CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT02877472Updated Aug 24, 2016

Porous Tantalum Rods Improve the Hip Joint Function of Patients With Avascular Necrosis of the Femoral Head

An interventional study of porous tantalum rod and core decompression in Femoral Neck Fracture, sponsored by Qinghai University. Status unknown at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-08-24.

Sponsored by Qinghai University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Aug 2016), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

To confirm 1) whether, compared with core decompression alone, core decompression with porous tantalum rod implantation improves the hip joint function of patients with avascular necrosis of the femoral head after femoral neck fracture surgery, 2) whether porous tantalum rod shows favorable biocompatibility with the human body, and 3) whether this treatment method is feasible for treating avascular necrosis of the femoral head after femoral neck fracture surgery.

Read the detailed description

History and current status of related studies: Femoral neck fracture can render the blood supply to the femoral head insufficient, leading to avascular necrosis of the femoral head. This often increases treatment difficulty and can have a strong influence on the recovery of hip joint function. Although core decompression for treatment of avascular necrosis of the femoral head has been largely used in clinical settings, the mid-term therapeutic effects are not satisfactory in some patients.

Biocompatibility is defined as the ability of a biomaterial, prosthesis, or medical device to perform with an appropriate host response. The biocompatibility of a bone implant and host influences the therapeutic effects. Therefore, biomaterials that are less likely to induce negative host responses may increase the therapeutic effects of such treatments for orthopedic diseases. A porous tantalum rod is a bone trabecula-like metal implant that is used to support weight-bearing areas of necrotic bone, preventing further collapse of the necrotic area. This implant has exhibited favorable effects in the early treatment of avascular necrosis of the femoral head. Although previous reports have focused on porous tantalum rod implantation for clinical treatment of avascular necrosis of the femoral head after fermoral neck fracture, few have assessed the long-term therapeutic effects or biocompatibility of porous tantalum rods.

Adverse events Possible adverse events include any expected or unexpected symptoms. If severe adverse events occur, information including the date of occurrence and measures taken related to the treatment of the adverse events will be reported to the principal investigator and the institutional review board within 24 hours.

Data collection, management, analysis, and open access Data collection: Case report forms with demographic data, disease diagnosis, accompanying diseases, drug allergy history, and adverse events will be collected , processed using Epidata software, collated, and then electrically recorded using a double-data entry strategy by data managers.

Data management: The locked electronic database will not be altered in any way, and will only be available to the project manager. Paper and electronic data regarding screening, informed consent, and clinical outcomes will be preserved at the Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, China.

Data analysis: The electronic database will be made available to a professional statistician for statistical analysis. An outcome analysis report will be made by the statistician and submitted to the lead researchers. An independent data monitoring committee will supervise and manage the trial data with the goal of ensuring a scientific and stringent trial process, resulting in accurate and complete data.

Data open access: Anonymized trial data will be published at http://www.figshare.com.

Statistical analysis Statistical analysis will be performed by a statistician using SPSS 19.0 software and will follow the intention-to-treat principle. Normally distributed measurement data will be expressed as a mean, standard deviation, min, and max. Non-normally distributed measurement data will be expressed as a lower quartile (q1), median, and upper quartile (q3). McNemar's test will be used to compare the percentage of patients with excellent hip joint function as per Harris hip scores 12 months after surgery, the percentage of patients presenting with femoral head collapse, prosthesis loosening, peri-prosthesis infection, and incidence of complications 6 and 12 months after surgery. The Mann-Whitney U test will be used to compare the VAS score prior to and 1, 6, and 12 months after surgery. Statistical significance will be accepted when α = 0.05.

02

Conditions studied

  • Femoral Neck Fracture
03

In context

Necrosis

477 studies on the registry are indexed under Necrosis; 54 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is above the median of 55 across 315 interventional studies indexed under Necrosis.

Browse Necrosis studies →

Lead sponsor

Qinghai University is the lead sponsor of 10 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with fracture nonunion as indicated by a clear fracture line 12 months after femoral neck fracture; avascular necrosis of the femoral head as shown by cystic degeneration, sclerosis, and uneven density on X-ray images and CT scans
  • Patients with avascular necrosis of the femoral head after femoral neck fracture surgery who underwent internal fixation between 1 January 2016 and 31 May 2017
  • Age 18-80 years
  • Any sex and nationality
  • Provision of signed informed consent to participate in the trial

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Poor general health
  • Chronic disease or history of surgery
  • Alcohol abuse or long-term use of hormone drugs
  • Unable or declines to cooperate with treatment and examination because of language and/or mental disorders
  • Unable or declines to cooperate with rehabilitation treatment because of mental and/or psychological disorders
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Experimental group

    Patients with avascular necrosis of the femoral head after femoral neck fracture surgery will undergo core decompression and porous tantalum rod implantation (experimental group).

    Device: porous tantalum rod

  • Experimental
    Control group

    Patients with avascular necrosis of the femoral head after femoral neck fracture surgery will undergo core decompression (control group).

    Procedure: core decompression

Interventions

  • Deviceporous tantalum rod

    Patients with avascular necrosis of the femoral head after femoral head fracture surgery receive treatment of core decompression and porous tantalum rod implantation

    Also known as: Experimental group

  • Procedurecore decompression

    Patients with avascular necrosis of the femoral head after femoral head fracture surgery will undergo core decompression.

    Also known as: Control group

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Harris hip scores

    To evaluate the recovery of hip joint function. The Harris hip score ranges from 0-100 points with higher scores indicating better hip joint function. Hip joint function is scored as follows: ≥ 90 is excellent, 80-89 very good, 70-79 good, and \< 70 poor.

    Time frame: 12 months after surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

    To evaluate the severity of pain and ranges from 0-10, with higher scores indicating more severe pain.

    Time frame: prior to and 1, 6, and 12 months after surgery

  2. Incidences of complications

    To evaluate the safety of various implantation methods.

    Time frame: 6 and 12 months after surgery

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Qinghai University Affiliated Hospital
    Xining, Qinghai 810001, China
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 24, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02877472
Lead sponsor
Qinghai University
Responsible party
Heling Zhang (Attending Physician, Qinghai University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 24, 2016
Start date
May 2015
Primary completion
Oct 2016 (estimated)
Completion
May 2017 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 24, 2016

Study contacts

Heling Zhang, Master
Contact
helingzhang_qu@sina.com
8613997262938
Heling Zhang, Master
principal investigator · Affiliated Hospital of Qinghai University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Aug 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion