CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02860572RESPONSEUpdated Dec 14, 2020

Non-interventional Follow-up Versus Fluid Bolus in RESPONSE to Oliguria in the Critically Ill

An interventional study of follow-up without intervention and fluid bolus in Critically Ill, Acute Kidney Injury and Sepsis, sponsored by Helsinki University Central Hospital. Completed at 2 sites in Finland. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 100 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-12-14.

Sponsored by Helsinki University Central Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
130
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 100 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Background: After hypotension, oliguria (urine output less than 0.5 mL/kg/h) was the most common trigger to administer fluid bolus in a multinational practice survey in intensive care. The effect of fluid bolus on cardiovascular variables can be very short-lived among patients in shock suggesting that fluid boluses in the optimization phase are unlikely to improve patient-centered outcomes. Moreover, a growing body of evidence suggests a poor renal response to fluid bolus.

Objective: To investigate, whether fluid bolus - as a standard of care - improves urine output in oliguric patients compared to a non-interventional follow-up approach without fluid bolus.

Design: Investigator-initiated, open, randomized, controlled study

Interventions:

  1. Intervention group - follow-up without intervention
  2. Control group - fluid bolus (500mL of balanced crystalloid over 30 minutes)

Randomization: 1:1 stratified according to the site, presence of acute kidney injury, and sepsis

Trial size: 130 patients randomized in 2 ICUs

Read the detailed description

Study hypothesis:

The investigators hypothesize that fluid bolus given due to oliguria does not improve urine output in a majority of patients, especially among those with acute kidney injury. Another study hypothesis is that patients receiving fluid bolus will have higher levels of endothelial damage biomarkers.

Intervention description:

Intervention group -follow-up without intervention; No intervention to increase the urine output within 2 hours will be done.

Standard group - Fluid bolus group: Patient will receive 500mL of balanced crystalloid intravenously over 30 minutes.

In both groups, if severe hemodynamic instability occurs, a rescue bolus of 500mL over 30 minutes may be given according to the decision of the treating clinician.

In both groups, all other ongoing infusions (nutrition and on-going clear fluids) will be held constant during the 2-hour period. Vasoactive medications, sedation, short-acting insulin, and other medications can be modified according the clinical need. No diuretics during the 2-hour study period are allowed. After two hours from randomization, treating clinician can modify the fluid and drug therapy according to the clinical needs of the patient. All administered fluids will be recorded 6 h from randomization.

Except for the study intervention period of 2 hours, no attempt to control fluid therapy will be done. During the study period, all other aspects of critical care will follow the ICU's standard operating procedures and clinician's prescription.

02

Conditions studied

  • Critically Ill
  • Acute Kidney Injury
  • Sepsis
  • Oliguria

Keywords

  • fluid therapy
  • oliguria
  • endothelial injury
03

In context

Acute Kidney Injury

1,595 studies on the registry are indexed under Acute Kidney Injury; 371 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 130 is above the median of 100 across 763 interventional studies indexed under Acute Kidney Injury.

Browse Acute Kidney Injury studies →

Lead sponsor

Helsinki University Central Hospital is the lead sponsor of 299 studies on the registry; 60 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 100 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age over 18
  • Emergency admission to an ICU
  • Mean arterial pressure (MAP) >65 mmHg (with vasopressors if needed) and initial fluid resuscitation for shock/hypovolemia has been given
  • Oliguria (urine output less than 0.5mL/kg/h) for at least 2 consecutive hours

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Marked fluctuations in hemodynamics within last 2 hours (cardiac arrhythmias, increase in norepinephrine need over 0.2ug/kg/min, need for initiation of inotrope/inodilator)
  • Administration of furosemide within last 6 hours
  • Chronic kidney disease (estimated pre-critical illness GFR \< 60ml/min/1.73m2)
  • Renal replacement therapy
  • Among patients with acute kidney injury, urgent indications for commencing renal replacement therapy
  • Fluid overload (cumulative fluid accumulation exceeds 10% of baseline body weight)
  • Pulmonary edema (bilateral infiltrates in chest x-ray)
  • Active bleeding (need for transfusion, platelets, or fresh frozen plasma)
  • Suspected or known intra-abdominal hypertension (IAP >16mmHg)
  • Pregnant or lactating
  • Expected survival less than 24h
  • Obtaining informed consent is not possible/consent is denied
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
130 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    follow-up without intervention

    No intervention to increase the urine output within 2 hours will be done.

    Other: follow-up without intervention

  • Active comparator
    Standard group - fluid bolus

    Patient will receive 500mL of balanced crystalloid intravenously over 30 minutes.

    Other: fluid bolus

Interventions

  • Otherfollow-up without intervention
  • Otherfluid bolus
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in individual mean cumulative urine output (mL/kg/h)

    Doubling of the urine output is defined as clinically meaningful response

    Time frame: 2 hours after randomization compared to urine output 2 hours preceding randomization

Secondary outcomes

  1. The difference between groups in the change in individual urine output

    Time frame: 2 hours after randomization compared to urine output 2 hours preceding randomization

  2. Duration of consecutive oliguria (urine output <0.5 mL/kg)

    Time frame: during ICU stay, i.e. as long as urine output stays below 0.5 mL/kg/h while the patient is in the ICU (an average of 5 to 7 days) or until renal replacement therapy is commenced

  3. Cumulative fluid balance

    Time frame: six hours from randomization

Other outcomes

  1. Number of patients receiving rescue boluses and the number of rescue boluses

    Time frame: study intervention period (i.e. 2 hours)

  2. Highest stage of acute kidney injury

    Time frame: within 24 hours, 48 hours and during ICU stay (an average of 5 to 7 days or up to 30 days if patient is still in ICU)

  3. Number of patients with one or several protocol violation(s) and number of those per patient

    Time frame: study intervention period (i.e. 2 hours)

  4. Number of patients with adverse events

    Time frame: from randomization to next morning

  5. Number of patients receiving renal replacement therapy

    Time frame: during ICU stay(an average of 5 to 7 days or up to 30 days if patient is still in ICU)

  6. change in mean arterial pressure

    Time frame: from randomization to 2 hours post-randomization

  7. change in heart rate

    Time frame: from randomization to 2 hours post-randomization

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • Helsinki University Hospital, Meilahti
    Helsinki, Uusimaa 00290, Finland
  • Central Finland Central Hospital
    Jyväskylä, Finland
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Inkinen N, Selander T, Pettila V, Valkonen M, Backlund M, Wennervirta J, Pulkkinen A, Hastbacka J, Vaara ST. Noninterventional follow-up vs fluid bolus in RESPONSE to oliguria-The RESPONSE trial protocol and statistical analysis plan. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2020 Sep;64(8):1210-1217. doi: 10.1111/aas.13599. Epub 2020 Apr 28. PubMed 32270496 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 14, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02860572
Lead sponsor
Helsinki University Central Hospital
Collaborators
Central Finland Central Hospital
Responsible party
Suvi Vaara (MD, PhD, Helsinki University Central Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 9, 2016
Start date
Jan 10, 2017
Primary completion
Dec 10, 2020
Completion
Dec 10, 2020
Last update
Dec 14, 2020

Study contacts

Suvi Vaara, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Helsinki University Central Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion