ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02874469COREABORUpdated Dec 16, 2025

Impact of an Intensive Care Diary on Post-traumatic Stress Disorder After a Resuscitated Sudden Death

An interventional study of Diary in Sudden Death and Sudden Cardiac Arrest, sponsored by University Hospital, Lille. Completed at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-12-16.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Lille · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 7 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Dec 2014, registered Aug 2016).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
173
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Sudden death is a public health problem with more than 300,000 cases per year in USA and 40,000 cases per year in France. Moreover, despite all recent therapeutic improvements (therapeutic hypothermia, new techniques of resuscitation…), the prognosis remains drastically poor and less than 50% of the patients admitted alive at hospital will survive to the event at 1 year.

Outside all medications and technical care to improve patient prognosis, a psychological evaluation looks also critical to detect the occurrence of a "post traumatic stress syndrome". In fact, along with the event severity, a variable period of amnesia related to coma may favor the occurrence of such a syndrome and psychological issues, which at the end may lead to impairment of patient quality of life.

Previous studies have evaluated the impact of an intensive care unit diary on psychological distress in patients and relatives in the context of severe traumatisms. Such an evaluation has however never been done in the specific setting of sudden death and the frequency of this syndrome is unknown in this context.

Aim The aim of the present study is to evaluate the impact of an intensive care unit diary on the occurrence of a "post traumatic stress syndrome" after a sudden death.

Secondary objectives

  • To evaluate the frequency of the occurrence of a "post traumatic stress syndrome" and other psycho traumatic symptoms after sudden death
  • To evaluate the impact of an intensive care unit diary on the severity of this syndrome, psycho traumatic symptoms, and psychopathologic comorbidities
  • To evaluate the impact of the diary on psycho traumatic symptoms and their severity in patient's relatives
  • To evaluate the satisfaction of the patients and their relatives regarding medical cares in both groups (with and without diary)
  • Comparison of nurse diagnostic (psychological distress) and diagnostic made by dedicated personal with a specific formation in psychology
  • Qualitative evaluation of the diary
  • Evaluation of the paramedical feeling before and after the diary input in practice
Read the detailed description

The COREABOR Study is an open label, prospective, that will compare patients with sudden death who will be included during 2 successive periods of time: first a period of control and then a period of intervention.

Interventional study.

Altogether, 330 patients with resuscitated sudden death will be screened during the whole study period allowing to include 96 patients in the study (alive at 3 months after the event, estimated survival rate of 30%). For each screened patient, 2 relatives will be selected to participate to the study (n=660).

To avoid biases, the control group of 48 patients will be included first and treated as recommended with usual care in center. Then, the 48 patients of the intervention group will be included during the second period of the study and the intensive care unit diary will be implemented only at this time.

In the intervention group (second period with diary), a maximal delay of 8 hours is allowed to implement the diary for each patient after admission in centre.

Visit 0 (V0): inclusion The study will recruit patients in the total incapacity to give their own consent for medical reasons (comatose patients) at admission. Subsequently a written inform consent of a relative will first be obtained and the patient's written consent will be obtained as soon as possible afterwards.

Period 1: control group Medical care as usually performed in center and as recommended.

Period 2: intervention group (intensive care unit diary) On top of usual care, an intensive care unit diary will be implemented for all patients within the first 8 hours following their admission. At discharge, the diary will be given to the patients themselves or to their relatives in case of in-hospital death. An anonymous copy will be kept by investigators.

For all patients A psychological evaluation will be performed at 1 month (V1), 3 months (V2) and 6 months by phone contact only (V3) using the following elements Auto-questioner (PDI) Nurse diagnosis Psychological evaluation by dedicated personal (CAPS and mini-DSMIV)

For relatives A psychological evaluation will be performed at 3 months (V2) and 6 months by phone contact only (V3)

02

Conditions studied

  • Sudden Death
  • Sudden Cardiac Arrest

Keywords

  • sudden death
  • post-traumatic stress disorder
  • psychological distress
  • diary
  • resuscitation
03

In context

Death, Sudden

66 studies on the registry are indexed under Death, Sudden; 5 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 173 is close to the median of 168 across 28 interventional studies indexed under Death, Sudden.

Browse Death, Sudden studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Lille is the lead sponsor of 631 studies on the registry; 142 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients who experienced a sudden death and who are admitted alive in our center
  • Patients who benefited from therapeutic hypothermia (and/or care to limit fever occurrence)

Relative's inclusion criteria :

  • Relatives of a patient that fit inclusion/exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria =

Patient's non-inclusion criteria :

  • Death or transfer in another center within the first 8 hours of admission in our center
  • Pregnancy
  • Patients who refuse to participate after being awake after initial coma

Relative's non-inclusion criteria :

  • Relatives who refuse to participate after being awake after initial coma
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
173 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Control group (first period)

    Patients treated as recommended with usual care in a center.

  • Experimental
    Group with diary (second period)

    Intervention group = On top of usual care, an intensive care unit diary will be implemented for patients within the first 8 hours following their admission.

    Other: Diary

Interventions

  • OtherDiary

    The diary was specifically created for the purpose of the present study by personal working at ICU at CHRU of Lille (France). All relatives, doctors and paramedics close to the patient during his hospital stay are allowed to write some comments inside the diary when he is comatose. The diary will be implemented during the second period of the study within the first 8 hours after admission. It will be given to the patients themselves at discharge or to their relatives in case of in-hospital death. An anonymous copy will be kept by investigators.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Rate of occurrence of "post traumatic stress disorder"

    Rate of occurrence of "post traumatic stress syndrome" (CAPS score over 39) at 3 months after resuscitation after sudden death

    Time frame: 3 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Peritraumatic Distress Inventory (PDI) Scale

    PDI is a scale of self-evaluation of 13 items to determine distress reactions emotional of a person at the time of a traumatic event and in the minutes and hours. People who have a high risk of distress Peritraumatic develop post-traumatic stress disorder.

    Time frame: 1 month

  2. Psychiatric comorbidities

    Psychiatric comorbidities evaluated by the mini DSM IV (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders - IV) for patients

    Time frame: 3 and 6 months

  3. Rate of "Post traumatic stress disorder" for patients

    Rate of "Post traumatic stress disorder" (CAPS score over 39) for patients

    Time frame: 6 months

  4. Rate of "Post traumatic stress disorder" for relatives

    Rate of "Post traumatic stress disorder" (CAPS score over 39) for relatives

    Time frame: 3 and 6 months

  5. Nurse diagnosis

    Comparison of nurse diagnosis and diagnosis made by dedicated personal with a specific formation in psychology

    Time frame: 3 months

  6. Qualitative evaluation of the diary

    Qualitative evaluation of the diary by satisfaction questionnaire

    Time frame: 6 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Hôpital Cardiologique - USIC - CHRU
    Lille, France
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Dec 2014 to primary completion in Dec 2023, 108 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 17, 2016
First posted
Aug 22, 2016
StartActual
Dec 31, 2014
Primary completionActual
Dec 2023
CompletionActual
Dec 2023
Last update
Dec 16, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 16, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02874469
Collaborators
Ministry of Health, France
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 22, 2016
Start date
Dec 31, 2014
Primary completion
Dec 2023
Completion
Dec 2023
Last update
Dec 16, 2025

Study contacts

Gilles LESMESLE, MD, PhD
principal investigator · University Hospital, Lille

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion