (PZA), the first-line drugs used for tuberculosis (TB) chemotherapy, are associated with hepatotoxicity. A high rate of hepatotoxicity has been reported in some developing countries compared with advanced countries with a similar dose schedule. Sharifzadeh et al. reported an incidence of 27.7% in Iran. The reasons for this higher rate of hepatotoxicity are not completely clear. Ethnic variations, advanced age, female sex, alcoholism, underlying liver disease, acetylator phenotype, hepatitis B and C virus, HIV infection, extensive pulmonary parenchymal disease, and hypoalbuminemia have been observed to be the risk factors for the development of drug-induced hepatotoxicity (DIH) because of anti-TB treatment.

The mechanism of DIH induced by anti-TB treatment is not yet fully understood. Sodhi et al. proposed oxidative stress as one of the likely mechanisms for INH-RIF-induced hepatic injury. It is well established that by augmenting a cellular antioxidative defense system, especially nonprotein thiols, that is, glutathione (GSH), cells can be protected against oxidative injuries produced by various drugs and chemicals.

The study will be performed with randomized trial for assessment and protective effects over liver function in patients receiving anti-TB agents and using NAC.

02

Conditions studied

  • Protective Effect in TB-DIH
  • TB-DIH Means: Drug Induced Liver Function Abnormalities

Keywords

  • tuberculosis
  • acetylcysteine
  • hepatotoxicity
03

In context

Congenital Abnormalities

980 studies on the registry are indexed under Congenital Abnormalities; 177 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 400 is above the median of 49 across 491 interventional studies indexed under Congenital Abnormalities.

Browse Congenital Abnormalities studies →

Lead sponsor

Far Eastern Memorial Hospital is the lead sponsor of 253 studies on the registry; 38 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. new diagnosed to have tuberculosis
  2. age >20 years -

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. acute hepatitis in a previous one year
  2. TB drugs induced urticaria or Steven-Johnson syndrome
  3. life less than one year due to advanced cancer status
  4. non-tuberculosis mycobacteria,NTM patients
  5. HIV patients
  6. patients can not cooperate
  7. Allergic reaction for NAC
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Factorial assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
400 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    NAC 1200 mg

    patients with add NAC (600) 1# bid use per day during the study period

    Drug: Acteylcysteine

  • Experimental
    NAC 2400 mg

    patients with add NAC (600) 2# bid use per day during the study period

    Drug: Acteylcysteine

  • Placebo comparator
    NAC 0 mg

    patients with add NAC (600) 0# (placebo) use per day during the study period

    Drug: Acteylcysteine

Interventions

  • DrugActeylcysteine

    randomized into three arms

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. the incidence of DIH

    the rate for

    Time frame: during the 6 months treatment

Secondary outcomes

  1. the incidence for other side effects

    side effects including GI upset, blurred vision, neuropathy, renal organ damage

    Time frame: 6 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Far Eastern Memorial Hospital
    Taipei, 886, Taiwan
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 13, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02889757
Lead sponsor
Far Eastern Memorial Hospital
Responsible party
Shih-Lung Cheng (Associate Professor, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 7, 2016
Start date
Jan 2017
Primary completion
Dec 2018 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 2019 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 13, 2016

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Sep 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion