An interventional study of porous tantalum rod and core decompression in Femoral Neck Fracture, sponsored by Qinghai University. Status unknown at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-08-24.
Sponsored by Qinghai University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
To confirm 1) whether, compared with core decompression alone, core decompression with porous tantalum rod implantation improves the hip joint function of patients with avascular necrosis of the femoral head after femoral neck fracture surgery, 2) whether porous tantalum rod shows favorable biocompatibility with the human body, and 3) whether this treatment method is feasible for treating avascular necrosis of the femoral head after femoral neck fracture surgery.
History and current status of related studies: Femoral neck fracture can render the blood supply to the femoral head insufficient, leading to avascular necrosis of the femoral head. This often increases treatment difficulty and can have a strong influence on the recovery of hip joint function. Although core decompression for treatment of avascular necrosis of the femoral head has been largely used in clinical settings, the mid-term therapeutic effects are not satisfactory in some patients.
Biocompatibility is defined as the ability of a biomaterial, prosthesis, or medical device to perform with an appropriate host response. The biocompatibility of a bone implant and host influences the therapeutic effects. Therefore, biomaterials that are less likely to induce negative host responses may increase the therapeutic effects of such treatments for orthopedic diseases. A porous tantalum rod is a bone trabecula-like metal implant that is used to support weight-bearing areas of necrotic bone, preventing further collapse of the necrotic area. This implant has exhibited favorable effects in the early treatment of avascular necrosis of the femoral head. Although previous reports have focused on porous tantalum rod implantation for clinical treatment of avascular necrosis of the femoral head after fermoral neck fracture, few have assessed the long-term therapeutic effects or biocompatibility of porous tantalum rods.
Adverse events Possible adverse events include any expected or unexpected symptoms. If severe adverse events occur, information including the date of occurrence and measures taken related to the treatment of the adverse events will be reported to the principal investigator and the institutional review board within 24 hours.
Data collection, management, analysis, and open access Data collection: Case report forms with demographic data, disease diagnosis, accompanying diseases, drug allergy history, and adverse events will be collected , processed using Epidata software, collated, and then electrically recorded using a double-data entry strategy by data managers.
Data management: The locked electronic database will not be altered in any way, and will only be available to the project manager. Paper and electronic data regarding screening, informed consent, and clinical outcomes will be preserved at the Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, China.
Data analysis: The electronic database will be made available to a professional statistician for statistical analysis. An outcome analysis report will be made by the statistician and submitted to the lead researchers. An independent data monitoring committee will supervise and manage the trial data with the goal of ensuring a scientific and stringent trial process, resulting in accurate and complete data.
Data open access: Anonymized trial data will be published at http://www.figshare.com.
Statistical analysis Statistical analysis will be performed by a statistician using SPSS 19.0 software and will follow the intention-to-treat principle. Normally distributed measurement data will be expressed as a mean, standard deviation, min, and max. Non-normally distributed measurement data will be expressed as a lower quartile (q1), median, and upper quartile (q3). McNemar's test will be used to compare the percentage of patients with excellent hip joint function as per Harris hip scores 12 months after surgery, the percentage of patients presenting with femoral head collapse, prosthesis loosening, peri-prosthesis infection, and incidence of complications 6 and 12 months after surgery. The Mann-Whitney U test will be used to compare the VAS score prior to and 1, 6, and 12 months after surgery. Statistical significance will be accepted when α = 0.05.
477 studies on the registry are indexed under Necrosis; 54 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 100 is above the median of 55 across 315 interventional studies indexed under Necrosis.
Browse Necrosis studies →Qinghai University is the lead sponsor of 10 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients with avascular necrosis of the femoral head after femoral neck fracture surgery will undergo core decompression and porous tantalum rod implantation (experimental group).
Device: porous tantalum rod
Patients with avascular necrosis of the femoral head after femoral neck fracture surgery will undergo core decompression (control group).
Procedure: core decompression
Patients with avascular necrosis of the femoral head after femoral head fracture surgery receive treatment of core decompression and porous tantalum rod implantation
Also known as: Experimental group
Patients with avascular necrosis of the femoral head after femoral head fracture surgery will undergo core decompression.
Also known as: Control group
Harris hip scores
To evaluate the recovery of hip joint function. The Harris hip score ranges from 0-100 points with higher scores indicating better hip joint function. Hip joint function is scored as follows: ≥ 90 is excellent, 80-89 very good, 70-79 good, and \< 70 poor.
Time frame: 12 months after surgery
Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
To evaluate the severity of pain and ranges from 0-10, with higher scores indicating more severe pain.
Time frame: prior to and 1, 6, and 12 months after surgery
Incidences of complications
To evaluate the safety of various implantation methods.
Time frame: 6 and 12 months after surgery
Plan to share: Undecided
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is status unknown, as verified in Aug 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Qinghai University